Bug#661789: grub-common: load_video required for linux on UEFI

Package: grub-common Version: 1.99-23 Followup-For: Bug #661789 Copying unicode.pf2 to /boot/grub was enough to get the 00_header script to insert a section containing load_video into the config on my fresh encrypted disk install without any other changes. Previously it couldn't find a font and sk

Bug#695832: apt: CVE-2012-0961

Package: apt Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole This was assigned CVE-2012-0961: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/975199 Stable is not affected, the logging as done as 0600 there. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#695831: med-pharma: uninstallable in sid, needs migration to med-tasks 1.13.1

Package: med-pharma Version: 1.13 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-outdated Hi, med-pharma depends on Depends: med-tasks (= 1.13), med-config (= 1.13) However, sid now has version 1.13.1 of these both packages. This makes med-pharma no longer installable in sid. It see

Bug#695830: nova: CVE-2012-5625

Package: nova Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Please see http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/435 Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Bug#686113: Fails to configure with emacs24 / causes emacs24 upgrade to fail

Hi Rob, I would like to ask for your help concerning bug #686113. It is somehow strange that the byte compile doe snot work. I reduced it to the following minimal example: ; from the path.el generatd in the emacsen install script (setq load-path (cons "." load-path)) (setq

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

Hi Vincent, On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:48:39 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Try: > > SSL_CERT_FILE=/dev/null lynx https://gforge.inria.fr/ But this is apparently wrong usage. What is your main point? Best regards, 2012-12-13(Thu) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of De

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

Hi Vincent, Please stop to mail only to 695653-qu...@bugs.debian.org but mail to 695...@bugs.debian.org I seldom visit web site "http://www.debian.org/Bugs/";. I've failed to get your most reports. Thanks. Best regards, 2012-12-13(Thu) -- Debian Developer - much more

Bug#695192: bind9: CVE-2012-5688

Why does the Wheezy release team have its nose so stuck up about a minor upstream version number? 9.8.4-P1 IS ISC's official bug fixed release of the 9.8.x source tree , INCLUDING 9.8.1* Don't drive the security maintainers into loops about unsupported code in an upcoming stable release! Sheesh,

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:12:51AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > Hi all, > > I can't reproduce the problem with neither testing > (2.8.8dev.12-2) nor unstable (2.8.8dev.15-1). I can - but even if we modified lynx so that the default path for the cert file is compiled-in, there's still some ambig

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

Hi, On 2012-12-13 10:12:51 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > I can't reproduce the problem with neither testing > (2.8.8dev.12-2) nor unstable (2.8.8dev.15-1). Try: SSL_CERT_FILE=/dev/null lynx https://gforge.inria.fr/ -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validate

Bug#695818: gnome-boxes: Can't create VM from a physical CD

Package: gnome-boxes Version: 3.4.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious 1. Insert an operating system install CD into your computer 2. Open Boxes and click New 3. Click Continue and then try to select the install CD What happens - It's not really possible to select the physical CD What should happen - The

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

On 2012-12-12 18:34:48 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > I can reproduce this, and see that the problem is arguably a > configuration error on your part. The first interesting difference is > this line omitted from a trace of the malfunctioning session: > > HTGetSSLHandle: certfile is set to /etc/ssl

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

Hi all, I can't reproduce the problem with neither testing (2.8.8dev.12-2) nor unstable (2.8.8dev.15-1). Best regards, 2012-12-13(Thu) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia

Bug#695814: marked as done (FTBFS: need to switch libnode-uglify build-dep to node-uglify)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:17:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695814: fixed in node-async 0.1.22-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #695814, regarding FTBFS: need to switch libnode-uglify build-dep to node-uglify to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#695751: gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:41:26PM +0100, Adrin wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the fast follow up. Two files are attached and this is the more > comprehensive report by adding set -x: I've tried to reproduce the failure on a clean wheezy install this evening using the /etc/init.d directory you provi

Bug#669878: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'phonon-backend-vlc'

Petter Reinholdtsen, le Wed 12 Dec 2012 21:07:20 +0100, a écrit : > I guess changes to one of these packages caused the upgrade to break. > After checking the package changelogs, I suspect the changes in > python-pyatspi2 version 2.5.3+dfsg-3 is the cause. See changelog at > http://packages.qa.deb

Bug#695814: FTBFS: need to switch libnode-uglify build-dep to node-uglify

Package: node-async Version: 0.1.22-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch This patch should be self-evident. libnode-uglify was dropped from unstable and, as such, node-async would now FTBFS if it was rebuilt in a tradition

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-12-12 06:28:56 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:08:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > I'm not able to reproduce the problem, either by recompiling, or > > > by installing this version on my Debi

Bug#693472: emacsen-common, emacs23: many emacs addons fail to install if emacs22 (lenny) is still installed

Sébastien Villemot writes: > The code looks good, and it passed the upgrade tests for devscripts-el > and emms. So I think you can go on. Great, and thanks for the help. I'll see about generating another wheezy candidate release soon -- very happy you tracked this down. -- Rob Browning rlb @d

Bug#695736: marked as done (gcc-mingw32: Wheezy transition package missing binaries provided in Squeeze)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:18:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695736: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 8 has caused the Debian Bug report #695736, regarding gcc-mingw32: Wheezy transition package missing binaries provided in Squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#690148: marked as done (gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:18:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#690148: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 8 has caused the Debian Bug report #690148, regarding gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Processed: Re: libnih: upstart test-suite fails on xfs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 695604 serious Bug #695604 [libnih] libnih: upstart test-suite fails on xfs Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b

Bug#693472: emacsen-common, emacs23: many emacs addons fail to install if emacs22 (lenny) is still installed

Le dimanche 09 décembre 2012 à 12:50 -0600, Rob Browning a écrit : > Rob Browning writes: > > > Sébastien Villemot writes: > > >> Since there seem to be no other new-style package in Wheezy, I think > >> this workaround is sufficient for now. But for Jessie you probably > >> need to refactor th

Processed: Re: Bug#639407 closed by Matthias Klose (Bug#639407: fixed in python2.7 2.7.3-1)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #639407 {Done: Matthias Klose } [python2.7-dev] python2.X/3.X-dev ships windows binaries which are not built at build time 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Bug#639407: closed by Matthias Klose (Bug#639407: fixed in python2.7 2.7.3-1)

Control: reopen -1 In 2.7.3-1 changelog you wrote: The wininst-* files cannot be built within Debian from the included sources, needing a zlib mingw build, which the zlib maintainer isn't going to provide. Closes: #639407. This confirms that the files in question are unbuildable in Debian,

Processed: found 695807 in 0.0.2-2, found 695807 in 0.0.3-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 695807 0.0.2-2 Bug #695807 [gksu-polkit] CVE-2012-5617: gksu-polkit privileged code execution with unprivileged credentials Marked as found in versions gksu-polkit/0.0.2-2. > found 695807 0.0.3-1 Bug #695807 [gksu-polkit] CVE-2012-5617: gks

Bug#695807: CVE-2012-5617: gksu-polkit privileged code execution with unprivileged credentials

Package: gksu-polkit Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following vulnerability was published for gksu-polkit. CVE-2012-5617[0,1]: privilege escalation due to improper authentication settings in policykit configuration file If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the C

Bug#669513: Removal of gnat-4.4 due to RC bug #669513

Tobias Hansen writes: > Am 06.12.2012 20:57, schrieb Tobias Hansen: >> Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta: >>> Tobias Hansen writes: since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore (see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed? >>> >>> Yes but maybe notify the maint

Bug#695803: tar: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Jakub Wilk writes: > However, the doc/ directory does include the non-free GFDL > documentation It appears that the package was built against the full upstream tarball and not the elided one. My bad. FWIW, the binary package for tar does not include the GFDL documents, this is just a source

Bug#695774: redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter

Is there a chance you had config files from an earlier redmine installation ? Do yours have adapter: postgresql ? Jérémy. On 12/12/2012 19:20, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Jérémy Lal dixit: > >> I don't reproduce. > > Hum. I just installed the packages and not much else (this is a > pretty fresh sy

Bug#669513: Removal of gnat-4.4 due to RC bug #669513

Am 06.12.2012 20:57, schrieb Tobias Hansen: > Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta: >> Tobias Hansen writes: >>> since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore >>> (see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be removed? >> >> Yes but maybe notify the maintainers of the sole package sti

Bug#679980: marked as done (cacti: license issue in include/treeview)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:47:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#679980: fixed in cacti 0.8.8a+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #679980, regarding cacti: license issue in include/treeview to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#673667: marked as done (totem-mozilla: Split out totem-vega or add to Flash alternatives)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:49:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673667: fixed in totem 3.6.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #673667, regarding totem-mozilla: Split out totem-vega or add to Flash alternatives to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#695715: fixed in cflow 1:1.4+dfsg1-1

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:22:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high > > . > >* Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the source > > and > > binary package (c

Bug#695715: fixed in cflow 1:1.4+dfsg1-1

On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:32 +, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > cflow (1:1.4+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Repackage with non DFSG-free texinfo files stripped out of the source and > binary package (closes: #695715). Thanks for fixing this. Unfortunately, the fact that you also

Bug#695803: tar: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: tar Version: 1.26-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/README says: Unfortunately, the info document describing tar is licensed under the GFDL with invariant cover texts, which violates the Debian Free Software Guidelines. As a result, the info documentati

Bug#669878: Could not perform immediate configuration on 'phonon-backend-vlc'

I investigated this some more. According to jenkins.debian.net, the problem was introduced between 2012-11-27T05:06:19 and 2012-11-28T05:07:29. The first failing log is available from http://jenkins.debian.net/job/chroot-installation_squeeze_install_gnome_upgrade_to_wheezy/62/ >. I extracted th

Bug#695799: xemacs21-packages: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with invariant sections)

Source: xemacs21-packages Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl Some of the files in the source packages are licensed under GFDL with Invariant Sections or with Cover Texts: ./xemacs-packages/ediff/ediff.texi ./xemacs-packages/gnus/texi/emacs

Bug#695715: marked as done (cflow: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections))

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:32:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695715: fixed in cflow 1:1.4+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #695715, regarding cflow: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections) to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Wednesday 12 December 19:03:12 UTC 2012 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/nordugrid-arc";>nordugrid-arc >

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Upstream bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 692629 http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/11870 Bug #692629 [src:php-horde-text-filter] non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil") Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/11870'.

Processed (with 1 errors): Upstream bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 692629 +upstream Bug #692629 [src:php-horde-text-filter] non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil") Added tag(s) upstream. > forward 692629 http://bugs.horde.org/ticket/11870 Unknown command or malfor

Processed: Re: Bug#695786: exim4-config: "pgsql_servers" option set for the second time

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 695786 fusionforge Bug #695786 [exim4-config] exim4-config: "pgsql_servers" option set for the second time Bug reassigned from package 'exim4-config' to 'fusionforge'. No longer marked as found in versions exim4/4.80-6. Ignoring request

Bug#695786: exim4-config: "pgsql_servers" option set for the second time

reassign 695786 fusionforge thanks On 2012-12-12 Frederic-Emmanuel PICCA wrote: > Package: exim4-config > Version: 4.80-6 > Severity: serious > Justification: "unknown" > Dear Maintainer, > during a upgrade of my system, I got this error message > thanks for your attention. > maybe this is a

Bug#695794: vcdimager: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: vcdimager Version: 0.7.24-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl docs/vcd-info.* and docs/vcdxrip.* have the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version

Bug#695793: source-highlight: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: source-highlight Version: 3.1.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/source-highlight.* have the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or

Bug#695339: marked as done (uses wrong location for typelib files)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:33:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695339: fixed in libguestfs 1:1.18.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #695339, regarding uses wrong location for typelib files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#695774: redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter

Jérémy Lal dixit: >I don't reproduce. Hum. I just installed the packages and not much else (this is a pretty fresh system used to evaluate redmine). >Could you check you don't have : >1) incompatible gems (gem list) root@redmine:~ # gem list *** LOCAL GEMS *** >2) incompatible redmine plugi

Bug#695422: ntop: links with both libssl and libgdbm and is mainly GPL-licensed without linking exception

On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:58:17 -0800 Ludovico Cavedon wrote: [...] > So basically, are you telling me that *any* code that is dynamically > linked against a gpl library is automatically relicensed under GPL, Not re-licensed, it "just" has to be licensed in a GPL-compatible manner, so that it is ef

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 695777 bug-gtyp...@gnu.org Bug #695777 [src:gtypist] gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'bug-gtyp...@gnu.org'. > tag 695777 upstream Bug #695777 [src:gtypist] gtypi

Bug#695138: marked as done (dovecot: CVE-2012-5620)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:52:05 +0100 with message-id <20121212175205.gb19...@inutil.org> and subject line Re: Bug#695138: dovecot: CVE-2012-5620 has caused the Debian Bug report #695138, regarding dovecot: CVE-2012-5620 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#695192: bind9: CVE-2012-5688

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 05:25:36AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Package: bind9 > > Severity: grave > > Tags: security > > Justification: user security hole > > Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828 > > Stable is not af

Bug#694808: libv8: CVE-2012-5120 CVE-2012-5128

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 03:56:49PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: libv8 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Please see > http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.de/2012/11/stable-channel-release-and-beta-channel.html What's the status? Cheers,

Bug#694693: tiff: CVE-2012-5581

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:46:41AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > Hi Jay, > > another security issue was discovered by Red Hat's Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala: > > The Red Hat bug contains the necessary details: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867235 >

Bug#695790: readline5: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: readline5 Version: 5.2-12 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl Some files in doc/ have the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or | any later

Bug#695789: CVE-2012-2253

Package: mahara Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, CVE-2012-2253 needs to be fixed in Wheezy: https://mahara.org/interaction/forum/topic.php?id=5076 Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

* Ben Armstrong , 2012-12-12, 13:20: "At the same time, we also consider that works licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License that include no invariant sections do fully meet the requirements of the Debian Free Software Guidelines. This means that works that don't include any Invariant

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 12/12/2012 01:20 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > "At the same time, we also consider that works licensed under the GNU > Free Documentation License that include no invariant sections do fully > meet the requirements of the Debian Free Software Guidelines. > > This means that works that don't include

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 12/12/2012 12:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Source: gtypist > Version: 2.9.1-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > Usertags: gfdl > > doc/gtypist.* has the following license: > | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > | under the terms of the GNU Fr

Bug#695786: exim4-config: "pgsql_servers" option set for the second time

Package: exim4-config Version: 4.80-6 Severity: serious Justification: "unknown" Dear Maintainer, during a upgrade of my system, I got this error message thanks for your attention. maybe this is a bad interaction with the fusionforge package. Cheers Frederic ORD03037:/home/picca/Projets/cdpy

Bug#695739: marked as done (ghc: FTBFS on armhf: braindead rebase of patch that duplicates upstream fix)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:03:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695739: fixed in ghc 7.6.1.20121207-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #695739, regarding ghc: FTBFS on armhf: braindead rebase of patch that duplicates upstream fix to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#695784: readline6: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: readline6 Version: 6.2-9 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl Some files in doc/ have the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or | any later

Bug#695776: gsl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 12 December 2012 at 17:35, Jakub Wilk wrote: | Source: gsl | Version: 1.15+dfsg-1 | Severity: serious | Justification: Policy 2.2.1 | Usertags: gfdl | | doc/gsl-ref.* has the following license: | | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | | under the terms of the

Bug#695774: redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter

I don't reproduce. Could you check you don't have : 1) incompatible gems (gem list) 2) incompatible redmine plugins (ls /usr/share/redmine/vendor/plugins) 3) custom installed rails (ls -l /usr/share/redmine/vendor/rails) thank you Jérémy. On 12/12/2012 17:24, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: r

Bug#695783: muse-el: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: muse-el Version: 3.20-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl texi/muse.texi has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or | any later versio

Bug#695782: libbinio: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: libbinio Version: 1.4-14 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/libbinio.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or | any later versi

Bug#695779: kbuild: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: kbuild Version: 1:0.1.9998svn2543-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl src/kmk/doc/* contains GNU make documentation, with the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documenta

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: gtypist Version: 2.9.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/gtypist.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or | any later versio

Bug#695776: gsl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: gsl Version: 1.15+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/gsl-ref.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or | any later versio

Bug#695775: gmerlin: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

Source: gmerlin Version: 1.2.0~dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The copyright file reads: | License: GFDL-1.1 | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or | any later version

Bug#695774: redmine: fails to upgrade, says something about a pgsql_adapter

Package: redmine Version: 1.4.4+dfsg1-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.2 Today’s dist-upgrade inside wheezy failed. Retrying yields: 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space wil

Bug#695773: sgmlop.so breaks xmlrpclib numerical character entities

Package: python-reportlab-accel Version: 2.4-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software If python-reportlab-accel (or more precisely, the sgmlop.so file it includes) is installed, software using the python xmlrpclib library rejects valid xml data containing numerical character e

Bug#694145: marked as done (cipux-cat-web, libcipux-cat-web-perl: inconsistent permission handling of /etc/cipux-cat-web/)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:32:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694145: fixed in cipux-cat-web 3.4.0.3-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694145, regarding cipux-cat-web, libcipux-cat-web-perl: inconsistent permission handling of /etc/cipux-cat-web/ to be marked as done

Processed: tagging 656552

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656552#61 > tags 656552 patch pending Bug #656552 [zope2.12-sandbox] zope2.12-sandbox: fails to install, remove and install again Added tag(s) pending and patch. > thanks Stopping processing here

Processed: Re: Bug#695690: openvdb: FTBFS on ia64: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Bcc:ing control > retitle 695690 openvdb: FTBFS: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies Bug #695690 [src:openvdb] openvdb: FTBFS on ia64: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies Changed Bug title to 'openvdb: FTBFS: TestCurl finds numeric discrepanc

Bug#695690: openvdb: FTBFS on ia64: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies

# Bcc:ing control retitle 695690 openvdb: FTBFS: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies thanks "Aaron M. Ucko" writes: > The test suite's output mostly consists of warnings(?) about > unregistered types, but wraps up with two errors from TestCurl.cc: Now that the i386 build gets as far as running

Bug#694355: marked as done (munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2))

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:10:43 +0100 with message-id <201212121510.44533.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: [Packaging] Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694355, regarding munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2) to be marked

Bug#649068: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#649068: Seems to need Wheezy build environment (Was: rgmanager and resource-agents: error when trying to install)

Hi Ivo, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:55:50PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:47:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > BTW did you ask for pre-approval from the release team for this upload? > > > The > > > freeze policy requires this for updates that can't

Bug#649068: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#649068: Seems to need Wheezy build environment (Was: rgmanager and resource-agents: error when trying to install)

Hi Andreas, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:47:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > BTW did you ask for pre-approval from the release team for this upload? The > > freeze policy requires this for updates that can't go to unstable. > > Hmmm, why do you think that the package can't go to unstable? It b

Bug#687694: version incompatibility

On 2012-10-04 22:45, brian.thoma...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > I'm happy to make whatever changes are necessary to this package, but I'm > not sure what is gained by providing Breaks for every potential package > affected by a bouncycastle upgrade. It seems to me more proper that if > packa

Processed: Re: Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #694355 {Done: Holger Levsen } [munin-doc] munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2) 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopene

Bug#649068: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#649068: Seems to need Wheezy build environment (Was: rgmanager and resource-agents: error when trying to install)

Hi Ivo, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:59:44PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Isn't creating a clean Wheezy chroot and building the package there the > > best way to go anyway. I know that "usually" building against un

Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1

Control: reopen -1 Control: fixed -1 2.0.9-1 On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:02:48PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > Subject: Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1 > > Source: munin > Source-Version: 2.0.9-1 Holger, Thanks for your work on this. As this bug is still present in testing and unstable, I'm

Bug#695770: python2.6 2.6.8-1: FTBFS on i386 mips sparc

package: src:python2.6 severity: serious Hi, It seems python2.6 2.6.8-1 fails to build on some archs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python2.6 This also prevents the fix for #639405 from reaching unstable (and testing). Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-

Bug#656552: zope2.12-sandbox: fails to upgrade from testing

Control: reopen -1 Hi, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I just uploaded zope-common and will upload Zope > 2.12 with bumped Pre-Depends on zope-common as soon as a patch is > available for CVE-2012-5505. Thanks for the fix in zope-

Processed: Re: Bug#656552: zope2.12-sandbox: fails to upgrade from testing

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #656552 {Done: Arnaud Fontaine } [zope2.12-sandbox] zope2.12-sandbox: fails to install, remove and install again 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add the

Bug#688603: mlterm: missing copyright files

Andreas, On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:58:58PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > thanks for your work on this. I just sponsored the package. Will you > file the unblock bug or should I care for it? Thanks for the upload. I filed the unblock: http://bugs.debian.org/695769 Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBS

Bug#688603: mlterm: missing copyright files

Hi Ivo, thanks for your work on this. I just sponsored the package. Will you file the unblock bug or should I care for it? Kind regards Andreas. On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Control: tag -1 patch pending > > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:12:0

Bug#649068: [Debian-ha-maintainers] Bug#649068: Seems to need Wheezy build environment (Was: rgmanager and resource-agents: error when trying to install)

Hi Andreas, On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Isn't creating a clean Wheezy chroot and building the package there the > best way to go anyway. I know that "usually" building against unstable > is the right way to go but besides this we are targeting at Wheezy and >

Bug#695751: gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:41:26PM +0100, Adrin wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the fast follow up. Two files are attached and this is the more > comprehensive report by adding set -x: Thanks for the files. The trigger for the problem is "vpnagentd_init", which lacks LSB headers. But there's nothin

Bug#695751: gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools

[Michael Biebl] >>> insserv: warning: script 'K25vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides >>> insserv: warning: script 'vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides >>> insserv: Starting vpnagentd_init depends on laptop-mode and therefore on >>> system facility `$all' which can not be true

Bug#694153: marked as done (mlterm, mlterm-tiny: after upgrade from squeeze files are missing in /usr/share/doc/mlterm-common/)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694153: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #694153, regarding mlterm, mlterm-tiny: after upgrade from squeeze files are missing in /usr/share/doc/mlterm-common/ to be marked as done. T

Bug#688606: marked as done (mlterm-im-uim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688606: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688606, regarding mlterm-im-uim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#688605: marked as done (mlterm-im-m17nlib: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688605: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688605, regarding mlterm-im-m17nlib: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#688604: marked as done (mlterm-im-scim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688604: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688604, regarding mlterm-im-scim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#688603: marked as done (mlterm-tools: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688603: fixed in mlterm 3.1.2-1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688603, regarding mlterm-tools: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Processed: Re: Bug#695751: gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 695751 insserv Bug #695751 [gdm3] gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools Bug reassigned from package 'gdm3' to 'insserv'. No longer marked as found in versions gdm3/3.4.1-5. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions

Bug#695751: gdm: gdm3 update fails due to conflict with laptop-mode-tools

reassign 695751 insserv thanks Hi adrin, On 12.12.2012 12:14, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 12/12/12 09:32, adrin wrote: >> insserv: warning: script 'K25vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides >> insserv: warning: script 'vpnagentd_init' missing LSB tags and overrides >> insserv: Starting vp

Bug#695689: marked as done (openvdb: FTBFS on 32-bit systems: TestParticlesToLevelSet.c mixes size_t and Index64)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:17:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695689: fixed in openvdb 0.99.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #695689, regarding openvdb: FTBFS on 32-bit systems: TestParticlesToLevelSet.c mixes size_t and Index64 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#695698: [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0

Hi Steve, 2012/12/11 Steve Langasek > reassign 695698 json-c > clone 695698 -1 > reassign -1 plymouth > retitle -1 please move libply-boot-client to /lib in support of mountall > severity 695566 critical > forcemerge 695566 695698 > affects 695698 upstart > thanks > > (Raising severity of the ex

  1   2   >