Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 391404 serious
Bug#391404: libapache2-modxslt: conflicts with modxslt-tools
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404917: fixed in libmail-listdetector-perl 0.34+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: linux-patch-bootsplash, kernel-patch-bootsplash
Severity: serious
Justification: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both linux-patch-bootsplash and kernel-patch-bootsplash ship
`/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/apply/bootsplash' but do not conflict or
add a diversion, thus fail to be install
El jue, 28-12-2006 a las 18:15 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
escribió:
> I see you're using the unstable version of xmms. Could you test with
> the testing version?
>
with 1.2.10+20061101-1, 1.2.10+cvs20050809-1_i386.deb and 1.2.10
+cvs20050809-5 xmms versions (the last two from snapshot.debi
Package: libmail-listdetector-perl
Version: 0.34-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
This module includes files which are -to me- clearly non-free: From
its POD documentation (in lib/Mail/ListDetector.pm):
This module includes a number of sample emails from various
mailing lists
Hi,
I'm using evolution 2.8 from Debian experimental and a similar problem
happens.
System.DllNotFoundException: /usr/lib/cli/evolution-sharp-2.0
/libevolutionglue.so
at (wrapper managed-to-native)
Evolution.Cal:e_cal_glue_ecal_get_changes(intptr,string,intptr&,intptr&,intptr&,intptr&)
at Evol
I am having this problem too on an x86 machine with ext3 filesystem.
rtorrent stops downloading and says:
Hash check on download completion found bad chunks, consider using
"safe_sync"
This is the case whether safe_sync is used or not. Download resumes if I
start the torrent again manually. T
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 18:02:48 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> (Aside from the whole "wrong bug report" question)
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:31:17AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > The xorg metapackage depends on a few font packages.
>
> Shouldn't the X server itself depend on xfonts-base?
(Aside from the whole "wrong bug report" question)
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:31:17AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> The xorg metapackage depends on a few font packages.
Shouldn't the X server itself depend on xfonts-base? This appears to have
been the case in sarge. The 'fixed' font must alway
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> forwarded 404888 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390532
Bug#404888: glib2.0: cannot go into testing; causes gnucash regrsession
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwar
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> > to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
>
> There are clearly two plausible sol
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
Here is a sample file; I suspect the offending character is the space,
if I'm reading Marc Brockschmidt's regex righ
On 28.12.06 21:53:52, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On Sunday 24 December 2006 20:36, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > No problem, my xulrunner.dpath is attached.
> >
> > Andreas
> I'm sorry but your patch isn't working for me, now I get:
Right, I wasn't clear enough: eclipse doesn't crash anymore due to
u
Package: dnsproxy
Version: 1.15-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of dnsproxy_1.15-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20061228-1543
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: olsrd
Version: 0.4.10-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of olsrd_0.4.10-3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20061228-0756
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 07:09:33PM +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> It seems to me that what is *really* needed is a script that knows
> where to stash files like this. That script would be invoked in the
> postinst scripts of extension packages like mozilla-imagezoom to
> register the extensi
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:57:53 +0200, Wouter Van Hemel wrote:
> I did a test upgrade from sarge (stable) to etch (testing) a few hours
> ago, and X ended up without any usable fonts after that upgrade (no
> xfonts-* packages with fonts installed).
>
This has nothing to do with the bug report
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
> to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
There are clearly two plausible solutions to the underlying problem:
1. Change gnucash to conform to the new behavi
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:08:21AM -0800, Mark Symonds wrote:
> Package: libapache-mod-ssl
> Version: 2.8.22-1sarge1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> The past week I've had four sarge boxes apache processes lockup.
> apachectl restart works without error,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 375850 patch
Bug#375850: john: modifies conffile
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 403855 patch
Bug#403855: john: please add any necessary maintscript foo to hide cracked
passwords not corrected since old versions
There were no tags
Daniel,
On 12/29/06, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I notice in the Debian Bugs Use Group that you have been working on a
patch for libapache2-mod-auth-mysql. It appears that the package has
been removed out of the repository also, which is a problem for me since
I use it in a production sys
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350851 -fixed-upstream
Bug#350851: kmail: v1.9.1: Data loss w/disconnected IMAP (reported upstream)
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Bug#321102: kmail loses mails
Bug#332473: kmail: dangerous handling of dimap-folders
Tags removed: fixed-upstream
tags 350851 -fixed-upstream
reopen 350851
found 350851 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-4
thanks
(Actually I can't seem to reopen this bug in KDE. Argh. If someone doesn't
notice and reopen it, I'll file a new one and link it to Debian.)
It's with a heavy heart that I reopen this bug on KDE's and Debian's track
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 16:46 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> What part of the freeze policy do you not understand? You uploaded two
> new upstream versions which fix no Debian bugs *after* the freeze.
Do you want me to report a Debian bug for each upstream issue? Or do you
really be
tag 375850 patch
tag 403855 patch
thanks
Included is a patch which drops conffile modification from john. This
package might become considerable for etch if someone uploads
sufficiently soon (this might require filterdiff including only the
"control" and maintscript modifications).
You can also
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-8
Followup-For: Bug #403818
I did a test upgrade from sarge (stable) to etch (testing) a few hours
ago, and X ended up without any usable fonts after that upgrade (no
xfonts-* packages with fonts installed).
(That's 28.dec.2006, just before midnight GMT,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 241931 libclanlib2
Bug#241931: pingus: Weird colors on powerpc arch (clanlib issue?)
Bug reassigned from package `pingus' to `libclanlib2'.
> forcemerge 404828 241931
Bug#404828: clanbomber: unusable on sparc and powerpc (clanlib issue?)
Bug#2
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sorry, but you don't make a soname bump just for the sake of
> applications ignoring function semantics.
Right. You also don't introduce regressions in an indeterminate number of
other packages during a freeze just because those
reassign 241931 libclanlib2
forcemerge 404828 241931
thanks
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:02PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:37:53PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > For checking a bit more whether the bug is in pingus or clanlib/etc,
> > could you check other games
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:18:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 3) The change altered the syntax of the file by adding restrictions. It
> is therefore a non-backwards-compatible change to the ABI, and therefore
> it needs an so-name bump. No amount of adding this or that character
> will ch
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 1) The release team has asked us not to upload changes which are not
> > destined for etch, and making gnucash work with the glib in unstable is
> > therefore a low priority;
>
> The glib in unstable is destined for etch, whether you l
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 16:18 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> I don't think I asked for important bug fixes to be blocked outside
> etch. On the other hand, the upload of 2.12.5 did not fix any bugs,
> according to the changelog and the BTS.
According to the upstream changelog it fixes
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 00:49 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 14:47 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> > Package: glib2.0
> > Version: 2.12.5-3
> >
> > This version of glib (both 2.12.5-3 and 2.12.6-1) causes an important
> > regression in gnucash, and therefore shou
Package: pcscd
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hoi :)
The pcscd postinst tried to start the daemon but it failed:
Starting PCSC Lite resource manager: pcscdStatus of PCSC Lite resource manager:
pcscd not run
I see you're using the unstable version of xmms. Could you test with
the testing version?
Thanks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 14:47 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> Package: glib2.0
> Version: 2.12.5-3
>
> This version of glib (both 2.12.5-3 and 2.12.6-1) causes an important
> regression in gnucash, and therefore should not go into testing.
>
> See http://bugs.debian.org/404585.
What i
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:43:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug applies only to oldstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I'm going to be away over the weekend, but I'll upload a new libtiff
that fixes the problem when I get back next week. I'll upload with
urgency high and will contact the release team at that time.
There are probably quite a few packages that have this bug, based on
the fact that there are severa
(Please ignore the previous reply.)
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 21:06 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
> block 404822 by 404756
> thanks
>
> Commenting out line 440 of
> gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-keyboard-xkb.c (the call that
> initially applies xkb settings) causes these callbacks to start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404888 serious
Bug#404888: glib2.0: cannot go into testing; causes gnucash regrsession
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 404143 -1
Bug#404143: Fans unreliable under load, permanent memory leak
Bug 404143 cloned as bug 404891.
> severity -1 serious
Bug#404891: Fans unreliable under load, permanent memory leak
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> reassign -1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 404888 serious
Bug#404888: glib2.0: cannot go into testing; causes gnucash regrsession
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403056: fixed in wengophone 2.0.0~rc5-svn8108-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
severity 404834 important
thanks
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:50:45PM +0100, Sebastian Fontius wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64
> Version: 2.6.18-8
> Severity: critical
> Tags: patch
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> at first: if the severity may seem inflated feel free to
On 2006-12-28 21:03:57 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> This is I think a question of interpretation;
> if the local change modifies the way the package works in any way, then
> I agree; but a comment?! Where does it end? Do you want upgrades to
> preserve the mtime of the configuration file as well?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reopen 404631
Bug#404631: missing files under /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404834 important
Bug#404834: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64: Kernel unaligned access kills at
least sshfs (and may make USB unreliable)
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # hardware-specific, not common case
> severity 404823 important
Bug#404823: Usb devices doesn't work
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
in your bug report you wrote to upload a fix from the upstream svn
repository. However I did not find an according bug report or patch at
the upstream homepage. Could you attach the patch or specify an URL to it?
Thanks,
Bastian
- --
,''`.
Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> The attached patch adds a configure option "--with-mnttab=". Maybe
> it's a good idea to push this upstream (e.g. for embedded platforms
> which might operate without /etc/mtab, but with /proc/mounts instead).
>
> Thomas, what is your opinion on this one?
Fine by me. Ple
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 12:46 +, Sam Morris a écrit :
> Package: gnome-control-center
> Version: 1:2.16.2-2
> Severity: serious
> File: /usr/bin/gnome-mouse-properties
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> None of the mouse-related options seem to have any effect:
>
>
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:08:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404631: missing files under /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 404631
Bug#404631: missing files under /usr/share/doc/libtiff-tools/
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383164: fixed in e3 1:2.70-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402816: fixed in dwm-tools 2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
block 404822 by 404756
thanks
Commenting out line 440 of
gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-keyboard-xkb.c (the call that
initially applies xkb settings) causes these callbacks to start working
again. So the problem seems to be in the code in apply_xkb_settings that
applies the settings and/or h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> merge 404662 404775
Bug#404662: iceweasel: creates /usr/share/firefox symlink
Bug#404775: iceweasel: upgrade fails from 2.0+dfsg-1 to 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1
Merged 404662 404775.
>
End of me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 404822 by 404756
Bug#404822: /usr/bin/gnome-mouse-properties: Mouse Preferences have no effect
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 404822 added: 404756
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
On Sunday 24 December 2006 20:36, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> No problem, my xulrunner.dpath is attached.
>
> Andreas
I'm sorry but your patch isn't working for me, now I get:
!ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2006-12-28 21:42:08.352
!MESSAGE XPCOM error -2147221164
!STACK 0
org.eclipse.swt.SWTError: XPCOM e
Package: toolbar-fancy
Version: 0.07-7.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package appears to have no effect on anything when
installed. Given the long time it has been efectively unmaintained and
the fact that upstream's page no longer exists, I assume it was meant
for
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 10:28:09AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > To me this always implied that file conflicts between packages aren't
> > possible in this situation, either (and I even think I tried it out).
> > After all, it's not a bug for two packages to ship the same di
Hi
following up to myself to announce that a preliminary patch (attached)
for this bug was worked out some days ago and should be soon available
in a definitive version as soon as mike emmel, gtkdfb maintainer,
reviews it.
The patch fixes the memory leaks that were experienced when destroyin
Hoi Bas,
On Thursday 28 December 2006 20:15, you wrote:
> You wrote:
> > forgot to ask you to for the ouput of dmidecode and acpidump.
> > for the acpi blacklisting.
>
> Attached.
Als de oplossing wordt om machines uit te sluiten, lijkt me dit wel een
candidaat voor documentatie in de Release No
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 404143 important
Bug#404143: Fans unreliable under load, permanent memory leak
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404855 wishlist
Bug#404855: french manpage is out of date, and doesn't include the ramdisk
option.
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Thu 28 Dec 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The upgrade from wwwoffle 2.9-2 to 2.9a-1 overwrote a local change in
> /etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf (at least a comment I had added at the end
> of the file, which disappeared).
>
> Section 10.7.3 of the Debian policy says:
>
> local changes must be
I believe this is more a bug either in postfix or in the submitter's
postfix configuration. See #403930
Pending confirmation from the submitter I will merge these two bugs and
either reassign them to postfix or outright close them.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:30:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line f-spot: Bug was fixed, closing.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
A couple of observations:
* This bug will not cause hardware damage. The hard thermal cutoff
temperature is well below the temperature at which actual damage will
occur.
* It's not clear that the vendor DSDT is broken. It's an unusual
interpretation of the spec, but not necessarily an invalid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 404855 french manpage is out of date, and doesn't include the ramdisk
> option.
Bug#404855: kernel-package ability to chose the ramdisk generator in
kernel-img.conf seems to have dissapeared.
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is current
I compiled gnome-settings-daemon with debug symbols and set breakpoints
on the mouse_callback and apply_xkb_settings functions. They simply
aren't being called.
I also noticed that changing theme settings has no effect so maybe the
bit of g-s-d that handles watching gconf keys and calling callback
It seems to me that what is *really* needed is a script that knows
where to stash files like this. That script would be invoked in the
postinst scripts of extension packages like mozilla-imagezoom to
register the extension file. Another script would be invoked in the
postinst scripts of browsers
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.9a-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
The upgrade from wwwoffle 2.9-2 to 2.9a-1 overwrote a local change in
/etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf (at least a comment I had added at the end
of the file, which disappeared).
Section 10.7.3 of the Debian policy says:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 403930 moreinfo
Bug#403930: xemacs21-basesupport: smtpmail silently drops mails if
/usr/bin/sendmail rejects them
Tags were: etch sarge
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
tag 403930 moreinfo
thanks
Hi. I'm taking a look at xemacs bug #403930, but I don't have a
postfix to run some tests with.
Could you retry the mail sending from the command line using the
options:
/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -odb
and check the error status returned. Also, please check whether the
Package: kwin
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #404226
Hi,
I just wanted to confirm that bug. Upon successfully starting the java program
ProjectX (with 'java -jar /path/to/ProjectX.jar'), kwin crashes a few seconds
later. I just updated to the latest JDK (in debian-multimedia.org,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404855 wishlist
Bug#404855: kernel-package ability to chose the ramdisk generator in
kernel-img.conf seems to have dissapeared.
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:32:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:42:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:32:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:39:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
reopen #377029
reopen #381065
reopen #331089
reopen #343543
reopen #383351
thanks
There is still a version in experimental that these bugs apply to.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. The
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:34:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:32:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:34:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:39:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
smptmail.el sends mail using SMTP *instead* of sendmail. The
workaround described by the poster 'fixes' the problem by disabling
the use of sendmail.el. Thus, the bug is almost surely contained in
sendmail.el.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:35:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen #377029
Bug#377029: rageircd: lsb-ize init script
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen #381065
Bug#381065: rageircd: FTBFS on Alpha
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reopen #331089
Bug#331089: rageircd stays connected to peer se
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:42:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:36:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:42:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:34:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hi vorlon,
I will uploading a patched version to sid this night.
>From upstream
Why is it critical:
davfs holds unsynchronized data in memory as well as in the cache on
disk. These will be lost in case of a crash.
In more detail:
1) mount.davfs will crash when using fuse (but not immediately,
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:35:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:38:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:33:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:36:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:16:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.065
Severity: serious
Justification: kernel policy
It seems that the configurable choice of the ramdisk generator, which we
discussed a year ago, has dissapeared. We reached the conclusion that it would
be configurable in kernel-img.conf, but i have looked at t
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
