Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 494037 wishlist
Bug#494037: linux86: Port to 64 bit archs
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
D] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sim
Version: 0.9.5~svn20080716-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of sim_0.9.5~svn20080716-1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> Build started at 20080806-0216
[...]
> ** Using build depende
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386570: fixed in sim 0.9.5~svn20080806-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #386570,
regarding sounds/icons with unclear licensing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Mark Whitis writes:
Hi,
> Package: zapping
> Version: 0.10~cvs6-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> I ran zapping and it killed the X server and I had to log back in and lost
> all my applications (which fortunately were few).Ran it again to see
> if it was r
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# subcommander (1.2.3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * debian/patches/50_no_dav_or_neon.dpatch
#- added patch to remove dav and neon dependency; thanks to Peter Samuelson
# for the patch; Closes: #490
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # via tagpending
> #
> # subcommander (1.2.3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * debian/patches/50_no_dav_or_neon.dpatch
> #- added patch to remove dav and neon dependency; tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # We don't have the setup to reproduce those bugs, so tagging them help:
> tag 487104 + help
Bug#487104: nis: map values containing non-ascii characters vanish
Tags were: help
Tags added: help
> tag 492856 + help
Bug#492856: Panic or segfault in Samba
"Kevin Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Getting back to this. I'm curious if there is a specific reason why
> the *.so symlink was not there? Adding the ".0" shouldn't be
> necessary. But there may be a reason for not including the .so
> symlink that I am not aware of.
>
> My default inst
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.11-2
Severity: grave
The Debianization of Mailman 2.1.11 has failed on a critical aspect, the
properties of /var/lib/mailman/locks and /var/lib/mailman/logs made it
impossible for Mailman to operate properly. The symbolic links used to point
to ../../locks/mailman a
(I'm following Camm in copying gcl-devel; to be honest I'm not sure if
this is debian specific; I _think_ not)
Hi All;
I finally isolated the problem which causes the gcl configure script
in Debian gcl 2.6.7-42 to fail in when run under dpkg-buildpackage.
The problem is the snippet used to test
Package: libprelude
Version: 0.9.19-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of libprelude_0.9.19-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20080807-0211
| **
| Checki
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493797: fixed in python2.5 2.5.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #493797,
regarding python2.5: CVE-2008-2316 integer overflow in _hashopenssl.c
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # this bug is not yet fixed in any upload and should not be tagged as such
> tags 460247 - fixed
Bug#460247: destroys existing ogg vorbis tags without any notice
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags removed: fixed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:51:20PM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
> tag 491270 fixed-upstream
> thanks
>
> Just letting you know that the patch is correct and was also fixed in
> upstream's head.
I know, i was the one submitting the patch upstream.
> Please include this patch in the debian
I'll just note that fortunately for us the openbabel project
(bio/chemical) went with pybel rather than babel in the python
hierarchy.
I'd vote for proper subnaming in python sidl.babel., sidl., sidlx., etc
which it seems (in typographical terms) Tom is ok with.
Not sure what the full directory st
Peter,
Thank you very much for the patch. It is almost right.
Open JDK 1.6 has this really weird setup where one of the shared libraries
is under the "server" subdirectory on AMD64 and under the "client" subdirectory
under i386. (Not sure what the story is on other architectures).
The PyLucene b
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:36:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> clone 471404 -1
> retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs
> severity -2 wishlist
> thanks
>
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > Package: bin86
> > Version: 0.16.17-2
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > The 64-bit versions of this package don't
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:28:00PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:16:29PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > When emulating Windows ME, the mouse movements are really strange. If
> > the cursor is that some position, and I move the mouse, the cursor
> > follows the movement, t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 494024 serious
Bug#494024: openal-soft: linking against openal makes programs segfault on
powerpc
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping pro
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
There's a python-babel package for internationalization, which has a
Python namespace conflict with the Python runtime bindings for the SIDL
Babel.
As a possible resolution, how much stuff would I break by changing
"babel" to "sidl" in [sidl]setup.py? I'm afr
Greetings,
There's a python-babel package for internationalization, which has a
Python namespace conflict with the Python runtime bindings for the SIDL
Babel.
As a possible resolution, how much stuff would I break by changing
"babel" to "sidl" in [sidl]setup.py? I'm afraid I don't know a whole
l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes GNOME menu doesn't visualize it.
Though modifying the main menu, you can see the Debian category, very strange.
- --
http://syx.googlecode.com - Smalltalk YX
http://lethalman.blogspot.com - Thoughts about computer technologies
http://www.ammazzat
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 00:28 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 7. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Okay. Before writing upstream, "dpkg -L python-babel" shows everything
> > in site-packages/sidl[x]. Is there a way I can change my EGG-INFO to
> > SIDL instead of Babel? Or woul
On Donnerstag, 7. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Okay. Before writing upstream, "dpkg -L python-babel" shows everything
> in site-packages/sidl[x]. Is there a way I can change my EGG-INFO to
> SIDL instead of Babel? Or would that break everything using it (which
> is nothing now, at leas
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 00:05 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 15:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > We talked about the python-babel name clash recently. Although I
> > > renamed my package to "python-pybabel" we seem to
severity 493093 important
tags 493093 moreinfo
thanks
2008/7/31 Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/7/31 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The package leaves the files
>> around after a build, and
>> fakeroot debian/rules binary
>> does not clean them.
>
> Should "binary" target
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 493093 important
Bug#493093: does not properly clean up build directory
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 493093 moreinfo
Bug#493093: does not properly clean up build directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> th
On Mittwoch, 6. August 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 15:30 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > We talked about the python-babel name clash recently. Although I
> > renamed my package to "python-pybabel" we seem to have a problem here.
> > As long as python-babel is installed, P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 493742 serious
Bug#493742: python-babel: please change name to python-sidl
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> retitle 493742 Python namespace conflict with python-pybabel
Bug#493742: python-babel: please change name to python-sidl
Cha
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492637: fixed in bitlbee 1.2.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #492637,
regarding use of /etc/init.d/bitlbee instead of invoke-rc.d
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#471404: fixed in linux86 0.16.17-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #471404,
regarding 64-bit versions not useful
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 493992 jcc FTBFS on everything except amd64 due to wrong paths.
Bug#493992: jcc_1.9-4(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, missing dependency
Changed Bug title to `jcc FTBFS on everything except amd64 due to wrong paths.'
from `jcc_1.9-4(sparc/unst
retitle 493992 jcc FTBFS on everything except amd64 due to wrong paths.
thanks
Reading the build log carefully this doesn't look like a missing
dependency error to me (openjdk-6-jdk which depends on openjdk-6-jre
which depends on openjdk-6-jre-headless which provides the libjvm.so is
indeed in
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:47:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493009: fixed in prayer 1.2.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #493009,
regarding prayer: ask for an undocumented help_dir configuration option;
missing manpage
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:47:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494011: fixed in prayer 1.2.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #494011,
regarding prayer: Ask for ondocumented lock_dir configuration option
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Hi Martin,
> usualy that is the sign that you used some non-clean code here. bus
> error on sparc is a nice error finder in your code. Best you ask for
> the build-depends to be installed on sperger.debian.org, or if you are
> not a debian developer (so you do not have access to sperger.d.o) ask
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 471404 -1
Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful
Bug 471404 cloned as bug 494037.
> retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs
Bug#494037: 64-bit versions not useful
Changed Bug title to `linux86: Port to 64 bit archs' from `64-bit versions not
us
obuild your package:
> >
> >> Automatic build of paraview_3.2.3-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> >> Build started at 20080806-0244
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> >> Build-Depends: cdbs
clone 471404 -1
retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs
severity -2 wishlist
thanks
Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: bin86
> Version: 0.16.17-2
> Severity: grave
>
> The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful code; they're full
> of
> sizeof(long) == 4 assumptions, causing as86 to
parc 99.99
>> Build started at 20080806-0244
>
> [...]
>
>> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
>> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.51), debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev, quilt (>=
>> 0.46-4), cmake (>= 2.4.8), libqt4-dev (>= 4.3.3-2), libopenm
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# prayer (1.2.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * welcome_is_template.patch:
#- shared/config.c: Don't require that the help_dir option, which was
# removed from the default prayer.cf earlier, is defin
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:47:52 -0300, gregor herrmann wrote:
> It seems to be related to the newer libmodule-install-perl, at least
> Module::Install 1) is used in the relevant Makefile.PLs and 2) it
> contains the lines that lead to "funny" directory names.
This seems to be the relevant change in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # via tagpending
> #
> # prayer (1.2.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * welcome_is_template.patch:
> #- shared/config.c: Don't require that the help_dir option, which was
>
Hi I'm an exaile dev. I do agree that this is a severe flaw that needs
to be fixed, though I am not sure what the most sane way to do so
would be. I am open to any suggestions as to the best way to resolve
this issue.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Package: paraview
Version: 3.2.3-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of paraview_3.2.3-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20080806-0244
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kevin Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> "Kevin Coffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Did you run ldconfig? I was trying to find the r
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:43 -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote:
> Whoops, an excellent point. You might want to simply use the attached
> (untested, but compiles and looks rather trivial) patch, instead,
> which is from upstream. It is upstream revision
> 90ed1fb17982cbb6355d5dd32d041b8c0027509b and
> 19
Package: elinks
Version: 0.11.1-1.2etch1
Severity: serious
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='nostrip debug noopt' fakeroot apt-get --build source $PACKAGE
fails here with
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/home/lindi/debian/debian-elinks/elinks-0.11.1/build-main/src/document/html/parser'
[CC] src/document/h
Ari Pollak spake unto us the following wisdom:
> As far as I can tell, --with-system-ssl-certs doesn't exist in 2.4.3.
Whoops, an excellent point. You might want to simply use the attached
(untested, but compiles and looks rather trivial) patch, instead,
which is from upstream. It is upstream re
retitle 467343 libvcp-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10
merge 467343 479948
tag 467343 patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:18:02PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: libvcp-perl
> Version: 0.9-20050110-1
> This package fails to build with Perl 5.10.0 (currently in experimental.)
>
> I looked into t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 467343 libvcp-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10
Bug#467343: libvcp-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10 (Getopt::Long has changed)
Changed Bug title to `libvcp-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10' from `libvcp-perl:
FTBFS with Perl 5.10 (Getopt::Long has changed)'.
> m
The same issue, involving _x_meta_info_reset, seems to have been
reported by Gentoo[1], ArchLinux[2], and possibly Ubuntu[3] users as
well. No solution in sight yet though, but who knows might be worth
keeping an eye open. Atleast it verifies that it's not a Debian-specific
or unreproducible pr
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > It still looks the same to me like before. I've also attached gdb and
> > set a breakpoint in selection_copy and never got there. The problem
> > seems to be that in old_main.c line 236, event.vc is 1, and cinfo[1] is
> > NULL.
As far as I can tell, --with-system-ssl-certs doesn't exist in 2.4.3.
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 13:03 -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote:
> Why is a patch necessary to enable /etc/ssl/certs? Does
> --with-system-ssl-certs= not do what you need? If so, we should fix
> it, rather than applying additional hack
Since you already know exactly what the problem is, please let me know where
it is, so I won't waste time on something already known. Please drop me an
email with it, and we keep in touch.
Thanks.
Fabio Pugliese Ornellas
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 6516089
MSN: [E
Hi Star,
please test the new version of libmysql5.0-cil available in
Debian/Unstable which is 5.2.1+dfsg-2. This version should fix the issue
you reported.
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8
FOSS Developer[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.meebey.net/
PEAR Developer[EM
Why is a patch necessary to enable /etc/ssl/certs? Does
--with-system-ssl-certs= not do what you need? If so, we should fix
it, rather than applying additional hacks.
Ethan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 493925 help
Bug#493925: binary firmware in drivers/char/drm/mga_ucode.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> tags 494007 help
Bug#494007: binary firmware in drivers/char/d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 494007 2.6.18-1
Bug#494007: binary firmware in drivers/char/drm/r128_cce.c
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 494010 2.6.18-1
Bug#494010: binary firmware in drivers/char/dsp56k.c
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 494009 2.6.18-1
Bug#494009: binary firmware in drivers/char/drm/radeon_microcode.h
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: linuxtv-dvb-apps
Version: 1.1.1+rev1207-1
Severity: serious
Please provide a transitional package for dvb-utils (-> dvb-apps) for
lenny transition
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493929: fixed in awesome 3.0~rc1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493929,
regarding awesome: can't spawn an xterm with older xcb-util
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi!
Sorry for following up late.
* Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-16 04:38:53 ART]:
> * The current version of mol in testing and unstable works with the
> patches from SuSE. So no update to mol or the driver packages is
> needed to fix the RC bug on mol-source.
I am
Package: prayer
Version: 1.2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: The packet is not usable
/etc/init.d/prayer start dies with "Starting webmail server:
prayerprayer PANICLOG:
Failed to open panic log file: "paniclog"
Error was: Aug 06 18:02:21 [3157] config: lock_dir not defined
failed!"
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
drivers/char/dsp56k.c (licensed under GPL2) includes a small section of
binary code:
/* DSP56001 bootstrap code */
static char bootstrap[] = {
0x0c, 0x00, 0x40, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
[...]
Since the l
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: serious
drivers/char/drm/radeon_microcode.h (licensed under BSD-style terms) is entirely
composed of binary code, such as:
/* production radeon ucode r1xx-r6xx */
static const u32 R100_cp_microcode[][2] = {
{ 0x21007000, 00 },
{ 0x200
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
drivers/char/drm/r128_cce.c (licensed under BSD-style terms) contains a small
buffer with code in binary form:
/* CCE microcode (from ATI) */
static u32 r128_cce_microcode[] = {
[...]
As per the comment, it appears to be copyrig
package octave-tsa
severity 493417 important
thanks
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-05 08:46]:
> tags 493417 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> People are looking at RC bugs, so let's give them a hint.
An unreproducible bug cannot be release-critical. I am hereby downgrading
the severit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package octave-tsa
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: octave-tsa
> severity 493417 important
Bug#493417: octave-tsa: FTBFS: `sumskipnan' undefined
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:31:24PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > The fix will require an soname bump and NEW package for libkipi
> > Why? If it's just a new symbol, bump the shlib and be done with it.
> That answers my question. Upload pendin
This is a very important bug; if you can get a fix for it, got for it.
I have not been able to do any FOSS work these last weekends. I guess
we will just miss Lenny...
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Fabio Pugliese Ornellas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If by any means I can help, please let me kn
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:02:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493999: fixed in tpm-tools 1.3.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #493999,
regarding tpm-tools: pkcs11 tools require libopencryptoki.so
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:16:29PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> When emulating Windows ME, the mouse movements are really strange. If
> the cursor is that some position, and I move the mouse, the cursor
> follows the movement, then goes back (after 1 or 2 secs) to the original
> position.
Can yo
i confirm last post that version 1.2 upstream solved the same issue for me
laptop:~# dfbinfo
===| DirectFB 1.0.1 |===
(c) 2001-2007 The DirectFB Organization (directfb.org)
(c) 2000-2004 Convergence (integrated media) GmbH
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
> severity 493857 serious
Bug#493857: mga-vid: Please update to 2.6.26
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
hi,
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 08:38:01AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: hdbc-sqlite3
> > Version: 1.1.4.0.0
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> >
> >> Automatic build of hdbc-sqlite3_1.1.4.0.0 on penalosa by
tags 493715 -sid
thanks
> Those
> patches could probably easily be backported to 0.16.4, just like I did
> to fix compatibility with 2.6.25 linux kernels.
that would be nice, please do so.
> As far as I know (that is, very little), 2.6.26 is not meant to be in
> lenny, so I'm tagging this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 493715 -sid
Bug#493715: em8300: FTBFS with 2.6.26-1
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 493999 serious
Bug#493999: tpm-tools: pkcs11 tools require libopencryptoki.so
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tags 493999 +pending
Bug#493999: tpm-tools: pkcs11 tools require libopencryptoki.so
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 386570
Bug#386570: sounds/icons with unclear licensing
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stoppin
Salut Nicolas :)
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 16:10:57 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> As far as I know (that is, very little), 2.6.26 is not meant to be in
> lenny, so I'm tagging this bug "sid" so that it does not cause the
> removal of the package from lenny.
>
Actually the plan is to release le
Attached is the interdiff of the NMU I have just made to delayed/1 to
fix the current RC bug against bitlbee.
Don Armstrong
--
There is no such thing as "social gambling." Either you are there to
cut the other bloke's heart out and eat it--or you're a sucker. If you
don't like this choice--don'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 493715 + sid
Bug#493715: em8300: FTBFS with 2.6.26-1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
tag 493715 + sid
thanks
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: em8300
> Severity: serious
>
> em8300 fails to build with 2.6.26-1.
Thanks for your report.
For what it's worth, the problem is already fixed upstream in 0.17.1
(see http://dxr3.sourceforge.net/hg
severity 492845 important
tags 492845 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
I'm unable to reproduce this bug, at least with the common case of
running login from rungetty. Please provide more information.
Downgrading to important, as requested by maintainer at debconf8.
-- System Information:
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 492845 important
Bug#492845: rungetty: Segfault on AMD64
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 492845 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#492845: rungetty: Segfault on AMD64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: hdbc-sqlite3
> Version: 1.1.4.0.0
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> Automatic build of hdbc-sqlite3_1.1.4.0.0 on penalosa by sbuild/hppa 98
>> Build started at 20080527-2141
Hi Lamont,
This is not manifest
Package: linux-modules-contrib-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.26-1 on spontini by
> sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20080805-0124
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies sup
Package: dwm-tools
Version: 28-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of dwm-tools_28-1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20080803-2009
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelpe
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.26-1 on spontini by
> sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20080805-0144
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplie
Package: jcc
Version: 1.9-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of jcc_1.9-4 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> Build started at 20080806-1315
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs, deb
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 01:09:04 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> After a short look it seems that make install really installs the
> files into strange directories, that's why dh_install can't find them
> later.
>
> No idea so far what's happening there ...
Good news: I can reproduce it (as in: it h
Hello,
fuse-source is not needed anymore with recent kernel. I think dropping
fuse-source package is the right way, at least for a stable release.
If you don't mind I would rather remove fuse-source by myself. I'm not
MIA, just a bit fusy theses days but I'll be on hollidays next week so
I'll
Package: libdirectfb-1.0-0
Version: 1.0.1-10
Followup-For: Bug #493899
Hello,
since the Debian package or directFB v.1.0.1 is broken, I compiled the latest
1.2.1 version and it works ok.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Your message dated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493854: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.20-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #493854,
regarding libdjvulibre-text: please add a conflict against the appropriate
version of djview3
to be marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 493966 upstream
Bug#493966: FBFS on alpha, arm, armel, hppa, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
sparc error: call of overloaded 'pack(uint)' is ambiguous...
Tags were: patch
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 493966 FBFS on alpha, arm, armel, hppa, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
> s390, sparc error: call of overloaded 'pack(uint)' is ambiguous...
Bug#493966: sim_0.9.5~svn20080716-1(sparc/unstable): FBFS on sparc. error: call
of overloaded 'pack(uint)
retitle 493966 FBFS on alpha, arm, armel, hppa, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
s390, sparc error: call of overloaded 'pack(uint)' is ambiguous...
tags 493966 patch
thanks
see attache
see also patch for build on ia64 :)
--
... mpd is off
. ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `~’
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 484700 serious
Bug#484700: busybox: chpasswd fails to set root password
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
