Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package xmms-sid
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xmms-sid
> tags 389463 + pending
Bug#389463: xmms-sid: undefined symbol: set_song_position -- just needs a
recompile
There were no ta
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389969: fixed in hinfo 1.02-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.1-16
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The lsb-base 3.1-16 has a problem with the FANCYTTY option.
When you try to upgrade by example mysql-server-5.0 an error happends:
Preparing to replace mysql-server-5.0 5.0.24a-4 (using
..
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:58:52PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:51:55AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >>
> >> This code also looks great for upstream subimition. I would like if
> >> you could send it to bug-grub@gnu.
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337127: fixed in gaim-encryption 3.0~beta5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:02:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388125: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hello,
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyway, is this compatibility between different versions of MBR and stage
> > files?
> > I don't think having version disparity between MBR and stage was meant to be
> > supported.
>
> Right but if
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:03:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bogus RC bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: mpg123
Version: 0.60-1
Severity: serious
dh_gencontrol -A
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture sparc does not appear in
package's list (i386)
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mpg123&arch=sparc&ver=0.60-1&stamp=1159479949&file=log
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:54:20 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060812 02:03]:
> > Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay. I've been out of town
> > and don't have access right now to any 3dfx graphics board. I've a
> > new upstream relea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> retitle 388998 xserver-xorg-video-tdfx: Missing symbol getsecs
Bug#388998: moving windows in Xinerama mode to tdfx-controlled screen kills X
server
Changed Bug title.
> severity 388
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:48:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome meta packages have broken depenencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 381526 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc
Tags were: pending moreinfo unreproducible
Tags removed: moreinfo, unreproducible
>
End of mes
this bug was reported sep/24, and still not fixed? come on, Starling is right, only a #include will do.i'll upload a package if the maintainers don't do it.-- winston
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # ongoing discussion with upstream about license
> tags 368968 etch-ignore
Bug#368968: tetex-base: License violation in csplain
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
>
End
Small patch for blam(low quality)
diff -urp ./blam-1.8.2/configure.in blam-1.8.2~/configure.in
--- ./blam-1.8.2/configure.in 2005-06-20 17:12:07.0 +0200
+++ blam-1.8.2~/configure.in2006-09-22 19:00:57.0 +0200
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ dnl **
AC_MSG_CHECKING([which mo
I have made small patch(low quality) to compile libgecko-cil with
xulrunner. (license same as package)
diff -urp ./gecko-sharp-0.6/debian/control ./gecko-sharp-0.6~/debian/control
--- ./gecko-sharp-0.6/debian/control2006-09-22 19:44:14.0 +0200
+++ ./gecko-sharp-0.6~/debian/control 20
Package: plptools
Followup-For: Bug #384146
I've added the patches from this (merged) bug to CVS for upcoming
plptools 0.16 (i.e. the FTBFS on amd64, and the FTBFS with gcc >=
4.1).
Thanks for the patches, and do contact me if I shouldn't just be
taking them as they are.
-- System Information:
De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Believed to be fixed by this upstream patche:
> # svn diff -c449724 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x
> reassign 387610 libapr0
Bug#387610: subversion: FTBFS on ia64
Bug reassigned from package `subversion' to `libapr0'.
> thanks
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:18:03 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387694: xfstt: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on
'x11proto-core-dev'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385880: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
reopen 370295
thanks
Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Distribution of Java SE with Linux or OpenSolaris is governed by the
> DLJ; however, these FAQ's are offered to explain and illustrate some
> of the language in the license. Sun's goals are to make the
> software widely usa
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 10:29:08AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: xtel
> Version: 3.3.0-5.3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> There is an error when attempting to purge xtel:
>
> Removing xtel ...
> Purging configuration files for xtel ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xtel.postrm: l
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:43:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385880: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: apt
Followup-For: Bug #388708
I also encountered this problem and thank you Manoj for explaining how
to fix it. I was totally lost. Because apt didn't work, users have to
download the deb of 0.6.45 directly from the repository and install it
with dpkg. It's a gnarly fix.
Seems like
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 370295
Bug#370295: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
# Believed to be fixed by this upstream patche:
# svn diff -c449724 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x
reassign 387610 libapr0
thanks
[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]
> Perhaps i'm not following the thread on bug #367610 properly, but it
> sounds to me like this isn't actually a subversi
On 9/28/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it looks to me like monotone is running a command during the build that
takes an unreasonably long time to complete on a number of our
architectures.
We could ask the buildd maintainers to increase timeouts for monotone, but
given that th
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:18:03 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387694: xfstt: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on
'x11proto-core-dev'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
tags 380960 + patch
thank
Hola Javier,
The attached patch update spikeproxy to the last Python Policy.
Besides, there are some lintian/linda issues that need to be addressed.
Ana
diff -Nrua spkproxy-1.4.8.orig/debian/changelog spkproxy-1.4.8/debian/changelog
--- spkproxy-1.4.8.orig/debian/change
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:40:40PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > It's just doing what you asked it to do.
>
> You are right I got completly confused...
>
> Sorry for the trouble,
No problem, it threw me the first time mysql stopped, cursed the
dbconfig guy etc.. (sorry Sean, I take it all ba
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385667: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380960 + patch
Bug#380960: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:02:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390034: fixed in lm-sensors 1:2.10.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 390015 important
Bug#390015: lsb-build-base2: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared library.
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> # porting bugs, not RC
> severity 3
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:55:33AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:25:00PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > it's sad to see that the safer path (renaming Mozilla applications in
> > > order to avoid being restricted by any t
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> there is a way out here. let me explain that:
Ok, I guess that this could still work. It would need to be acted on
pretty soon to happen though.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Steve,
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-29 00:51]:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:06:01PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
>
> > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060924 18:56]:
> > [..]
> > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > > fetchmailconf: Depends: fetchma
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:11:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug, package remove from the archive.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385821: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Quoting Modesto Alexandre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I have exactly the same problem :
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389986
>
> did you have an solution ?
>
> Thanks
> Alex.
>
Yes, the solution is to kill the perl process that is running the
xserver-org.post
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385667: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 303780 normal
thanks
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:46:13AM -0400, Marc Sherman wrote:
> This bug violates at least policy 10.7.2, as the files in modified in
> /var/lib/hinfo/ are being used as configuration files, and should be
> located in /etc.
The files in /var/lib/hinfo are included
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 303780 normal
Bug#303780: hinfo: Autoupdate should not overwrite files shipped in .deb
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:02:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379812: fixed in kde-style-polyester 1.0~beta1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:51:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378815: fixed in python-kde3 3.15.2+20060422-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:22:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389940: Security: OpenSSL Security Advisory [28th
September 2006]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 377394 serious
Bug#377394: python-qt3: arm/3.16-1.2: FTBFS
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
severity 390004 serious
merge 390004 388376
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390004 serious
Bug#390004: tex-common fails to install trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/texmf/doc'
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> merge 390004 388376
Bug#388376: latex-ucs-doc: installs files into /usr/share/texmf/doc against
Debian
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:49:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389499: fixed in kde-icons-crystalclear
0.0.20050623.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:28:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Now that debhelper is frozen, before any forward progress was made on my
> goal to move python support out of debhelper (and with > 1 month having
> went by without any action on that at all on the pycentral side), it seems
> that the onl
Package: libept
Version: 0.4.0
Severity: serious
You appear to be missing a build-depends on cmake.
| Automatic build of libept_0.4.0 on auric by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060928-0606
| **
[...]
| ** Using
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:52:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389316: fixed in stlport5.1 5.0.99rc2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libsensors3
Version: 2.10.1-1
Severity: serious
You appear to be missing a depends on debconf.
| Automatic build of cpufreqd_2.2.0-2 on auric by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060927-1449
| **
[...]
| **
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 387409 nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
Bug#387409: nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6-686-smp: depends on general kernel while
there is no module for its current version
Bug reass
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:36:08PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Much to my bafflement, I notice that 0.29 built successfully on sparc,
> but 0.30 FTBFS. Also, the machine that built 0.29 may not be the same
> as the one that built 0.30; for sparc, these were phleebhut and auric,
> respectively.
Perhaps i'm not following the thread on bug #367610 properly, but it
sounds to me like this isn't actually a subversion bug any more, but
rather an apache bug. Is this correct?
If so, can bug 367610 be closed (or reassigned)? Or does svn 1.4.0
still failing on ia64, even with the libapr fix?
W
[Jens Peter Secher]
> Thank you for your bug report regarding patents on IDEA, RC2, RC5,
> and RC6, all present in libcrypto++.
>
> Debian's general stand on software patents is to ignore patents when
> such patents are not being actively enforced.
Right, well, I assumed that when IDEA and RC5 w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libunicode-map-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libunicode-map-perl
> tags 389988 + pending
Bug#389988: libunicode-map-perl: FTBFS when building with sudo [$(PWD) usage]
T
For the record.
To reproduce this problem with 0.0.54:
1. find a package with no bug registered in the BTS.
2. apt-get install /this package with no bugs/
3. see the error happen.
I added a special-casing now. Sorry for the inconvenience.
After upgrading from 0.0.53 to 0.0.54 I get the follo
tags 389967 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 19:12 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> The postrm script cannot rely on ucf to be available when purging.
This is fixed in the latest version (which unfortunately isn't available
in Debian, yet).
Please see http://www.fatal.se/pub/debian/bandwi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
Hi,
>> retitle 390005 openser-jabber-module: empty package on arm (gcc: internal
>> consistency failure)
I'll look into that next week, thanks for the report.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libcrypt-rijndael-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libcrypt-rijndael-perl
> tags 389990 + pending
Bug#389990: libcrypt-rijndael-perl: empty package when building with sudo
reassign 390004 latex-ucs-doc
close 390004 20041017-6
merge 390004 388376
thanks
This bug belongs to latex-ucs-doc, and has already been fixed there.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> merge 389858 390007
Bug#389858: tagcoll2 - FTBFS: error: no match for 'operator|'
Bug#390007: tagcoll2: FTBFS: no match for 'operator|'
Merged 389858 390007.
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389967 pending
Bug#389967: bandwidthd: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:33:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line New Gnash Package in SID. Still getting this error?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: gtalk
Version: 0.99.10-10.1
Severity: serious
Hello Christoph,
There is an error when attempting to purge gtalk:
Removing gtalk ...
Purging configuration files for gtalk ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gtalk.postrm: line 22: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing gtalk (--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 390004 latex-ucs-doc
Bug#390004: tex-common fails to install trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/texmf/doc'
Bug reassigned from package `tex-common' to `latex-ucs-doc'.
> close 390004 20041017-6
Bug#390004: tex-common fails to install trying to o
To be on the safe side I duplicate below the message
sent to bug-grub@gnu.org, just recently.
I might add that I did cross check that my patch
is not touching anything that is not present in the
upstreams tar-ball. In addition, the patched setup
function acts on whatever Stage1 is to be deposi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 389934 important
Bug#389934: libg20-perl: include unsafe rpath to /build/buildd
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libtime-piece-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtime-piece-perl
> tags 389874 + pending
Bug#389874: libtime-piece-perl: FTBFS with sudo [$(PWD) usage]
Tags were: patch
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # the etch version also FTBFS with sudo
> found 389874 1.09-2
Bug#389874: libtime-piece-perl: FTBFS with sudo [$(PWD) usage]
Bug marked as found in version 1.09-2.
>
End of message,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:06:01PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060924 18:56]:
> [..]
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > fetchmailconf: Depends: fetchmail (= 6.3.4-6) but 6.3.4-6+b1 is to be
> > > installed
> > > E: Broken package
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.4.7-1.1
Severity: serious
Attempting to upgrade on a testing box to the version currently in sid:
Setting up multipath-tools (0.4.7-1.1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/multipath-tools ...
Starting multipath daemoninvoke-rc.d: initscript m
Thank you for your bug report regarding patents on IDEA, RC2, RC5, and
RC6, all present in libcrypto++.
Debian's general stand on software patents is to ignore patents when
such patents are not being actively enforced. So Debian, as an
organisation, will not remove algorithms on the sole ground t
Package: ser-postgres-module
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package inusable
Hi,
as seen on packages.debian.org [1], the ser-postgres-module is empty
on all architectures except i386 and amd64.
These lines in the build log look related:
aug_sysdep.h:356:2: error: #err
Thank you for that trouble shooting! This is very useful information.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 9/28/06, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I debugged the problem a bit and the problem seems to be the
BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS define and monotone being linked against the
multithreaded boost lib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> forcemerge 389506 389986
Bug#389506: fails to configure with debconf
Bug#389986: xserver-xorg: package configuration on fresh install fails
Forcibly Merged 389506 389986.
>
End of me
Mike Hommey wrote: "Some changes applied to the debian packages don't
fall in the community edition authorized changes, and there's no way
we want not to apply these."
If you're referring to the list of "permitted" changes in Community
Editions on
http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/com
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libset-object-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libset-object-perl
> tags 389870 + pending
Bug#389870: empty packages on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)]
Tags were:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libopengl-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libopengl-perl
> tags 389879 + pending
Bug#389879: empty packages on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)]
Tags were: patch
Ta
Package: tagcoll2
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -c -o
stream/filters-tut.o stream/filters-tut.cc
../tagcoll/coll/simple.tcc: In member function 'void
tagcoll::coll::Sim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libplot-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libplot-perl
> tags 389869 + pending
Bug#389869: empty packages on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)]
Tags were: patch
Tags a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libtext-csv-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtext-csv-perl
> tags 389707 + pending
Bug#389707: empty packages on several architectures [sudo and $(PWD)]
Tags were: patc
Package: linphone
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches with the following
error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include/ -I.. -I../../oRTP/include
-DORTP_BIGENDIAN -I../../gsmlib -DORTP_INET6 -Wall -g -O2 -DINET6 -Wall -O2 -g
-D_BIGENDIA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # sorry about the wrong subject
> retitle 390005 openser-jabber-module: empty package on arm (gcc: internal
> consistency failure)
Bug#390005: ser-postgres-module: empty package on a
Package: lsb-build-base2
Version: 2.1.1-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cc -g -Wall -fno-builtin-c -o libGL.o libGL.c
[...]
ld -shared -o libGL.so --version-script libGL.Version -h `grep "libGL "
LibNameMap.txt | cut -f2 -d' '` libGL.o
ld:
Package: savant
Version: 20060129-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
../../src/aire/iir/IIRScram/IIRScram.hh:497: error: extra qualification 'IIRScr
am::' on member '_get_my_design_file'
make[5]: *** [IIRBase_AccessTypeDefinition.lo] Error 1
Kurt
Package: tulip
Version: 2.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the following
error:
../../../../library/tulip-ogl/src/GlADComposite.cpp: In member function 'void
tlp::GlADComposite::makeAugmentedDislplaySelect(GlGraph*)':
../../../../library/tulip-og
Package: lsb-build-base3
Version: 3.0.3-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cc -g -Wall -fno-builtin-c -o libGL.o libGL.c
[...]
ld -shared -o libGL.so --version-script libGL.Version -h `grep "libGL "
LibNameMap.txt | cut -f2 -d' '` libGL.o
ld:
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.28
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
tex-common_0.29_all.deb fails to install with error
below. Installation of other tetex components proceeds normally.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tex-common_0.29_all.deb
(--unpack):
tryi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 389466
Bug#389466: gdm: runs sessions with "POSIX" locale after installation
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
reopen 389466
thanks
27 вересня 2006 о 09:38 -0700 Ryan Murray написав(-ла):
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:22:38PM +0200, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> > Package: gdm
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: patch l10n d-i
> >
> > This is due to changes in location where information about locale is
> > stor
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:51:55AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> This code also looks great for upstream subimition. I would like if
> you could send it to bug-grub@gnu.org and talk to them. If you can get
> it there would be easier to us just grub a CVS snapshot for packaging
> proposes.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 09:59:44PM +0200, Ji?? Pale?ek wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:12:02 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:42:51AM +0200, Ji Pale??ek wrote:
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>>I'd be stunned if this was actually a server problem, and not a
> >>>client-side pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389276 grave
Bug#389276: ltsp-client-builder fail when there is no network (CD install)
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> tags 389276 + pending
Bug#389276: ltsp-client-builder fail when there is no network (CD install)
Tags were: patc
Package: openser-jabber-module
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package inusable
Hi,
as seen packages.debian.org [1], the openser-jabber-module
is empty on arm.
This seems to be a toolchain problem. From the build log:
tree234.c: In function 'delpos234_internal':
tree2
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
