Bug#409243: fails to boot.

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** -- Package-specific info: -- /proc/cmdline root=/dev/mapper/vg00-root ro -- /proc/filesystems ext2 cramfs ext3 -- lsmod Modu

Bug#409242: causes kernel oops

Package: drbd8-module-source Version: 8.0pre5-1 Severity: grave Hi, compiled the kernel module on two different systems (one is an older 2.6.16-2-xen-686, but the other one is linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (2.6.18-7)). On both systems I saw a kernel oops upon executing "/etc/init.d/drbd start". Out

Bug#393415: marked as done (Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393415: fixed in tcllib 1.9.dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#385831: marked as done (package build-depends on g++-4.0, which is not available on hppa)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385831: fixed in fwbuilder 2.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#342966: marked as done (Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385831: fixed in fwbuilder 2.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#409225: Can't update from python-uno_2.1-2 to python-uno_2.1-3

Package: python-uno Version: 2.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi! Today while trying to update python-uno from version 2.1-2 to 2.1-3, I've got: Preparing to replace python-uno 2.1-2 (using .../python-uno_2.1-3_i386.deb) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pycentral

Bug#408270: onak: missing dep on adduser

On Wednesday 31 January 2007, Masami Ichikawa wrote: > Hi. > > I wrote a patch. > > I added dependency on adduser and delete account. > also added delete account to postrm file. Hi! Please _only_ remove the user if you are 110% sure that the user does not own _any_ file or _any_ dir on the entir

Bug#405565: jabber: Jabber failing on i386 with port bind issues

Package: jabber Version: 1.4.3-3.1 Followup-For: Bug #405565 I wanted to add in that I'm having the same issue with jabber not being able to bind to a port. This is with the same config that I've been running for a few years now. Attached is the strace and the results of a "grep -C 10 ' 6, base

Bug#408360: NMU of gnugk to fix RC bug

usertag 408360 supplied-patch thanks Hi, I have NMUed your package to fix the RC bug 408360. My NMU interdiff is attached. I also added two lines to the init.d script to create the /var/run/gnugk directory on start of the daemon, as some systems clean that directory or mount a tmpfs on top of /va

Bug#408360: marked as done (gnugk: must pre-depends on adduser, not just depends on it)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408360: fixed in gnugk 2:2.2.5-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#407411: marked as done (iceape-browser: Leaves dangling symlinks to /etc/alternatives when package is purged)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:17:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#407411: fixed in iceape 1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#405911: marked as done (iceape needs a versioned conflict against mozilla)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:17:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#405911: fixed in iceape 1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#409115: marked as done (putty: FTBFS in experimental/alpha (Re: Log for failed build of putty_0.59-1 (dist=experimental)))

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409115: fixed in putty 0.59-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#401983: marked as done (mozilla fails to install)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:17:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#405911: fixed in iceape 1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#406861: marked as done (iceape-mailnews: Segfaults upon startup)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:17:39 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#406861: fixed in iceape 1.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#409213: libgd2-xpm: shlibs file specifies too tight dependencies

Package: libgd2-xpm Version: 2.0.34~rc1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 libgd2-xpm.shlibs specifies that packages linking against libgd2-xpm must depend on libgd2-xpm (>= 2.0.34) [with no tilde], which is impossible to satisfy quite yet. Likewise for libgd2-noxpm, making libgd2-too

Processed: Fwd: Re: libcommoncpp2-1.5-0 version 1.5.3-1 is ABI incompatible with version 1.5.1-4

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 402009 bug-commoncpp@gnu.org Bug#402009: twinkle: symbol lookup error when hanging up Forwarded-to-address changed from bug-commoncpp@gnu.org, David Sugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as d

Bug#381337: marked as done (mozilla-firefox-adblock: adblock does not get active in firefox)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381337: fixed in mozilla-firefox-adblock 0.5.3.043-0.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: raise severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 408839 grave Bug#408839: CVE-2007-0508: bbclone: "BBC_LIB_PATH" Parameter Handling Remote File Inclusion Vulnerability Severity set to `grave' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#403706: allow-hotplug and udev

reassign 403706 release-notes severity 403706 important thanks On Tuesday 19 December 2006 22:19, Joey Hess wrote: > It's not particularly clear to me that this is a d-i bug though. If > ifupdown/udev doesn't behave correctly/reliably for allow-hotplug > interfaces that are cold-plugged at system

Processed: reassign 409101 to discover1-data

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > reassign 409101 discover1-data Bug#409101: discover-data: fails to find any display devices Bug reassigned from package `discover-data' to `discover1-data'. > End of message, stoppin

Processed: Re: Bug#403706: allow-hotplug and udev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 403706 release-notes Bug#403706: (sometimes?) fails to bring up interfaces on bootup by default Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `release-notes'. > severity 403706 important Bug#403706: (sometimes?) fails to bring up interfaces on bootu

Processed: severity of 409101 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > severity 409101 serious Bug#409101: discover-data: fails to find any display devices Severity set to `serious' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: reassign 409101 to discover-data

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > reassign 409101 discover-data Bug#409101: discover-data: fails to find any display devices Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `discover-data'. > End of message, stopping

Processed: Re: Bug#409142: x11-common: Xsession is missing, gnome fonts display as squares, and kde is not starting any more, even if i copy Xsession from somewhere else

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 409142 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug#409142: x11-common: Xsession is missing, gnome fonts display as squares, and kde is not starting any more, even if i copy Xsession from somewhere else There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducibl

Bug#409142: x11-common: Xsession is missing, gnome fonts display as squares, and kde is not starting any more, even if i copy Xsession from somewhere else

tags 409142 + moreinfo unreproducible severity 409142 important thank you soloturn wrote: > Package: x11-common > Version: 1:7.1.0-11 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > This is not severity critical. It breaks your X session, right. But, the whole system is not br

Processed: Fixed in next upstream release

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 404022 + pending Bug#404022: file conflicts between interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl There were no tags set. Bug#404023: file conflicts between interchange and libbusiness-ups-perl Tags added: pending > tags 375916 + pending Bug#375916: interc

Bug#408244: intend to NMU

This one time, at band camp, Bastian Venthur said: > Hi, > > Fixing the bug by adding adduser to the depends-line, reveals another > problem. In ifmail.postinst you are calling newaliases which belongs to > exim4 but you ifmail does not depend on exim4. > > I'm currently working on this bug in or

Processed: Re: Bug#225833: 225833: letter vs A4 in TeX

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 379089 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#379089: tex-common: unclear wording of debconf messages, assumes wrongly mktex.cnf has been created by a knowing admin Changed Bug submitter from Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Manoj Sriv

Processed: patch + NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 408272 patch Bug#408272: openggsn: missing dep on debconf There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Processed: patch + NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 408235 patch Bug#408235: dnscvsutil: missing dep on adduser There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#409018: nohwcap

Hello I refer to my posting http://www.mail-archive.com/grml@mur.at/msg00781.html in which a whole discussion thread deals with the subject. It had also been relayed to the maintainers of x-servers x.org IMHO the nohwcap issue shall be dealt with only by the kernel and / or any other hardware

Bug#408272: marked as done (openggsn: missing dep on debconf)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408272: fixed in openggsn 0.84-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#408235: marked as done (dnscvsutil: missing dep on adduser)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408235: fixed in dnscvsutil 0.10.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#408235: patch + NMU

tags 408235 patch quit Hi, I've just patched the bug (the patch is attached) and did an 0-day NMU according to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de Debian Developer

Bug#394834: marked as done ("Not yet ready to release: Segfault on AMD64")

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#394834: fixed in dicomnifti 2.22-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#409191: prosper: Missed dependency to texlive-latex-recommended

Package: prosper Version: 1.00.4+cvs.2006.10.22-1 Severity: serious prosper uses style 'seminar' from texlive-latex-recommended, but does not depend on it. This is RC bug according to the http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt: "Packages must include a "Depends:" line listing any other pack

Bug#408244: marked as done (ifmail: missing dep on adduser)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408244: fixed in ifmail 2.14tx8.10-19.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#408272: patch + NMU

tags 408272 patch quit Hi, I've fixed the bug and uploaded it to DELAYED/0. The patch is attached. Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de Debian Developer venthur at debian org diff -ruN orig/openggsn-0.84/

Bug#408244: intend to NMU

Hi, Fixing the bug by adding adduser to the depends-line, reveals another problem. In ifmail.postinst you are calling newaliases which belongs to exim4 but you ifmail does not depend on exim4. I'm currently working on this bug in order to NMU it. Please drop me a note in order to stop me. Cheer

Bug#408244: patch + NMU

tags 408244 patch quit Hi, I've attached a trivial patch which fixes this bug. I just added adduser to ifmail's depends line. Now ifmail runs smoothly through piuparts. I noticed another bug: in ifmail.postinst you echo stuff in /etc/aliases but you don't check if this file exits or not. If this

Bug#408270: onak: missing dep on adduser

Hi. I wrote a patch. I added dependency on adduser and delete account. also added delete account to postrm file. Cheers, -- /* * Masami Ichikawa * mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * : [EMAIL PROTECTED] */ diff -u onak-0.3.2/debian/postrm onak-0.3.2/debian/postrm --- onak-0.3.2/debian/postrm

Bug#408262: patch + NMU

Hi again, according to the announce on http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html we've currently ('till the release) the NMU-0 rule for bugs older than 7 days. So I've uploaded to DELAYED/0. Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur

Bug#408262: marked as done (mpd: missing dep on adduser)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408262: fixed in mpd 0.12.1-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#408885: marked as done (deco_3.9-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: TIOCGLTC undefined)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408885: fixed in deco 3.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Processed: patch + NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 408262 patch Bug#408262: mpd: missing dep on adduser Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -

Bug#408262: patch + NMU

tags 408262 patch quit Hi, I've prepared a trivial patch which solves the problem. It simply adds adduser to the depends line. mpd runs now smoothly through piuparts. I'm not sure if you're MIA since your last activity is a few months ago, so I'm tempted to do an DELAYED/7 NMU immediately since

Bug#409169: ocamldsort: missing OCaml runtime dependency on some architectures

Package: ocamldsort Version: 0.14.3-1.3 Severity: serious On those architectures that don't have a native compiler (eg. hppa), /usr/bin/ocamldsort begins with #!/usr/bin/ocamlrun but the package doesn't depend on an OCaml runtime environment for the interpreter. Recommendations on generating th

Processed: tagging 394834

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 394834 - fixed Bug#394834: "Not yet ready to release: Segfault on AMD64" Tags were: pending fixed Tags removed: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processed: patch + NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 408262 patch Bug#408262: mpd: missing dep on adduser There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Processed: Re: Bug#409152: mysql-client-5.0: Commands out of sync error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 409152 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#409152: mysql-client-5.0: Commands out of sync error There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > severity 409152 normal Bug#409152: mysql-client-5.0: Commands out of sync error Severity set t

Bug#409152: mysql-client-5.0: Commands out of sync error

tags 409152 + unreproducible moreinfo severity 409152 normal stop Hello Diwaker On 2007-01-31 Diwaker Gupta wrote: > Package: mysql-client-5.0 > Version: 5.0.32-3 ... > Anything I try to do using mysqladmin comes back with: > error: 'Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now' > > As a

Bug#405221: FTBFS - yelp needs a build-dep on libxt-dev

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007, Adriaan Peeters wrote: > What is withholding the upload of the fix? This was marked as uploaded in the SVN, there were even new changes in a new revision, but I didn't find the -2 upload, so I'm preparing it now. PS: 2.16/experimental is not top priority... -- Loïc Minie

Processed: Re: Bug#409148: glibc tzdata2006b out of date for 4 Canadian Provinces.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 409148 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5 Bug#409148: glibc tzdata2006b out of date for 4 Canadian Provinces. 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5, send any further explanation

Bug#409148: glibc tzdata2006b out of date for 4 Canadian Provinces.

close 409148 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5 severity 409148 normal thanks David Broome a écrit : > Package: libc6 > Version: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 > Severity: critical > > Hello - tzdata in glibc for stable is based on tzdata2006b (from edits in > 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1), this does not have the correct PST ch

Bug#409152: mysql-client-5.0: Commands out of sync error

Package: mysql-client-5.0 Version: 5.0.32-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Anything I try to do using mysqladmin comes back with: error: 'Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now' As a result, all my init scripts for mysql are broken. -- System Information: D

Bug#409147: glibc tzdata2005b out of date for 4 Canadian Provinces.

merge 409147 409148 thanks David Broome wrote: > Package: glibc > Version: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4 > Severity: critical > > Hello - tzdata in glibc for stable is based on tzdata2006b (from edits > in 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1), this does not have the correct PST changes for > this year for 4 Canadian

Bug#409147: marked as done (glibc tzdata2005b out of date for 4 Canadian Provinces.)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:25:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409147: glibc tzdata2005b out of date for 4 Canadian Provinces. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t