Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:
>> Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus >> further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw >> dh: >> A. debian/rules is not required to be a makefile, only to implement the >> same interface as a debian/rules file implemented as a makefile >> (including handling of arguments and exit status). Debian Policy >> should be updated to change the requirement to a recommendation, and >> new versions of the leave package should be permitted to be uploaded to >> the archive without changing debian/rules to be a makefile. >> B. The Technical Committee affirms the Debian Policy requirement that >> debian/rules must be a makefile. All packages in the archive, >> including leave, are required to follow this requirement. This >> makefile may, as is common practice, delegate implementation of its >> targets to a script. >> C. Further discussion. > Hearing no objections, I call for a vote on this ballot. I vote BAC. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
pgpK6PKSwDYEW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
