Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329986: fixed in ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329983: fixed in ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 01:09:38AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please find attached patch for Makefile-in to only process texi with
> texi2html files that succeed.
> So it build again.
Ok. I will apply it right away.
> Additionaly there are many warnings during build and something is
Your message dated Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:23:12 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #330005,
regarding sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6'
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Michael Tüxen <
retitle kino-timfx: crashes kino
thanks
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:30:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > and some of the plugins crash badly indeed. it seems that kino-dvtitler,
> > kinoplus and kino-timfx need a rebuild. they still depend on libstdc++5.
>
> Hrm?
>
oops, sorry.
> Package:
Package: sctplib
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.0.4-1
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of sctplib_1:1.0.4-1 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 65
Build started at 20050925-0608
[...]
** Using build dependencies
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can successfully apt-get the kernel-source-2.4.27 package using
testing, but when trying to bunzip it bunzip2 gives a Data Integrity
Error while decompressing
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 326801 -1 -2 -3
Bug#326801: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes
Bug 326801 cloned as bugs 329998-33.
> severity -1 serious
Bug#329998: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes
Severity set to `serious'.
> severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 327711 -sid sarge
Bug#327711: uim-xim crashes at startup: Segmentation fault
Tags were: sarge sid pending fixed-upstream
Tags removed: sid, sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:24:31PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > The last "fic" opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong
> > > instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc.
> >
> > I don't think we real
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 327711 +sid
Bug#327711: uim-xim crashes at startup: Segmentation fault
Tags were: pending fixed-upstream
Tags added: sid
> tags 327711 +sarge
Bug#327711: uim-xim crashes at startup: Segmentation fault
Tags were: sid pending fixed-upstream
Tags add
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > The last "fic" opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong
> > instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc.
>
> I don't think we realised this until now. I suspect we've been
> silently emitting bad code up un
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.24
Severity: serious
In commit r29833 the value of link_in_boot was changed from false to true
for i386 and amd64. This change make lilo-installer fail as lilo.conf is
configured to expect symlinks for the kernel and initrd in / (if boot is
not a separate part
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329246 grave
Bug#329246: mondoarchive failing when booting in compare mode
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 327272 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#327272: libpam-modules: pam_issue.so causes "double free or corruption"
error in glibc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, more
> > binutils-2.15 has this in include/opcodes/hppa.h:
> > { "fdc",0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
> > { "fdc",0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(b)", pa10, 0},
> > { "fic",0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(S,b)", pa10, 0},
> > { "fic",0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(
Hi Pierfrancesco,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:30:53PM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> Hello,
> I just had the nasty surprise of not being able to login at the console
> anymore with the following error:
> penny login: myusername
> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x080
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> The last "fic" opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong
> instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc.
I don't think we realised this until now. I suspect we've been
silently emitting bad code up until this poi
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327334: fixed in qscintilla 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
> binutils-2.15 has this in include/opcodes/hppa.h:
> { "fdc",0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
> { "fdc",0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(b)", pa10, 0},
> { "fic",0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(S,b)", pa10, 0},
> { "fic",0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, "cZx(b)", pa10,
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264445: fixed in tzc 2.6.15-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Jens,
Fortunately, it should be perfectly valid to build part of the source with
g++3.4, and part with g++4.0...
Attached is a patch that works fine in tests on i386, using g++-3.4 to build
only those source files that cause ICEs with g++-4.0. I don't know if
dll.cpp is the only problematic f
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328069: fixed in oprofile 0.9.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: python2.3-ctypes
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package depends on libffi2, which is not available in unstable
repository. Instead, libffi4 is available. Please adapt to the new lib.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Hi!
Please find attached patch for Makefile-in to only process texi with
texi2html files that succeed.
So it build again.
Additionaly there are many warnings during build and something is
outdated, so the package needs some work.
Kindly regards,
Erik
--
www.ErikSchanze.de
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:25:01PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:10:38PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In order to build aspell-bg requires more than 1GB RAM+swap. May be
> this is what has caused the problem?
I retried the build with 3gb swap space. It failed the sam
Package: python2.4-ctypes
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package depends on libffi2, which is not available in unstable
repository. Instead, libffi4 is available. Please adapt to the new lib.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316631: fixed in apt-watch 0.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 327744
Bug#327744: [FTBFS] libxrender missing libxt-dev build-dep
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> close 327527
Bug#327527: lib
> Your package did show up on this list and we propose to orphan
> it. There are not very many users, the last upload was two years ago
> and it's rc-buggy.
Hmm. Actually my records show I uploaded version 0.3.0-9 last August,
which was supposed to have fixed #259615:
vanzandt:/usr/local/src/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> severity 329963 grave
Bug#329963: callgrind: Uninstallable in sid, requires older valgrind
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 329137 329963
Bug#329137: not installable
Bug#329963: callg
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322448: fixed in libapache-request-perl 1.33-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Hi!
I cannot reproduce this failure.
hostap-source builds fine with m-a on my system.
Perhaps submitter have no configured kernel source installed, so the
link /lib/module/2.6.12-1-k7/build/ -> /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12
points to nothing or he removed the .config for some reasons?
Severity c
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: gucharmap
> Version: 1:1.4.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Replaces conffile from another package, wiping any
> customisation
> The postinst contains this line:
> # Hopefully GTK+ upstream will do something about
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327843: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329881: fixed in bgoffice 3.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327937: fixed in ifrit 2.9.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
> So I think closing the sig-bugs will be acceptable.
Go for it! :-)
--
.-.
=-- /v\ =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\
Package: valgrind-callgrind
Version: 0.9.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is currently uninstallable in sid because it
conflicts with valgrind (>> 1:2.6) and 1:3.0.1-1 is in sid.
It also can not be build for the same reason.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:06:48PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:33:15PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > > As discussed on irc:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329888
> >
> > This is a debian issue as far a I can tell. I tried
> >
> >
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:33:15PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > As discussed on irc:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329888
>
> This is a debian issue as far a I can tell. I tried
>
> fic,m %r23(%sr3,%r26)
>
> with GNU assembler 2.16.91 20050814 and I
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:45:40AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> As discussed on irc:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329888
binutils-2.15 has this in include/opcodes/hppa.h:
{ "fdc",0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZx(s,b)", pa10, 0},
{ "fdc",0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, "cZ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 329881 -1
Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
Bug 329881 cloned as bug 329954.
> reassign -1 aspell
Bug#329954: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
Bug reassigned from package `bgoffice' to `a
clone 329881 -1
reassign -1 aspell
retitle -1 aspell munch-list fails on some architectures
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Since this "aspell munch-list" command is quiet CPU+memory intensive
for the sake of the autobuilders I am going to fix this bug by
including precomp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 329238
Bug#329238: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox from sidebar
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox
Bug closed, send any further e
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Yaroslav Halchenko told:
> > > In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng
> > Which version did you tried? It would be very helpfull to know
> > wether
> > http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb
> >
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325294: fixed in gnuboy 1.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14619 (project findutils):
Hello,
Afaict almost any usage of -perm +'symbolic mode' is broken in .25.
(Checked e.g. u+x g=w u+w,g+r).
Contrary to my initial claim 4.2.(21-24) is _not_ ok, though, -perm + has lots of false positives, e.g -perm +u+x matches 455, 472, 62
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329915: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329915: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
> > In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng
> Which version did you tried? It would be very helpfull to know
> wether
> http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb
> helps or not.
My installed version is 0.0+20050831-1. Judging from the mailed
chan
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329835: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Please, close the bug, following worked and restored libgnome2-0
The idea of upgrading large amount of files with gnome isn't right way
apparently.
# dpkg --purge --force-all libgnome2-0
dpkg: libgnome2-0: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
mozilla-firefox-gnome-support de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323815 grave
Bug#323815: bzflag: shoots trough other players
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 324170 grave
Bug#324170: bzflag: jitter = -21 problem
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 324276 grave
Bug#324276: bzflag-server: bzflag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329920 important
Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4
(tdfx/glide3) [regression]
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 329920 libglide3
Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 18:50 +0300, Vesa Voutilainen a écrit :
> > > No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so'
> >
> > Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run?
>
> Booted system up this morning, with gconfd 2.10.1
What Debian version?
> , then later on upgraded
> gnome based
severity 329920 important
reassign 329920 libglide3
merge 326099 329920
kthxbye
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 15:55 +0300, sagi wrote:
> Package: xlibmesa-dri
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
[...]
> libGL error:
> can't find Glide library, dlopen(li
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328918: fixed in hyperestraier 0.9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Saturday 24 September 2005 16:49, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:03 +0300, matt a écrit :
> > Package: libgnome2-common
> > Version: 2.10.1-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > *** Please type your report below this line ***
> >
>
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:52:31PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> yes, i'm aware of this. it is due to the libcurl-gnutls.so.3 soname
> still being libcurl.so.3. everything else is in place for a good upload.
>
> as of today, i've not found a solution different from patching the
> makefiles. i'
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:19 +0200, Remco Schaar a écrit :
> Ah... the upgrade I had in my report was not the proper one. The actual
> one was:
>
> 2005-09-23 21:04:41 install gconf2-common 2.10.1-3
> 2005-09-23 21:04:42 upgrade gconf2 2.10.1-2 2.10.1-3
> 2005-09-23 21:05:40 upgrade libgsf
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Yaroslav Halchenko told:
> I just was upgrading mutt-ng and saw your "SEGFAULT" bug report with no
> usable description.
>
> In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng
Which version did you tried? It would be very helpfull to know
wether
http
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319162: fixed in gnome-games 1:2.10.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:19 +0200, Remco Schaar a écrit :
> Ah... the upgrade I had in my report was not the proper one. The actual
> one was:
>
> 2005-09-23 21:04:41 install gconf2-common 2.10.1-3
> 2005-09-23 21:04:42 upgrade gconf2 2.10.1-2 2.10.1-3
> 2005-09-23 21:05:40 upgrade libgsf
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 04:15:53PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Domenico Andreoli told:
>
> It doesn't seem so:
> dpkg -l | grep curl
> ii curl 7.14.1-2
> ii libcurl3 7.14.1-2
> ii libcurl3-gnutls7.14.1-2
Anthony DeRobertis writes:
> feynman:/etc/gtk-2.0# head /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules
> # GTK+ Input Method Modules file
> # Automatically generated file, do not edit
> # Created by gtk-query-immodules-2.0 from gtk+-2.6.8
>
> That doesn't belong in /etc.
The system administrator might want to remov
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 14:49 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run, or at least the same day?
Ah... the upgrade I had in my report was not the proper one. The actual
one was:
2005-09-23 21:04:41 install gconf2-common 2.10.1-3
2005-09-23 21:04:42 upgrade gc
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:25:01PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> In order to build aspell-bg requires more than 1GB RAM+swap. May be
> this is what has caused the problem?
My pbuilder has 640 MB ram and 1GB swap currently. I can try adding a
swap file and seeing if that will let it build.
--
I just was upgrading mutt-ng and saw your "SEGFAULT" bug report with no
usable description.
In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng
as well - was segfaultig. Removal of header cache files from previous
version helped A LOT -- now it works nicely, so you might want to check
if you didn
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Domenico Andreoli told:
> tag 318590 + fixed-in-experimental
>
It doesn't seem so:
dpkg -l | grep curl
ii curl 7.14.1-2
ii libcurl3 7.14.1-2
ii libcurl3-gnutls7.14.1-2
ii libcurl3-gnutls-dev7.14.1-2
Buil
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Domenico Andreoli told:
> tag 318590 + fixed-in-experimental
>
It doesn't seem so:
dpkg -l | grep curl
ii curl 7.14.1-2
ii libcurl3 7.14.1-2
ii libcurl3-gnutls7.14.1-2
ii libcurl3-gnutls-dev7.14.1-2
Buil
Package: gucharmap
Version: 1:1.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Replaces conffile from another package, wiping any customisation
The postinst contains this line:
# Hopefully GTK+ upstream will do something about this sillyness
gtk-query-immodules-2.0 > /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules
This
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 329915 serious
Bug#329915: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/
Severity set to `serious'.
> severity 329924 serious
Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (p
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:03 +0300, matt a écrit :
> Package: libgnome2-common
> Version: 2.10.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> # apt-get -f install
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependen
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:29:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303721: fixed in plptools 0.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:02:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325798: fixed in insserv 1.02.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: libgnome2-common
Version: 2.10.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 399 not upgraded.
Hi,
Roger Leigh wrote:
> Has any progress been made on this RC bug?
Considering that we have 3 more or less different proposals for fixing
this >1 year old "Severity: serious" bug, its last day should be coming
soon.
Additional notes:
* I suggest replacing tmp/DEBIAN with ../$t/DEBIAN in the la
Package: xlibmesa-dri
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
- 3D hardware acceleration stopped working.
- I tried switching back to the xfree86-server but it doesn't help anymore.
- All OpenGL applications now issue these lines (didn't used to happen when
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 329905 libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-3
Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_IEND)
Bug reassigned from package `pngmeta' to `libpng12-0'.
> merge 329886 329905
Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages
Bug#329905: pn
reassign 329905 libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-3
merge 329886 329905
thanks
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:49:20PM +0300, Kaloian Doganov wrote:
> pngmeta refuses to process any PNG file, for example:
> $ pngmeta /usr/share/pixmaps/splash/gnome-splash.png
> pngmeta: symbol lookup error: pngmeta: undefined symbo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329838 + fixed
Bug#329838: zinc-compiler: ftbfs [sparc] run.nw:212: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Package: hmake
Version: 3.09-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
Your package currently can't be installed in sid because it still
depeneds on libgmp3 and that has been renamed to libgmp3c3
because of the C++ ABI transition.
A simple rebuild should take care of this.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
forgot cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
From: H B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:38 +0200
Subject: Re: Bug#329454: broken symlinks "/usr/bin/boo*"
To: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
thanks for your prompt reaction. If it was just a missing depe
Hi,
I've also did a NMU for this, now using gcc-3.3 to avoid the
gcc-4.0 ICE on sparc (#329840). I've attached the patch of both
of them.
Kurt
diff -u zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
--- zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
+++ zinc-compiler-1.0.2/deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 327183 pending
Bug#327183: cyphesis-cpp: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends:
libatlas-cpp-0.5-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 313384 pending
Bug#3133
Package: muine
Version: 0.8.3-7
Severity: grave
Hi,
Muine is currently uninstallable in sid:
muine: Depends: libgconf2.0-cil (>= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed
Depends: libglade2.0-cil (>= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed
Depends: libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.3.
Package: pngmeta
Version: 1.11-3
Severity: grave
pngmeta refuses to process any PNG file, for example:
$ pngmeta /usr/share/pixmaps/splash/gnome-splash.png
pngmeta: symbol lookup error: pngmeta: undefined symbol: png_IEND
The result is exactly the same without any command line arguments at
all:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:48:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: cyphesis-cpp
> Version: 0.3.5-2
> Severity: grave
>
> The cyphesis-cpp package is currently not installable in unstable due to
> various library transitions:
>
> # aptitude install cyphesis-cpp
> Reading package lists... D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 327937 +pending
Bug#327937: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:10:38PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: bgoffice
> Severity: serious
> Version: 3.0-5
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> bgoffice failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
In order
tag 327937 +pending
thanks
Just to keep the bug and submitter up-to-date, I've sent ifrit 2.9.3-2
to my sponsor so this bug should be fixed soon.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"I told you I was ill"
The epitaph of Spike Milligan (1918-2002)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.6.8-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
feynman:/etc/gtk-2.0# head /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules
# GTK+ Input Method Modules file
# Automatically generated file, do not edit
# Created by gtk-query-immodules-2.0 from gtk+-2.6.8
That does
Package: cyphesis-cpp
Version: 0.3.5-2
Severity: grave
The cyphesis-cpp package is currently not installable in unstable due to
various library transitions:
# aptitude install cyphesis-cpp
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializi
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:43:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329895: gconf2-common: if there is no /etc/gconf/2,
package wants to create /etc/gconf2 and fails.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329889: fixed in ethereal 0.10.12-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: lirc
Version: 0.7.1pre2-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up lirc (0.7.1pre2-9) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/lirc.config: line 576: ./setup-driver.sh: No such file or
directory
dpkg: error processing lirc (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script retur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # package is uninstallable, this is a grave bug
> severity 316629 grave
Bug#316629: please rebuild, apt 0.6 reached unstable
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # package is uninstallable, this is a grave bug
> severity 316631 grave
Bug#316631: please rebuild, apt 0.6 reached unstable
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 329711 gconf2
Bug#329711: gconf2-common: installation fails
Bug#329724: gconf2-common: fails to install
Bug#329789: gconf-common installation error (missing directory)
Bug#329797: gconf2-common fails to install if /etc/gconf/2/ is not present
B
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
