Package: monodevelop-nunit
Version: 4.0.5+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
david@zion:~$ mdtool setup reg-build
MonoDevelop Add-in Setup Utility
WARNING: [MonoDevelop.NUnit,4.0.5] Could not load some add-in assemblies: Could not find
file "/usr/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/NUnit/nunit.core.dll".
ERROR: Er
tags 697280 + patch
tags 710242 + patch
thanks
Hi,
I've updated vagrant to 1.0.7 using git-import-orig. It builds fine with
git-buildpackage and works with the new vagrant in testing. Please
upload this:
https://github.com/DavidS/pkg-vagrant
Best Regards, David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 01 December 2006 22:08, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Monday 20 November 2006 18:31, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Thanks to the hard work of kpilot upstream, the newer rumors is that it
> > now works with the new pilot-link.
>
> And newer rumors says t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:53, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Rumors say that these two packages (temporarily) solves the problem
>
> http://people.debian.org/~ana/394534/kpilot_3.5.5.dfsg.1-1~ana_i386.deb
> http://people.debian.org/~ana/394534/libpisock8_
On Monday 11 September 2006 00:37, Yannick Roehlly wrote:
> Package: libexiv2-0.10
> Version: 0.10-1.1
> Severity: important
>
> The libexiv2-0.10.shlibs provided by the package contains:
>
> libexiv2 0.10 libexiv2-0.10 (=${binary:Version})
>
> With this, building a package against libexiv2-0.1
On Sunday 10 September 2006 23:22, you wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:56:39PM +0200, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Please find attached a minimal patch, fixing the binNMU security.
>
> This patch fixes nothing. There is *no* way for an arch: all package to
> have a strict versi
Hi!
Please find attached a minimal patch, fixing the binNMU security.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
-- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
diff -uwrbN libgtk-java-2.8.5.b
Hi!
This bug seems to be fixed in 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-2:
* Add 002_ftbs_64bit_fix.patch: Fix FTBFS on 64-bit platforms
(patch courtesy of Andreas Jochens)
(which was coincidentally uploaded exactly 37 seconds(!) earlier than this bug
was reported ;)
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts
+1,10 @@
+radiusclient (0.3.2-9.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Nonmaintainer Upload
+ * fixes shlibs generation. Closes: #378986
+
+ -- David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:51:20 +0200
+
radiusclient (0.3.2-9) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix auth on 64bit machines. Patch
reopen 385033
retitle 385033 libxvmc: unlicensed sourcefiles make package undistributable
thanks
Hi!
The new debian/copyright only contains licensing information for
src/XvMCWrapper.c. The other source files
./include/X11/extensions/XvMClib.h
./src/XvMClibint.h
./src/XvMC.c
do not contain any
Hi!
I'm running
libxine1: 1.1.2-4
xine-ui: 0.99.4+cvs20060813-1
xserver-xorg-video-ati: 1:6.6.1-2
and can't reproduce the problem. Only when pressing and holding the
toggle-full-screen key ('f'), the following message appears:
xiTK WARNING(_x_error_handler:258): X error received: 'BadWindow (i
+anything that debhelper doesn't already do for us.
+ * replace shlibs.local by dh_makeshlibs -V
+ * make package bin-NMU-able by using ${binary:Version} and B-D on dpkg-dev
+(>= 1.13.19)
+
+ -- David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:51:51 +0200
+
exiv2 (0.10-1)
Hi *!
I could only find two license statements in the whole tree:
COPYING:
This is a stub file. This package has not yet had its complete licensing
information compiled. Please see the individual source files for details on
your rights to use and modify this software.
Please submit updated CO
Hi *!
Please find attached a patch to rename libexiv2 to libexiv2-0.10, the SONAME
of the library. Additionally, I changed all ${Source-Version} occurrences
from hardcoded entries in control to an improved version using
${binary:Version} in shlibs.local. For this the versioned dependency on
d
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.5.3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1, FHS 5.2
Hi!
After emptying /var/cache/apt-cacher/, apt-cacher cannot start anymore.
An easy workaround is to
$ mkdir -p /var/cache/apt-cacher/private/
$ touch /var/cache/apt-cacher/private/exlock
$ chown -R www-d
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Followup-For: Bug #359355
Hi!
I fixed this by adding empty initializers for supportet_{host,target}_version
into /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs-kpkg just before the getopt call.
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
http://sluglug.ucsc.edu/macromedia/site_ucsc.html: 404 Not found
Therefore comment out this line:
"sluglug.ucsc.edu" => "/macromedia/site_ucsc.html",
in /etc/update-flashplugin.conf.rb and run update-flashplugin.
Regarding the installer package itself, better error checking would be
handy
Package: atmel-firmware
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: unsatisfiable depends
Hi!
Since udev 0.070-3, udev provides and conflicts hotplug. This renders
atmel-firmware uninstallable on udev systems (which, I gather, will be a
significant number by the time of etch).
Barring any ot
On Sunday 11 September 2005 18:35, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 17:17 +0200, David Schmitt wrote:
> > zion:/etc/X11# dpkg -L xserver-xorg-dbg
> > [...]
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/X11R6
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/X11R6/lib
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/X11R6/l
Package: xserver-xorg-dbg
Version: 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear XSF!
It seems that there was a minor glitch when restructuring the new
debugging xserver:
zion:/etc/X11# l /etc/X11/X
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Sep 11 17:10
Hello *!
Including in kdeui/kactioncollection.h fixes this ftbfs,
though I have not yet tried whether the new packages work and the build
sports quite a few warnings.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisc
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #317098
Same problem here. Backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1208117184 (LWP 2910)]
0x43fe11db in QString::QString () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x43fe11db in QString::QStrin
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
> > > thus overriding a local admin who h
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:34, Frank Küster wrote:
> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
> doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
Indeed. Great. Thanks!
> >
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:37, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
[analysis skipped]
> I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against
> glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib?
I found the cause:
libSDL.so from libsdl1.2debian-all links against glib2.0 (and much othe
Hi!
zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libsdl-mixer1.2 libsdl-net1.2 libsdl1.2debian-all |
grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1 > /tmp/sdldeps
zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libwxgtk2.4 | grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1
> /tmp/wxdeps
zion:~# diff -u /tmp/sdldeps /tmp/wxdeps | grep '^ '
scorched
Hi Daniel, bug, *!
I built junit today with the new gjdoc (0.7.2-2) and it worked without
modification.
I think this bug can be closed.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
-- Matthias Leeb,
package junit
tag 297664 + patch
thanks
Currently, this bug depends on resolving gjdoc#299282, which is the (current)
cause for not building the documentation in junit.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septische
Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
There is a typo in gjdoc.sh.in: The jars are installed to
/usr/share/java/, not /usr/share/java/ext/. Due to this gjdoc fails to
run reproducably.
The (trivial) patch is attached.
Regards, Da
Hi *!
[Pressed send to early :( there was a final thing]
Line 523++:
| chmod 0640 ${CONFIG}*; chown proxy:proxy ${CONFIG}*
[...]
| chown proxy /etc/wwwoffle
| chmod u+w /etc/wwwoffle
I don't know how this should be handled, but it smells too.
Upon fixing those things, one probably should also
5
diff -ru wwwoffle-2.8e.unpatched/debian/changelog wwwoffle-2.8e/debian/changelog
--- wwwoffle-2.8e.unpatched/debian/changelog 2005-02-27 17:14:32.606080552 +0100
+++ wwwoffle-2.8e/debian/changelog 2005-02-27 17:00:05.782857712 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+wwwoffle (2.8e-1~1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fixed w
Hello world!
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg01254.html
is the last post on a short discussion regarding the effects of this bug.
As far as I understand it, the old packages have to be retained, because
removing them would force a soname bump on cernlib.
Perhaps the sections wo
Hi Siggi, *!
I could reproduce this on a current sid machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] gxine > /tmp/gxine.out 2>&1
Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Here is also the backtrace from gdb, sorry no debugging info:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switchin
Hi Matt, *!
Do you have ulimits (max RAM, max CPU or so) enabled on your system? A friend
of mine had apache crashing without useful errormessages after memory
limiting apache and installing another module and thus exceeding the
allowance...
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *h
Hi!
3dwm has an additional Build-Dep on libxmu-dev. Without this, the configure
test will fail. It also tests for libglut, but doesn't seem to require it.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
Package: debbuggtk
Version: 0.28-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
Upon trying to start buglister (or any other bug* tool) following
messages are logged to /tmp/debbuggtk-log... and the program fails to
start:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ bugwatcher
Using /usr/bin/gij-wrapp
36 matches
Mail list logo
