Bug#633829: libpthread-workqueue: FTBFS: src/posix/manager.c:343:134: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Werror=sign-compare]

2011-07-13 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: libpthread-workqueue Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, libpthread-workqueue FTBFS on some architecture. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libpthread-workqueue http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libpthread-workqueue - checking for err

Processed: Re: Bug#633814: [src:gnome-applets] FTBFS: fatal error: dbus/dbus.h: No such file or directory

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 633814 liboobs-1-dev Bug #633814 [src:gnome-applets] [src:gnome-applets] FTBFS: fatal error: dbus/dbus.h: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'src:gnome-applets' to 'liboobs-1-dev'. Bug No longer marked as found in vers

Bug#633814: [src:gnome-applets] FTBFS: fatal error: dbus/dbus.h: No such file or directory

2011-07-13 Thread Michael Biebl
reassign 633814 liboobs-1-dev forcemerge 629891 633814 affects 629891 src:gnome-applets affects 629891 src:gnome-system-tools thanks Hi Mònica, Am 14.07.2011 01:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda: > > I tried to build this package with pbuilder and it fails to build with > the following error: >

Bug#626720: support in squeeze

2011-07-13 Thread Russell Coker
What I want to do is to have a policy in squeeze that supports running wheezy in a basic configuration. If a daemon that is in wheezy gets a new feature and breaks then I'm not too bothered (I am not aiming for full compatibility). But I want to have the basics work for everyone (which include

Bug#626720: sorry for being slack

2011-07-13 Thread Russell Coker
I'm working on this now. http://userspace.selinuxproject.org/trac/browser/libselinux/src?order=date&desc=1 http://userspace.selinuxproject.org/trac/wiki/Releases Firstly please tell me what libraries you used when testing this patch? It seems that the necessary patch to libselinux was first pro

Processed: severity of 633644 is important

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 633644 important Bug #633644 [tomcat6-common] tomcat6-common: JSP including JSPF are not compiling with the jasper-jdt.jar while it is working with the bundle package downloaded from the source Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

Bug#633644: tomcat6-common: JSP including JSPF are not compiling with the jasper-jdt.jar while it is working with the bundle package downloaded from the source

2011-07-13 Thread tony mancill
Hi, This doesn't sound like a grave bug as there are many functioning parts of tomcat6 in the current package. I take it the issue is with running liferay - can you please provide more information about JSP that is causing problems? Thank you, tony On 07/12/2011 05:11 AM, Network Services wrote

Bug#633821: znc: FTBFS: configure: error: swig was not found.

2011-07-13 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: znc Version: 0.098-2 Severity: serious Hi, znc FTBFS on latest unstable. I comfirmed on pbuilder/amd64. And you can see this problem on buildlog of powerpcspe, sh4 and sparc64. http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=znc - checking for c_ares... yes checking for openssl

Bug#633710: [Python-modules-team] Bug#633710: swiginac: FTBFS: swiginac_wrap.cpp:6138: error: 'asdict' is not a member of 'swig::traits_from

2011-07-13 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2011/7/13 Sebastian Ramacher : > # bug in swig > block 633710 with 633766 > thanks > > On 07/13/2011 05:16 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall >> -Wstrict-prototypes -g -O2 -g -O2 -Wall -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.6 >> -c swiginac_wr

Processed: fixed 628261 in 1.81.6-8.2

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 628261 1.81.6-8.2 Bug #628261 {Done: Axel Beckert } [src:nvi] nvi: FTBFS: configure: error: Need DB 3. Bug Marked as fixed in versions nvi/1.81.6-8.2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 628261:

Bug#633814: [src:gnome-applets] FTBFS: fatal error: dbus/dbus.h: No such file or directory

2011-07-13 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Package: src:gnome-applets Version: 2.30.0-3 Severity: serious Hi, I tried to build this package with pbuilder and it fails to build with the following error: --- gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I. -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/inc

Bug#633484:

2011-07-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
- Original message - > This patch solves the problem for sid upgrades and squeeze->sid > upgrade, please test it. > > Regards > > -- > Angel Abad Hi, thanks a lot for this patch. Unfortunately I'm flying to France in few hours, and later I'll be busy with friends I haven't seen in yea

Bug#614010: patching problem of xenomai still persists

2011-07-13 Thread Clayton Audi
Attempted to patch kernel and ran into same issue as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614010 Bug has been closed as fixed but still: dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please use '--print-architecture' instead. START applying xenomai patch (Xenoma

Bug#630818: marked as done (Invalid Maintainer)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:32:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#630818: fixed in diff-ext 0.3.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #630818, regarding Invalid Maintainer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#611618: marked as done (FTBFS binutils-gold)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:32:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#611618: fixed in fische 3.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #611618, regarding FTBFS binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#633810: Build-depends on vala-desktop-agnostic

2011-07-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: src:avant-window-navigator Version: 0.4.0-2.1 Severity: serious Recent vala upload merged vala-desktop-agnostic into libdesktop-agnostic-dev, so the former is no longer available in unstable. As avant-window-navigator already build-depends on libdesktop-agnostic-dev, it should be easy to

Bug#633809: Build-depends on libcucul-dev

2011-07-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: src:crystalspace Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Recent libcaca upload dropped libcucul-dev, a transitional package for libcaca-dev. As crystalspace already build-depends on libcaca-dev, it should be straightforward to get rid of libcucul-dev. Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Lu

Bug#633452: marked as done (fstrim: fails to install, trying to overwrite other packages files)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:38:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#633697: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #633452, regarding fstrim: fails to install, trying to overwrite other packages files to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#627579: marked as done (util-linux: ..trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/fstrim.8.gz', which is also in package fstrim 0.2-2)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:38:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#633697: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #627579, regarding util-linux: ..trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man8/fstrim.8.gz', which is also in package fstrim 0.2-2 to be mar

Bug#631829: marked as done (FTBFS almost everywhere)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:32:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#631829: fixed in bin-prot 1.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #631829, regarding FTBFS almost everywhere to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: Re: Bug#633781: HTTP process runs with root privileges

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package gracie Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'gracie' Limit currently set to 'package':'gracie' > severity 633781 minor Bug #633781 [gracie] HTTP process runs with root privileges Severity set to 'minor' from 's

Bug#633781: HTTP process runs with root privileges

2011-07-13 Thread Ben Finney
package gracie severity 633781 minor thanks On 13-Jul-2011, Daniel Pocock wrote: > The gracie daemon runs with root privileges Yes. > The daemon is a HTTP server that is intended to listen for > connections from the public internet. No, it is not intended to listen on the public internet. Howe

Bug#554657: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:04:52 +0200 with message-id <4e1e0874.9000...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#554657: FTBFS with binutils-gold has caused the Debian Bug report #554657, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processed: your mail

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 633484 +patch Bug #633484 [libdbi-dev] libdbi-dev: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libdbi.a', which is also in package libdbi1 0.8.4-1 Added tag(s) patch. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#633484:

2011-07-13 Thread Angel Abad
This patch solves the problem for sid upgrades and squeeze->sid upgrade, please test it. Regards -- Angel Abad angela...@gmail.com | angela...@ubuntu.com | angela...@fsfe.org http://www.pastelero.net FPR: EBF6 080D 59D4 008A DF47  00D4 098D AE47 EE3B C279 libdbi_0.8.5-6.debdiff Description: Bi

Bug#631820: Fix found, awaiting upstream feedback

2011-07-13 Thread Clint Byrum
The problem here is just that the autoconf ac_pkg_swig.m4 snippet used in the m4 dir of gearman-interface is broken and cannot detect swig versions greater than 1.x. There is an updated macro available in the latest version of autoconf-archive, which I've asked upstream to include (they do not hav

Processed: tagging 631820

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 631820 + pending Bug #631820 [src:gearman-interface] gearman-interface: FTBFS: SWIG version >= 1.3.31 is required. You have 2.0.4. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 631820

Bug#554657: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2011-07-13 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Hi, I tested this bug ans it's not present at least at version 2.30.2-4. Moreover, in debian/changelong, we can read: gnome-panel (2.30.2-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/0001-build-explicitly-link-to-xrandr.patch: + New patch from upstream git, fix build with --as-needed.

Bug#628261: marked as done (nvi: FTBFS: configure: error: Need DB 3.)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:54:10 +0200 with message-id <20110713195410.gr29...@sym.noone.org> and subject line Bug#628261 (nvi: FTBFS: configure: error: Need DB 3.) fixed with last NMU has caused the Debian Bug report #628261, regarding nvi: FTBFS: configure: error: Need DB 3. to be ma

Bug#631187: Kernel panics when removing external hard drive

2011-07-13 Thread Alexander Kurtz
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 22:03 +1000, Linh Nguyen wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > How are you? I came across your post > http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/06/msg00580.html detailing > similar issue as to what I am experiencing. > > Every time I unmount a portable HDD (normal USB sticks are

Bug#632343: ucommon: FTBFS - tries to run doxygen even in binary-only builds

2011-07-13 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Jonas Smedegaard writes: > When looking at [0] which I guess is an example failure caused by this > bug, it seems to me that the buildd invokes "debian/rules build" which > as I understand it will cause both -arch and -indep parts to be build. Yes, your understanding is correct; sorry if that

Bug#633789: guake: Guake doesnt start at all

2011-07-13 Thread Eloi COUTANT
Package: guake Version: 0.4.2-5 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Hi everyone, There is a problem with my version of guake, i get this issue : Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/guake/guake.py", line 1353, in if not main(): File "/usr/lib/guake/guake.

Bug#631891: marked as done (kfreebsd-9: FTBFS on mipsel: tries to chmod absent malta modules)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:27:41 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#631891: kfreebsd-9: FTBFS on mipsel: tries to chmod absent malta modules has caused the Debian Bug report #631891, regarding kfreebsd-9: FTBFS on mipsel: tries to chmod absent malta modules to be marked a

Bug#631968: aborts on start (GNU/kFreeBSD)

2011-07-13 Thread Robert Millan
2011/7/10 Robert Millan : > Bug only appears when upgrading gnome-terminal itself. I bisected gnome-terminal and found that the problem was introduced with the GDBus migration: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-terminal/commit/?id=fdf01b94d14d7f9c4df7e9f762f851d0800c4927 -- Robert Millan --

Bug#633600: [Openstack] Fwd: Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

2011-07-13 Thread Jay Pipes
Hey Thomas, File a bug on this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/810051 Cheers! jay On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > Seems debian/copyright isn't correct and needs some refinement. > > I don't think that openwrt-x86-ext2.image and openwrt-x86-vmlinuz should

Bug#633781: HTTP process runs with root privileges

2011-07-13 Thread Daniel Pocock
Package: gracie Severity: serious Version: 0.2.11-1 Tags: security The gracie daemon runs with root privileges The daemon is a HTTP server that is intended to listen for connections from the public internet. Therefore, it should not be root. However, some of the pam functionality requires ro

Bug#633764: starman: failing tests

2011-07-13 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > starman FTBFS due to test failures: Weird, it builds fine here (sid pbuilder on amd64). Could you please try the version on SVN (0.2013-1)? It should have relaxed the t/harakiri.t test, maybe fixing the problem (I didn't exp

Processed: Re: Bug#633775: libbotan-1.8.2 breaks packages that depend on version 1.8.2

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 633775 serious Bug #633775 [libbotan-1.8.2] libbotan-1.8.2 breaks packages that depend on version 1.8.2 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633775:

Processed: severity of 625341 is important

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 625341 important Bug #625341 [gdb] gdb: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#625341: gdb: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-07-13 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:32:59AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: gdb > Version: 7.2-1 > Severity: important > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror > > This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings > whic

Bug#633385: marked as done ([drupal7] drupal7 security update 7.3 and regular update 7.4 available)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:47:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#633385: fixed in drupal7 7.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #633385, regarding [drupal7] drupal7 security update 7.3 and regular update 7.4 available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#565039: [mmpong] Unreproducible with gcc 4.6

2011-07-13 Thread Bruno Kleinert
Hi, I can't reproduce the bug in a sid build chroot, mmpong builds just fine. The build log is attached to this mail. gcc version: fuddl@gummipuppe:~$ gcc --version gcc (Debian 4.6.1-3) 4.6.1 Should we close this bug? Cheers - Fuddl mmpong_0.9.1-1-i386-20110713-1619.gz Description: GN

Processed: severity of 633385 is grave

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > severity 633385 grave Bug #633385 [drupal7] [drupal7] drupal7 security update 7.3 and regular update 7.4 available Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > End of messag

Bug#633730: FTBFS on mips: seed segfaults in doc/modules/readline/

2011-07-13 Thread Michael Biebl
tags 633730 help thanks Am 13.07.2011 10:59, schrieb Michael Biebl: > Full build log at > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=seed&arch=mips&ver=3.0.0-2&stamp=1310476423 > > Previous versions of seed built fine on mips and seed_3.0.0-2 also > builds on mipsel. Some additional informat

Bug#625392: mdadm: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-07-13 Thread Maxime Chatelle
Hi, Sorry, with holidays, I lack of time. Attached, a patch that comment out all unused variables and associated code. This patch is mainly for stable because the to-be-packaged version (3.2.2) dont appear to have this issue (just quick checked, I'm not sure) It build fine with the patch and

Bug#633764: starman: failing tests

2011-07-13 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: starman Version: 0.2012-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid Justification: FTBFS Hi starman FTBFS due to test failures: >dh_auto_test > make[1]: Entering directory > `/build/salvi-starman_0.2012-1-amd64-e9NZV_/starman-0.2012' > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::

Processed: Re: Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 633754 important Bug #633754 [src:gcj-4.6] gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633754: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 633754 important thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:30:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: [...] (gcj-4.6 was never built on m68k before, but

Bug#633755: FTBFS on kbsd-amd64: test-suite failure /extension/c/call-no-args: FAIL

2011-07-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: src:libpeas Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd libpeas FTBFS on kbsd-amd64: /extension/c/create-invalid: OK /extension/c/reload: OK /extensio

Bug#632448: marked as done (opendnssec: obsolete build-dependency: libopensc2)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:32:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#632448: fixed in opendnssec 1.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #632448, regarding opendnssec: obsolete build-dependency: libopensc2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile /tmp/buildd/gcj-4.6-4.6.1/build/./gcc/gcj -B/tmp/buildd/gcj-4.6-4.6.1/build/m68k-linux-gnu/m68040

Bug#633736: swig2.0: python/std_map.i doesn't honor all template arguments

2011-07-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 07/13/2011 12:37 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > The attached patch fixes this bug. I've also submitted the patch upstream [3]. I've run svn diff in the wrong directory. Attached is an updated patch that applies cleanly to the current packaging of swig2.0. Kind regards, -- Sebastian Ramacher

Processed: bug in swig

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bug in swig > block 633710 with 633736 Bug #633710 [src:swiginac] swiginac: FTBFS: swiginac_wrap.cpp:6138: error: 'asdict' is not a member of 'swig::traits_from > > >' Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 633710: 633736 > thank

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#633710: swiginac: FTBFS: swiginac_wrap.cpp:6138: error: 'asdict' is not a member of 'swig::traits_from

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bug in swig > block 633710 with 633766 Bug #633710 [src:swiginac] swiginac: FTBFS: swiginac_wrap.cpp:6138: error: 'asdict' is not a member of 'swig::traits_from > > >' No valid blocking bug(s) given; not doing anything Failed to set blocking bu

Bug#633710: [Python-modules-team] Bug#633710: swiginac: FTBFS: swiginac_wrap.cpp:6138: error: 'asdict' is not a member of 'swig::traits_from

2011-07-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
# bug in swig block 633710 with 633766 thanks On 07/13/2011 05:16 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -g -O2 -g -O2 -Wall -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.6 > -c swiginac_wrap.cpp -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.6/swiginac_w

Bug#633736: swig2.0: python/std_map.i doesn't honor all template arguments

2011-07-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Package: swig2.0 Version: 2.0.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: causes FTBFS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 std::map has four template arguments, but the code in swig's python/std_map.i only honors the first two. This makes e.g swiginac [1] and syfi [2] fail to bui

Bug#632346: ucommon: FTBFS on kFreeBSD: POSIX_FADV_* not declared

2011-07-13 Thread David Sugar
Apparently we do do define _XOPEN_SOURCE to 600 in fsys.cpp (36), though perhaps not soon enough since relevant headers may already be included before that. On 07/13/2011 04:04 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > tags 632346 upstream > thanks > > @David: Could could I please ask you to have a look at t

Processed: Re: Bug#633731: package FTBFS

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 633731 serious Bug #633731 [xaralx] package FTBFS Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633731

Bug#633731: package FTBFS

2011-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 633731 serious thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:17:23 +0200, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: Package: xaralx Version: 0.7r1785-3 Severity: critical The package fails to build from source. Which in no way justifies a severity of "critical". Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Bug#633731: package FTBFS

2011-07-13 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
Package: xaralx Version: 0.7r1785-3 Severity: critical The package fails to build from source. In ubuntu we fixed this with the attached patches. #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run ## Description: add some description ## Origin/Author: add some origin or author ## Bug: bug URL ## 40_fix_gc

Bug#633730: FTBFS on mips: seed segfaults in doc/modules/readline/

2011-07-13 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: src:seed Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: serious seed FTBFS on mips: Making all in readline make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd2-seed_3.0.0-2-mips-0ZVgdz/seed-3.0.0/doc/modules/readline' ../../../src/seed ../../../doc/modules/make-functions.js ../../../doc/modules/readline/readline.js

Bug#633709: marked as done (ntfs-3g: FTBFS: checking for LIBGCRYPT - version >= 1.2.2... no)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:48:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#633709: fixed in ntfs-3g 1:2011.4.12AR.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #633709, regarding ntfs-3g: FTBFS: checking for LIBGCRYPT - version >= 1.2.2... no to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#632859: random testsuite failures

2011-07-13 Thread Julian Taylor
On 07/13/2011 10:23 AM, Enrico Tassi wrote: > > While I'll investigate more, I don't think the severity is appropriate. > > Moreover, do you run the tests inside the pbuilder environment (--login) > or you run them in your real system? Maybe there is something broken > there. I mean, FTBFS means

Bug#632859: random testsuite failures

2011-07-13 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:10:43PM +0200, Julian Taylor wrote: > Package: lua-svn > Version: 0.4.0-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBS > > the testsuite fails sometimes when building the package. While I'll investigate more, I don't think the severity is appropriate. Moreover, do you run

Bug#632346: ucommon: FTBFS on kFreeBSD: POSIX_FADV_* not declared

2011-07-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
tags 632346 upstream thanks @David: Could could I please ask you to have a look at the below? On 11-07-01 at 12:08pm, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: ucommon > Version: 5.0.3-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > Builds of ucommon on kFreeBSD are failing in the com

Bug#632343: ucommon: FTBFS - tries to run doxygen even in binary-only builds

2011-07-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 11-07-01 at 12:00pm, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: ucommon > Version: 5.0.3-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > Binary-only builds of ucommon in minimal environments (such as typical > autobuilders) are failing because they attempt to run doxygen without > n

Bug#632287: marked as done (ucommon-utils and scrub: error when trying to install together)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:38:36 +0200 with message-id <20110713073836.gj5...@jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#632287: ucommon-utils: ..conflict with scrub-2.4.2 over /usr/share/man/man1/scrub.1.gz has caused the Debian Bug report #632287, regarding ucommon-utils and scrub: error whe

Bug#633669: marked as done (CVE-2011-2527: qemu-kvm -runas does not clear supplementary groups)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:32:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#633669: fixed in qemu-kvm 0.14.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #633669, regarding CVE-2011-2527: qemu-kvm -runas does not clear supplementary groups to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#632987: marked as done (CVE-2011-2212 virtqueue indirect overflow)

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:32:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#632987: fixed in qemu-kvm 0.14.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #632987, regarding CVE-2011-2212 virtqueue indirect overflow to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d