[Frans Pop]
> I suspect that this is particular to debian-edu because you have some
> other package that changes configuration info, which causes the "strange
> configuration" (quoting Petter) that update-inetd wants to ask about.
>
> You could try if delaying those configuration steps to later
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The default "bonded.png" style doesn't seem to be available in the
> package. This should probably be fixed as well, so the default
> configuration is sensible. (Eigther by adding it, or by using another
> default.)
Hmmm... bonded.png is supposed to be del
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:32:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375281: fixed in gdm 2.16.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.84
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Initramfs-tools modifies the behaviour of mdadm when mdadm is run from
initramfs.
There is a debconf question for mdadm which defines the raid arrays to start
from
initramfs, however initramfs-too
Hi John,
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:15:55AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Version 0.6.2 of sysvconfig is an erroneous upload of an early version. It
> should not be released. I will upload a fixed package shortly.
Is that meant to be 0.60.2?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:46:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394215: directfb-0.9-22: FTBFS, uses PAGE_SIZE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:40:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libcairo-directfb: removed from archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: latex-cjk-common
Version: 4.6.0+cvs20060714-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I upgrade my etch, the latex-cjk-common was installed. After
latex-cjk-common installed, I cound not use latex command correctly. The error
message is as below.
Package layou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> close 352453 0.7.5-4
Bug#352453: denemo: dependency missing
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.7.5-4, send any f
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 15:52 -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Note that this bug no longer applies, but is kept open as a dummy
> britney-helping bug to avoid the package to reenter testing once
> linux-2.6 is updated, in case nvidia-graphics-drivers is not in testing
> then.
>
That's a bit con
> This bug also affect the daily built installation cd if you install in
> gui mode.
>
> How to reproduce:
> 1. Boot the installer by writing "installgui" at the boot prompt
> 2. do the installation
> 3. select a task that include a package that use update-initd.
> i choose fileserver, since th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 394136 + pending
Bug#394136: Add support for multiple device setup in initramfs
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending
> tags 382280 + pending
Bug#382280: does not configure encrypt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This bug is reproducible by at least four people, using different
> # hardware and different kernel versions.
> # It's not yet clear whether this is a cdparanoia or a kernel bug, so I
> # don't think it should be downgraded that quickly just because t
I've found that Peter's patch described in [1] works for me. I've been
able to get mod_auth_mysql running again on my Etch machines.
--
Mike
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389579;msg=5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:32:36 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395921: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.26-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: gtk-gnutella
Version: 0.96.1svn12109-1
Severity: serious
Justification: none
As described in gtk-gnutella FAQ, non-stable versions expire after 90
days, while old stable versions expire after a year. Since Debian stable
versions take a long time to be released, I suggest releasing the sta
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 1.0.4~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
cryptsetup contains a patch for po/Makefile, which is generated from
Makefile.in during build. The problem now is that the resulting
Makefile differs between a build on etch and a build on s
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 21:07 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 09:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Ok, is there some other difference at the instruction set level between the
> > netwinder and cats systems?
>
> No, the instruction sets are the same. FWIW, though, smackdown i
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:47:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394425: fixed in burn 0.4.3-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396043 + patch
Bug#396043: gnome-hearts: crashes when started
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:32:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332702: fixed in dvipng 1.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22-0.1
> forcemerge 395082 396098
Bug#395082: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC
Bug#396098: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC
Forcibly Merged 395082 396098.
>
End of messa
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:03:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392948: fixed in latex-cjk-chinese-arphic 1.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:14:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395513: swt-gtk: FTBFS: depends on removed package
mozilla-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:03:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395343: fixed in latex-cjk-chinese-arphic 1.15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
tags 396043 + patch
thanks
Ok, got it
gnome-hearts crashes when it's not able to find the configured cards
style, since no card style gets activated!
The default "bonded.png" style doesn't seem to be available in the
package. This should probably be fixed as well, so the default
configuratio
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:04:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393717: fixed in wprint 2.05+dfsg-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:03:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394778: fixed in mrxvt 0.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 29/10/06 20:19:45, Neil Williams wrote:
OK, I've tweaked Alexander's patch and I'm ready to do an NMU to
close this long standing RC bug.
Oops. Wrong file!
:-(
This is the real one.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://ww
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:02:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395264: fixed in commons-pool 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:51:47PM -0300, Eduardo Trápani wrote:
> Yes, that is the situation. I'll remove it as soon as possible.
>
> I see you propose some more cleaning up. It looks good but I'll check
> it though. It's been a while since the last update.
The font is required for running a
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:02:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393752: fixed in castle-combat 0.8.1.dfsg.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:10:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing with proper version header
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Yes, that is the situation. I'll remove it as soon as possible.
I see you propose some more cleaning up. It looks good but I'll check
it though. It's been a while since the last update.
Thanks Eduardo.
The font is used for a manual test that does not run in the build
process and seems not
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:10:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing with proper version header
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I just installed gnome-hearts and it crashes on startup.
I get the same backtrace as the bug submitter.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 47935319911392 (LWP 21008)]
0x00407cce in cards_image_set_size (cards=0x0, width=93,
height=89)
at cards-im
tags 391778 + patch
thanks
On October 11, 2006 at 3:24AM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:
> reassign 391778 xemacs21-mule
> retitle 391778 xemacs21-mule: postinst fails if xemacs21-support is not yet
> configured
> severity 391778 serious
> thanks
>
> I'm reassigning Bug#391778 from apel to xe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391778 + patch
Bug#391778: xemacs21-mule: postinst fails if xemacs21-support is not yet
configured
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 09:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ok, is there some other difference at the instruction set level between the
> netwinder and cats systems?
No, the instruction sets are the same. FWIW, though, smackdown is
actually a cats, not a netwinder, and the build seems to be fail
В Вск, 29/10/2006 в 10:35 +0100, Martin Michlmayr пишет:
> * Alexander Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-29 11:19]:
> > Package: mythweb
>
> There's no such package in Debian. What does
> dpkg -p mythweb | grep Maintainer
> say?
Ouch. That's package from debian-multimedia.org with Christi
Hi,
Attached is the patch of my castle-combat NMU.
Besides the patch, the package has been re-packaged removing the
undistributable font.
Ana
diff -Nrua debian.old/changelog debian/changelog
--- debian.old/changelog2006-10-29 21:26:15.0 +0100
+++ debian/changelog2006-10-29 21:4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 395082 396098
Bug#395082: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC
Bug#396098: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC
Merged 395082 396098.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22-0.1
> forcemerge 395082 396098
Bug#395082: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC
Bug#396098: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC
Forcibly Merged 395082 396098.
>
End of messa
merge 395082 396098
thanks
Several usertags were lost some days ago, and the 'nonfree-doc rfc' on
395082 was one of them, so I failed to notice that this bug had
already filed, and file another one, 396098. I'm merging the bugs...
See:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release
OK, I've tweaked Alexander's patch and I'm ready to do an NMU to close
this long standing RC bug.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
--- gchangepass-0.1.5.orig/debian/copyright
+++ gchangepass-0.1.5/de
Severity: serious
Package: kdepim
Version: 4:3.5.5-1
User: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
This source package contains the following files from the
IETF under non-free license terms:
kdepim-3.5.5/kioslaves/sieve/draft-showalter-sieve-vacation-04.txt
kdepim-3.5.5/ki
Hi,
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 08 Oct 2006 23:41:00 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 15:03:47 +0200, a écrit :
> > I put a (really) rough patch on
> > http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-yasm
I updated the patch again, plus a loadlin patch in
http://dept-info.labri.f
package: ingo1
tags: security
severity: grave
A vulnerability has been found in ingo:
procmail in Ingo H3 before 1.1.2 Horde module allows remote
authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via shell
metacharacters in the mailbox destination of a filter rule.
This is fixed in 1.1.2. See
h
Severity: serious
Package: cyrus-sasl2-mit
Version: 2.1.19.dfsg1-1
User: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
Based on the package names, I suspect cyrus-sasl2-mit share the same
source package as the cyrus-sasl2 package, and that the problem below
might get fixed automat
Hi,
I've hit the same bug. The system crashes at ioctl(SGIO) in
sgio_handle_scsi_cmd().
I've written a report to LKML and linux-ide. Hope they can help ...
Gregor
PS: Ripping with -g instead of -d works fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:10:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396002: tetex-bin: fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.0.4-3
Severity: serious
e.g, look at the -e displayed when using dash as /bin/sh:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/#/etc/init.d/cryptdisks start
Starting remaining crypto disks... home(starting)
-e -e
- The device /dev/sda6 contains a valid filesystem type crypto_LUKS.
-e
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389579 libapache2-mod-auth-mysql
Bug#389579: libapache-mod-auth-mysql: FTBFS against apache 2.2
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-auth-mysql' to
`libapache2-mod-auth-mysql'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Peter Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It seems your file got corrupted for some reason, because:
[...]
> Yes, I think so, too:
[...]
> But no errors in messages about disk getting corrupted.
:-/
I guess we can close the bug, right?
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Am So 29.10.2006 19:24 schrieb Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Peter Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Looking at line 822 of
> >
> > /usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/generic/hyphen/icehyph.tex:
> >
> > [...]
> > d^^f35l^^ed
> > 1d^^f32m
> >
Peter Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at line 822 of
>
> /usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/generic/hyphen/icehyph.tex:
>
> [...]
> d^^f35l^^ed
> 1d^^f32m
> d^^f3m5an
> l.822 ---> d^^&35ne
> 3d^^f3r
>
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:02:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390126: fixed in sysvinit 2.86.ds1-34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Good Morning cheryl desmarais,
Contact me at my number if you can return calls.
888.705.l353
Find out how to generate 1.5 - 3.5k a day from home.
remove - shortlink "dot" co . uk / c jq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:12:37AM -0600, Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote:
> it appears that a recent apt-get upgrade of mailman, python, exim4,
> or other related packages to the debian-mailman package releases,
> has caused mailman to NOT be able to send messages OUT to recipient
> list members.
> On
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # incorrectly reopened due to unrelated bug
> reassign 296370 boa
Bug#296370: boa: fails when asked to serve large files (>100kB)
Bug#296783: boa: sendfile write: Value too large for defined data type
Bug reassigned from package `boa' to `boa'.
> clos
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:25:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392114: This appears fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package azureus
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: azureus
> found 392114 2.4.0.2-2
Bug#392114: azureus: FTBFS in etch: The import org.eclipse cannot be resolved
Bug marked as found in version 2.4.0.2-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
reopen 394475
tag 394475 patch
tag 395984 patch
thanks
Hello James,
* James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2006-10-28 16:14 -0400]:
> Actually automake is not required to build the package, so I removed
> it from the list.
I've tried rebuilding minpack 19961126-10 under pbuilder, but it fa
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> >No, it is not. ncompress has the same upstream version in stable as in
> >testing/unstable; if the stable orig.tar.gz were present, it would be the
> >same for testing and stable. The only orig.tar.gz in the archive for
> >ncom
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 394475
Bug#394475: minpack_19961126-9+b2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tag 39
Am So 29.10.2006 13:09 schrieb Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Peter Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
> > /tmp/tetex.format_creation.PGl27246/fmtutil-sys.log
> > Please include this file if you report a bug.
>
> [...]
>
>
Arthur de Jong wrote:
> After a recent upgrade the ntp system user seems to be gone. Tracing
> my steps, this is probably caused by purging the ntp-simple package
> after the new ntp package is installed (from a glance at the postinst
> and postrm).
You also have to upgrade ntp-simple before purgi
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> As said I am not a porter, so I don't know the difference between cats
> and netwinder, but AFAIK cats is v4l and netwinder is v3l.
>
> Upstream tests and only has access to arm v5l and can't reproduce this
> problem, as seen in the up
8
> Build started at 20061029-0056
> **
...
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_installdirs -ppython-numeric-ext usr/share/doc
> ln -sf python-numeric
> debian/python-numeric-ext/usr/share/doc/python-numeric
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 395225 395999
Bug#395225: CVE-2006-4573: GNU Screen UTF-8 Character Handling Vulnerabilities
Bug#395999: Remote DoS and possible code execution in screen <= 4.0.2
Forcibly Merged 395225 395999.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 395999 + fixed-upstream
Bug#395999: Remote DoS and possible code execution in screen <= 4.0.2
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: python-numeric
Version: 24.2-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of python-numeric_24.2-6 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006102
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 395414 minor
Bug#395414: cryptsetup: Command failed: device-mapper: reload ioctl failed:
Invalid argument
Severity set to `minor' from `grave'
> tags 395414 + moreinfo
Bug#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> close 384910 0.39-2
Bug#384910: guessnet: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'pkg-config'
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> retitle 392405 RM: linpac -- RoQA; RC-buggy; upstream and maintainer appear
> MIA
Bug#392405: ships architecture-dependent files in /usr/share
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, s
Hi
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:51:20AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:23:04AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Thanks for letting me know, but this was actually fixed in the
> > Debian package before the fixed realvnc was released, and before a CVE
> > number was assigned to th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389562 + patch
Bug#389562: apache2-redirtoservname: FTBFS with apache 2.2
Tags were: confirmed patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Hello,
I was just looking at this bug, and it is reproducible. The while loop
at line 14 of t/3_while.t hangs on line 408 of t/testbox and never goes
any farther. I don't know if this is a bug in this package, or
something has changed in the mime tools that it uses. Sorry I don't
have time to d
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:50:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bug #394418 is a report filed regarding a recurring build problem with mono
> on arm that results from mono generating code that's incompatible with the
> arm v3 instruction set. Likewise, it appears shadow fails to buil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> # cannot build a new version with current SDL
> block 395988 with 396063
Bug#395988: gcompris - FTBFS: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but
argument 4 has type 'gsize'
Was no
The attached patch fixes the build failure. It's compile tested only, no
runtime testing at all!
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
diff -urp apache2-redirtoservname-0.1-orig/debian/rules apache2-redirtoservname-0.1/debian/rules
--- apache2-redirtoservname-0.1-orig/debian/rules 2006-10-29 17:05:38.0
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 07:17:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393730: fixed in pyopengl 2.0.1.09.dfsg.1-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: libsdl1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.11-4
Severity: grave
/usr/lib/libSDL.la mentions "-lcaca -lcucul" in dependency_libs, but
none of the matching dev packages are pulled by libsd1.2-dev. As a
result, it breaks the build of unrelated software (in my particular case,
gcompris).
-- System Informat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 384910
Bug#384910: guessnet: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'pkg-config'
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> notfound 38491
rectory `/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18'
> make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
> ******
> Build finished at 20061029-0949
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Attached is the patch of my pyopengl NMU.
Besides the patch, the package has been re-packaged removing the
undistributable font.
Ana
diff -Nria debian.old/changelog debian/changelog
0a1,12
> pyopengl (2.0.1.09.dfsg.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * New upst
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393807: fixed in cronosii 0.2.2.23.1-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392407: fixed in cronosii 0.2.2.23.1-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
I have tested a rebuild of this on i386 in unstable and it builds fine.
It currently can't be built on amd64 due libswt-gtk-3.2-java being
uninstallable on amd64 (or at least it is on the local mirror).
Not sure what to do about the severity of the bug, though.
--
---
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 03:09:32PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > We really need a better way to handle bug reports which affect more than one
> > package, since cloning and merging is not the best way to go for those.
>
> In the past, the BTS allowed
It appears that someone put your name on
http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu , and so I thought that certainly
after the 5 day wait had passed, you wouldn't have had any objections.
Take care,
--
-
| ,''`.
dered] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ipe-6.0pre27/src'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061029-0552
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--- End Message ---
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:17:46 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396027: fixed in zope-ldapuserfolder 2.8~beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: gnome-hearts
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When started, gnome-hearts crashes. Removing the configuration file as
pointed in another bug reported does not solve the problem.
There is no message on console. The backtrace is the following:
#0 0x
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> We really need a better way to handle bug reports which affect more than one
> package, since cloning and merging is not the best way to go for those.
In the past, the BTS allowed things like this:
Package: foo, bar
I'm not sure if this is still support
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:02:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 05:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393075: fixed in gnushogi 1.3-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:01:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:01:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:28:24PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > [ snipped paragraph about Manoj ]
>
> Quoting Julian Gilbey in the logs for this bug:
>
> > According to Manoj in the logs to bug#394661, which was blocking this
> > bug and has since b
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
