le trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050511-1353
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph,
> ocaml-native-compile
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me
> > from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon
> > as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order.
>
> BTW, do you know if thes
Package: rsync
Version: 2.6.4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I upgraded from 2.6.4-2 to 2.6.4-4 on my local network server and now
my client gets an error:
$ rsync mydesktop::
rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data s
Ok, after further analysis on IRC, it seems that the error in Bill's upgrade
happens only because the packages are being removed, and apt removed some
packages in an order that was not consistent with the declared dependencies.
Since there's no reason to think apt is playing fast and loose with
dep
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:44:11AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In
> > UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in
> > fonty-rg, it's used
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:34:57PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > There appear to be a number of undocumented changes, relative to -4, which
> > are not documentation fixes. :/ Would you remind removing them and
> > uploading a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these
> >
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.9
The relevent changes for this CAN appear to be solely in
./fs/binfmt_elf.c.
There is also a memset in ./drivers/char/drm/drm_ioctl.c whic
Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 02:34:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nec: FTBFS: couldn't open the intermediate file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2005 10:28:46 +1000 (EST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse
error near `www-sivut.`
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
[all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2'
> > make: *** [build] Error 2
> > **
> > Build finished at 20050511-0808
> > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> [...]
>
> Bastian
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:47:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308179: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi LaMont,
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:02:25PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: cdbs
> Version: 0.4.28-1
> Severity: serious
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5
> > B
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:10:50AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:09:49PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>>Why is this bug filed as "RoM"?
>>Should I change it?
>
>You should not say "Request of Maintainer" when it isn't a request of
>the maintainer, that's
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 287224 serious
Bug#287224: doc-rfc-3000-3999: RFC packages are missing hundreds of RFCs
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 08:23:59PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> The problem is that we are missing a versioned conflict against
> older versions of python-apt, which contains the same files as
> python2.3-apt does now.
Wouldn't a Replaces actually suffice?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[
Package: llvm
Severity: serious
It seems the package lacks some build-depends.
It doesn't fail to build, but it at least lacks some info files then
which are only build if texinfo is installed.
I also get massive complains from doxygen about missing graphviz and
missing fonts although I didn't che
Eric Dorland wrote:
> Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me
> from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon
> as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order.
BTW, do you know if these only impact firefox, or do they also affect
mozil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 305530
Bug#305530: Add dependency to libpt sound plugin
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Package: tftpd-hpa
Severity: serious
Installing tftpd-hpa in a clean chroot leads to the following problem:
Setting up tftpd-hpa (0.40-4) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tftpd-hpa.postinst: line 28: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing tftpd-hpa (--configure):
subprocess post-installatio
Hello Udi,
May Debian redistribute binaries built from modified source code?
The Debian Free Software Guidelines state that "The license must
explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source
code." but it seems to me this must apply to software in the non-free
archive as well
Well aware. Of course Mozilla's silly security policies prevent me
from viewing the bug's making a release before MoFo does. But as soon
as 1.0.4 is released I'll have it packaged in short order.
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.3-2
> Severity: grav
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307782: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:02:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305156: fixed in amule 2.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs fixed in NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 22:16:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs fixed in NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.28-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050511-1353
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends-In
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308409: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 15:53:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308410: fixed in pdns 2.9.17-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 19:53, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [Wed, 11 May 2005 19:33:07 +0200]:
> Hey cobaco! :)
hola (see I learned some Spanish :)
/me really missing the good wether from Valencia as it's raining here ;-(
> > -> having this shared file owned by _a
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:03:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RT 3.2 removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:01:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RT 3.2 removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
On Wed, 11 May 2005 19:40:15 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Severity: grave
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> A locally exploitable flaw has been found in the Linux ELF binary format
> loader's core dump function that allows local users to gain roo
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 20:02:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 122556 libsaxon-java
Bug#122556: lib-saxon-java: Saxon is MPL, works with kaffe; please move to main
Bug reassigned from package `lib-saxon-java' to `libsaxon-java'.
> reassign 141334 libsaxon-java
Bug#141334: lib-saxon-java: doesn't handle si
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 275394 request-tracker3.4
Bug#275394: Status field not honoured when replying to ticket.
Warning: Unknown package 'request-tracker3.2'
Bug reassigned from package `request-tracker3.2' to `request-tracker3.4'.
> reassign 275396 request-tracker3
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 19:58:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 14:47:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308587: fixed in ht 0.8.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308634 security
Bug#308634: kernel-source-2.6.8: A locally exploitable flaw to gain root.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> thanks, control, and have a nice day
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:04:59AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> You might have the wrong bug number:
> Bug#308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start
Ah, off by one error. Today's not my day :-(
I'm deeply sorry for the noise.
--
Miroslav Kure
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
tags 308586 patch
> Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt.
> Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/ap
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 14:17:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308476: fixed in poedit 1.3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308586 patch
Bug#308586: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/apt_pkg.so',
which is also in package python-apt
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: patch
> > Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt.
Unknown command o
You might have the wrong bug number:
Bug#308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start
Cheers,
Shaun
On 5/11/05, Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Argh,
>
> please don't be fooled by wrong subject of the bugreport, it *really*
> contains Czech (cs.po) debconf translation for *slbackup*.
>
> /m
Argh,
please don't be fooled by wrong subject of the bugreport, it *really*
contains Czech (cs.po) debconf translation for *slbackup*.
/me should not send bugreports so late at night :-(
--
Miroslav Kure
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Package: kernel-build-2.6.8-powerpc
Version: 2.6.8-12
Severity: grave
Hello,
I tried to understand your packaging scheme and IMO you do it _wrong_.
a) kernel-build-KVERS on other architectures is a package with common
files. Your packages seem to play the role of kernel-headers-KVERS
packg
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
A locally exploitable flaw has been found in the Linux ELF binary format
loader's core dump function that allows local users to gain root
privileges and also execute arbitrary code at kernel privilege level.
V
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that
> affects several of binutil's binaries, such as nm, strings or objdump and
> can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary
> code. S
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282062: fixed in libflash 0.4.11-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gdb
Version: 6.3-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that
can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and execute arbitrary
code. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91398 for a cr
Package: binutils
Version: 2.15-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
An integer overflow in parsing ELF segment headers has been found that
affects several of binutil's binaries, such as nm, strings or objdump and
can potentially be exploited to corrupt the heap and e
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
I'm sure you already know of these, but for the record, firefox is
vulnerale to a pair of new security holes:
CAN-2005-1477
The install function in Firefox 1.0.3 allows remote web sites on the browser's
whitelist, such as u
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Source-Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ohphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 09:18:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308567: fixed in lablgtk2 2.4.0+2005.02.18-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: libchipcard2
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge sid
Justification: renders package unusable
A problem has been discovered on libusb, which only affect the ARM
architecture. It is a memory alignement problem (__packed was forgotten
on some structures).
The bug has been fixed in libusb, but all
Hello,
I believe this is symptomatic of the fact that s390 doesn't have a native code
compiler, and indeed looking at the full log i see that those files are listed
in :
liblablgtk2-gnome-ocaml-dev.files
without taking in account the non-native-code arches.
Samuel, will you fix that ? I bel
Al,
Hmm, unfortunately, my build machine isn't actually beefy enough to build
llvm. :) So this bug will have to wait for someone with more memory than I
have to upload.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I finally managed to build samba packages with current upstream SVN
sources, which , according to Jerry Carter, fix the Win XP file
listing bug.
To the bug submitter : coul dyou please test this with the packages
you'll find at:
http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/packages/
signature.asc
Descrip
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 301370
Bug#301370: quota postrm fails due to missing dependency
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 308597 postgresql-8.0
Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp
Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-8.0' to `postgresql-8.0'.
>
End of message, stopping p
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 07:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272726: fixed in nagat 1.0a2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308567 sid
Bug#308567: lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.33-5
Followup-For: Bug #308591
OK, here's a short patch which fixes the problem and lets it be
installed, although since I don't read Finnish I've got no idea whether
I've changed the semantics behind the entry:
--- apache-ssl.templates.org2005-05-11 11:54:52
Please report this as a different bug report. The reason is that bug
303352 was closed, and I do want to take care of the man page.
A Costa wrote:
> Package: tea
> Version: 9.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #303352
>
>
> It's the curse of 'dak'. The man page still thinks 'teaed' is called 'tea'.
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 308597 postgresql-8.0
Bug#308597: postgresl-8.0: server socket created in /tmp
Warning: Unknown package 'postgresl-8.0'
Bug reassigned from package `postgresl-8.0' to `postgresql-8.0'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
tags 308587 pending
thanks
Hello Moritz!
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Gentoo has reported several security issues in ht:
>
> 1. An integer overflow in the ELF segment parsing
> 2. Some buffer overflows in the PE parser.
>
> Fixes: (Please double check)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308587 pending
Bug#308587: Multiple security issues in ht
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: postgresl-8.0
Version: 8.0.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
The server creates a socket in /tmp, which is unsafe. Any local user
can create a similar socket and impersonate the database server.
This bug also breaks backwards comaptibility with old cli
Steve,
> There appear to be a number of undocumented changes, relative to -4, which
> are not documentation fixes. :/ Would you remind removing them and
> uploading a -4sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates, or else explain why these
> changes are warranted during the freeze?
Please take my apologi
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 12:34:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301370: marked as done (quota postrm fails due to missing
dependency)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On Tue, May 10, 2005 14:55, Ulf Harnhammar wrote:
> Protecting against this type of attack is much more complicated than
> this. As Jeroen noted, HTML entities are interpreted, so you have to
> protect against things like "javascript:". Some browsers allow varying
> amounts of whitespace inside pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308591 sid
Bug#308591: apache-ssl: 1.3.33-5 won't install: Template parse error near
`www-sivut.`
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.33-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Output from dpkg --configure apache-ssl:
>
>Setting up apache-ssl (1.3.33-5) ...
>Template parse error near `www-sivut.', in stanza #5 of
>/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache-ssl.templates
>dpkg: error processing
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:47:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258289: fixed in quotatool 1.4.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>...
> So I suggest letting:
> * tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and
> libkpathsea-dev)
> * cweb_3.64.debian-2
> into sarge.
I agree, this is a better solution than my suggestion.
>Julian
cu
Adrian
Package: python2.3-apt
Version: 0.6.11
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-apt.
Unpacking python2.3-apt (from .../python2.3-apt_0.6.11_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pyth
Package: ht
Severity: grave
Tags: security, patch
Justification: user security hole
Gentoo has reported several security issues in ht:
1. An integer overflow in the ELF segment parsing
2. Some buffer overflows in the PE parser.
Fixes: (Please double check)
1:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:17:27PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > tags 307816 -sid
> > thanks
> >
> > That's not a sid-only thing, because as I explained in my bug report,
> > the package in sarge is not really usable.
>
> Agreed.
>
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 05:02:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308548: fixed in apache 1.3.33-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
>> If you really think we should not mention the default value there that's
>> okay but on the other side I request that the behaviour of the readline
>> frontend is changed to at least present the user the current/default
>> value if the libterm-readline-gnu-perl package is not installed. And
Package: tea
Version: 9.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #303352
It's the curse of 'dak'. The man page still thinks 'teaed' is called 'tea'.
% apropos "^tea" | grep text
tea (1) - small text editor for gnome2
teaed (1)- small text editor for gnome2
Any 'tea' page?
% man
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 258289 289812
Bug#258289: quotatool: does not work with xfs if non-xfs quotas are supported
by the kernel
Bug#289812: quotatool: Assumes XFS quotas if the kernel supports them
Merged 258289 289812.
> tags 289812 fixed-upstream
Bug#289812: quotat
Hi all,
>The technical details of why debconf is not able to present a default
>value with the readline frontend, when the recommended
>literm-readline-gnu-perl is not installed, or with the teletype
>frontend, are already explained in bug #183970. I know of no better
Just a silly question: why d
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 10:38:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308453: plone: Fails to add new Plone site
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Il giorno mer, 11/05/2005 alle 10.10 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha
scritto:
> Hi Alceste,
> after looking at the source code of CMFCore.TypesTool (line 535 and
> below) I suspect your problem is caused by one of these packages:
>
>zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3
>zope-psycopgda
Hi Alceste,
after looking at the source code of CMFCore.TypesTool (line 535 and
below) I suspect your problem is caused by one of these packages:
zope-exuserfolder 0.50.0-3
zope-psycopgda 1.1.18-1
zope-zwiki 0.37.0-4
ZMS
CMFpgForum.
Could you
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:09:49PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>Why is this bug filed as "RoM"?
>Should I change it?
You should not say "Request of Maintainer" when it isn't a request of
the maintainer, that's misrepresenting the facts.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTEC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 308390
Bug#308390: protocol error
Bug#302734: libgimp-perl: protocol error (1)
Bug#307856: libgimp-perl won't init: "protocol error"
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 308390 - sid
Bug#308390: protocol error
Tags were: sarge sid patch
Il giorno mar, 10/05/2005 alle 12.34 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella ha
scritto:
> Hi, could you please send me the list of the zope packages (with version
> numbers) that you have installed on your system?
Here it is:
zope-btreefolder2 1.0.1-5
zope-cmf1.41.4.7-4
zo
g directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2/runtime'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/babel-0.10.2'
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20050511-0808
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
[...]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 17:40:23 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308556: RM: partimage [!i386] -- RoM; code has issues on a
number of platforms
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 03:32:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302734: fixed in libgimp-perl 2.0.dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 215773 - woody
Bug#215773: on fresh install, groups postdrop and postfix created with gid>1000
Tags were: woody
Bug#162941: postfix: During install groupadd prompts for Password and hangs
Tags removed: woody
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Package: libapache-mod-witch
Version: 0.0.4
Followup-For: Bug #297706
sed uses \( and \) for grouping, not ( ). Here's a patch that fixes this
problem.
--- libapache-mod-witch-0.0.4/debian/postrm.orig2002-09-16
11:36:39.0 -0700
+++ libapache-mod-witch-0.0.4/debian/postrm 200
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
