Quoting Martin Kos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> hi christian & steve
OK, let's get Andrew Bartlett's attention on that one first now that
we have as much information as possible..:-)
http://bugs.debian.org/312513
Andrew, if you have an idea to suggest us. Neither Steve nor I can
reproduce the bug bec
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:15:27PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
> When dbuild was run:
> test -d /usr/src/debian-builder/deb/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patched ||
> install -d /usr/src/debian-builder/deb/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patched
> applying patch debian/patches/10_cvs.dpatch... failed.
> mak
Package: evolution
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Adding an account mail type (IMAP, POP, maildir) causes the evolution account
adding wizard to crash, meaning that users cannot use evolution for any mail
accounts.
The first pane appears and functions
When dbuild was run:
test -d /usr/src/debian-builder/deb/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patched ||
install -d /usr/src/debian-builder/deb/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patched
applying patch debian/patches/10_cvs.dpatch... failed.
make: ***
[/usr/src/debian-builder/deb/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patch-s
The senior patent holder is presumably now Ford Oxaal, who discusses
his licensing policy, his relationship to iPIX, and the status of
Helmut Dersch's "PT toolset" at
http://www.pictosphere.com/kwx/faq.html .
I have made no attempt to evaluate the strength of his patents in
light of the prior art,
Can I do an NMU of devilspie to fix this? It doesn't look like there's
been any activity for a while.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
intltool-debian has a size mismatch on ftp.debian.org. Here's the
error message.
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/i/intltool-debian/intltool-debian_0.30+20040213_all.deb
Size mismatch
--
Package: glibc
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
when debuild attempts to apply patches, it fails part way through the
first patch to be applied (10_CVS?).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
GET CD AND DOWNLOADS, all software under $99-$15
http://dviye.ls7io23e0dlaim3.artemiadc.com
First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
They can because they think they can.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Downgrade, as there is a simple workaround.
> severity 315249 minor
Bug#315249: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-ko: Does not work
Severity set to `minor'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
reassign 315249 mozilla-thunderbird
thanks
According to Yooseong Yang, this bug happens only if you install Mozilla
Thunderbird and locale package *together*, but not when you install them
separately. I confirmed this, and he confirmed that the same problem
exists for other mozilla-thunderbird-loc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 315249 mozilla-thunderbird
Bug#315249: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-ko: Does not work
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-thunderbird-locale-ko' to
`mozilla-thunderbird'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Le Mercredi 22 Juin 2005 02:38, Steve Langasek a écrit :
[...]
> > You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he
> > will fix the bug or not.
>
> The "wontfix" tag isn't really appropriate for an RC bug, however -- either
> it gets fixed, or the package gets removed.
>
Ye
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:31:04 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs fixed on last upload to unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Cyril Mougel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/06/2005):
> (xfce-mcs-manager:5371): libxfce4util-WARNING **: Invalid
> XDG_CONFIG_HOME
> directory `/home/shingara/.config', program may behave incorrectly.
>
> ** (xfce-mcs-manager:5371): CRITICAL **: backdrop_settings.c: Unable to
>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:03:48PM +0200, Florent Bayle wrote:
> Le Mardi 21 Juin 2005 18:10, Robert Jordens a écrit :
> > severity 309257 grave
> > tags 309257 - wontfix
> > tags 309257 + sid etch
> > thanks
> You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he will
> fix the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 315339 sid
Bug#315339: installation of lvm2 renders vg's unusable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 315233 sid
Bug#315233: pwlib: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for pwlib:
libdc1394-11-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processi
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.01.12-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installing the latest lvm2 package I get the following error when
attempting any lvm-related operation (pvscan, vgdisplay, etc.):
PV segment VG free_count mismatch: 13 != 4294965183
Internal error:
Package: haskell-http
Version: 0.4.20050430-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
haskel-http fails to build from source on all buildds, duplicated on
sparc pbuilder.
./Codec/MD5.lhs:86:1:
Warning: No explicit method nor default method for `fromInteger'
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:04:09AM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote:
> Package: jpilot
> Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre9-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When trying to restore the palm pilot, jpilot simply crashes showingthe
> following:
> ==
> baloo:
Package: xfce4-mcs-manager
Version: 4.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't launch the xfce-mcs-manager. If I launch this in my shell, I see :
0:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% xfce-mcs-manager
(xfce-mcs-manager:5371): libxfce4util-WARNING **: Invalid
X
Package: jpilot
Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to restore the palm pilot, jpilot simply crashes showingthe
following:
==
baloo:~/.jpilot# jpilot
removing stale pidfile
Segmentation fault
baloo:~/.jpilot#
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 314813 grave
Bug#314813: cdebootstrap lack of support for etch breaks dfsbuild testing
Bug#315154: add etch to /usr/share/cdebootstrap/suites
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:07:45 +0200,
Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking around for the "Unsupported major.minor" error message turned up
> that this was for classes compiled with jdk 1.4 which are trying to be
> loaded by jdk 1.3 or earlier.
> Installing blackdown jdk 1.4 packa
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:58:04 -0700,
Josh Partlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:07 +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>> I think you are running tomcat5 on a non-free JDK ?
>>
> Yes, sorry, it was tested on:
>
> java version "1.4.2_06"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
* Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-19 20:02]:
> The transition from raidtools2 to mdadm breaks all installations with
> more than one RAID array
> That the transitional raidtools2 package entered sarge just days before
> the release (and that sarge had zero testing cycles, unlike pota
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:23:35 -0700,
Josh Partlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> These are the changes I needed to make to get the tomcat5 packages
> working:
I already did this but thanks for your help.
I'm also comparing /usr/share/tomcat5 and a fresh binary download from
the jakarta we
Package: bogofilter-common
Version: 0.95.0-1
Severity: serious
Selecting previously deselected package bogofilter-common.
Unpacking bogofilter-common (from .../bogofilter-common_0.95.0-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/bogofilter-common_0.95.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
Package: bogofilter-bdb
Version: 0.95.0-1
Severity: serious
Unpacking bogofilter-bdb (from .../bogofilter-bdb_0.95.0-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/bogofilter-bdb_0.95.0-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/bogofilter', which is also in package bog
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:15:58PM -0400, Rick wrote:
OK, I hadn't seen this on unstable before, but until you're sure that
this is dfsbuild's fault (can you run cdebootstrap with the same mirror
manually and *not* get the problem), I'm assuming it is either a problem
with cdebootstrap or exim4.
Package: dfsbuild
Version: 0.6.19
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-mppe
Locale:
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:47:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308232: fixed in bugzilla 2.18-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 315120 grave
Bug#315120: apt-spy: segfault with updated mirror list
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Manolo Díaz schrieb:
> Purge grace. This action remove /usr/share/grace and grace6 doesn't work
> anymore untill it's reinstalled and is shown the known message.
Confirmed, you should not purge grace until the bug is fixed. As a quick
workaround you can reinstall grace6.
Regards,
Torsten
--
To
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:16:21 +0400,
Paul Romanchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:12:21 +0400,
>> Paul Romanchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, I know...
>> http://www.edev.be/blog/index.php/archives/2005/06/11/tomcat5-in-experimental-to-ex
Hi,
We know that there was no testing cycle for Sarge (badly enough) but we
made a release note for this and you can find it here:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-mdadm
If we make a patch that does the transition from /etc/raidtab to
mdadm.conf, i'm
I tried attaching strace to debootstrap instead, this showed it forking
off a child process at the end, waiting on it, and getting a WEXITSTATUS
of 1. run-debootstrap is out of the picture.
I'm pretty sure the problem is in the exit_function, this explains why set -x
makes it look like it exits ze
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 297096 -1
Bug#297096: adonthell: FTBFS: Link errors
Bug 297096 cloned as bug 315305.
> retitle -1 adonthell: New upstream release: 3.4
Bug#315305: adonthell: FTBFS: Link errors
Changed Bug title.
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug#315305: adonthell: New
I'd like to point out that the version of adonthell in Debian is
0.3.3.cvs.20031022-3 and the version 3.4 was released on 18 Apr 2005.
Before trying to fix this an update to that version might be useful.
This bug just might simply go away along with that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:17:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296524: fixed in memtester 2.93.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Le Mardi 21 Juin 2005 18:10, Robert Jordens a écrit :
> severity 309257 grave
> tags 309257 - wontfix
> tags 309257 + sid etch
> thanks
>
You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he will
fix the bug or not.
>
> Hey!
>
> * Florent Bayle:
> > severity 309257 important
>
Well, I've ruled out the SIGCHLD handler as having anything to do with
the problem.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Here's a transcript of a strace of base-installer as it finishes running
debootstrap just before it displays the error message:
read(0, "0 Base system installed successf"...,4096) = 38
waitpid(16112, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 1}], 0} = 16112
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
sigretu
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:10:20AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
> Completely agreedI don't want to know the passwords. What I'd like
> to see is, over the long term, are these scans making more attempts at
> non-system, first-name valid accounts that do exist than random chance
> should allow, an
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:32:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308715: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:32:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#233817: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:32:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263909: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:32:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289217: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
I can confirm the problem, and a solution.
The problem is the existence of several broken links in
/usr/share/grace/fonts/type1, of the type:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2005-06-21 17:06 ecb10.pfa -> /path/to/pfa/ecb10.pfa
All of the broken links have the names of fonts from the
ec-fonts-mftrace
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:42:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315257: can't start skippy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Completely agreedI don't want to know the passwords. What I'd like
to see is, over the long term, are these scans making more attempts at
non-system, first-name valid accounts that do exist than random chance
should allow, and a clear indication that more attempts at valid
accounts are made tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 309257 grave
Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 309257 - wontfix
Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems
Tags were: wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
> tags 309257 + sid etch
Bug#309257: libpano12: patent proble
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:07 +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> I think you are running tomcat5 on a non-free JDK ?
>
Yes, sorry, it was tested on:
java version "1.4.2_06"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_06-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_06-b03, mixed mode)
severity 314813 important
reassign 314813 cdebootstrap
retitle 314813 cdebootstrap lack of support for etch breaks dfsbuild testing
merge 315154 314813
thanks
Please note, I am uploading a new dfsbuild that has a dfs.cfg that will
not try to build etch by default. Perhaps that will help.
-- John
Hello,
It appears this is a bug in cdebootstrap, see #315154. However, you
should still be able to build a "stable" CD. You indicated that's what
you're trying to do, but I haven't ever seen your dfs.cfg file, so I
can't very that. Are you *sure* you're not trying to including anything
past sta
Sure, but what do you plan to do with the data? Rather, how do you
plan to analyze it? It seems to me that this could be done without
knowing what passwords are tried.
The data lined up pretty well last night, when I discovered the first
ssh scan; I had to remove some blank lines from /etc/ssh-l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 314813 important
Bug#314813: dfsbuild: can not build a "stable" live cd, the output is: "E:
Unknown suite etch"
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 314813 cdebootstrap
Bug#314813: dfsbuild: can not build a "stable" live cd, the output is:
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:26:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in ncurses
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310138 +pending
Bug#310138: metar: why not arch: any?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 314475 +pending
Bug#314475: metar(GNU/kFreeBSD): FTBFS: kfreebsd-i386 not in the architecture
list
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pendin
> That still sounds grave to me, if it means the tool in its present state
> will not be usable for building CDs of etch when etch is released as
> stable.
Since the fix is simple, and we have a while before etch to be released,
important should be enough for now. If there'll be a delay, I'll bump
Package: skippy
Version: 0.5.1rc1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I ran `apt-get dist-upgrade' today, then I was not able to start skippy.
I got the following error message every time.
$ skippy
X Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource
de
Hello Steve,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 12:55:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: metar
> Version: 20050103.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The metar source package uses Architecture: i386 in debian/control for no
> apparent reason, wrongly limiting the package to building only on i386.
> Packa
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:25:38 +0530
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309505: gnuradio_0.9-2.1 (unstable): fails to build, old
config.sub
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:02:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315202: fixed in bogofilter 0.95.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
This bug has NOT been fixed in 2.71, or even 2.72
When razor processes certain legitimate email it will Segmetation
fault. This can be tested by downloading this email:
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/email.txt
and running either:
razor-check email.txt
or:
spamassassin -tD < email.txt
This problem
package logcheck
severity 315250 normal
merge 315071 315250
thanks
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 15:56 +0300, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> During installation the following is returned:
> Setting up logcheck (1.2.39) ...
> gpasswd: unknown user adm
> adduser: `/usr/bin/gpasswd -M root,adm,daemon,logcheck adm' re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package logcheck
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck
> severity 315250 normal
Bug#315250: logcheck: Installation fails due to an error
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 315071 315250
Bug#315071: logcheck: LogCheck won't start/work
Bug#315250: logc
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:02:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263760: fixed in cdrw-taper 0.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.39
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During installation the following is returned:
Setting up logcheck (1.2.39) ...
gpasswd: unknown user adm
adduser: `/usr/bin/gpasswd -M root,adm,daemon,logcheck adm' returned
error code 1. Aborting.
Cleaning
Package: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-ko
Version: 1.0.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed this package, but Thunderbird's menu still comes out in
English. What's going on?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT poli
hi christian & steve
On 06/08/2005 06:07 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
Could you please reproduce this bug with log level set to 10 and send
the relevant winbind log excerpt to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==> host.0.0.0.0 <==
[2005/06/21 14:07:49, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(470)
client
Hi!
This is CAN-2005-1993, please mention that in the changelog.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 218908 serious
Bug#218908: tuxtype: Please package a new, very improved tuxtype version -
1.5.1 -> legal issues
Bug#244295: tuxtype: a long time has passed, and still no new version, and now
there is 1.5.2 -> legal issues
Severity set to `ser
Package: pwlib
Version: 1.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'pwlib' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
E: Package libdc1394-11-dev has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency f
Hi,
let me correct this a bit.
There never has been any mess in the official
star source. There may however have been a mess
in the patches applied at Debian.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 315123 grave
Bug#315123: implicitly converted pointer
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:03:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The most recent version of gmime2.1 fails to build on all architectures
> except for i386 and powerpc, due to the addition of various mono-related
> build-dependencies:
Yes, I noticed. The amd64 autobuilders seem to compile gmime2.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:56:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yay, sarge is out. By the time etch comes around these packages will be
> > ready for stable.
>
> So, is schooltool *currently* in a releasable state? If you don't think so,
> it would be nice to keep it out of testing until it i
Package: metar
Version: 20050103.1-2
Severity: serious
The metar source package uses Architecture: i386 in debian/control for no
apparent reason, wrongly limiting the package to building only on i386.
Packages must be supported on as many architectures as is reasonably
possible; I have personally
severity 313555 grave
severity 314234 grave
merge 313555 315216
thanks
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 313555 grave
Bug#313555: java-package: make-jpkg does not detect sun j2sdk because of wrong
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE
Bug#314234: java-package: appears broken in sid for j2sdk-1_4_2_08 and
jdk-1_5_0_03
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 314234 gra
Package: java-package
Version: 0.24
Severity: grave
dpkg-architecture's output for DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE changed from
"i386-linux" to "i486-linux-gnu". This causes all java detection scripts
to fail to detect the java archive.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 278411
Bug#278411: SchoolBell should not be released with sarge
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
84 matches
Mail list logo
