Hi Fathi, Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Fathi Boudra: > Hi Micha, > > Fatih, you shouldn't have closed the bug without providing any > versioning information. Moreover, if it's not a bug of kmymoney2, > please > reassign it to the affected package (instead of simply closing it) > next > time.
You didn't say anything about the lines above... > You missed the fact that libchipcard2 is still available in Etch, and > needs to be fixed there because missing dependencies are of release > critical severity (especially when causing segfaults). Thus I reassign > the bug to libchipcard2 -- and will take care of it there. > > Just to be clear, i didn't missed anything. Apparently we disagree on that statement. > I choosed to close the bug without anything more than my 2c comments > which is pretty clear: > Please, submit your bug report to Ubuntu Launchpad. > > By the way, i took time to look if it'isn't a kmymoney bug but not > more. > I can understand you don't agree with my decision, anyway i would like > to explain my motivation and explain it: > > our priority is our users. I can't follow your arguments here. Since I'm not sure that we will find a consensus on *how* to achieve the common motivation: "our priority is our users", please give me feedback on whether reopening and reassigning the bug to libchipcard2 was correct from your point of view. Kind regards Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
