Bug#1095717: marked as done (tinycbor-utils has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/json2cbor)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2025 07:35:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095717: fixed in tinycbor 0.6.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095717, regarding tinycbor-utils has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/json2cbor to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: [Help] Seems to be autoconf issue in ncftp

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #1066410 [src:ncftp] ncftp: FTBFS: /<>/config.h:174:22: error: two or more data type Added tag(s) help. -- 1066410: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066410 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1066410: [Help] Seems to be autoconf issue in ncftp

2025-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Thanks Hi, thanks to Alexandre ncftp is now on Salsa which enables providing build logs easily in Salsa CI. I think the problem of this build issue is hidden behind some totally broken / outdated autoconf stuff. I tried my best (which admittedly is not much) and added a pa

Bug#1093047: dcmtk: leftover CVE status.

2025-02-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Étienne On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:24:33PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > Salvatore Bonaccorso, on 2025-02-09: > > Regarding CVE-2024-28130, should we ignore it for fixing in bookworm > > if it is too risky for regressions? > > With the first batch of CVEs addressed in prop

Bug#1094422: rust-serde-yml - serious concerns about these forks.

2025-02-11 Thread Blair Noctis
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:26:19 + Peter Green wrote: > Package: rust-serde-yml > Severity: serious > > (I will be cloning this bug against rust-libyml once I have a bug number) > > rust-serde-yml is a fork of rust-serde-yaml and rust-libyml is > a fork of rust-unsafe-libyaml. > > Serious conce

Bug#1095794: NoMethodError: undefined method `behavior=' for class ActiveSupport::Deprecation

2025-02-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-acts-as-list Version: NoMethodError: undefined method `behavior=' for class ActiveSupport::Deprecation Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, autopkgtest is broken with rails 7. full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-acts-as-list/unstable/amd6

Processed: gpyfft: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1082237 by -1 Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2 1082237 was blocked by: 1063599 1066316 1067335 1071807 1086577 1086578 1088707 1088823 1090292 1091809 1091938 1092083 1092781 1094109 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373 1094374

Bug#1095793: gpyfft: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-11 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Source: gpyfft Version: 0.7.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so Control: block 1082237 by -1 Dear Maintainer, Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gpyfft&arch=am

Processed: version on the buildd I actually found this in

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1095791 1.22.15 Bug #1095791 [src:dpkg] dpkg: incompatible and Policy-violating R³ default change breaks packages’ builds Marked as found in versions dpkg/1.22.15. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >One thing I do can see is that the older build called >debian/rules build-arch before debian/rules binary-arch, >the newer calls only the latter. So, perhaps, some value >that got reobtained is now cached? (But why only the one?) > >Investigation continues. It’s an incompatible change

Bug#1095746: marked as done (openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:55:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095746: fixed in openjdk-8 8u442-ga-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095746, regarding openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1 to

Bug#1095791: dpkg: incompatible and Policy-violating R³ default change breaks packages’ builds

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: dpkg Version: 1.22.13 Severity: serious Justification: Policy §5.6.31 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de dpkg 1.22.13 implemented a backwards-incompatible change, violating Policy (which states the default value is most certainly *not* “no”) and breaking builds of packages. dpkg (1.22.13) unsta

Processed: reassign 1095103 to src:appmenu-registrar

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1095103 src:appmenu-registrar Bug #1095103 [src:vala-panel-appmenu] appmenu-registrar: unsatisfiable dependency on appmenu-gtk2-module Bug reassigned from package 'src:vala-panel-appmenu' to 'src:appmenu-registrar'. No longer marked as f

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
>These seem to be the only ones affected, from the apt-get install >output, though I’ll also look at the packages. I’ll investigate. Best I can say at this point is that the wildcard in… all_jre_tools = $(filter-out javaws, $(notdir $(wildcard $(builddir)/$(jreimg)/bin/*))) jre_tools = $

Processed: Re: Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1095746 openjdk-8-jre-headless Bug #1095746 [openjdk-8-jdk] openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1 Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8-jdk' to 'openjdk-8-jre-h

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
reassign 1095746 openjdk-8-jre-headless thanks On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Matthias Mueller wrote: >The Link from /etc/alternatives/java -> >/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1. Ouch, indeed. This is… surprising, there’s not been a deliberate change even near that area.

Bug#1069089: ruby-rubygems: Broken platform detection which lead to unability to install sass-embedded

2025-02-11 Thread 夏目夏樹
Hi all, Maintainer of sass-embedded gem here. The reason you can no longer reproduce this issue on Debian ruby 3.1 is because I blocked ruby 3.1 from installing precompiled Linux gem since 1.77.1: https://github.com/sass-contrib/sass-embedded-host-ruby/commit/2c145537c7c3fe4e3c4da47845b9cd402e06e

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-02-11 Thread Antoine
Hi, On 2/11/25 12:41, Vincent Lefevre wrote: I'm also wondering about the current status of this bug. After more than one year, there haven't been any comments. Sorry for not being of great help on this, but just for information, it has been also one year since I'm holding it's upgrade: ##

Bug#1095778: sympy: autopkgtest failures

2025-02-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Source: sympy Version: 1.13.3-2 Severity: serious Hi, sympy is failing its own autopkgtests, preventing migration to testing. From the amd64 log: 198s autopkgtest [12:09:10]: test pybuild-autopkgtest: pybuild-autopkgtest 198s autopkgtest [12:09:10]: test pybuild-autopkgtest: [---

Bug#1080123: marked as done (pycollada: FTBFS: FAIL: test_cimage_data_loading (collada.tests.test_material.TestMaterial.test_cimage_data_loading))

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:25:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1080123: fixed in pycollada 0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1080123, regarding pycollada: FTBFS: FAIL: test_cimage_data_loading (collada.tests.test_material.TestMaterial.test_cimage_data_loading) to be

Bug#1095765: marked as done (openssl: CVE-2024-12797)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
hangelog entry. For further information see: [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-12797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797 [1] https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt Regards, Salvatore --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: openssl

Bug#1093043: dcmtk: leftover CVE status.

2025-02-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso, on 2025-02-09: > Regarding CVE-2024-28130, should we ignore it for fixing in bookworm > if it is too risky for regressions? With the first batch of CVEs addressed in proposed-updates, I could take a fresher look at the patch set. I thought I would hit a brick

Bug#1095755: marked as done (tasmanian: binary-all FTBFS)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:01:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095755: fixed in tasmanian 8.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095755, regarding tasmanian: binary-all FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1080123: marked as done (pycollada: FTBFS: FAIL: test_cimage_data_loading (collada.tests.test_material.TestMaterial.test_cimage_data_loading))

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:58:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1080123: fixed in pycollada 0.7.2-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1080123, regarding pycollada: FTBFS: FAIL: test_cimage_data_loading (collada.tests.test_material.TestMaterial.test_cimage_data_loading) t

Bug#1094706: marked as done (xrayutilities: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: `np.asfarray` was removed in the NumPy 2.0 release)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:01:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094706: fixed in xrayutilities 1.7.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094706, regarding xrayutilities: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: `np.asfarray` was removed in the NumPy 2.0 release to be marked as done. This

Bug#1095423: marked as pending in qtbase-opensource-src

2025-02-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Jan! On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Jan Christoph Uhde wrote: > How about passing the fix to upstream? That way it would get reviewed by > somebody else, as it is related to keepass I think it would be the correct > choice. Not knowing the code, it would take me some time to verify t

Bug#1080123: Fallout from setuptools dropping the test command

2025-02-11 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Gregor Riepl > Here's a patch that fixes both issues and more: > > 1. Fixes setup.py so the unit test data files are copied during the > installation stage. This makes the unit tests work again. > > 2. Removes unit tests from python3-collada package. I'm not sure why they > were included in

Bug#1095768: gnome-shell-extensions-extra: needs update for GNOME Shell 48

2025-02-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: gnome-shell-extensions Version: 20240916-1 Severity: serious Tags: trixie sid User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: gnome-shell-48 The Debian GNOME team is intending to include GNOME Shell 48 in Trixie. Currently, GNOME Shell 48 Beta is in Experimental. Many packag

Bug#1095423: marked as pending in qtbase-opensource-src

2025-02-11 Thread Jan Christoph Uhde
How about passing the fix to upstream? That way it would get reviewed by somebody else, as it is related to keepass I think it would be the correct choice. Not knowing the code, it would take me some time to verify the correctness of your code. ~ J

Bug#1093661: Please fix the debian/mumble.install file

2025-02-11 Thread Daniel Lange
Your mumble.install has usr/lib/* which also catches usr/lib/systemd/system/mumble-server.service usr/lib/sysusers.d/mumble-server.conf usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/mumble-server.conf as you can see on https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/mumble/filelist (at the time of writing this bug report) Pleas

Bug#1039999: Bug#1004135: plantuml: Please update to latest version: v1.2025.0

2025-02-11 Thread Andrej Shadura
Hello, On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, at 20:17, rzr wrote: > I have noticed that the mentionned PR has been stalling for months: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/plantuml/-/merge_requests/4#note_582015 > > Would it help to consider team mainenance (join #debian-java) > and check with latest upstream ver

Bug#1090136: marked as done (python-confection: FTBFS: ERROR confection/tests - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'srsly.ujson.uj...)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:24:47 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1090136: python-confection: FTBFS: ERROR confection/tests - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'srsly.ujson.uj... has caused the Debian Bug report #1090136, regarding python-confection: FTBFS: ERROR conf

Bug#1095765: openssl: CVE-2024-12797

2025-02-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
rg/news/secadv/20250211.txt Regards, Salvatore

Bug#1095697: marked as done (golang-1.24: FTBFS on arm64: FAIL)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:37:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095697: fixed in golang-1.24 1.24~rc3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095697, regarding golang-1.24: FTBFS on arm64: FAIL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#1056874: marked as done (python-srsly: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:21:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1056874: fixed in python-srsly 2.5.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1056874, regarding python-srsly: ftbfs with cython 3.0.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1095762: ruby-rails-deprecated-sanitizer: undefined method `debug=' for class ActiveSupport::Deprecation

2025-02-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-rails-deprecated-sanitizer Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, autopkgtest broke with rails 7 full logs https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-rails-deprecated- sanitizer/unstable/amd64/57585565/ -- System Information: Debian Relea

Bug#1095760: ruby-state-machines-activerecord: uninitialized constant Minitest::Reporters::BaseReporter::MiniTest (NameError)

2025-02-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-state-machines-activerecord Version: 0.8.0-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, This package autopkgtest broke with rails 7 Full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-state-machines- activerecord/unstable/amd64/57585575/ -- System Information:

Bug#1092413: marked as done (gecode: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'ChangeLog'. Stop.)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:04:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092413: fixed in gecode 6.2.0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092413, regarding gecode: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'ChangeLog'. Stop. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1095393: marked as done (sourmash: FTBFS: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `rkyv = "^0.7.44"`)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:36:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095393: fixed in sourmash 4.8.14-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095393, regarding sourmash: FTBFS: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `rkyv = "^0.7.44"` to be marked as done. This me

Processed: Bug#1095393 marked as pending in sourmash

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095393 [src:sourmash] sourmash: FTBFS: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `rkyv = "^0.7.44"` Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095393: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow..

Bug#1095393: marked as pending in sourmash

2025-02-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095393 in sourmash reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sourmash/-/commit/0f48a2b945242c5d92d3212a535d7

Bug#1095715: marked as done (libdtkcore-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features/dtk_install_dconfig.prf)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:04:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095715: fixed in dtkcore 5.7.9-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095715, regarding libdtkcore-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features/dtk_install_dconfig.

Bug#1095189: marked as done (rust-gio-0.18: Fails to build with glib 2.83)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:04:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095189: fixed in rust-gio-0.18 0.18.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095189, regarding rust-gio-0.18: Fails to build with glib 2.83 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#1095755: tasmanian: binary-all FTBFS

2025-02-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: tasmanian Version: 8.1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Sébastien Villemot https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tasmanian&arch=all&ver=8.1-2&stamp=1739292345&raw=0 ... dh_missing -i -O--buildsystem=cmake dh_missing: warning: tasmanian.mod exists in debian/tmp but is not ins

Bug#1095751: wlroots-0.17: Not for trixie

2025-02-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: wlroots-0.17 Version: 0.17.4-2 Severity: serious Since wlroots-0.17 is being removed from Unstable, we don't need it to migrate to Testing. https://bugs.debian.org/1095652 Thank you, Jeremy Bícha

Bug#1095275: marked as done (sogo-activesync silently overwrites files via directory symlinks)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:06:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095275: fixed in sogo 5.11.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095275, regarding sogo-activesync silently overwrites files via directory symlinks to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processed: sourmash: FTBFS: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `rkyv = "^0.7.44"`

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1095393 + patch Bug #1095393 [src:sourmash] sourmash: FTBFS: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `rkyv = "^0.7.44"` Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 10953

Bug#1095739: mdanalysis FTBFS on i386

2025-02-11 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: mdanalysis Followup-For: Bug #1095739 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Thanks. Waiting for build reports from mips64el riscv64 before fixing. Drew

Processed: Re: mdanalysis FTBFS on i386

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1095739 [src:mdanalysis] mdanalysis FTBFS on i386 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1095739 to the same tags previously set -- 1095739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095739 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.d

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-11 Thread Christoph Schmidt-Hieber
> On 11 Feb 2025, at 15:07, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Am Di., 11. Feb. 2025 um 14:59 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > : >> >>> On 11 Feb 2025, at 14:47, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >>> >>> Am Di., 11. Feb. 2025 um 10:32 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber >>> : > On 11 Fe

Bug#1087687: marked as done (mediathekview: Fatal error in Java Runtime Environment/SIGSEV)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:59:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1087687: fixed in openjfx 11.0.11+1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1087687, regarding mediathekview: Fatal error in Java Runtime Environment/SIGSEV to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1089991: marked as done ([armel] FTBFS with undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' due to opentbb cmake not adding -latomic)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:00:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1089991: fixed in vcmi 1.6.5+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1089991, regarding [armel] FTBFS with undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' due to opentbb cmake not adding -latomic to be marked a

Bug#1092257: marked as done (alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable after upgrading to 1.2.13-1)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:49:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092257: fixed in alsa-ucm-conf 1.2.13-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092257, regarding alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable after upgrading to 1.2.13-1 to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-11 Thread Christoph Schmidt-Hieber
> On 11 Feb 2025, at 14:47, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > Am Di., 11. Feb. 2025 um 10:32 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > : >> >> >>> On 11 Feb 2025, at 09:34, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber wrote: >>> Apparently the icons are supposed to be in xpm format: >>> https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?p

Bug#1095746: openjdk-8-jdk: Link /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1

2025-02-11 Thread Matthias Mueller
Package: openjdk-8-jdk Version: 8u442-ga-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@gmx.de Dear Maintainer, The Link from /etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/java is missing in 8u442-ga-1. -- System Information: Debian Release: tri

Bug#1092257: alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable after upgrading to 1.2.13-1

2025-02-11 Thread noisycoil
No problem, thanks a lot!

Bug#1092257: alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable after upgrading to 1.2.13-1

2025-02-11 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hi! El dt. 11 de 02 de 2025 a les 14:00 +0100, en/na NoisyCoil va escriure: > Package: alsa-ucm-conf > Version: 1.2.13-1 > Followup-For: Bug #1092257 > X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, jo...@debian.org > > Hi Jordi, > > Should we NMU this? > > Thanks Wow, sorry! This totally fell off my r

Bug#1095393: sourmash: FTBFS: error: failed to select a version for the requirement `rkyv = "^0.7.44"`

2025-02-11 Thread Peter Green
Tags 1095393 +path thanks With the attatched patch I was able to build sourmash succesfully.diff -Nru sourmash-4.8.14/debian/changelog sourmash-4.8.14/debian/changelog --- sourmash-4.8.14/debian/changelog2025-01-20 10:50:45.0 + +++ sourmash-4.8.14/debian/changelog2025-02-11 14

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 11. Feb. 2025 um 14:59 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber : > > > On 11 Feb 2025, at 14:47, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > > > Am Di., 11. Feb. 2025 um 10:32 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > > : > >> > >> > >>> On 11 Feb 2025, at 09:34, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber > >>> wrote: > >>> App

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 11. Feb. 2025 um 10:32 Uhr schrieb Christoph Schmidt-Hieber : > > > > On 11 Feb 2025, at 09:34, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber wrote: > > Apparently the icons are supposed to be in xpm format: > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=stimfit > > > > Should I prepare a new package to address

Bug#1095742: cambalache: broken dependencies

2025-02-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: cambalache Version: 0.94.1-1 Severity: serious If cambalache is installed in a clean Debian install, it won't work because of missing dependencies. I mentioned earlier while we were waiting for NEW review that cambalache could be a single binary package. This is similar to what is done wi

Bug#1095728: mimic-dkms: dkms fails on a module for 6.12.13-cloud-amd64: Error no BTF blob found

2025-02-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Hi Eric, thanks for explaining whats' going on here, now I also understand the need for your other "weird" dependencies. On 2/11/25 12:32, Eric Long wrote: `extract-linux` from kernel source code tries to do it at first (it only supports bzImage, so another custom binary runs to extract vmlin

Processed: limit source to matplotlib, tagging 1083475, tagging 1095355

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source matplotlib Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'matplotlib' Limit currently set to 'source':'matplotlib' > tags 1083475 + pending Bug #1083475 [src:matplotlib] matplotlib: (build-)depends on deprecated mod

Bug#1092257: alsa-ucm-conf: internal microphone unavailable after upgrading to 1.2.13-1

2025-02-11 Thread NoisyCoil
Package: alsa-ucm-conf Version: 1.2.13-1 Followup-For: Bug #1092257 X-Debbugs-Cc: noisyc...@tutanota.com, jo...@debian.org Hi Jordi, Should we NMU this? Thanks

Processed: Bug#1089991 marked as pending in vcmi

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1089991 [vcmi] [armel] FTBFS with undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8' due to opentbb cmake not adding -latomic Added tag(s) pending. -- 1089991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089991 Debian Bug Tracking System Cont

Bug#1089991: marked as pending in vcmi

2025-02-11 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1089991 in vcmi reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/vcmi/-/commit/71db7bdaf47a74044ab2f52f6f840d188c8

Bug#1095194: marked as done (hurd_no_setfsuid patch breaks pam_modutil_regain_priv)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:39:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095194: fixed in pam 1.7.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095194, regarding hurd_no_setfsuid patch breaks pam_modutil_regain_priv to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#1057621: valgrind should not drop valgrind-dbg

2025-02-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, On 2023-12-06 02:05:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: valgrind > Version: 1:3.20.0-1 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-Cc: Adam Borowski > > -dbgsym packages are not part of the normal archive, > and they can therefore not be expected to be pulled in > by normal dependencies. > > For th

Bug#1094946: marked as done (ikiwiki-hosting-web: not installable due to missing dnsutils)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:38:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094946: fixed in ikiwiki-hosting 0.20220717-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094946, regarding ikiwiki-hosting-web: not installable due to missing dnsutils to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1095739: mdanalysis FTBFS on i386

2025-02-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: mdanalysis Version: 2.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch X-Debbugs-Cc: Drew Parsons https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mdanalysis&arch=i386&ver=2.8.0-1&stamp=1739236579&raw=0 ... === FAILURES === _

Bug#1061106: greenbone-security-assistant: FTBFS: Module not found: Error: styled-components tried to access react-is

2025-02-11 Thread Sophie Brun
I intend to fix this bug and to update the package but I'm running out of time at the moment. Sophie OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1095737: valgrind: unsatisfiable recommends on valgrind-dbg

2025-02-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: valgrind Version: 1:3.24.0-2 Severity: serious valgrind 1:3.24.0-2 still has a "Recommends" on valgrind-dbg, which is no longer available. This prevents upgrade with aptitude, in particular. Either the valgrind-dbg package should be built, or the Recommends should be dropped. But see als

Bug#1095731: ruby-js-image-paths: Could not find 'rails' (< 7.0, >= 4.0)

2025-02-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-js-image-paths Version: 0.1.1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, autopkgtest is broken with rails 7 full log https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-js-image-paths/unstable/amd64/5758/ -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT p

Bug#1095714: caveexpress FTBFS: SDLSoundEngine.cpp:34:23: error: cannot convert ‘_Mix_Music*’ to ‘Mix_Music*’

2025-02-11 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 13:31:51 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > caveexpress fails to build from source in unstable on amd64. This is probably a regression with libsdl2-mixer 2.8.1. > | In file included from > /build/reproducible-path/caveexpress-2.5.2/src/modules/sound/SDLSoundEngine.cpp:11: > | /

Bug#1095728: mimic-dkms: dkms fails on a module for 6.12.13-cloud-amd64: Error no BTF blob found

2025-02-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: mimic-dkms Version: 0.6.3+ds-1 Severity: serious mimic-dkms does not have autopkgtests enabled, see the attached patches to do that. The autopkgtests work fine for 6.12.13-amd64 and 6.12.13-rt-amd64, but they fail for 6.12.13-cloud-amd64 with an error that I haven't encountered so far in

Bug#1069523: marked as done (libss7: FTBFS on armhf: ss7.c:654:56: error: format ‘%li’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long long int’ [-Werror=format=])

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:34:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069523: fixed in libss7 2.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069523, regarding libss7: FTBFS on armhf: ss7.c:654:56: error: format ‘%li’ expects argument of type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘lon

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-11 Thread Christoph Schmidt-Hieber
> On 11 Feb 2025, at 09:34, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber wrote: > Apparently the icons are supposed to be in xpm format: > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=stimfit > > Should I prepare a new package to address this? If so I probably need to bump > the version number yet again because it wi

Bug#1095727: ruby-asset-sync: Could not find 'useragent' (~> 0.16)

2025-02-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: ruby-asset-sync Version: 2.11.0-1.1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, autopkgtest broken with rails 7 https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-asset-sync/unstable/amd64/57585531/ -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable

Bug#1087058: marked as done (lxqt-build-tools-qt5 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/lxqt-transupdate)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:11:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1087058: fixed in lxqt-build-tools-qt5 0.13.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1087058, regarding lxqt-build-tools-qt5 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/bin/lxqt-transupdate to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1087687: mediathekview: Fatal error in Java Runtime Environment/SIGSEV

2025-02-11 Thread Pierre Gruet
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending Hi, On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 12:42:50 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: reassign -1 src:openjfx > Control: affects -1 src:mediathekview > > Mediathekview segfaults since openjfx 11.0.11+1-4 was uploaded to unstable in > November 2024. Apparently several g++

Processed: Re: mediathekview: Fatal error in Java Runtime Environment/SIGSEV

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed pending Bug #1087687 [src:openjfx] mediathekview: Fatal error in Java Runtime Environment/SIGSEV Bug #1087423 [src:openjfx] libopenjfx-jni: mediathekview won't start with version 11.0.11+1-4 Added tag(s) pending and confirmed. Added tag(s) pending

Processed: bmtk: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1082237 by -1 Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2 1082237 was blocked by: 1063599 1066316 1067335 1071807 1086577 1086578 1088707 1088823 1090292 1091809 1091938 1092083 1092781 1094109 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373 1094374

Bug#1095723: bmtk: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-11 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
Source: bmtk Version: 1.1.1+ds-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: numpy2 Control: block 1082237 by -1 Visible on https://ci.debian.net/packages/b/bmtk/testing/amd64/57584162/ but also happens during the package build. bmtk/simulator/filternet/lgnmodel/

Processed: tagging 1095096

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1095096 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #1095096 [src:seaborn] seaborn: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1095096: https:

Processed: Re: Bug#1093934: rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: no matching package named `bounded-static` found

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #1093934 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:rust-bounded-static] rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: no matching package named `bounded-static` found Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1093934 to the same values previously set -- 109

Bug#1068032: stimfit 0.16.4-1.1 packaged for debian

2025-02-11 Thread Christoph Schmidt-Hieber
Apparently the icons are supposed to be in xpm format: https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=stimfit Should I prepare a new package to address this? If so I probably need to bump the version number yet again because it will affect the source distribution? Christoph

Bug#1093934: rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: no matching package named `bounded-static` found

2025-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: reopen -1 Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2025-02-11 09:19:30) > Version: dh-rust/0.0.11 > > Quoting Santiago Vila (2025-01-24 02:00:16) > > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: > [...] > > error: failed to prepare local package for uploading > > > > Cau

Bug#1093934: marked as done (rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: no matching package named `bounded-static` found)

2025-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:19:30 +0100 with message-id <173926197000.2664089.9951874774978526...@cairon.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1093934: rust-bounded-static: FTBFS: no matching package named `bounded-static` found has caused the Debian Bug report #1093934, regarding rust-bou