Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:06:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line warped: #325155 fixed in latest unstable version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:15:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line warped: #268250 fixed in latest unstable version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: tioga
Version: 1.0.I-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'tioga' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_clean
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
cd make;\
PREFIX=/usr ruby1.8 extconf.rb --debian;
/bin/sh: l
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:47:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349195: fixed in sablevm-classlib 1.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:47:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347083: fixed in sablevm-classlib 1.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 352297 normal
Bug#352297: perl-modules 5.8.8-2 needs to depend on perl-base 5.8.8-2
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 349853 + fixed
Bug#349853: libdockapp-dev - depends against unavailable package xlibx11-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Package: stgit
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'stgit' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
#/usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=/stgit-0.8.1/debian/stgit
python setup.py install --root=/stgit-0.8.1/debian/stgit
running install
error: invalid Python inst
severity 352297 normal
thanks
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:02:40PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: perl-modules
> Version: 5.8.8-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> On my amd64 system, today's upgrade got me perl-base 5.8.8-1 and
> perl-modules 5.8.8-2 . With the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349853 patch
Bug#349853: libdockapp-dev - depends against unavailable package xlibx11-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
tags 349853 patch
thanks
Hi Jeff,
I've prepared a fixed NMU to correct the botched package name in the
previous NMU. Please find the patch for this attached.
The NMU will be uploaded to incoming shortly, as this is one of only a
handful of packages left that break with the new xorg.
Cheers,
--
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352219: fixed in gri 2.12.10-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I'll try to get to it next week, I'm helping with a debian booth this
weekend.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.0
Severity: serious
I thougth I chose right settings, when debconf was run during
installation. But somehow they have no effect. For example I have Finnish
keyboard layout and 102 keys. But as you can see below, debconf did not
care my choices at all.
-- Syste
Package: perl-modules
Version: 5.8.8-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On my amd64 system, today's upgrade got me perl-base 5.8.8-1 and
perl-modules 5.8.8-2 . With the fix for bug 352074, neither contains
overload.pm, making the install of other packages break. perl-modu
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:19:03 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352258: Recompile libfox1.4-dev due to changes in
libxft-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> # bts abuse
> severity 352286 normal
Bug#352286: apt-get purges packages after it asks for permission to remove them.
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 352286 352267
Bug#352267: apt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 347479 + pending
Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43.2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
See the example. Apt-get asks permission to REMOVE the packages,
but it will actually PURGE them, if given permission.
# apt-get --purge remove samba-common
Reading package lists... Done
Building depend
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351372: fixed in gdal 1.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 352243 Uninstallable on i386/FTBFS elsewhere: depends on experimental
> libsysfs
Bug#352243: Uninstallable on i386/FTBFS elsewhere: depends on
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 351043 + upstream
Bug#351043: gnudoku: generates puzzles with multiple solutions
Tags were: help
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 352243 Uninstallable on i386/FTBFS elsewhere: depends on
Bug#352243: Uninstallable in Sid - depends on experimental libraries
Changed Bug title.
> experimental libsysfs
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> found 352243 1.1-1
Bu
retitle 352243 Uninstallable on i386/FTBFS elsewhere: depends on
experimental libsysfs
found 352243 1.1-1
notfound 352243 1.1.1-1
thanks
Santiago, I guess Martin was asking to address 347634 in experimental
until libsysfs2 itself enters unstable :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 06:21:05PM -0200, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote:
> > Ah, I didn't notice that this bug was about memory usage in g++; I assumed
> > it was a C++ standards bug, like so many others. Still, this seems to be
> > the only package in all the archive that has such a problem, and th
Package: libgtk-trayicon-ruby
Version: 0.1.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
The package installs the library in a usr/local/lib/site_ruby tree _under_
/usr/lib/ruby. This directory is obviously not in the $LOAD_PATH and
therefore this package/the lib is not usable at all.
% dpkg -L libgtk-trayico
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:39:27 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in ecj
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:32:31 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350007: fixed in gkrelldnet 0.14.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:43 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348529: fixed in smilutils 0.3.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:43 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321551: fixed in smilutils 0.3.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:43 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320876: fixed in smilutils 0.3.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 352183 1.4-3
Bug#352183: minc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: MINC file has only 3 dims, volume
requires 4.
Bug marked as found in version 1.4-3.
> severity 352183 serious
Bug#352183: minc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: MINC file has only 3 dims, volume
requires
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 352267 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 352267 normal
Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much
Se
tags 352267 moreinfo unreproducible
severity 352267 normal
thanks
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:46:26PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote:
> I intended to purge dbus-1 so I could make sure that the config
> files were the Debian defaults. I intended to re-install
> dbus-1 immediately afterwards. So, I d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 345641 + pending
Bug#345641: libc6: libnss_dns-2.3.5.so incompatible with libc-2.3.5.so :
version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 351036 + pending
Bug#351036: libc6 should restart Dropbear sshd (or provi
Hi, Steve
> Ah, I didn't notice that this bug was about memory usage in g++; I assumed
> it was a C++ standards bug, like so many others. Still, this seems to be
> the only package in all the archive that has such a problem, and the only
> package which build-depends on g++-3.3; could this bug be
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43.2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I intended to purge dbus-1 so I could make sure that the config
files were the Debian defaults. I intended to re-install
dbus-1 immediately afterwards. So, I did
apt-get --purge dbus-1
I expected this to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> severity 352231 important
Bug#352231: Subject: aptitude: aptitude ignores --target-release option
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> Package: grub
> Version: 0.97-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: 2
> I've just updated an AMD64 server with dist-upgrade to the latest grub
> version and kernel 2.6.15.
> The upgrade jumped from before 0.97-1 version to 0.97-3 ve
Hi again,
Martin Pitt [2006-02-10 20:45 +0100]:
> It works for version 5.52; 5.51 still crashes with that patch, I will
> look into this as well.
Ok, done: 5.51 does some unsafe strcpy()s in do_wild(), which are not
present any more in 5.52. Here is the 5.51 patch, maybe it is useful
for fixing w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 349794 patch
Bug#349794: unzip: Info-ZIP UnZip File Name Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
tag 349794 patch
thanks
Hi!
I took a stab at this bug; granted, it's not the worst one in the
world, but it should be fixed eventually.
This is the patch I used for the Ubuntu security update:
http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/unzip.CVE-2005-4667.diff
It works for version 5.52; 5.51 still cr
Quoting Grégoire Druant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Aptitude ignores -t option or its long version --target-release.
> It will allways install the unstable version of the packages I try to
> install.
> If I try aptitude install package -t blabl
Package: libfox-1.4-dev
Version: 1.4.16-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
I am maintaining rezound, a package that uses the FOX toolkit. Due
to changes in libxft-dev the FOX package has to be recompiled, as
libfox1.4-dev currently depends on the file /usr/lib/libXft.la (which
doesn't exist anymore).
I fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 351043 +help
Bug#351043: gnudoku: generates puzzles with multiple solutions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
tags 351043 +help
thanks
I don't know how to deal with this bug. I am quite surprised of its
severity since I totally agree with John.
Of course I don't want to start a "severity war" so I just mark the bug
with the help tag.
> The generation of ambiguous puzzles is a known bug. None of the au
Package: ipodder
Version: 2.1.9-4
Severity: serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ipodder
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/ipodder/iPodderGui.py", line 44, in ?
import gui.iPodderWindows
File "/usr/share/ipodder/gui/iPodderWindows.py", line 21, in ?
import listctrl as listmi
Torsten Werner wrote:
> > OTRS is vulnerable to several SQL injection and Cross-Site-Scripting
> > vulnerabilities. Please see here for more information:
> > http://otrs.org/advisory/OSA-2005-01-en/
> > http://moritz-naumann.com/adv/0007/otrsmulti/0007.txt
> >
> > The new upstream version 1.3.3 fi
Maybe including the dependencies would make more sense in this report :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache showpkg bridge-utils
Package: bridge-utils
Versions:
1.1-1(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages)
1.0.6-1(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_d
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:05:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These kernel packages / patches have been removed from the
archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:05:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These kernel packages / patches have been removed from the
archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:05:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These kernel packages / patches have been removed from the
archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351043 serious
Bug#351043: gnudoku: generates puzzles with multiple solutions
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Package: bridge-utils
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: grave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy bridge-utils
bridge-utils:
Installed: 1.0.6-1
Candidate: 1.1-1
Version table:
1.1-1 0
900 http://debian.yorku.ca unstable/main Packages
*** 1.0.6-1 0
100 http://debian.yorku.ca
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:02:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285484: fixed in ayttm 0.4.6+34-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
Assuming you mean 3.1.2-1, could you indicate the command which
generates that output?
It was a simple "aptitude upgrade". As I said "aptitude install eclipse"
configured eclipse and eclipse-sdk worked afterwards.
If no one can verify this problem feel free to clos
Hi,
Assuming you mean 3.1.2-1, could you indicate the command which
generates that output?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:47:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350816: fixed in tix 8.4.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348649 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#348649: ftbfs: "I can't find file `policy.aux'."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352014 + fixed
Bug#352014: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'zlib1g-dev'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294520 + patch
Bug#294520: libparted1.6-13: Incorrect handling of extended partitions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gri
> Version: 2.12.10-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: package uninstallable
>
> The netcdf3g package has been renamed and split into C and C++ parts,
> but the i386 package of gri still depends on the removed netcdf3g and
> therefore canno
tags 348649 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I just tried it on an uptodate sid and with an uptodate pbuilder
and both built java-common without a problem.
Can you retry and if it still fails provide more information about
the system and the versions of the build-dependencies you are using
Package: python-netcdf
Version: 2.4.9-3
Severity: grave
Justification: package uninstallable
Moi Matthias!
python-netcdf depends on package netcdf3g that was removed in your
recent netcdf NMU. As python-scientific has strictly versioned
dependencies from arch-any to arch-all packages, it can't be
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Aptitude ignores -t option or its long version --target-release.
It will allways install the unstable version of the packages I try to
install.
If I try aptitude install package -t blablabla, it doesn't mind that
blablabla is no valid release, pro
Package: dovecot-common
Version: 1.0.alpha5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
On upgrade, overwrites configuration files in /etc/dovecot, specifically
(in my case) /etc/dovecot/dovecot{,-ldap}.conf.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
AP
Package: gmt
Version: 4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on release candidate architecture
Despite several attempts, version 4.0-2 of gmt could never be built on
hppa due to linkage problems[0]. As a consequence, 3.4.4-1 is still
current on hppa, but this version is uninstallable because
Package: adduser
Version: 3.82
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity is set to grave because it breaks one of the two core
functionalities of adduser, and one that is used by most postinst scripts
that use adduser, to boot.
Adduser is failing to correctly deal with a pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 340375 important
Bug#340375: Subject: kuser destroys all passwords if /etc/shadow isn't present
Severity set to `important'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> # until someone has a better idea
> tags 349442 patch
Bug#349442: dpkg: Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed (abort).
There were no tags set.
Bug#349120: dpkg: assertion failure after f
severity 340375 important
stop
Since this bug is largely fixed in Sid, but not so totally resolved that I'd
want to attach a "fixed" tag, I think the best course of action is to lower
the bug to important, but keep it open. In any case, the bug isn't a
regression with respect to what's in Etch
Package: gri
Version: 2.12.10-5
Severity: grave
Justification: package uninstallable
The netcdf3g package has been renamed and split into C and C++ parts,
but the i386 package of gri still depends on the removed netcdf3g and
therefore cannot be installed at the moment. A simple rebuild should be
s
Package: websvn
Version: 1.61-16
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Temporary directories and files are created in /usr/share/websvn/temp.
IMHO this behaviour is not compliant with FSH.
Moreover, it seems that the temporary files are never got rid of.
In a few days 4.1
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:44:23AM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote:
> Correct on both counts: it would be just "pushing it ahead", and I am
> reluctant at this time to turn off DTDDECL in stable, because that is removing
> behavior, though the longer the package remains in unstable with DTDDECL
> handling
Tags: patch
Hello,
I have traced this problem down to libparted (and reassigned the bug
accordingly). I think I have found the problem, but since I cannot reproduce
the behaviour, I am not sure. I attached a patch for libparted/disk_dos.c.
The problem seems to be that the partition number does
Michael Koch wrote:
I dont investigated your problem yet but why dont your install CDT from
Debian (apt-get install eclipse-cdt)?
Oh, great. Didn't notice we have this :)
Will use it...
Cheers,
Michael
Thanks,
Armin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi all,
on Friday 10 February 2006 12:27, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:19, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> > The real problem though is, that our configure script does not support
> > being called by an absolute path. I changed that in the current CVS
> > HEAD version and try to
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-4
Severity: serious
Justification: 2
Hi,
I've just updated an AMD64 server with dist-upgrade to the latest grub
version and kernel 2.6.15.
The upgrade jumped from before 0.97-1 version to 0.97-3 version.
When calling update-grub, I receive :
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:46:16PM +0100, Armin Berres wrote:
> Got some more Information:
> After reinstalling CDT from the CDT update site subclipse also reappeard
> partially. I can use it from the menu and it is on the update site
> again, but the "subclipse view" doesn't work (eclipse gave m
Package: tcc
Version: 0.9.23-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
"XFocus Security" discovered that tcc incorrectly evaluates certain sizeof()
expressions, which may lead integer overflows. Please see
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/424257/100/0/thre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 294520 libparted1.6-13
Bug#294520: QTParted Mixes Up Partiton Numbers
Bug reassigned from package `qtparted' to `libparted1.6-13'.
> retitle 294520 libparted1.6-13: Incorrect handling of extended partitions
Bug#294520: QTParted Mixes Up Partit
Got some more Information:
After reinstalling CDT from the CDT update site subclipse also reappeard
partially. I can use it from the menu and it is on the update site
again, but the "subclipse view" doesn't work (eclipse gave me a message
about this too). The CDT view seems to be broken too.
B
On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:19, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> The real problem though is, that our configure script does not support
> being called by an absolute path. I changed that in the current CVS HEAD
> version and try to backport it for the next stable release.
>
> How could this be tested u
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I just updated to 3.2.1-1 and with this update all my plugins which
were installed via eclipse vanished (CDT, sublipse, checkstyle and even
more).
The plugins living in /usr/local/lib/eclipse/plugins/ ar
Package: eclipse-sdk
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just tried to update to 3.2.1-1, but it failed and made eclipse
unusable.
###
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eclipse-sdk:
eclipse-sdk depends on eclipse (= 3.1.2-1); however:
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:21:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352086: libkjsembed-dev: libkjsembed.la depends on
/usr/lib/libXft.la which no longer exists in debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 352182 Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder
Bug#352182: Crash in the
Changed Bug title.
> clone 352182 -1
Bug#352182: Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder
Bug 352182 cloned as bug 352188.
> reassign -1 libtasn1-0 0.1.2-5
Bug#352188: Crash in the ASN.1 DE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> merge 308879 352179
Bug#308879: endless loop on startup
Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of #308879
Merged 308879 352179.
>
End of message, stopping process
Apologies for resubmission; I've jsut found this bug report. I'd like to
add my voice to the requests that this be re-evaluated. In particular,
"env_check" does not suffice.
See below:
From: Jan Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sudo update to 1.6.8p7-1.3 breaks scripts: is this the permanent
Package: libtasn1-2
Version: 0.2.17-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
A crash in the DER decoder of GnuTLS has been disclosed.
From: Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: GnuTLS 1.2.10 - Security release
Newsgroups: gnu.announce
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], help-gnutls@gnu.org, info-gnu@gnu.org
D
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of
#308879
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 0.7.0-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 308879 -sid
Bug#308879: endless loop on startup
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid
> merge 352179 308879
Bug#308879: endless loop on startup
Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of
Shouldn't we stop this madeness and close this bug ?
I don't think our beloved users need such extrmist attitude.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tinyca
Version: 0.6.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading from Debian 3.0 "Woody" to 3.1 "Sarge" it is impossible
to access existing CA, certificates and keys of production systems.
The issue is described in bug report #308879, this one is resolved
Package: pngcrush
Version: 1.5.10-2
Severity: grave
[Desktop]# pngcrush Logo-1.png Logo-2.png
Warning: versions are different between png.h and png.c
png.h version: 1.2.7
png.c version: 1.2.8
| pngcrush 1.5.10, Copyright (C) 1998-2002 Glenn Randers-Pehrson
| This is a free, open-source pr
95 matches
Mail list logo
