Processed: correct version info

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 664983 8.12-4 Bug #664983 [libpcre3] libpcre3: wrong SONAME No longer marked as found in versions pcre3/8.12-4. > found 664983 8.30-1 Bug #664983 [libpcre3] libpcre3: wrong SONAME Marked as found in versions pcre3/8.30-1. > thanks Stoppin

Bug#664983: Same thing on amd64.

Same thing on amd64. libpcre3-8.30-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: tagging 636460

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 636460 + sid wheezy Bug #636460 {Done: Jordi Mallach } [accerciser] provide ipython 0.11 compatibility Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636460: http://bugs.debian.

Processed: severity of 625834 is serious, retitle 625834 to nxml interferes with psgml's `xml-mode\' autoload

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 625834 serious Bug #625834 [emacs23-el] psgml: does not work (?) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > retitle 625834 nxml interferes with psgml's `xml-mode\' autoload Bug #625834 [emacs23-el] psgml: does not work (?) Changed Bug t

Processed: Re: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#664917: kcm-fcitx: FTBFS: FcitxSubConfigParser.cpp:85:102: error: 'FcitxXDGGetPath' was not declared in this scope

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 664917 + pending Bug #664917 [src:kcm-fcitx] kcm-fcitx: FTBFS: FcitxSubConfigParser.cpp:85:102: error: 'FcitxXDGGetPath' was not declared in this scope Added tag(s) pending. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#664983: libpcre3: wrong SONAME

Package: libpcre3 Version: 8.12-4 Severity: grave Hello, On my system I have libpcre3 (8.12-4) which ships: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3 But on armhf buildd, its using libpcre3 (8.30-1) which ships: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libpcre.so.2 That makes buildd very unhappy, failing

Bug#664958: marked as done (bzr-gtk: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: gir1.2-appindicator3-0.1)

: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#652802: marked as done (ruby-image-science: FTBFS: tests failed)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2012 01:02:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652802: fixed in ruby-parsetree 3.0.8-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #652802, regarding ruby-image-science: FTBFS: tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: tagging 663669

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not failing on squeeze > tags 663669 + wheezy sid Bug #663669 [xpyb] xpyb: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'ListType' object has no attribute 'parent' Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: tagging 663671

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not failing on squeeze > tags 663671 + wheezy sid Bug #663671 [umview] umview: FTBFS: error: 'lwip_vdeif_add' undeclared here (not in a function) Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#664912: marked as done (node-sqlite3: FTBFS: ../src/sqlite3.cc:3:25: fatal error: node_events.h: No such file or directory)

Version: 2.0.17+ds1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering directory `/«BUILD

Processed: tagging 663943

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not failing on squeeze > tags 663943 + wheezy sid Bug #663943 [visualboyadvance] visualboyadvance: FTBFS with current zlib Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 663943: htt

Bug#664913: marked as done (node-glob: FTBFS: ../src/glob.cc:150:76: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive])

ms --- Begin Message --- Source: node-glob Version: 2.0.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make

Processed: Re: Bug#664919: obexpushd: FTBFS: bluetooth.h:159:9: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'typeof'

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 664919 libbluetooth-dev Bug #664919 [src:obexpushd] obexpushd: FTBFS: bluetooth.h:159:9: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'typeof' Bug reassigned from package 'src:obexpushd' to 'libbluetooth-dev'. No longer marked as foun

Bug#664919: obexpushd: FTBFS: bluetooth.h:159:9: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'typeof'

reassign 664919 libbluetooth-dev retitle 664919 libbluetooth-dev makes obexpushd FTBFS forcemerge 661879 664919 thanks It's a duplicate of #661879 I reassigned to libbluetooth-dev. It happens even if built with libbluetooth-dev 4.99-1. Merging. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ..

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile"): > Russ Allbery writes: > > Russ Allbery writes: > >> B. The Technical Committee affirms the Debian Policy requirement that > >>debian/rules must be a makefile. All packages in the archive, > >>including leave, are

Processed: tagging 664188

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not failing on squeeze > tags 664188 + wheezy sid Bug #664188 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [gdcm] insighttoolkit: FTBFS: Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664188: http:

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile"): > Russ Allbery writes: > > Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus > > further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw > > dh: > > > A. debian/rules is not required to

Processed: Re: [ovs-dev] Bug#663051: Lots of (sometimes serious)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # My upload of OVS 1.4.0+git20120321 is at least intended to fix > # all the important lintian violation reported in bug #663051 with > # the exceptions of ones due to shipping files that aren't actually > # used in the openvswitch-datapath-dkms p

Bug#663051: [ovs-dev] Bug#663051: Lots of (sometimes serious)

# My upload of OVS 1.4.0+git20120321 is at least intended to fix # all the important lintian violation reported in bug #663051 with # the exceptions of ones due to shipping files that aren't actually # used in the openvswitch-datapath-dkms package. In my judgment, # this is no longer a "serious" s

Bug#664900: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19:47PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:37PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > t/dhe.t > > > > Failed 2/3 subtests > > > > In fact this

Bug#647999: marked as done (rabbitvcs-nautilus needs updating.)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:22:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#647999: fixed in rabbitvcs 0.15.0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #647999, regarding rabbitvcs-nautilus needs updating. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#644690: marked as done (rabbitvcs-nautilus: Please transition to nautilus 3 and GObject introspection)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:22:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#644690: fixed in rabbitvcs 0.15.0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #644690, regarding rabbitvcs-nautilus: Please transition to nautilus 3 and GObject introspection to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#635123: marked as done (rabbitvcs-gedit: Please update for gedit 3.0 plugin path changes)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:22:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#635123: fixed in rabbitvcs 0.15.0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #635123, regarding rabbitvcs-gedit: Please update for gedit 3.0 plugin path changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#663686: marked as done (libzorp3.9-5: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/libzorpproxy.so.0.0.0)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:19:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#663686: fixed in zorp 3.9.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #663686, regarding libzorp3.9-5: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/libzorpproxy.so.0.0.0 to be marked as done. This

Bug#663549: marked as done (libzorp3.9-5 and libzorp3.9-0: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:19:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#663549: fixed in zorp 3.9.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #663549, regarding libzorp3.9-5 and libzorp3.9-0: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Processed: severity of 664853 is grave

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 664853 grave Bug #664853 [php5-curl] php5-curl: update to 5.4.0-2 fails Severity set to 'grave' from 'minor' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Processed: limit source to node-glob, tagging 664913

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #node-glob (3.1.7-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * New upstream version > #- the package is now no more compiled (Closes: #664913) > # > limit source node-glob Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'node-glob' Li

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#664913: node-glob: FTBFS: ../src/glob.cc:150:76: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 664913 pending Bug #664913 [src:node-glob] node-glob: FTBFS: ../src/glob.cc:150:76: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive] Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please c

Bug#664913: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#664913: node-glob: FTBFS: ../src/glob.cc:150:76: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive]

tags 664913 pending thanks On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:28:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: node-glob > Version: 2.0.9-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Bug#664900: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:37PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > t/dhe.t > > > Failed 2/3 subtests > > In fact this one does not fail in a wheezy build with 1.42-1+b1. > > Okay to reassign this t

Bug#660269: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: cat: /tmp/sslh_test.pid: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:17:39 +0100 with message-id <1332364659.18619.3.ca...@yamcha.kamehouse.iroqwa.org> and subject line Re: Bug#660269: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: cat: /tmp/sslh_test.pid: No such file or directory has caused the Debian Bug report #660269, regarding FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

Bug#664900: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > t/dhe.t > > Failed 2/3 subtests In fact this one does not fail in a wheezy build with 1.42-1+b1. Okay to reassign this to libnet-ssleay-perl and add a affects libio-socket-ssl-perl? Regards, Salvato

Bug#660269: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: cat: /tmp/sslh_test.pid: No such file or directory

Le mardi 20 mars 2012 à 21:58 +0100, Guillaume Delacour a écrit : > Le mercredi 07 mars 2012 à 02:33 +0100, Guillaume Delacour a écrit : > > > > I'm afraid, there is another problem with fano and field schroots: > > 127.0.0.1 appears to point twice to localhost, so sslh try to listen > > twice to

Bug#664960: python-melangeclient: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named setuptools

Source: python-melangeclient Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > faker

Bug#664958: bzr-gtk: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: gir1.2-appindicator3-0.1

Source: bzr-gtk Version: 0.103.0+bzr780-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#664957: gdc-4.4: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: gcc-4.4-source (< 4.4.7) but 4.4.7-1 is to be installed

Source: gdc-4.4 Version: 1.063-4.4.6-10 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#664956: getdp: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libpetsc3.1-dev, libslepc3.1-dev

Source: getdp Version: 2.1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#664955: haskell-hledger-vty: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libghc-hledger-dev (< 0.16.2) but 0.17-2+b1 is to be installed

Source: haskell-hledger-vty Version: 0.16.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#664954: gdc-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: gcc-4.6-source (< 4.6.3) but 4.6.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gdc-4.6 Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#664953: hpodder: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libghc-haxml-dev (< 1:1.21~) but 1:1.22.5-2+b1 is to be installed

Source: hpodder Version: 1.1.5.0+nmu3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#664950: goplay: FTBFS: ../libxdgutils/libxdgutils.a: could not read symbols: Bad value

Source: goplay Version: 0.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: ../libxdgut

Bug#664949: dillo: FTBFS: bw.o: could not read symbols: Bad value

Source: dillo Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: b

Bug#664948: gmsh: FTBFS: CMakeFiles/gmsh.dir/Fltk/Main.cpp.o: could not read symbols: Bad value

Source: gmsh Version: 2.5.1~beta2~svn11604~dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/

Bug#664947: epm: FTBFS: libepm.a: could not read symbols: Bad value

Source: epm Version: 4.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: libepm.a(suppor

Bug#664946: spatialite-tools: FTBFS: libsqlite3.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation

Source: spatialite-tools Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: n

Bug#664944: nipype: FTBFS: tries to access $HOME

Source: nipype Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#664943: imview: FTBFS: imview.o: could not read symbols: Bad value

Source: imview Version: 1.1.9c-8 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: imvie

Bug#664942: freepops: FTBFS: linker.cxx:60: undefined reference to `luaL_pushresult'

Source: freepops Version: 0.2.9-5 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-li

Bug#664941: flpsed: FTBFS: GsWidget.o: could not read symbols: Bad value

Source: flpsed Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/ld: GsWidge

Bug#664940: pyentropy: FTBFS: tries to write to $HOME

Source: pyentropy Version: 0.4-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Enter

Bug#664939: egenix-mx-base: FTBFS: _configtest.c:5: undefined reference to `clock_gettime'

Source: egenix-mx-base Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -pthr

Processed: severity of 628247 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not a parallel build issue > severity 628247 serious Bug #628247 [src:sofia-sip] sofia-sip: FTBFS: ./sofia-sip/sip_extra.h:2:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping proc

Bug#664938: tqsllib: FTBFS: openssl_cert.cpp:1587:2: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'stack_st_OPENSSL_BLOCK*' [-fpermissive]

Source: tqsllib Version: 2.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /bin/bash ./libtool --

Bug#664937: openchange: FTBFS: libsmbconf.so.0: undefined reference to `dbwrap_delete_bystring@SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18'

Source: openchange Version: 1:0.11.dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin

Bug#664936: ax25mail-utils: FTBFS: ulistd.c:57:52: fatal error: netax25/kernel_ax25.h: No such file or directory

Source: ax25mail-utils Version: 0.11-6.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > x86_64-linux-

Bug#664935: octave-ad: FTBFS: ov-grad.cc:74:41: error: no matching function for call to 'octave_value::print_with_name(std::ostream&, const char [6], bool) const'

Source: octave-ad Version: 1.0.6-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules bu

Bug#664933: fceu: FTBFS: file.c:157:20: error: request for member 'have' in something not a structure or union

Source: fceu Version: 0.98.12-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -DPACKAGE_N

Bug#664931: jzip: FTBFS: fileio.c:97:18: error: request for member 'have' in something not a structure or union

Source: jzip Version: 210r20001005d-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -Wall -g

Bug#664932: aprsdigi: FTBFS: testparse.c:19:33: fatal error: netax25/kernel_ax25.h: No such file or directory

Source: aprsdigi Version: 2.4.4-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: >

Bug#664930: openldap: FTBFS: smbk5pwd.c:471:4: error: too few arguments to function 'hdb_generate_key_set_password'

Source: openldap Version: 2.4.28-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ../../../debian/bu

Bug#664929: ekiga: FTBFS: connection.h:1879:5: error: 'virtual ptlib_virtual_function_changed_or_removed****** OpalConnection::IsConnectionOnHold()' is private

Source: ekiga Version: 3.2.7-4.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /bin/b

Bug#664928: warmux: FTBFS: ./action/action.cpp:88:18: error: reinterpret_cast from type 'const char*' to type 'Uint32* {aka unsigned int*}' casts away qualifiers

Source: warmux Version: 1:11.04.1+repack-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: >

Bug#664926: node-mapnik: FTBFS: ../src/mapnik_map.cpp:583:65: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive]

Source: node-mapnik Version: 0.5.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Enter

Bug#664927: python-drizzle: FTBFS: interface/globals.i:82: Error: Unable to find 'libdrizzle/constants.h'

Source: python-drizzle Version: 1.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Enter

Bug#664925: viruskiller: FTBFS: src/pak.cpp:134:16: error: cannot convert 'FILE* {aka _IO_FILE*}' to 'gzFile' for argument '1' to 'int gzclose(gzFile)'

Source: viruskiller Version: 1.0-1.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ `sdl-con

Bug#664923: wmauda: FTBFS: wmauda.c:19:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory

Source: wmauda Version: 0.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc -Wall -g -Wl,--as-nee

Bug#664924: kbibtex: FTBFS: bibtexfileview.h:58:5: error: 'KSharedConfigPtr' does not name a type

Source: kbibtex Version: 0.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Entering direct

Bug#664922: odin: FTBFS: fileio_lipsia.cpp:546:44: error: call of overloaded 'storeScal(int, VAttrRec*&, const char [4])' is ambiguous

Source: odin Version: 1.8.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /bin/bash ../libtool --

Bug#664921: octave-octgpr: FTBFS: pdist2_mw.cc:161:24: error: 'MArray2' does not name a type

Source: octave-octgpr Version: 1.2.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Enter

Bug#664919: obexpushd: FTBFS: bluetooth.h:159:9: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'typeof'

Source: obexpushd Version: 0.11.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Enter

Bug#664918: octave-fixed: FTBFS: Array-f.cc:63:29: fatal error: octave/MArray2.cc: No such file or directory

Source: octave-fixed Version: 0.7.10-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules bu

Bug#664916: node-zipfile: FTBFS: ../src/node_zipfile.cpp:226:73: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive]

Source: node-zipfile Version: 0.2.4+ds1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Enter

Bug#664917: kcm-fcitx: FTBFS: FcitxSubConfigParser.cpp:85:102: error: 'FcitxXDGGetPath' was not declared in this scope

Source: kcm-fcitx Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: Enter

Bug#664915: tcsh: FTBFS: | /«PKGBUILDDIR»/conftest.c:20: undefined reference to `crypt'

Source: tcsh Version: 6.18.01-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -o tcsh -Wl,-z,relro

Bug#664914: desmume: FTBFS: ROMReader.cpp:143:14: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'gzFile' [-fpermissive]

Source: desmume Version: 0.9.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ -DPACKAGE_N

Bug#664913: node-glob: FTBFS: ../src/glob.cc:150:76: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(eio_req*)' to 'void (*)(eio_req*)' [-fpermissive]

Source: node-glob Version: 2.0.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Enter

Bug#664912: node-sqlite3: FTBFS: ../src/sqlite3.cc:3:25: fatal error: node_events.h: No such file or directory

Source: node-sqlite3 Version: 2.0.17+ds1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > mak

Bug#664911: octave-nurbs: FTBFS: bspeval.cc:62:71: error: 'u' is predetermined 'shared' for 'shared'

Source: octave-nurbs Version: 1.3.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules bu

Bug#664910: xbubble: FTBFS: loadpng.c:58:8: error: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]

Source: xbubble Version: 0.5.11.2-3.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFI

Bug#664909: stardict-tools: FTBFS: resourcewrap.hpp:70:49: error: could not convert template argument 'gzclose' to 'int (*)(void*)'

Source: stardict-tools Version: 3.0.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ -DHAVE_CONFI

Bug#664908: postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: Backend.c:214:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Source: postgresql-pljava Version: 1.4.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -c -g

Bug#664907: tennix: FTBFS: network.c:189:28: error: reinterpret_cast from type 'const Uint32* {aka const unsigned int*}' to type 'Uint32* {aka unsigned int*}' casts away qualifiers

Source: tennix Version: 1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ -W -Wall -ansi -pedan

Bug#664906: audacious-dumb: FTBFS: audacious-dumb.h:41:32: fatal error: audacious/configdb.h: No such file or directory

Source: audacious-dumb Version: 0.65-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > cc -o obj/audaci

Processed: affects 659861

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 659861 + security.debian.org Bug #659861 [cvs] cvs contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz Bug #664872 [cvs] cvs: Excess dir.gz file in /usr/share/info Added indication that 659861 affects security.debian.org Added indication that 664872 affects s

Bug#651317: pike7.8: FTBFS on i386: Segmentation fault

tag 651317 + patch # in theory: 651317 and 640818 should be merged, not sure if the BTS # has recovered yet thanks On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:56:26 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > pike7.8 FTBFS on i386: > | Making dynamic: post_modules/GL > | Original CFLAGS: -g -g -ggdb3 -mtune=i686 -O3 -pipe -W -W

Processed: Re: Bug#651317: pike7.8: FTBFS on i386: Segmentation fault

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 651317 + patch Bug #651317 [src:pike7.8] pike7.8: FTBFS on i386: Segmentation fault Added tag(s) patch. > # in theory: 651317 and 640818 should be merged, not sure if the BTS > # has recovered yet > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Processed: Patch for x86info/kfreebsd

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 662658 +patch Bug #662658 [src:x86info] x86info: FTBFS(kfreebsd): fatal error: asm/mtrr.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662658: http://bugs.de

Bug#662658: Patch for x86info/kfreebsd

tag 662658 +patch kthxbye Hi! The patch below compiles on both linux-amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64. I have tested the resulting binary on both architectures and it seems to work. output of `x86info -a` on the same hardware (Thinkpad X220 with Intel i5 2520M) is identical (apart from 2 different regi

Bug#664900: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test

Source: libio-socket-ssl-perl Version: 1.59-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 libio-socket-ssl-perl FTBFS: >dh_auto_test > make[1]: Entering directory > `/build/salvi-libio-socket-ssl-perl_1.59-1-amd64-fsWlQT/libio-socket-ssl-perl-1.59'

Bug#664895: Info received (squirrelmail: completely broken with PHP 5.4)

I should say that the version of SM in testing/unstable (2:1.4.22-1) actually works much better even than the experimental version and only requires hex2bin to be fixed. A patch for that looks like it's already been submitted upstream: --- http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

Russ Allbery writes: > Russ Allbery writes: >> Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus >> further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw >> dh: >> A. debian/rules is not required to be a makefile, only to implement the >>same interface

Bug#664895: squirrelmail: completely broken with PHP 5.4

Package: squirrelmail Version: 2:1.5.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable With the upgrade to PHP 5.4.0 coming down the pipeline, SquirrelMail has been rendered unusable. Commenting out the session_(un)register functions get things working somewhat again, but SM is

Processed: tagging 639857

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 639857 + wheezy sid Bug #639857 [nvidia-cg-toolkit] nvidia-cg-toolkit: Fails to install with libc6 (>= 2.13-17) Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 639857: http://bug

Bug#664820: marked as done (samba4: FTBFS: ../source4/kdc/pac-glue.c:484:2: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of 'hdb_enctype2key')

Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:50:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664820: fixed in samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #664820, regarding samba4: FTBFS: ../source4/kdc/pac-glue.c:484:2: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of 'hdb_enctype2key' to

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

Russ Allbery writes: > Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus > further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw > dh: > A. debian/rules is not required to be a makefile, only to implement the >same interface as a debian/rules file implem

Bug#659861: Bug#664872: broken cvs in squeeze-security

Dixi quod… >For the record, the package I would have uploaded to fix the security >issue, with a non-bogus version number, did not have this issue: In fact, neither do the auto-built packages on e.g. armel which I can download to verify that. So I highly suspect someone entrusted with debian-sec

Processed: broken cvs in squeeze-security

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 659861 664872 Bug #659861 [cvs] cvs contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz Bug #664872 [cvs] cvs: Excess dir.gz file in /usr/share/info Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Added indication that 664872 affects release.debian.org Marked as f

Bug#659861: broken cvs in squeeze-security

forcemerge 659861 664872 thanks Jens Stimpfle dixit: >Package: cvs >Version: 1:1.12.13-12+squeeze1 > >The last cvs package build apparently generates a global info index file This report is a duplicate so I’m merging them. Bernhard R. Link dixit: >So it would be nice to fix that package in st

Processed: tagging 615520

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 615520 + patch Bug #615520 [python-turbogears] python-turbogears: broken dependency list Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 615520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

  1   2   >