Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324865: fixed in gnomad2 2.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
[...]
> Terribly sorry for the oversight; will have a new package ready for
> sponsorship today.
[...]
This package has been fixed, and vesion 1.5.3-2 is awaiting sponsorship
and upload. It can be found at:
ftp://www.bytemason.or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328795 normal
Bug#328795: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
severity 328795 normal
thanks
> [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than
> three years.
>
> [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
>
> [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you
> might be MIA
>
> [4] (
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328781: fixed in wmaker 0.92.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:22:40PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than
> three years.
>
> [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**)
>
> [3] the state of your packages in general seems to in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> sorry mistyped
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 328365 - patch
Bug#328365: temporary file race in texindex
Tags were: patch security
Tags removed: patch
> tags 328364 +
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302141: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326645: fixed in tellico 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315579: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302141: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi Regis,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:45:21PM +0100, Regis Boudin wrote:
> So, as promised earlier this morning, the latest tellico source package
> is at http://www.imalip.info/tellico/sid/source
> The upstream site is http://periapsis.org/tellico/ which show the same
> md5sum for the original so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316403 serious
Bug#316403: circular dependency between libgconf2-4 and gconf2
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326499: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326497: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326667: fixed in gnat-gdb 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
tags 328365 + patch
Hi, I attached a patch for the problem.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail prefer
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.1
Followup-For: Bug #328129
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I atached a backtrace for this annoying bug. Maybe it helps even it
misses the symbol names:
[..]
(gdb) r
[..]
(no debugging symbols found)
- ---Type to continue, or q to quit---
(no de
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321042: fixed in libadabindx 0.7.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: libsilc-1.0-2
Version: 0.9.12-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It appears the NMU for libsilc is missing the actual libraries. Only
the documentatios under /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2/ is in the package,
and nothing else:
$ dpkg -L libsilc-1.0-2
/.
/usr
/usr/
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 04:29:31PM -0500, Mike Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 22:37 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Sep 17, Mike Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Kernels 2.6.12 and newer are not yet available in testing or unstable.
> > They are.
> Ah, someone had the brainiac idea
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326786: fixed in digikam 0.7.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328816 RM: vgagamespack -- RoM; old, unused, superseded
Bug#328816: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328816 normal
Bug#328816: RM: vgagamespack -- RoM; old, unused, superseded
Severity set to `normal'.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328816 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328816: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `vgagamespack' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> reassign 328839 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328839: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned f
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 22:37 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 17, Mike Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kernels 2.6.12 and newer are not yet available in testing or unstable.
> They are.
Ah, someone had the brainiac idea to change the package names from
"kernel-image-2.6.xxx" to "linux-im
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 319676 + patch
Bug#319676: aspell-bg: Needs repackaging for latest aspell
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 319676 + patch
thanks
Dear Anton,
I dared to prepare a NMU for bgoffice, since in the past two months
several fellow translators and colleagues were tormenting me with
wrong accusations that Debian's quality is "poor". This is a bloody
insult which has to be washed away ASAP. I'm attaching
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:37:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328875: apt-get downloads udev and attempts to install
while kernel is not >= 2.6.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326701: fixed in bittornado 0.3.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # no previous successful build
> severity 323798 important
Bug#323798: [sparc] corrupted double-linked list
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: udev
Version: 0.068-2
Severity: serious
I'm running (primarily) Debian testing. Apt-get complains upon
downloading and attempting to install udev 0.068-2:
(Reading database ... 163044 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 (using .../archives/u
tags 320868 pending
tags 281163 pending
thanks
All,
I have now rebuilt rate-engine with libmysqlclient14-dev, which seems to clear
up a number of these issues. I have also uploaded to svn.asterisk.org and
changed the binary package name to asterisk-rate-engine to conform with the
rest of the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 320868 pending
Bug#320868: asterisk: Asterisk segfaults when hangup button in linphone pressed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 281163 pending
Bug#281163: rate-engine: unconfigured mysql causes asterisk to segfault
There were no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> notforwarded 316590
Bug#316590: cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005
052005)
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 316590 - upstream
Bug#316590: cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005
052005)
Tags were: upstream sarge security
Tags removed: upstream
>
End of mess
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 316590 upstream
Bug#316590: cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005
052005)
Tags were: sarge security
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> forwarded 316590 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316590
Bug#316590: cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005
052005)
Noted your statement that Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # I agree, and reassigning it.
> #
> reassign 328862 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328862: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `gidic' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 328862 RM: gidic -- RoM and RoQA; old, unused, gtk1.2
Bug#3
#
# I agree, and reassigning it.
#
reassign 328862 ftp.debian.org
retitle 328862 RM: gidic -- RoM and RoQA; old, unused, gtk1.2
severity 328862 normal
thanks
On 9/17/05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gidic
> Version: 0.2-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328851 RM: sitescooper, sitescooper-sites -- RoM; old, superseded,
> unneeded
Bug#328851: very old packages, should these be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328851 normal
Bug#328851: RM: sitescooper, sitescooper-sites -- RoM; old, super
On Saturday 10 September 2005 04:11, Diego Woitasen wrote:
> I 'm using debian sarge with asterisk. The problem is that asterisk
> crash after hangup of any channel (IAX, SIP or Phone). I get the crash
> running asterisk with -vvv or running it in background.
>
> Do you have any report like this? a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328813 RM: vmnet -- RoM; old, superseded
Bug#328813: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328813 normal
Bug#328813: RM: vmnet -- RoM; old, superseded
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 328813 ftp.debian.org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328817 normal
Bug#328817: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 328817 RM: bloksi -- RoM; old, alternatives available
Bug#328817: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328818 RM: pcrd -- RoQA; old, superseded
Bug#328818: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328818 normal
Bug#328818: RM: pcrd -- RoQA; old, superseded
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign ftp.debian.org
Unknow
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:26:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321041: fixed in hk-classes 0.7.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: opennap
Version: 0.44-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:21:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324100: fixed in hyperestraier 0.5.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:14:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278411: fixed in schoolbell 1.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I remember having something similar, and it turned out that a system
tray was already added in the taskbar so it would not create
another.But the error message is misleading indeed if it's your case
too.So if you have little icons in the upper right corner chances are
you already have the systray r
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/09/2005):
> I'll try to have a look at it, I never used it till now.
Seems to be known upstream as #1098 [1]. For information, the error
message is issued from 666th line of xfce4-panel-4.2.2/panel/controls.c
I guess that we'll have to check periodically ups
Package: ultrapoint
Version: 0.4-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Package: gidic
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pro
Package: libhs
Version: 0.1.3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pro
Package: safe-hole-perl
Version: 0.08-3.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:11:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Eric IDE says "undefined symbol: _ZTI11QMotifStyle"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323035 + fixed
Bug#323035: libslc violates library policies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318590 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#318590: libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Hi all,
All of this is, I believe, fully explained in package's README.Debian
Is not the first time this kind of bug happens, and will not be the last
as it seems not much people cares to read the README.Debian files :)
Despite the fact that the package cannot be first-time-installed in S
Package: libfloat
Version: 990616-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Package: samba-doc-ja
Version: 2.0.6+ja1.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on
Package: nwutil
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pr
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:51:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327161: fixed in ecj-bootstrap 3.0.93-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/09/2005):
> Hi,
Hi.
> When I try to add the System tray plugin to my XFCE panel, it simply
> displays a dialog box with « Impossible to create panel element
> "Systemtray" » (this message is a translation from french to english, as
> I'm running with a fren
Package: tag-types
Version: 0.0.9-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325128 unreproducible
Bug#325128: kghostview: hangs and sucks CPU resouces up, when loading PS file
with PDF extension
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
tag 325128 unreproducible
thanks
* Борисов Юрий Владимирович [Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:54:03 +0300]:
> Package: kghostview
> Version: 4:3.3.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: probably user security hole
I can't reproduce this. Only, with gs-gpl, I can't display the
document, but that's all. W
Package: sitescooper,sitescooper-sites
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your packages showed up on the l
Package: saxon-catalog
Version: 2203-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: asm
> Version: 1.5.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> When building 'asm' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> debian/rules clean
> debian/rules:13: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No
Package: xfce4-systray
Version: 4.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
When I try to add the System tray plugin to my XFCE panel, it simply
displays a dialog box with « Impossible to create panel element
"Systemtray" » (this message is a translation from french to en
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#187052: fixed in ksetisaver 0.3.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174241: fixed in ksetisaver 0.3.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:41:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327360: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:41:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327360: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:41:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327291: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Lo Steve, Horacio,
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:50:37 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reassign 328695 sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Horacio Spiders wrote:
> > >But there certainly is such a version of sylpheed-claws in unstabl
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 10:27 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>
> > In file included from glcontextmodes.c:60:
> > ../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/glcontextmodes.h:39: warning: type
> defaults
> > to 'int' in declaration of '__GLXvisualConfig'
>
> Uhm... glxint.h is missing upstream.
>
Package: pc532down
Version: 1.1-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I
Package: regex
Version: 0.12-15
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I p
Package: camlp4-doc
Version: 3.02-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Package: titrax
Version: 1.98.1-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328017: fixed in kxdocker 0.35-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328801 RM: cfe -- RoM and RoQA; old, unused
Bug#328801: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328801 normal
Bug#328801: RM: cfe -- RoM and RoQA; old, unused
Severity set to `normal'.
> thankskbye
Stopping proc
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: vmnet
> Version: 0.4-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I made my changes and uploaded -5 version. The buildd logs are ok? Is this bug
closed?
Thanks a lot
- --
Victor Seva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key ID: 0xDD12F253
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.torreviejawireless.org http://linuxmaniac.homeip.n
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327942: fixed in kbarcode 1.8.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # I agree with the removal,
> # and I am reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org
> #
> reassign 328801 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328801: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `cfe' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping proc
#
# I agree with the removal,
# and I am reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org
#
reassign 328801 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On 9/17/05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: cfe
> Version: 0.9-8
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09t
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326851: fixed in beagle 0.0.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi Mark,
I believe bloksi can be removed from debian archives w/ little
prejudice for anyone.
Thx for contributing to Debian,
Etienne
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:16:20PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
# Package: bloksi
# Version: 0.0.2001.07.13-1
# Severity: serious
#
# Hi,
#
# Du
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328727 important
Bug#328727: xmms freezes on the desktop
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 328727 unreproducible
Bug#328727: xmms freezes on the desktop
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Pl
severity 328727 important
tags 328727 unreproducible
stop
On September 16, 2005 19:00, fb wrote:
> Package: xmms
> Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> xmms when opened as an application, immediately crashes and ceases to
> function. Clickin
Package: emwin
Version: 0.93-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pr
Package: tik
Version: 0.90-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I prop
Package: math3d
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I
Package: pcrd
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pro
Package: bloksi
Version: 0.0.2001.07.13-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the
Package: vgagamespack
Version: 1.4-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list
Package: gmgaclock
Version: 0.4.8-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Package: debian-history-ko
Version: 0.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the l
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
