Bug#302771: Win XP file listing bug in smbclient and libsmbclient

Quoting Gerald (Jerry) Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I remember you fixing this post 3.0.14a correct ? Maybe > even post 3.0.15pre2. > > Would one of you debian dudes retest the latest SAMBA_3_0 > tree and let us know ? Jerry, I grabbed SAMBA_3_0 from svn 2 hours ago and, while trying to reco

Bug#302771: my konqueror, smbc, smbclient versions

Quoting Gabor Guzmics ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >Hi, > > > >I tried to reproduce your problem. But tested in konqueror and smbc and > >I can't reproduce it. For me this problem is fixed. > > > >Can you give your smb.conf here ? > > > >Which version of smbc and konqueror do you have ? > > > >Regards, >

Bug#308132: d4x: Segfaults on startup every time.

Package: d4x Version: 2.5.0rel-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable d4x is unable even to startup. Merely invoking d4x from the command line brings up the window, immediately generates a "Segmentation Fault" message, and quits. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 A

Bug#308125: bash dependence

Package: skkdic Version: 20040323-1 Severity: serious The following syntax in which there is debian/rules is dependent on bash. > rm > debian/skkdic-extra/usr/share/skk/SKK-JISYO.{L,wrong.annotated,china_taiwan.header} > cp zipcode/{README.ja,words.zipcode} > debian/skkdic-extra/usr/

Bug#278495: Bug#279232: What about perl-bug #279232?

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:12:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Given the recent freeze announcement, I'd suggest that regardless of > > what other fixes are made, a good first step would be to get a fixed > > doc-base (i.e. one that works with the current stable perl-base only) > > package into

Bug#299207: ipac-ng: hardcoded GDBM struct sizes

Are you referring to this code in storage/gdbm/gdbm.c::gdbm_init(): /* check record lengths. This is the only spot where these * values are hard-coded. */ if (sizeof(gdbm_timestamp) != 5 || sizeof(gdbm_data_value_header_t) != 16

Bug#299939: able to test this?

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:50:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I notices that Justin Pryzby has proposed a patch to fix the gkdial > double-click crash. Its not a real patch; disconnect_valid is a variable I made up, and it does not presently exist in the source code. But, as best I can tell (having

Processed: Fixed in NMU of doom-wad-shareware 1.9-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 260006 + fixed Bug#260006: doom-wad-shareware: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debhelper Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#306906: marked as done (python2.2-mysqldb: Connection leak)

Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 17:50:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line python2.2-mysqldb: Connection leak has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#299939: able to test this?

I notices that Justin Pryzby has proposed a patch to fix the gkdial double-click crash. I wonder if you're able to test it and see if it fixed the bug you filed? You can find the patch at http://bugs.debian.org/299939 ; if you're not comfortable patching it yourself I can do a rebuild. This bug h

Bug#294058: marked as done (Nautilus stops responding to new files after a while)

Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 20:25:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294058: fixed in gamin 0.0.26-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#306947: marked as done (Please rename to python-statgrab)

Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 20:29:37 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306947: fixed in pystatgrab 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#306647: marked as done (libgef-java: FTBFS: The java class is not found: org.apache.tools.ant.launch.AntMain)

Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 20:27:14 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306647: fixed in libgef-java 0.9.6-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#300859: NMU

Hi, prepared (but not yet uploaded) NMU: diff -Nur 1/debian/changelog 2/debian/changelog --- 1/debian/changelog 2005-05-08 02:19:24.0 +0200 +++ 2/debian/changelog 2005-05-08 02:19:30.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +gnupg (1.4.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer uploa

Processed: tagging 308112

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 308112 sid Bug#308112: bbkeys_0.9.0-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing build dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#304122: [dom@earth.li: libtext-wikiformat-perl]

- Forwarded message from Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 00:20:01 +0100 From: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-release@lists.debian.org Subject: libtext-wikiformat-perl User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Hello, Please accept libtext-wikiformat-perl 0

Bug#308112: bbkeys_0.9.0-2 (unstable): FTBFS, missing build dependency

Package: bbkeys Version: 0.9.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of bbkeys_0.9.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper, xlibs-dev, libbt-dev, pkg-config [..

Bug#302771: my konqueror, smbc, smbclient versions

>Hi, > >I tried to reproduce your problem. But tested in konqueror and smbc and >I can't reproduce it. For me this problem is fixed. > >Can you give your smb.conf here ? > >Which version of smbc and konqueror do you have ? > >Regards, > >Matthijs Mohlmann I use debian testing, the release which is

Bug#307931: evolution-data-server1.2: missing depends on libdb4.1-dev

On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:56:42AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: > e-d-s1.2 was changed to use the system libdb 4.1. However, > evolution-data-server1.2-dev doesn't depend on libdb4.1-dev Atleast the following packages are missing a dependency on libdb4.1-dev: libcamel1.2-dev libebook1.2-dev libecal

Bug#306621: marked as done (chown: cannot access `/var/cache/approx': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 16:28:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line /var/cache/approx has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#308088: ultrapossum-slapd: FTBFS: test020-proxycache failed.

Package: ultrapossum-slapd Version: 0.0.4+2.2.20sb3-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: > Starting test020-proxycache ... Starting master slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that master slapd is running... Waiting 5 seconds fo

Processed: tagging 307912

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 307912 sid Bug#307912: evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#260006: patch to build-depend on debhelper

package doom-wad-shareware tags 260006 patch thanks Please find attached a patch for the control file to Build-Depend on debhelper. -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ PGP fingerprint: 7032F238 --- doom1-lib-1.9.orig/debian/control 2005-05-07 20:12:05.009923248 +0100 +++ d-w-s--apt-get/doo

Processed: patch to build-depend on debhelper

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package doom-wad-shareware Ignoring bugs not assigned to: doom-wad-shareware > tags 260006 patch Bug#260006: doom-wad-shareware: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debhelper Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please co

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 301782 Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 301782 = sarge Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault There were no tags set. Tags set to: sarge > thanks Stopping processing her

Bug#307982: Bug fixed?

tag 307982 patch thanks Somehow, the upstream patch was only half-fixed by the package's maintainer in recent uploads to cope with the Debian changes. fork.o should be in the list of files having exported objects. The attached patch is against the rtai-3.1.0 source package and only takes into

Bug#302771: (forw) Re: Win XP file listing bug in smbclient and libsmbclient

Forwarding this which resulted from a private exchange. To the bug submitter : do you by chance have an opportunity to test if this bug is still here with the SAMBA_3_0 branch in samba.org's SVN? - Forwarded message from "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 07 May 2005

Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

tags #307231 thanks To help debugging you can configure with --enable-developer (either manually with ./configure or specified in config when it asks for additional arguments). This makes compile a bit more anally retentive and will complain at more things. Hehe. Alasdair On 7 May 2005, at 1

Processed: Bug fixed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 307982 patch Bug#307982: kernel-patch-adeos: Kernel 2.4.27 does not build with Adeos patch There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#307122: How to properly fix the liborbit0 shlibs breakage?

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:46:52AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: >... > For sgcontrol, only arm seems affected, for gnome-vfs all arches, same > for bonobo. > So I would say binNMU for sgcontrol and source-full uploads for the > other two. > > Let's hope we don't get way more of these... I've s

Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

tags #307231 thanks On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:44:56PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote: > The compile failure is in src/ircsprintf.c as follows. > > cc -g -Wall -O2 -export-dynamic -I../adns -I../include -I../zlib -c > ircsprintf.c > ircsprintf.c: In function `ircvsprintf': > ircsprintf.c:29:

Bug#307982: Possible solution

Hello, try sticking an "#define EXPORT_SYMTAB 1" in fork.c, at the beginning of the file. It compiles for me after that. Whether that is actually the correct solution remains to be determined. BTW, for those trying to reproduce the bug, get kernel-package from unstable (the version in sarge h

Bug#308048: debootstrap --variant=buildd doesn't work correctly anymore

Package: debootstrap Version: 0.2.45-0.2 Severity: grave Tags: sid since the shadow upload from two days ago (I at least guess that's the reason), debootstrap --variant=buildd produces a chroot with broken dependencies (passwd has an unstaisfied dependency on debconf). I used grave instead of im

Bug#307504: marked as done (bbkeys: Missing build dependency.)

Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 10:02:26 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307504: fixed in bbkeys 0.9.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#279232: What about perl-bug #279232?

# let's have this on both reassign 279232 perl,doc-base thanks On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:25:06PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote: > >it could be "fixed" by introducing a versioned pre-dependency of > >perl-modules on perl-base while let

Processed: Re: What about perl-bug #279232?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # let's have this on both > reassign 279232 perl,doc-base Bug#279232: perl can be in a unusable state during upgrade Bug#278495: perl can be in a unusable state during upgrade Bug reassigned from package `perl' to `perl,doc-base'. > thanks Stopping pro

Processed: Re: Bug#307990: libzlib-ruby: Segmentation fault

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 307990 libruby1.8 Bug#307990: libzlib-ruby: Segmentation fault Bug reassigned from package `libruby1.8' to `libruby1.8'. > At Sat, 07 May 2005 13:57:23 +0900, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Daigo Moriwaki wrote: Unknown

Bug#308031: mailutils: sql injection vulnerability in sql authentication module

Package: mailutils Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In /auth/sql.c there is a function sql_escape_string (...) which does escaping of "bad" characters before feding them to DB. The problem is that function only escapes

Bug#302771: libsmbclient: File listings against WinXP servers still broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I tried to reproduce your problem. But tested in konqueror and smbc and I can't reproduce it. For me this problem is fixed. Can you give your smb.conf here ? Which version of smbc and konqueror do you have ? Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann -BEG

Processed: Re: Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Severity #307366 grave Bug#307366: libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs Severity set to `grave'. > Merge #307784 #307366 Bug#307366: libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366 Bug

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:48 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > Severity #307366 Grave > Merge #307784 #307366 > Thanks dear bugtracking system. > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:17PM +0200, Primoz wrote: > > Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security > > problems fixed), so p

Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366

Severity #307366 Grave Merge #307784 #307366 Thanks dear bugtracking system. On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:17PM +0200, Primoz wrote: > Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security > problems fixed), so package stays in sarge. I would need at least a week > to 14 days to

Processed: reopening 307990, tagging 307990

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 307990 Bug#307990: libzlib-ruby: Segmentation fault Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 307990 sarge Bug#307990: libzlib-ruby: Segmentation fault There were no tags s

Processed: severity of 307958 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 307958 important Bug#307958: straw ignores http proxy settings, always tries to connect directly Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#308014: build against broken orbit

Package: gnome-vfs Severity: serious gnome-vfs was build against a broken version of orbit and has therefor too lax (i.e. unversioned) depends on liborbit0. Since all binary packages are affected, a rebuild-only source-ful upload is needed. (Please don't add any versioned build-depends on liborbit

Bug#307752: work only on 2.4.18-k6 not 2.4.18-k6-1

This Exploit work only on 2.4.18-k6 not 2.4.18-k6-1. Sorry, but meant that 2.4.18-k6 ist a metapackage with the latest 2.4.18-k6-X. Please close this bugreport. Thank you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308013: build against broken orbit

Package: bonobo Version: 1.0.22-2.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid bonobo was build against a broken version of orbit and has therefor too lax (i.e. unversioned) depends on liborbit0. Since all binary packages are affected, a rebuild-only source-ful upload is needed. (Please don't add any versioned b

Bug#307990: marked as done (libzlib-ruby: Segmentation fault)

Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 06:32:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307990: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#307122: shlibs incorrect

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:53:55AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > The latest orbit version has a broken shlibs such that packages building > > against orbit won't depend anymore on a sufficiently high liborbit > > version

Bug#308007: marked as done (leafnode security bug)

Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 11:00:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308007: leafnode security bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processed: tagging 306107, closing 306107

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 306107 - sarge Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-depends Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge > close 306107 Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-de

Processed: tagging 304367, closing 304367

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 304367 - sarge Bug#304367: Should stop building slapd & ldap-utils Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge > close 304367 Bug#304367: Should stop building slapd & ldap-utils 'close

Processed: tagging 307734

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 307734 - fixed Bug#307734: jabber-irc: crashes when trying to register transport Tags were: pending fixed Tags removed: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#307299: Perl taint error on TWiki diffs page after twiki/apache upgrade

I'm sorry, but I cannot re-produce this. and when testing your suggested change, I get other errors in my log. is there any more information you can give me? (what topics, what kind of changes, which particular diffs link) Sven On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 07:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Packa

Bug#308007: leafnode security bug

Package: leafnode Version: 1.11.1.rel-1 Severity: grave Tags: security confirmed sarge patch fixed-upstream Please backport 1.11.2.rel-1 from unstable to fix CAN-2005-1453, two denial of service vulnerabilities that can crash fetchnews.

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc

Which version of ia32-libs-dev was installed during the build? Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307183: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred

retitle 307183 linda: can't build as root tag 307183 patch thanks The mysterious error is caused by linda switching to nobody when started by root--after that, it's unable to read the temporary directory created in tests/endtoend.py. Adjusting permissions in endtoend.py is not enough as $TMPDIR (

Processed: Bug#307183: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 307183 linda: can't build as root Bug#307183: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred Changed Bug title. > tag 307183 patch Bug#307183: linda: can't build as root There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.0-2 > Severity: serious bug reports for unsupported architectures aren't RC. anyway, the libc cannot be found. Please could you check, if applying the following patch succeeds in finding the 32bit libc? --- gcc/config/i386/t-linux64~ 20

Bug#308000: FTBFS: missing libmpfr-dev build-dependency

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.0-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: experimental > Justification: build-dependencies must be listed exhaustively strange, because it's already found in the build dependency list (without any typo). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc

Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Justification: package must BFS Hi, here is the problem: $ fakeroot apt-get -b source gcc-4.0 [...] ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/x86_64-linux/bin/ -isystem /usr/x86_64-linux/include -isystem /usr/x86_64-linux/sys-include -L/home/bon

Bug#308000: FTBFS: missing libmpfr-dev build-dependency

Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Justification: build-dependencies must be listed exhaustively Hi, here is the problem: $ fakeroot apt-get -b source gcc-4.0 [...] mkdir /home/bonnaud/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build : # configure cd /home/bonnaud/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build \

Bug#307919: The buggy version is still in sarge

reopen 307919 tags 307919 +sarge thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: The buggy version is still in sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 307919 Bug#307919: advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 307919 +sarge Bug#307919: advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge > thanks Stopping pro