On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 10:19 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Soeren Sonnenburg:
> > Package: octave3.0
> > Version: 3.0.0-1
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > just try
> >
> > echo version | octave
> >
> > or
> >
> > octave
> >
> > on an arm machine:
>
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:39:06 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459688: keytouch: doesn't ship debian/changelog nor
debian/copyright
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459551: fixed in bind9 1:9.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In case it helps anyone...
In looking at the differences between 2.0.0.9-1 and 2.0.0.9-2, it appears
that the change to debian/icedove.js (installed as
/etc/icedove/pref/icedove.js) is causing the different behavior on my
system. I commented out the
Package: keytouch
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5, 12.7
The keytouch binary package doesn't ship debian/changelog nor
debian/copyright, which is a violation of section 1 of the RC policy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12
> severity 459678 normal
Bug#459678: network-manager can't connect to my wireless network, it's dropped
whet trying to associate with router (timed out).
Severity set to `normal' from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 459564 + confirmed
Bug#459564: icedove does not open any http link anymore
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tags 459564 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:39:20PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.9-2
> Followup-For: Bug #459564
>
> Starting with this version, my icedove tray icon is broken and the
> Provider for Google Calendar plugin no longer works (my calenda
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> reassign 435945 libghemical0c2a
Bug#435945: libghemical: not binNMU safe
Bug reassigned from package `libghemical' to `libghemical0c2a'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.6.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
network-manager can't connect to my wireless network, it's dropped whet trying
to associate with router (timed out). my network without any
encryption and router allow connect from MAC address. when
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> merge 435945 449147
Bug#435945: libghemical: not binNMU safe
Bug#449147: libghemical0c2a: Uninstallable, not binNMU safe.
Merged 435945 449147.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-2
Followup-For: Bug #459564
Starting with this version, my icedove tray icon is broken and the
Provider for Google Calendar plugin no longer works (my calendar now
comes up empty). I'm not sure it's a grave bug, but definitely quite
serious. I believe the proble
Source: aime
Version: 0.60.3-7.3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* It FTBFS under two situations (kfreebsd and gcc-4.3)
* It has a low popcon a
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:48:27 +0100 Xavier Brochard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:56:37 -0700,
> Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > OK, can you try one more thing? Can you install
> > libgnustep-ba/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/filesystem.shse1.14,
> > gnustep-base-
Source: gtk-engines
Version: 0.12-8.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Hi,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* It has a RC bug (although it is still recent)
* FTBFS under two situati
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425506: fixed in specimen 0.5.2rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:24:01PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > Whatis the output of `id clamav` on the affected system? It appears
> > that you have the user but not the group, which is a "should not happen"
> > kind of situation.
>
> At th
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:24:01PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said:
> > postinst seems to assume that "clamav" group already exists:
> >
> > [...]
> > S'està configurant clamav-base (0.92~dfsg-2) ...
> > chown: «clamav:clamav»: el grup no és vàlid
> > d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 459621 grave
Bug#459621: bsd-mailx: missing /usr/bin/mail link
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan said:
> postinst seems to assume that "clamav" group already exists:
>
> [...]
> S'està configurant clamav-base (0.92~dfsg-2) ...
> chown: «clamav:clamav»: el grup no és vàlid
> dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar clamav-base (--configure):
> el sub
* Decklin Foster [Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:37:27 -0500]:
> Sorry, it totally slipped my mind that I should have cut a release
> soon after fixing these. I will do so for tomorrow.
No problem, cheers for the upload.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian De
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:05:40 + John Halton wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 1:38 PM, Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems to me that
> > the copyright notices conflict, and effectively render the file not
> > distributable, but I am not quite sure; if this file is effectively a
> > d
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416594: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 169.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#437128: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 169.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458295: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 169.07-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: f-spot
Version: 0.4.1-4
Severity: grave
Upgrading f-spot makes some extensions unavailable (the ones shipped
with F-Spot, but strangely not the external ones such as
DevelopInUfraw and RawPlusJpeg).
I'm pasting from IRC (with only minor edits), here's some context:
- broken = the "Exp
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452862: fixed in apt 0.7.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452862: fixed in apt 0.7.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452862: fixed in apt 0.7.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Package: tkdesk
Version: 2.0-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installed tkdesk.. It required me to have itcl , which is not marked as a
dependancy. Further, tkdesk requires itcl3.2 whereas still has itcl3.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers t
Subject: gnash: Gnash package dependency conflict
Package: gnash
Version: 0.8.1~rc.070818-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable on non-Sid systems
Tags: l10n
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Gnash is now un-usable on anything but a pure
Sid install.
The previ
ExcellentPillsLiza
http://pillsenricor.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:32:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452295: fixed in lastfmsubmitd 0.37-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:05:24PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
after uprading to 2.0.0.9-2 from 2.0.0.6-1, my addons don't work
anymore. I tried to uninsta
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:10:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459632: initramfs-tools: Unable to detect LVM correctly if
root device does not match /dev/mapper/*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459547: fixed in etckeeper 0.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91d
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I've got a LVM setup on top of a raid1 (soft raid). Raid is detected fine but
the LVM was not.
Here is the problem.
LVM has an 'lvm' volume group and a 'root' logical volume.
Udev has two entries for
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> On my system I have set 'nano' as the default 'editor'.
> When trying to use etckeeper with the '-e' option in
> /etc/etckeeper/etckeeper.conf, etckeeper will call the
> editor, but I'm unable to do anything - no cursor mo
I'm using my own packages, based on your work, of misdn-kernel and misdn-user
with asterisk. I don't know anything about libraries so ... But I'm building
asterisk with no problems with thouse packages.
I hope this could help someone.
http://linuxmaniac.torreviejawireless.org/debian/misdn-kern
Hi Arnaud,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:38:10AM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> I have an update (2.2.1) underway, but devs drained most of my time.
> I can integrate your changes in it if you prefer...
Whatever you prefer. If you don't think you will make the upload within the
near future, I'd sugge
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11ubuntu3
# getting this too
tags 459551 + confirmed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11ubuntu3
> # getting this too
> tags 459551 + confirmed
Bug#459551: lwresd fails to start after upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processi
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:05:24PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.9-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Hi,
>
> after uprading to 2.0.0.9-2 from 2.0.0.6-1, my addons don't work
> anymore. I tried to uninstall them and reinstall th
Package: tilda
Version: 0.09.4+cvs20071012-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Same here. The bug is completely reproducible.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.071109
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 459606 linux-2.6
Bug#459606: libc6: 2.7-5 breaks dpkg on sparc64
Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 433187 459606
Bug#433187: linux-2.6 - [sparc64-smp] produces unkillable processes
Bug#459606: libc6: 2.7-5 breaks
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.40.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi, Ted!
Your recent switch to dietlibc for e2fsprogs-static had the
unfortunate side effect of breaking amd64 builds, as dietlibc (unlike
glibc) doesn't bother providing either llseek o
Package: lsb-rpm
Version: 4.4.1-14.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Packages created by lsb-rpm don't pass the checks that the lsbpkgchk
program (from the lsb-pkgchk3 package, or directly from LSB website,
http://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/test_suites/released-3.1.0/bin
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:07:40PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > *** t7201-co.sh ***
> > * ok 1: setup
> > * ok 2: checkout from non-existing branch
> > * ok 3: checkout with dirty tree without -m
> > * ok 4: checkout with unrelated dirty tree without -m
> > * ok 5: checkout -m wit
On Jan 7, 2008 1:38 PM, Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that
> the copyright notices conflict, and effectively render the file not
> distributable, but I am not quite sure; if this file is effectively a
> derived work from the work copyrighted by the Universtity of Nort
[Andre Ferraz]
> I have a question, this is not a case to port this fix for stable?
> sometimes users compile the latest kernel from kernel.org for his server
> (my case for example).
> If shutdown remains without the patch , this can be a serious problem
> for the debian stable user , this patch
Hello,
how is the status of this _grave_ bug for stable (etch) and oldstable (sarge)?
It will be very nice if this will be fixed, since the fixed version is in
testing (security) since 2007-11-18.
thanks and best regards
Thomas Sesselmann
--
Dipl.-Inf. Thomas Sesselmann
Kirchhoff-Institut fu
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458827: fixed in cwiid 0.6.00-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #459414 normal
Bug#459414: sshm - binary in package is not rebuilt
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi,
seems pygoocanvas builds fine now, so this bug should get closed.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[please CC me and the bug for replies, thanks]
Hello,
The package vegastrike (in main) contains two files whose copyright
header is reproduced integrally in this message. It seems to me that
the copyright notices conflict, and effectively render the file not
distributable, but I am not quite
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package octave2.1
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: octave2.1
> retitle 417486 [should not ship with Lenny] FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing
> #includes
Bug#417486: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
Changed Bug title to `[should not ship with Lenny] FTBFS
1.0.4
http://downloads.mozdev.org/moztraybiff/mozTrayBiff-1.0.4.xpi
1.0.4
{3550f703-e582-4d05-9a08-453d09bdfdc6}
0.7
0.7
http://downloads.mozdev.org/moztraybiff/mozTrayBiff-1.0.4.xpi
Michael wrote:
> In both cases gij is called (indirectly). Can you please try to make a
> simple testcase running gij on hppa?
Ok, but then a testcase isn't needed, as it's easily reproducable.
Just call "gij" without any parameters and it will crash (as already
reported in Bug #459563).
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Deller, Helge wrote:
> This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
I think both are issues in GCJ. Ant itself is only bytecode. So no
native calls (except when ant-gcj and ant-optional-gcj are installed but
I think these are empty on hppa anyway
Hi Fathi,
Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Fathi Boudra:
> Hi Micha,
>
> Fatih, you shouldn't have closed the bug without providing any
> versioning information. Moreover, if it's not a bug of kmymoney2,
> please
> reassign it to the affected package (inste
I have a question, this is not a case to port this fix for stable?
sometimes users compile the latest kernel from kernel.org for his server
(my case for example).
If shutdown remains without the patch , this can be a serious problem
for the debian stable user , this patch cannot be into sysinit st
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:17:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458869: fixed in python-qt4 4.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This is probably the same problem as in ecj Bug#459563
Package: locate
Version: 4.2.31-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Configuration changes lost
It looks like the new locate package reads
/etc/updatedb.findutils.cron.local as its configuration file now.
Configuration changes made to /etc/updatedb.conf are lost with this
package split, which is a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12
> found 452730 1.14.7
Bug#452730: changelogs out of sync
Bug marked as found in version 1.14.7.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#452730: fixed in dpkg 1.14.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: dirmngr
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: grave
dirmngr segfaults at once on hppa architecture
Example:
3545:~# uname -a
Linux ls3545 2.6.24-rc4 #25 Sat Dec 8 12:36:01 CET 2007 parisc GNU/Linux
ls3545:~# dirmngr
dirmngr[28087]: error opening `/root/.gnupg/dirmngr_ldapservers.conf':
No such fil
Subject: sbaz unusable in lenny
Package: sbaz
Version: 1.20-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
$ sbaz-setup /tmp/
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
scala/runtime/Comparator
at sbaz.clui.Setting
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458690: fixed in dash 0.5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458687: fixed in dash 0.5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426355: fixed in libonig 5.9.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458687: fixed in dash 0.5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458690: fixed in dash 0.5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:06:05AM +0100, Kurt Pruenner wrote:
Package: maildrop
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
Upgrading maildrop from version 2.0.3 to the new version 2.0.4 in unstable fails due to the new package trying to overwrite
/usr/bin
Package: ecj
Version: 3.3.0+0728-5
Severity: grave
javac / ecj crashes at once at startup on the hppa architecture
Example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux ls3545 2.6.24-rc4 #25 Sat Dec 8 12:36:01 CET 2007 parisc GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ javac
Segmentation fault
I assume the prob
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In the network preference I have an http link for the automatic
proxy configuration URL. IT open many iceweasel tabs and is not processed.
HTML mails with link also open every figure in a separate browser
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:06:05AM +0100, Kurt Pruenner wrote:
> Package: maildrop
> Version: 2.0.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.1
>
> Upgrading maildrop from version 2.0.3 to the new version 2.0.4 in unstable
> fails due to the new package trying to overwrite
> /usr/bin/make
Package: ant
Version: 1.7.0-3
Severity: grave
ant crashes at once on the hppa architecture if it's called from the command
line.
Example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ant
Segmentation fault
the last part of strace gives:
.
brk(0) = 0x12000
brk(0x33000)
Tobias Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> "However as far as I see, the actual issue in #459424 is very different:
> package bar (in this context: libsane-extras) is buggy whether it is in
> installed state or removed state.
> Package foo (in this context: libsane) is not required to work ar
Please read
http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2008/01/msg00059.html
"However as far as I see, the actual issue in #459424 is very different:
package bar (in this context: libsane-extras) is buggy whether it is in
installed state or removed state.
Package foo (in this context: libsane) is not
Package: lwresd
Version: 1:9.4.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/var/lib/dpkg/info/lwresd.postinst: line 43: rndc-confgen: command not found
dpkg: error processing lwresd (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
??
cheers, Phil
I was always embarassed of my small cock in the Mens locker room - but not
anymore http://www.Restroosster.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 459545 maildrop 2.0.4-1
Bug#459545: maildrop: Tries to overwrite /usr/bin/makedat, which is also
supplied by courier-base
Bug reassigned from package `maildrop' to `maildrop'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: etckeeper
Version: 0.8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
On my system I have set 'nano' as the default 'editor'.
When trying to use etckeeper with the '-e' option in
/etc/etckeeper/etckeeper.conf, etckeeper will call th
Package: maildrop
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
Upgrading maildrop from version 2.0.3 to the new version 2.0.4 in unstable
fails due to the new package trying to overwrite
/usr/bin/makedat which is already supplied by courier-base:
| Preparing to replace maildrop
Hi Micha,
Fatih, you shouldn't have closed the bug without providing any
> versioning information. Moreover, if it's not a bug of kmymoney2, please
> reassign it to the affected package (instead of simply closing it) next
> time.
>
> You missed the fact that libchipcard2 is still available in Etch
Hi,
I was fighting with lirc-modules-source last weekend.
Please consider my changes to lirc source package - patch attached.
Original Makefiles modification by sed I replaced with a smarter awk
script. Two rules for making Makefile.in and Makefile are removed from
Makefile based on `Makefile' st
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for taking care of this.
I have an update (2.2.1) underway, but devs drained most of my time.
I can integrate your changes in it if you prefer...
Note that, for #447961, I've suppressed udev from Build-deps, keeping
it only in Depends.
2008/1/6, Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi everyone,
do you have any news on this bug ?
do you need more information ? (trace, logs, action to be done ?)
This bug is very annoying ...
Thanks
Denis
--
Denis Sacchet aka. Ouba ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
. . `; -._)-;-,_`)
"Com
89 matches
Mail list logo
