Bug#444945: /usr/share/imapfilter/common.lua is missing

Package: imapfilter Version: 1:2.0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When running imapfilter directly (/usr/users/frankie/debian/mypkgs/imapfilter/imapfilter-2.0.4/debian/imapfilter/usr/bin/imapfilter) the program fails immediately with the error imapfilter: cannot open

Bug#444938: pkinit does not belong in libkrb53

package: libkrb53 severity: serious version: 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-1 This version should not move into testing until pkinit.so moves into a package other than libkrb53. Probably the README needs to be updated as well. I expect to make an upload in a week or so that moves pkinit into its own package;

Bug#444937: esperanza: No entry in debian menu system

Package: esperanza Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.6 Esperanza doesn't have an entry in the debian menu system: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html not sure if this is a wishlist item or a policy violation. feel free to adjust the priority

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package boost Ignoring bugs not assigned to: boost > forwarded 367825 http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/977 Bug#367825: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: bjam segfaults Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/

Bug#367825: (no subject)

package boost forwarded 367825 http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/977 thanks Note that upstream considers using "-fno-strict-aliasing" as a workaround rather than a fix. Still no fix, however. -S signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#444888: Segfault on feed update

In case you'd like to try, there is an i386 1.4.4 package available at http://www.nul-unu.net/quien/rodrigo/debian/liferea/liferea_1.4.4-1~1_i386.deb Look at http://www.nul-unu.net/quien/rodrigo/debian/liferea/liferea_1.4.4-1~1_i386.changes for filenames, in case you need the -dbg package, or the

Bug#443880: marked as forwarded (SIGSEGV on hppa, ia64, sparc)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:59:36 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #443880, regarding SIGSEGV on hppa, ia64, sparc to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (NB: If you are a syste

Bug#361571: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.2: ... should have been declared inside ...)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:32:25 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361571: fixed in gnomoradio 0.15.1-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#444928: CVE-2007-5156 remote php file inclusion vulnerability in fckeditor

Package: knowledgeroot Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for knowledgeroot. CVE-2007-5156[0]: | Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in | editor/filemanager/upload/php/upload.php in FCKeditor, as used in | SiteX CMS 0.7.3.beta

Bug#444829:

According to , it seems I am correct, and the whole browser exiting is due to a defect in the Java plug-in. I hate crappy non-free software! I also cannot reproduce the crash with appletviewer--only with epiphany or iceweasel. -- Sam Mo

Bug#442971: marked as done (pyqwt3d: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute '_pkg_config')

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#442971: fixed in pyqwt3d 0.1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#443749: Fixed.

This bug should be fixed as of NRSS 0.3.5 (pending confirmation, I don't have an S390 and can't determine a safe macro name).

Bug#441553: Fixed.

This bug was fixed with NRSS 0.3.4

Bug#443021: marked as done (gnome-main-menu: FTBFS: Package libnm-util was not found in the pkg-config search path.)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443021: fixed in gnome-main-menu 0.9.8.svn.20070430-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#427738: marked as done (libcomplearn-dev: Missing Depends on libglib2.0-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:12 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427738: fixed in libcomplearn 1.0.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#443702: marked as done (fuse-source: Missing dependencie to dpatch package)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443702: fixed in fuse 2.7.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#444634: libwww-mechanize-shell-perl: build times out

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 444634 patch Bug#444634: libwww-mechanize-shell-perl: build times out There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > forwarded 444634 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=29455 Bug#444634: libwww-mechanize-shell-perl: build times out Noted yo

Bug#432993: marked as done (wing: not a binNMU safe package)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:36 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#432993: fixed in wing 0.7-27.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#444887: marked as done (lincity-ng: File collision in two packages)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444887: fixed in lincity-ng 1.1.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#444634: libwww-mechanize-shell-perl: build times out

tag 444634 patch forwarded 444634 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=29455 thanks On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 09:08:21AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 30/09/07 at 22:26 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > Useless content call in void context at /usr/share/perl5/LWP/Simple.pm > > > line 150

Bug#443632: marked as done (FTBFS: Does not use BSD 'struct tcphdr' definition)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443632: fixed in cheops 0.61-15.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#372470: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.2: jam0 segfaults)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372470: fixed in ftjam 2.5.2-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#443702: marked as done (fuse-source: Missing dependencie to dpatch package)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443702: fixed in fuse 2.7.0-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#444546: amsn segfault at connection with tcl/tk 8.4.16-1

Package: amsn Version: 0.97~rc1+dfsg1-5 Hi Luc, As you can see in my Package information, I am using tcl/tk 8.4.16-1 and I don't have any problems with amsn. Could you please inform if the problem still? or If you find a solution using the version of tcl/tk 8.4.16-1? I'll appreciate if you launc

Bug#443702: I'm not MIA

Hi, * Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-01 21:38]: > Could you please avoid sending NMU's diff to an active maintainer ? [...] Well he did it like it is described in the developers reference: "Make sure that the package's bugs that the NMU is meant to address are all filed in the

Processed: [bts-link] source package kdebase

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdebase > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Bug#397692: libdbd-informix-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate ExtUtils/AutoInstall.pm in @INC

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:38:09 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Nothing has happened since then. Could you fix that problem please? Sorry about that. I wanted to compile with the latest version of the Informix tools, but I had problems installing it. Additionally, the older Info

Bug#444562: Bug#441161: bibletime - FTBFS: configure: error: Failed to compile the test program to check the Sword version

On 10/1/07, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. This issue is completely valid. > > The .la file shipped with libsword-dev references libcurl.la. > Indeed, and that's the one I looked at when filing this bugreport: Well, you didn't mention it in the bugreport. All you mentioned was

Bug#444784: marked as done (xenman doesn't run at all)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:32:34 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444784: fixed in xenman 0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: reassign 444905 to nvidia-glx, forcibly merging 443870 444905

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > reassign 444905 nvidia-glx Bug#444905: xserver-xorg: Xorg segfaults when using two Video cards, but not on one Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `nvidia-glx'. > forcemer

Bug#444682: -2 causes mdadm segfault (fixed in -3)

Package: mdadm Followup-For: Bug #444682 After upgrading to -2 of this package, I got the following during bootup (or when trying to activate md4, which is running on top of lvm) md: md4 stopped. mdadm[5176]: segfault at 7fff9538cfe0 rip 2b04151acd78 rsp 7fff9538cfa0 error 6 I con

Bug#443845: marked as done (Dependency mess-up in upgrade of mysql-admin to 1.2.5rc-2 with uninstall of mysql-admin-common?)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:42:59 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed uninstallable bug in -2 version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#443702: I'm not MIA

Could you please avoid sending NMU's diff to an active maintainer ? I'll fix fuse soon. Moreover adding dpatch dependency seems to be crap, because I don't think fuse source needs dpatch at all. A proper fix would be to figure out why module building targets does depend on dpatch. Regards, Adam.

Processed: Re: Bug#444873: g++-4.2 [hppa] internal compiler error while building saods9

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 444873 + moreinfo Bug#444873: g++-4.2 [hppa] internal compiler error while building saods9 There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > severity 444873 important Bug#444873: g++-4.2 [hppa] internal compiler error while building saods9 Severity se

Bug#444873: g++-4.2 [hppa] internal compiler error while building saods9

tag 444873 + moreinfo severity 444873 important thanks - please recheck with gcc-snapshot - please attach the preprocessed source (4.2 and 4.3/snapshot) Sergei Golovan writes: > Package: g++-4.2 > Version: 4.2.1-5 > Severity: grave > > Hi! > > Looks like building saods9 package on hppa archit

Bug#385139: marked as done (disc-cover: Please add support for texlive)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385139: fixed in disc-cover 1.5.4-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#444888: Segfault on feed update

Package: liferea Version: 1.4.3-1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb71ffb60 (LWP 16594)] 0xb73a5bab in vfprintf () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0xb73a5bab in vfprintf () from

Bug#443179: ucf: expects the wrong answers from debconf

On Monday 01 October 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 01 October 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > > Please consider the attached patch which uses the Choices-C feature of > > debconf. With that you'll never have to worry about inconsistency with > > actual strings. > > Oops. Noticed a small error in the

Bug#444666: deleted my modified powerbtn script on upgrade w/o warning

Torsten Werner wrote: > Everything is explained in NEWS.Debian. Actually, no, your NEWS.Debian mentions "the old log files" and "the logrotate configuration file" but fails to mention that all acpid files are also hosed by this upgrade. > > | You should check in preinst, by comparing the md5sums

Processed: Re: Bug#444887: lincity-ng: File collision in two packages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 444887 pending Bug#444887: lincity-ng: File collision in two packages There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#385139: 0-day NMU

As of Sep 1 2007, Debian's policy has been: "For bugs violating our Release Policy (aka RC-bugs) or a Release Goal, you can upload 0-days NMUs if the bug in the bug tracking system is open for more than one week." http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/09/msg0.html Attached is th

Bug#444887: lincity-ng: File collision in two packages

tag 444887 pending thanks Marc-Jano Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/10/2007): > lincity-ng and lincity-ng-data seem to share a file which leads to a > collision during installation: > […] Hi Marc-Jano, thank you, that's being fixed in SVN. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgpQ92v9JyQ1y.pgp Descript

Bug#444676: behavior change (that looks like power button support broke in Debian)

Torsten Werner wrote: > The bug report comes quiet late because the change has happened before > the etch release. Etch has happily been released with that 'serious > bug'. No, look again: acpid |1.0.4-5 |stable | source, amd64, i386, ia64 acpid (1.0.4-7) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#444887: lincity-ng: File collision in two packages

Package: lincity-ng Version: 1.1.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable lincity-ng and lincity-ng-data seem to share a file which leads to a collision during installation: # aptitude safe-upgrade [...] The following packages will be upgraded: gnome-icon-theme libapr1 libgno

Processed: tagging 421103

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > # reallly tagging, as vorlons failed > tags 421103 lenny sid Bug#421103: FTBFS: tie: Command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny, sid > End of message, stopping proce

Bug#421103: tagging 421103

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 # reallly tagging, as vorlons failed tags 421103 lenny sid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#443179: ucf: expects the wrong answers from debconf

On Monday 01 October 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > Please consider the attached patch which uses the Choices-C feature of > debconf. With that you'll never have to worry about inconsistency with > actual strings. Oops. Noticed a small error in the patch that would have meant loosing the translator com

Processed: Bug#443179: ucf: expects the wrong answers from debconf

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 443179 3.003 Bug#443179: ucf: expects the wrong answers from debconf Bug marked as found in version 3.003 and reopened. > severity 443179 grave Bug#443179: ucf: expects the wrong answers from debconf Severity set to `grave' from `important' > th

Bug#444089: marked as done (openipmi: FTBFS: Build-Depends on unavailable libsnmp10-dev)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:02:24 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#444089: fixed in openipmi 2.0.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#432540: tagging 432540, tagging 305325, tagging 433350, tagging 434316

On 21/08/07 at 22:24 +0100, Paul Cager wrote: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > tags 432540 + pending > tags 305325 + pending > tags 433350 + pending > tags 434316 + pending Hi, This has been pending for more than a month. Is your upload blocked by something

Bug#429480: Lesstif patch for Vibrant apps' (clustalx, etc.) segfaults

On 25/09/07 at 14:26 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) writes: > > > Could you please apply it, or authorize an NMU? > > Seeing no objection (or response at all, admittedly), and one > independent confirmation that my patch works (thanks for testing, > Charles!), I h

Bug#444768: Audacity crashes when opening preference dialogue

> I'm just trying to understand the issues at present. AFAIK, the problem at the root was that a new version of gtk+ got stricter in it's interface and wxwidgets violated one of the stricter rules causing crashes. This is fixed now in the latest wxwidgets in sid. As far as I know, this is no i

Bug#444873: g++-4.2 [hppa] internal compiler error while building saods9

Package: g++-4.2 Version: 4.2.1-5 Severity: grave Hi! Looks like building saods9 package on hppa architecture revealed a bug in g++-4.2. g++ -Wall -g -O2 -DHAVE_SYS_UN_H -DHAVE_SYS_SHM_H -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -w -I. -I.. -I../widget -I../vector -I../l

Bug#444682: [PATCH] Fix segfault on assembly on amd64 with v1 superblocks

also sprach Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.30.2140 +0100]: > --- mdadm-2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59.orig/super1.c > +++ mdadm-2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59/super1.c > @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ > tst.minor_version = bestvers; > tst.ss = &super1; >

Bug#387616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: uses removed minimum/maximum operator

Hi, There's a new upstream version available that probably fixes this bug, according to the statement in the bug log. Lucas On 15/09/06 at 19:07 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > Hi, > > I can see that 2.0.5 (in incoming) is affected as well. > Damn, why didn't they push for normalization of those op

Bug#444865: Depends on nonexistent virtual package "editor"

Package: ldapvi Version: 1.7-2 Severity: serious Hi, ldapvi depends on a virtual package called "editor" that according to Debian policy doesn't exist and thus mustn't appear in a Provides or a Depends line. See e.g. #398752 for a discussion. Best regards, Andras -- Andras K

Bug#439642: Probably something debian buildd specific

2007/10/1, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think you mean NEW. Incoming is , and is > described in . True, got confused, meant NEW. Regards Javier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Bug#443819: marked as done (Missing dependency?)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:32:11 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443819: fixed in python-kde3 3.16.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#428995: marked as done (seal: FTBFS: linkage.h:4:26: error: linux/config.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:32:12 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428995: fixed in seal 1.07-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#181378: update for 64-egf-speedup.patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 181378 patch Bug#181378: grep is extremely slow There were no tags set. Bug#206470: LC_CTYPE=C speeds 'grep a' 800 times! Bug#224993: /usr/share/man/man1/dlocate.1.gz: not fast alternative for dpkg -l Tags added: patch > forcemerge 181378 442882 B

Bug#442271: marked as done (courier-pop-ssl: pop3s does not work any more)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#442271: fixed in courier 0.57.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#441019: marked as done (debian/copyright wasn't updated for GPLv3)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:47:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441019: fixed in gnash 0.8.1~rc.070818-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#441706: marked as done (gnash: package content changed if build twice or more times in a row)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:47:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#441706: fixed in gnash 0.8.1~rc.070818-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#443285: marked as done (not compatible with xserver-xorg 7.3)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#443285: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-amd 2.7.7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#442966: enigmail: FTBFS: nsEnigModule.cpp:(.text+0x23): undefined reference to `NS_NewGenericModule2(nsModuleInfo const*, nsIModule**)'

Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/10/2007): > Hey dear NM ... you forgot to attach anything :) ... at least the > mails i got had no patch/attachment. And as discussed on IRC, an updated patch (runtime not checked this time since I've no longer any tester around). Cheers, -- Cyril diff -u

Bug#444495: Same with Kad

Hi ! I've got the same issue when updating KAD's nodes... Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: found 443990 in 2.20.0-3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > found 443990 2.20.0-3 Bug#443990: sun-java6-jre: After GNOME upgrade, all swing applications crash on startup Bug marked as found in version 2.20.0-3. > End of message, stopping pr

Processed: retitle 443990 to After GNOME upgrade, all swing applications crash on startup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > retitle 443990 After GNOME upgrade, all swing applications crash on startup Bug#443990: sun-java6-jre: After GNOME upgrade, all swing applications crash on startup Changed Bug title

Processed: severity 346238 grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 346238 grave Bug#346238: gsm-utils: deletes and recreates the gsmsms user on each upgrade (!?) Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#423190: zangband: should this package be orphaned?

Ok. Vince, can you please confirm that zangband can be safely removed from Debian ? Thank you, Lucas On 01/10/07 at 14:32 +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi Debian Games team, > > > > Are you interested in taking over zangband

Bug#444510: libquicktime: FTBFS: error: expected, specifier-qualifier-list before 'GtkTooltips'

forwarded 444510 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4af8d6ff0709290416p2b73d9fet18bb562af46b704b%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=libquicktime-devel thanks Loic: I've produced the attached patch against upstream's CVS; could you take care of forwarding it? Sure, but obviously

Bug#444843: Broken dependencies in sid (libpt-1.10.10)

Package: libopal-2.2 Version: 2.2.8~dfsg1-2 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Since many days ago (almost two weeks, I think), it is impossible to upgrade ekiga and libopal-2.2 (to version 2.2.11~dfsg1-1) because of the broken dependency. --- System information.

Processed: found 444285 in 2.12.0-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > found 444285 2.12.0-2 Bug#444285: gimp-data: Generated cache was invalid Bug marked as found in version 2.12.0-2. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: reassign 444285 to libgtk2.0-bin

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > reassign 444285 libgtk2.0-bin 2.12.0-2 Bug#444285: gimp-data: Generated cache was invalid Bug reassigned from package `libgtk2.0-0' to `libgtk2.0-bin'. > End of message, stopping pro

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 439642 pending Bug#439642: Snort does not work on amd64, tries to load 32-bit libraries Tags were: help Tags added: pending > tags 441796 pending Bug#441796: ITP: oss2jack -- kernel based ap

Bug#423190: zangband: should this package be orphaned?

On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Debian Games team, > > Are you interested in taking over zangband? It's non-free, in Debian > since 1999, and it never migrated to testing. > > Description: A single-player, text-based, roguelike game > Zangband is a single-pla

Bug#416768: Fixes bug 416768 in hunglish

tags 416768 - patch thanks On 18/05/07 at 20:11 +0200, Javier Merino wrote: > tags 416768 + patch > thanks > > Hi, > > The patch attached makes the call in the postrm script to debconf and > awk conditional. That way hunglish no longer depends on non-essential > packages in postrm. Hi Javi, I ca

Bug#361568: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: 'scratch' will always evaluate as 'true'

On 28/06/07 at 23:17 +0200, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > Hi, > > this patch just replaces x_strdup() with plain strdup(), which makes the > warning go away without changing the behaviour of the code. > However, the benefits of using -Werror are minimal compared to the number > of possible FTBFS

Processed: Re: Bug#416768: Fixes bug 416768 in hunglish

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 416768 - patch Bug#416768: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm Tags were: patch etch-ignore Tags removed: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#428995: seal: FTBFS: linkage.h:4:26: error: linux/config.h: No such file or directory

On 15/06/07 at 14:41 +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > tag 428995 pending > thanks > > Thank you for the report. > > This is fixed in Debian Games SVN. > > Best regards, Hi Gonéri, This has been pending for more than 2 months. What do you need to fix that bug? A sponsor? -- | Lucas Nussbaum |

Bug#419874: Debian package available (was: Re: amavis-stats does not create and display graphics anymore)

Hi, FWIW, a Debian package with Daniel Smolik's patch is available from deb[-src] http://non-gnu.uvt.nl/debian etch amavis-stats I *might* have time to upload this as an NMU, soonish. Bye, Joost signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#439642: Probably something debian buildd specific

Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/10/2007): > Well, a patch is a patch. A comment is *not* a patch. … > I've already fixed this and uploaded a new version of the package (in > INCOMING, since it introduces a new package). Introducing a new > package and moving files over to it is

Bug#439642: Probably something debian buildd specific

2007/10/1, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > And where's the patch? > > "Put the .so in the appropriate package", do you really expect more? You > might have wanted to remove the "help" tag instead, since you've now got > the hint you were looking for, haven't you? Well, a patch is a patch.

Bug#442424: Oops, malformed tags line

tag 442424 patch thanks The Fungi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/10/2007): > tags 442424 + patch > > (tried to tag the wrong bug number in my last update--sorry!) That mail should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and a “thanks” has to follow the command(s), so that it doesn't try to parse your text below.

Processed: Re: Bug#442424: Oops, malformed tags line

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 442424 patch Bug#442424: xserver-xorg-input-wacom: Please provide packages for xserver-xorg-core 1.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#444829: sun-java6-plugin: remote browser crash

On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 12:54 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Sam Morris: > > > Package: sun-java6-plugin > > Version: 6-02-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: security > > Justification: remote DOS on user's browser > > Browser crashes are generally not RC bugs (there are just too many of > them).

Bug#439642: Probably something debian buildd specific

Le dimanche 30 septembre 2007 à 22:27 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit : > > I'd also advise to use ???-module -avoid-version??? to build plugins, no > > need to have .0.0.0 things for them, but please fix that bug first. > > Why shouldn't there be a versioning for the modules? If lib

Bug#444829: sun-java6-plugin: remote browser crash

Hi, * Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-01 13:04]: > * Sam Morris: > > Package: sun-java6-plugin > > Version: 6-02-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: security > > Justification: remote DOS on user's browser > > Browser crashes are generally not RC bugs (there are just too many of > them).

Bug#444562: Bug#441161: bibletime - FTBFS: configure: error: Failed to compile the test program to check the Sword version

Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/10/2007): > On Monday 01 October 2007, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > From what I found out, this is not true and this bug should be closed > > as invalid. > > No. This issue is completely valid. > > The .la file shipped with libsword-dev references libcurl.la

Bug#444829: sun-java6-plugin: remote browser crash

* Sam Morris: > Package: sun-java6-plugin > Version: 6-02-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: security > Justification: remote DOS on user's browser Browser crashes are generally not RC bugs (there are just too many of them). Anyway, I can't reproduce this with appletviewer. Are you sure this isn't a

Bug#444833: debian-reference-es: trying to launch debian-reference gives an error

Package: debian-reference-es Version: 1.11 Severity: serious Justification: unknown lanuching debian-reference gives this: (gnome-terminal:27807): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_gc_get_colormap: assertion `GDK_IS_GC (gc)' failed -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy:

Bug#439642: Probably something debian buildd specific

Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30/09/2007): > > I'd also advise to use “-module -avoid-version” to build plugins, no > > need to have .0.0.0 things for them, but please fix that bug first. > > Why shouldn't there be a versioning for the modules? If libraries are > in a separat

Bug#444829: sun-java6-plugin: remote browser crash

Package: sun-java6-plugin Version: 6-02-1 Severity: serious Tags: security Justification: remote DOS on user's browser -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The applet at http://evil.hackademix.net/fullscreen/applet.html causes Epiphany and Iceweasel to crash. $ gdb epiphany-browser Usin

Bug#444666: deleted my modified powerbtn script on upgrade w/o warning

On 9/30/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > broke my perfectly functioning system and forced me to read your > postinst script[1] and pull powerbtn files out of acpid-cruft.tar.gz. Everything is explained in NEWS.Debian. > | You should check in preinst, by comparing the md5sums of the > |

Bug#444676: behavior change (that looks like power button support broke in Debian)

On 9/30/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have filed this bug report as severity serious because this is a > serious reversion in functionality, that if shipped with lenny, The bug report comes quiet late because the change has happened before the etch release. Etch has happily been rel

Bug#442966: enigmail: FTBFS: nsEnigModule.cpp:(.text+0x23): undefined reference to `NS_NewGenericModule2(nsModuleInfo const*, nsIModule**)'

Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/10/2007): > Hey dear NM ... you forgot to attach anything :) ... at least the > mails i got had no patch/attachment. Fixed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=17;bug=442966 some minutes after. ;) Cheers, -- Cyril pgpbZQzyRosiS.pgp Descrip

Bug#444768: Audacity crashes when opening preference dialogue

John Halton wrote: Joost Yervante Damad wrote: Hello, Can you please try with wxwidgets version 2.6.3.2.2-1 ? There was a problem in an earlier version with the new gnome/gtk+. Thanks, Joost Thanks. The new wxwidgets is only in Sid for AMD at the moment, but once the i386 version arrives I

Processed: Bug#431026: reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen #431026 Bug#431026: knowledgeroot: clarify licence for HTMLSax3.php 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of mes

Bug#424802: marked as done (mlmmj-php-web-admin: affected by php4-removal)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:47:35 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424802: fixed in mlmmj 1.2.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#425928: marked as done (slony1: FTBFS: Erroneous request for title for this element)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:00:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line not a slony bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

  1   2   >