Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 677400
Bug #677400 {Done: Ola Lundqvist } [nova-common] nova-common:
prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677400 to the same values
previousl
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:58:27 +0200
with message-id <20120618055827.ga2...@inguza.net>
and subject line There are three ways to solve this bug #673805
has caused the Debian Bug report #673805,
regarding python-quantum: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite
/usr/share
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 677856 dcap/2.47.6-2
Bug #677856 [src:dcap] dcap: FTBFS[kfreebsd-amd64 linux-i386]: error: inlining
failed in call to always_inline 'vasprintf': function not inlinable
No longer marked as found in versions dcap/2.47.6-2.
> reassign 67785
notfound 677856 dcap/2.47.6-2
reassign 677856 gcc-4.7
found 677856 gcc-4.7/4.7.0-11
fixed 677856 gcc-4.7/4.7.0-12
forcemerge 672411 677856
thanks
This is not a bug in dcap
This is a bug in gcc
This bug is already fixed
Please update the gcc version in your buildd build environments.
Matt
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:06:30 +0200
with message-id <20120618050630.ga2...@inguza.net>
and subject line This is not a bug, it is a feature!
has caused the Debian Bug report #677400,
regarding nova-common: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not
modified by the user
to be
Hi,
Andreas Beckmann writes:
> the problem now also happens on a regular update from testing.
>
> Adding set -x to the postinst script does not reveal any useful
> information:
>
> [...]
>
> Installing dialog does not help. You should ask a debconf guru as
> that seems to
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:34:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677921: fixed in rdist 6.1.5-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #677921,
regarding rdist: FTBFS with several LDFLAGS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#671961: fixed in pyentropy 0.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #671961,
regarding pyentropy: FTBFS: test failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 673542 grave
Bug #673542 [libpng12-0] libpng12-0_1.5.10-2 sends gdm3 and Xorg in an infinite
loop, breaking the whole graphical system
Bug #673645 [libpng12-0] libpng12: version PNG12_0 not found error
Severity set to 'grave' from 'serio
All those "compat" packages in 1.5.x are completely broken.
libpng15-15 does not have the same ABI as libpng12-0. So making
libpng12-0_1.5.10 a compat package depending on libpng15-15 and creating
symlinks makes absolutely no sense.
The same is true for libpng3 and the libpng12-dev package.
--
Wh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 677921 serious
Bug #677921 [rdist] rdist: FTBFS with several LDFLAGS
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 652001 serious
Bug #652001 [libpng-dev] libpng-dev: breaks "pkg-config --cflags gtk+-3.0"
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
652001: http://bugs.debian
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:01:37 -0400
with message-id <20120618020137.gn5...@onerussian.com>
has caused the report #669466,
regarding pynn: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Michael Hanke , Andrew Davison
(NB: If you are a
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 16:34 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> reassign 612439 linux-2.6 2.6.32-45
> severity 612439 grave
> kthxbye
>
> Hi,
>
> Vanush Misha Paturyan wrote:
> > So, if snapshot-merge is missing from the kernel, shouldn't a bug be
> > opened against kernel-images-2.6.32-5-amd64?
>
> In
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 612439 lvm2 2.02.66-5
Bug #612439 [linux-2.6] lvconvert --merge breaks Logical Volumes
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'lvm2'.
No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-45.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #61
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:38:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676161: fixed in sogo 1.3.15a-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #676161,
regarding sogo: cronjob removes /var/spool/sogo and even worse trys removing
/var/spool
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:38:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676077: fixed in raspell 1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #676077,
regarding raspell: FTBFS: ext/raspell.c:76:9: error: format not a string
literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
to be
Hi Julian
>> I will use version "0.9.9+release-1" for now, and then use "1.0.0"
>> with "pre" or "rc" when biblatex is also upgraded.
>
> If you want to do that, remember to use the "~" syntax: 1.0.0~pre1-1
> or similar; that way, 1.0.0-1 will be strictly greater than the "pre"
> version number!
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 674448 + pending
Bug #674448 [libcommons-compress-java] CVE-2012-2098
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
674448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674448
Debi
tags 674448 + pending
thanks
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:13:35PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: libcommons-compress-java
> Version: 1.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Please see https://commons.apache.org/compress/security.html
>
> Fixed in 1.4.1. This doesn't warrant a DSA
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Looks like missing versions on dependencies; policy violation but not
> totally broken
> severity 677825 serious
Bug #677825 [tircd] Unable to update Twitter status
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:46:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673001: fixed in xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #673001,
regarding liblzma-dev contains wrong static library (liblzma.a)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:46:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#649522: fixed in xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #649522,
regarding liblzma-dev: undeclared Breaks against binutils-gold (linker prefers
unversioned symbol, causes rbuilddeps to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 677636 normal
Bug #677636 [samba4] samba4: fails to install - libsecurity.so not found
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677636: http://bugs.debian.org
Julien Cristau (18/06/2012):
> Only s390x is a regression though, AFAICT, so the others shouldn't
> matter?
Yeah, I meant to mention the distinction, but got distracted.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 23:15 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 22:41 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Quoting Ben Hutchings (2012-06-17 03:43:30)
> > > ii libnet-twitter-lite-perl 0.10003-1 interface to the Twitter API
> > I just noticed that you are using
reopen 676717
thanks
Hi Osamo,
sorry to disappoint you, but it is still not fixed at all.
On So, 17 Jun 2012, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> #1. Use proper sgml as test as attached.
Copied your test.sgml to my system, run it:
$ debiandoc2text test.sgml
nsgmls:/etc/sgml/xml-resume-library.cat:8:8:E: canno
Am Montag, den 18.06.2012, 00:38 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:23:38 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
> > > The attached patch solve the FTBS.
> >
> > Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their
oh, and BTW, nice job working on trying to use the system protobuf!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 16:43:55 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: cpl
> Version: 6.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> we have test failures on Linux archs, and missing files to install on
> kfreebsd-*. This prevents your package from migrating to testing, and
> the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 00:23:38 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
> > The attached patch solve the FTBS.
>
> Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their rules? We need to
> rename the ruby package. Can make this package support
Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 21:11 +0200 schrieb Rémi Vanicat:
> The attached patch solve the FTBS.
Can you please read [1] and check if we follow their rules? We need to
rename the ruby package. Can make this package support all supported
ruby versions?
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-an
the skia patch here is tested and critical for armel.
I am unable to test the rest cause I am having issues in the linking
stage with chromium 20 with symbols that should be provided by the vpx
library. I was using chromium-browser-20.0.1132.21~r139451-1
Since these problems do not seem arm-speci
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 22:41 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Quoting Ben Hutchings (2012-06-17 03:43:30)
> > ii libnet-twitter-lite-perl 0.10003-1 interface to the Twitter API
> I just noticed that you are using an old version of
> libnet-twitter-lite-perl. Can you upgrade to the
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:08:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677486: fixed in openjdk-7 7~u3-2.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677486,
regarding Multiple security issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
On 17/06/12 17:42, Ilya Barygin wrote:
> tags 667417 patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> #675181 is fixed, but wrapitk-python still FTBFS with gcc 4.7, now
> because of a problem in insighttoolkit headers. Here's the patch.
>
>
wrapitk-python gets it's sourcecode from the insighttoolkit.
I have attem
Steve McIntyre dixit:
>Digging further with the built-in debug TRACE function, I can see
>problems in usr/dash/eval.c:evalcommand(). The place where cmd
>switches from non-NULL to NULL is
>
> status = redirectsafe(cmd->ncmd.redirect, REDIR_PUSH|REDIR_SAVEFD2);
Yeah, I got approximately so far to
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:55:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677419: fixed in fdupes 1.50-PR2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #677419,
regarding fdupes: When using -L and traversing filesystems, removes files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:56:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677080: fixed in glance 2012.1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677080,
regarding glance-common: fails to upgrade from 'testing':
glance-common.postinst: 8: .: Can't open
/usr/share/dbconfig-common/dpkg/
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:18:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>shawn dixit:
>
>>"I am at wit's end." would be how I would translate it.
>
>Ah, thanks ;-)
>
>>no idea how to fix segfaults, sorry :).
>
>No problem. I think Iâve done my share too, thoughâ¦
>
>>However I don't think the linked is
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 21:11:39 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> Julien, could you delay the nmu more for a less intrusive patch to be
> found?
>
Rescheduled to 5 days.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Package: udev
Version: 175-3.1
Severity: serious
udev fails to start if ps is not available.
| /etc/init.d/udev: 131: /etc/init.d/udev: ps: not found
| [warn] udev does not support containers, not started ... (warning).
Bastian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers tes
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676765,
regarding libguac-client-vnc: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency:
libguac
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676764,
regarding guacd: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libguac-dev (< 0.6) b
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676736,
regarding node-mapnik: FTBFS: parse.hpp:155:9: internal compiler error:
Segm
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676033,
regarding node-stringprep: FTBFS: (.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676731,
regarding mapnik: FTBFS: parse.hpp:155:9: internal compiler error: Segmentati
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676018,
regarding tclxml: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lz
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #674378,
regarding apt-xapian-index: FTBFS: test failed
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676012,
regarding xerces-c: FTBFS: src/CreateDOMDocument/CreateDOMDocument.o: could n
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676010,
regarding grcompiler: FTBFS: gdlpp-cpp1.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #671974,
regarding ruby-actionmailer-3.2: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies:
ru
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #672095,
regarding serna-free: FTBFS: src/qtlocalpeer.cpp:103:54: error: '::getuid' ha
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #671969,
regarding phlipple: FTBFS: configure: error: The pkg-config script could not
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #71,
regarding tbb: FTBFS: test hang
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #41,
regarding kimwitu++: FTBFS: !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file ecrm1200): Font
ec
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #22,
regarding refcard: FTBFS:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/xelatex/xunicode
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #16,
regarding installation-guide: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
ko.te
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #666578,
regarding developers-reference: FTBFS:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/xel
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #622051,
regarding isakmpd: FTBFS: (.text+0x4f): undefined reference to `inflateEnd'
t
Those bugs are no longer reproducible in another rebuild in the same
conditions. Thus, closing them.
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hey,
Quoting Ben Hutchings (2012-06-17 03:43:30)
> ii libnet-twitter-lite-perl 0.10003-1 interface to the Twitter API
I just noticed that you are using an old version of
libnet-twitter-lite-perl. Can you upgrade to the current testing version
(0.11001-1) and see if you can still reproduce t
Rémi Vanicat writes:
[...]
> The attached patch solve the FTBS, but I don't know if I don't miss
> something as my ruby & xmms apps are only half working with this
> (https://github.com/vanicat/xmms-gtk-rater).
More test show that it was an incompatibility between my software and
ruby1.9, The p
Hi Ben,
Quoting Ben Hutchings (2012-06-17 03:43:30)
> Package: tircd
> Version: 0.21.2-2
> Severity: grave
>
> For the last few days, my attempts to set status through tircd have
> quietly done nothing. I assume this is due to a Twitter API change
> and might need to be fixed in libnet-twitter-l
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:22:49PM +0800, Danai SAE-HAN (ééè) wrote:
> > So you could call this one 0.9.9+release-1 and avoid having to use an
> > epoch. Â 0.9.9.0+git2012415-1 would also work. Â It seems a shame to
> > introduce an epoch for a case like this where the version numbers are
> >
Source: openfst
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.1
OpenFST 1.2-1 broke ABI without changing SONAMEs (at least
FLAGS_fst_pair_parentheses disappeared, probably more).
AFAICS OpenFST 1.3.2 breaks ABI again (an extra parameter was added to
the fst::StrToInt64 function).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 672048 patch
Bug #672048 [src:qwbfsmanager] qwbfsmanager: FTBFS:
src/gui/pColorButton.h:35:25: fatal error: FreshExport.h: No such file or
directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
tags 672048 patch
thanks
The needed patch is
https://github.com/pasnox/fresh/commit/ae40018bcd80ead2dcdefc0af63a92e50f69b3f6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Bastian, Alessio,
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:33 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The ceph upload in NEW tells:
> | * Limit archs to build on as leveldb dependency doesn't support all.
> The leveldb package is clearly not restricted to specific architectures,
> so this is not allowed.
While I agree
Benjamin Drung writes:
> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
>> should delay it longer.
>
> Dropping the ruby package seems to be the wrong f
2012/6/17 Cyril Brulebois :
> Hmm, sorry, I tried to dcut rm the NMU proposed by Tobias, but was a few
> minutes late. Do you want to get the NMU overriden by your upload, or
> will the NMU do the job?
>
> Sorry for the kinda-hasty sponsoring, but the freeze clock's ticking…
No problem, let's go w
Siegfried Gevatter (17/06/2012):
> 2012/6/17 Cyril Brulebois :
> > can you please publish a source package somewhere so that somebody
> > can sponsor your package?
>
> There you go: http://eurion.net/tmp/open-invaders_0.3-4.dsc
Hmm, sorry, I tried to dcut rm the NMU proposed by Tobias, but was a
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#668815: fixed in open-invaders 0.3-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #668815,
regarding open-invaders: FTBFS: ../headers/declare.h:80:30: fatal error:
../include/pmask.h: No such file or directory
to be mar
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#668815: fixed in open-invaders 0.3-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #668815,
regarding "open-invaders FTBFS: Uses macro ALLEGRO_LINUX falsely"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 668815 patch pending
Bug #668815 [src:open-invaders] "open-invaders FTBFS: Uses macro ALLEGRO_LINUX
falsely"
Bug #676025 [src:open-invaders] open-invaders: FTBFS:
../headers/declare.h:80:30: fatal error: ../include/pmask.h: No such file or
Further debugging notes:
(1) rebuilding without hardening doesn't change matters
(2) rolling back ncurses to 5.7+20100313-5, locales (libc) to 2.11.3-3
and rebuilding slang doesn't help.
--
Alastair McKinstry , ,
http://blog.sceal.ie
Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forev
tag 668815 patch pending
thanks
Tobias Hansen (17/06/2012):
> I also prepared a NMU, before Siegfried Gevatter wrote that mail. You
> could also upload that for now:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/open-invaders/open-invaders_0.3-3.2.dsc
Thanks! I only tweaked urgency=high (wil
2012/6/17 Cyril Brulebois :
> can you please publish a source package somewhere so that somebody
> can sponsor your package?
There you go: http://eurion.net/tmp/open-invaders_0.3-4.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Am 17.06.2012 20:10, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Hello,
>
> Siegfried Gevatter (06/06/2012):
>> Thanks for your patch & explanation!
>>
>> I have an upload ready, but debian-keyring got the idea that my key
>> expired, so at some point eventually I'll upload it :P.
>
> can you please publish a so
Hi,
If this bug relates to JIT, it could be the same as #673469 seen on
armel, still unfixed upstream but disabling JIT for now is a suggested
workaround.
My mipsel hardware is probably not powerful enough to rebuild webkit to
try this myself, though...
p.s.: disabling JavaScript in Midori made
Hello,
Siegfried Gevatter (06/06/2012):
> Thanks for your patch & explanation!
>
> I have an upload ready, but debian-keyring got the idea that my key
> expired, so at some point eventually I'll upload it :P.
can you please publish a source package somewhere so that somebody
can sponsor your pa
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676762: fixed in cpl 6.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676762,
regarding esorex: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libcpl-dev (>= 5.1.0)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676759: fixed in cpl 6.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676759,
regarding python-cpl: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libcpl-dev (>=
5.1.0)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#671675: fixed in cpl 6.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #671675,
regarding libcpl-dev: uninstallable in sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
> tag 650359 + unreproducible
> thanks
> Hello,
> I can't reproduce this bug on my machine. I'll try running gmpc in
> longer sessions, where the bug may be triggered.
> If anyone else is affected, please let me know !
> glyr & the new version of gmpc probably won't make it into wheezy, so
> fi
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:54:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675837: fixed in protobuf 2.4.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #675837,
regarding protobuf: FTBFS[!linux]: error: 'isatty' was not declared in this
scope
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
tag 650359 + unreproducible
thanks
Hello,
I can't reproduce this bug on my machine. I'll try running gmpc in
longer sessions, where the bug may be triggered.
If anyone else is affected, please let me know !
glyr & the new version of gmpc probably won't make it into wheezy, so
fixing this bug is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 650359 + unreproducible
Bug #650359 [gmpc] segmentation fault gmpc
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
650359: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650359
D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 646540 + patch
Bug #646540 [phpgacl] phpgacl: uninstallable in sid, needs to transition to
smarty3
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 646540 + pending
Bug #646540 [phpgacl] phpgacl: uninstallable in sid, needs to transition to
smarty3
Added tag(s)
Yes, I will make an upload hopefully today.
Regards
Javier
El 17/06/2012 19:14, "Adam D. Barratt" escribió:
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 18:18 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Now we just have to figure out why it fa...
Is there any chance of an upload including the updated patch (or an
alternative so
tags 646540 + patch
tags 646540 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for phpgacl (versioned as 3.3.7-7.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers
Luk
diff -u phpgacl-3.3.7/debian/changelog phpgacl-3.3.7/debian/changelog
---
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 19:35 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> The package was binNMU'ed as part of the mysqlclient transition.
>
> Here is a sample log file.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scilab-scimysql&arch=powerpc&ver=0.1.1-3%2Bb1&stamp=1339264256
FWIW, only the powerpc and s3
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:23:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673215: fixed in libsvm 3.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #673215,
regarding libsvm: FTBFS in sid with newer dpkg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Hi Ana,
Ana Guerrero (17/06/2012):
> Your package is one of the last 5 remaining packages in unstable using
> Qt3. I haven't pushed for the removal until now because you have told
> me you were working in a possible Qt4 version. The freeze is close, I
> don't know the date yet, but if you don't
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 18:18 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Now we just have to figure out why it fails to build on all buildds,
> although it built for me on amd64 and for you on i386 :/
>
> Ah, here we are: it's "build vs. build-arch".
>
> Hm, seems liks build-basic get called again from build-
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:02:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676201: fixed in racc 1.4.8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #676201,
regarding racc: FTBFS: /usr/bin/rd2:198:in `===': invalid byte sequence in
US-ASCII (ArgumentError)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 677893 pending
Bug #677893 [src:cpl] cpl: FTBFS on armel, ia64, kfreebsd-*, s390x, sparc
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
677893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 15:23:16 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
>> Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2012, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> > I've prepared an NMU for xmms2 (versioned as 0.8+dfsg-2.1) and
>> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667417 patch
Bug #667417 [wrapitk-python] wrapitk-python: ftbfs with recent gccxml
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
tags 667417 patch
thanks
Hello,
#675181 is fixed, but wrapitk-python still FTBFS with gcc 4.7, now
because of a problem in insighttoolkit headers. Here's the patch.
Description: adapt headers to gcc 4.7
Author: Ilya Barygin
--- insighttoolkit-3.20.1+git20120521.orig/Code/Review/Statistics/itkW
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
