severity 295736 important
tags 295736 moreinfo
thanks
> Stella on 64-Bit does not work on my computer. With the same command, the
> 32-Bit stella works fine when I boot 32-Bit Sarge.
When I run "stella" from the commandline on alpha, it gives me a usage
message. Does this bug require a ROM to re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295736 important
Bug#295736: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole.
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 295736 moreinfo
Bug#295736: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole.
There were no ta
Package: kaffe
Version: 2:1.1.4.PRECVS8-2
Severity: serious
kaffe fails to build from source on s390.
| In file included from
/build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s390/linux/md.h:19,
| from ../../../config/md.h:1,
| from
/buil
I've just switched to tulip from de4x5 on my alpha, and none of the problems
that were present previously appear to persist under 2.4.27-2. So I don't
have any objections to blacklisting de4x5.
OTOH, I also can't find anything in the current kernel-image 2.6.8-2
packages that explains why the de4
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.3-20041231+1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ppp_2.4.3-20041231+1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050226-1530
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
This appears to be a problem with gxine's handling of character encodings
for translations. If I set my locale to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I have no
problems starting gxine; setting it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], however, I get the
same
segfault, along with:
(gxine:7997): Gtk-WARNING **: Invalid input strin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 296807 important
Bug#296807: ftp.debian.org: ftp.nz.debian.org inaccessable from majority of nz
internet
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Package: adonthell
Severity: serious
Version: 0.3.3.cvs.20031022-2
>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link i386-linux-g++ -Wall -fno-exceptions
-DSWIG_GLOBAL -DDATA_DIR="\"/usr/share/games/adonthell"\" -O2 -o adonthell
main.o libadonthell.a -
Your message dated Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:23:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed version in testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:47:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296531: fixed in zircon 1.18.255-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:47:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296839: fixed in unace 1.2b-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
> IIRC, it failed in greylistd.postinst right after:
> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> so it's likely not a bug in greylistd, but somewhere between debconf
> and/or ash. It looks a lot like #242011.
No, this is completely unrelated to #242011. This *is* a bug in greylistd.
false=-1
ismember
Hi Michael,
Yes, you will want to ask your sponsor to upload this package to non-free
for you.
In the meantime, I have removed daapd from testing to facilitate getting the
original mdnsresponder bug resolved in a timely manner.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Des
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297020 sid
Bug#297020: dbus-1-dev: Version 0.23.2 breaks API
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tag 296863 pending
thanks.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:30:45PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> Just wanted to know whether you had time to investigate a bit on the
> libgnomedb FTBFS (#296863), I've heard you had a stuck package in NEW,
> but I don't know if it's related.
I'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 296863 pending
Bug#296863: libgnomedb: FTBFS: Errors processing docs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
svn://ia.mit.edu/svn-debian/openafs/branches/experimental
contains packages that work against 2.6.10. I'm not happy with the
server packages; there is a horrible bug that tends to take out
windows clients in sufficiently large cells. I'm not sure whether I'm
going to upload these packages.
-
--
Hi,
> The other solution is to close this bug - as noone is able to
> reproduce it - so obviously it has got fixed over the time.
If the original submitter cannot reproduce it either, or is no longer
reachable, you can close the bug. But use the *proper* way to do that,
not the changelog. The ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-02-2005 18:23, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>Have been too busy with real life to dig into the problem myself, but
>>will appreciate a patch and package it.
Well - off course I won't package it unless it looks sane...
> the patch is inspired by
Hi Dan,
I see you've recently orphaned kernel-patch-redhat. Maybe you're better off
just requesting its removal from the archive, given that it has a release
critical bug filed against it, which suggests it's going to be useless in
Sarge anyway?
Just my $AUD 0.05 worth.
regards
Andrew
--
linu
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:32:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#185479: fixed in html2ps 1.0b3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
> Hi there,
>
> Please help testing the new OpenLDAP 2.2 packages at
>
> http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/
>
> I'd like to know if they fix the index and data corruption problems.
>
> Thanks
>
> Torsten
>
I will directly test it after i'm back from fosdem.
Thank you for response.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:26:44PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Can you remove the following mistakenly-uploaded packages from
> the archive?
Is stuff like this ever removed from the archive? (Not to mention it wouldn't
help any; lots of people have probably already upgraded.) My best guess wo
Dear FTP-masters,
I screwed up the recent upload of cppunit: I neglected to check
that the SOVERSION remained the same from cppunit 1.10.0
to 1.10.2. Unfortunately, it isn't.
I will upload a cppunit 1.10.2-2 that builds a new library
package libcppunit-1.10-2.
Can you remove the following mist
Package: mono
Severity: serious
This bug keeps Mono out of sarge.
For more information why it should not enter sarge see:
http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOC
Package: mcs
Severity: serious
This bug keeps Mono out of sarge.
For more information why it should not enter sarge see:
http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:36:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The problem may be that the DB_PASSWORD line is unable to handle an @
> > sign (though I cannot reproduce it).
>
> I'm not sure why you can't reproduce this:
1) You seem to have replaced ')' with '}'. (Just for the record).
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 293564 sid
Bug#293564: strace - miss build-depends against libc6-dev-s390x [s390],
libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc]
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
tags 297010 patch
thanks
The attached patch adds the upstream patch for bug 341.
Bastian
Index: debian/patches/00list
===
--- debian/patches/00list (revision 853)
+++ debian/patches/00list (working copy)
@@ -116,3 +116,4
tags 276800 + patch
thanks
Hello,
a patch is attached to this message.
Regards,
Torsten
diff -ru erlang-10.b.1a/debian/changelog erlang-10.b.1a-tw/debian/changelog
--- erlang-10.b.1a/debian/changelog 2005-02-26 18:56:43.0 +0100
+++ erlang-10.b.1a-tw/debian/changelog 2005-02-26 18:12:26.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 276800 + patch
Bug#276800: erlang: Segmentation fault trying to run "erl"
Tags were: sid sarge
Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fault on start...
Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still present in sarge
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping process
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297010 patch
Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:32:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289968: fixed in scilab 3.0-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:17:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296845: fixed in phpmyadmin 3:2.6.1-pl2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
> I have been listening on the sideline, and really appreciate the good
> input on this.
great :)
> Have been too busy with real life to dig into the problem myself, but
> will appreciate a patch and package it.
well, then a patch is attached.
it is a patch against the tree built by the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reassign 297010 libc6-dev,lvm2
Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers,lvm2' to `libc6-dev,lvm2'.
>
End of message, stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 293815
Bug#293815: libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tag 293815 sarge
Bug#293815: libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: sarge
> thanks, c
Hello world!
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg01254.html
is the last post on a short discussion regarding the effects of this bug.
As far as I understand it, the old packages have to be retained, because
removing them would force a soname bump on cernlib.
Perhaps the sections wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 297010 linux-kernel-headers,lvm2
Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `linux-kernel-headers,lvm2'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
reassign 294992 erlang
merge 294992 276800
thanks
Package: erlang
Version: 1:10.b.1a-2
Followup-For: Bug #276800
Hello,
I think recompiling with --disable-hipe would be appropriate.
Regards,
Torsten
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (986, 'testing'
reopen 219165
thanks
This affects woody as well, so I shouldn't have closed it with the sarge
upload.
Fixed packages for woody have been sent to the security team.
--
Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG Key ID: 1024D/D097A261
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: libcppunit-1.10-0
Version: 1.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
libcppunit-1.10-0 now suddenly contains the file
/usr/lib/libcppunit-1.10.so.2 instead of the file
/usr/lib/libcppunit-1.10.so.0; if you want to bump the soname, you must
also bump the package name. (This change does of
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Toni Willberg wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm not a Debian developer, so I don't know (nor really care) about the
> policy.
>
> What should be done, and by who, to get libsilc package to Testing?
> There are more than one SILC client packages (GAIM's SILC plugin an
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:29:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line scilab: FTBFS in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 282247 erlang
Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fault on start...
Bug reassigned from package `ejabberd' to `erlang'.
> severity 282247 grave
Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fault on start...
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 282247 276800
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 219165
Bug#219165: DoS in WU-FTPD (exploit in 'ls')
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 294992 erlang
Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still present in sarge
Bug reassigned from package `ejabberd' to `erlang'.
> merge 294992 276800
Bug#276800: erlang: Segmentation fault trying to run "erl"
Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still p
tags 297010 - patch
reassign 297010 libc6-dev
retitle 297010 libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
thanks
Fixing l-k-h does not help, it is not possible to use asm/fcntl.h and
fcntl.h at the same time. It has to be fixed in
bits/fcntl.h which comes from
$glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/$arch/bits/fcn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297010 - patch
Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> reassign 297010 libc6-dev
Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 262925 sid
Bug#262925: gfs framework should not enter testing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: dbus-1-dev
Version: 0.23.2-2
Severity: grave
Version 0.23.2 removes a function from the API without changing the
SONAME of the library.
In particular, my package bluez-utils is caused not to build from source
by this change.
bluez-utils-2.15/hcid/dbus.c:75: undefined reference to
`dbus_
tags 297010 patch
thanks
The attached patch updates asm-*/fcntl.h to the versions in 2.6.10 which
includes O_NOATIME.
Bastian
--
"That unit is a woman."
"A mass of conflicting impulses."
-- Spock and Nomad, "The Changeling", stardate 3541.9
diff -u linux-kernel-h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297010 patch
Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:12:45PM -0800, Erich Schubert wrote:
> reopen 260808
> thanks
>
> Reopening this bug report.
> You must not close bugs in changelogs if you did not *change* anything.
> Please handle this bug report correclty.
w I see you are some 'bug search' fanatic -
Obviously you h
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17
Severity: critical
File: linux-kernel-header
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock
itself due to atime updates on /dev/ being blocked while the LVM is
locked. Sine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-02-2005 19:46, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit :
>
>>Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]:
>>>
- : this is really not trivial : inetd
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:49:33PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
>
> Although, I agree that this is a policy error, the scope of the error
> only applies to back porting the package.
The problem will also happen on a woody system which is in the process of
being upgraded to sarge.
I do second gi
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:32:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296971: fixed in ltp 20050107-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi.
I'm not a Debian developer, so I don't know (nor really care) about the
policy.
What should be done, and by who, to get libsilc package to Testing?
There are more than one SILC client packages (GAIM's SILC plugin and
Silky) on hold because of this.
- Toni
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Aoine, 2005-02-25 at 20:27 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: ltp
> Version: 20050107-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
Thanks for your work on this.
I've backported a fix that was present in the ltp-20050207 release,
though I will be conservative and not try a new upstream release at thi
Hi,
Thanks to everyone for their helpful responses.
> BTW, about which KDE version do we talk? Is it enough if we change the
> license in CVS HEAD aka KDE 4 (maybe 3.5)?
If a license change is likely, I would be most appreciative if the
change could be made in KDE_3_3_BRANCH also (since it app
As a minor contributor too, you also have my permission to dual-license
Cervisia with GPL, that's okay with me.
Shaheed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Please verify if the new version of libgnomecups1.0-1 (0.1.14-1), which is
now in testing, solves this bug.
Willi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: octave2.1
Version: 2.1.66-1
Followup-For: Bug #296991
On further investigation, it is octave-forge (version 2004.11.16-5) that
changes the default
plotting to use grace. However, "toggle_grace_use" from octave-forge doesn't
work.
Trace:
octave:1> toggle_grace_use
error: /usr/share/oct
Package: octave2.1
Version: 2.1.66-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The current octave "plot" appears to depend on grace as the default plotting
bbackend and seg faults if grace is not found.
Here's a trace.
octave:1> t=0:pi/100:2*pi;
octave:2> x=sin(t);
octave:3> plot(t
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296922: fixed in plan 1.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Feb 26, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems somewhat similar to the bug described in #296776, but I did
It is.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295344 - unreproducible
Bug#295344: segfaults on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: unreproducible
> tags 296732 + patch
Bug#296732: 3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing he
severity 295914 important
thanks
> The code that this comment refers to was not being used and has been
> removed from newer versions of tvtime. Since the code is long gone, I
> have removed the comment describing the license from the source file in
> CVS. It will be gone from the next version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294895 unreproducible
Bug#294895: dependency problems prevent configuration of a2ps
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> reassign 294895 emacsen-common
Bug#294895: dependency problems prevent configuration of a2ps
Bug reassigned fr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295914 important
Bug#295914: tvtime: seems to include undistributable code
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 294415 - sarge
Bug#294415: Two problems in Firefox
Tags were: sarge security
Tags removed: sarge
> close 294415
Bug#294415: Two problems in Firefox
'close' is deprecated; see htt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> # not a RC issue
> severity 295919 important
Bug#295919: Recommends: field has typos
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295918 sid
Bug#295918: libgtkada2-dev: inappropriate symlink left in /usr/share/doc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
severity 292098 important
reassign 292098 hyperlatex
thanks
> Found it. e3 package is buggy and keeps alternative on e3em after
> removal. A stupid case check on prerm, running update-alternatives only
> on upgrades.
> Removing e3 ...
> + '[' remove '!=' upgrade ']'
> + update-alternatives --quie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 292098 important
Bug#292098: does not depend on xemacs
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 292098 hyperlatex
Bug#292098: does not depend on xemacs
Bug reassigned from package `e3' to `hyperlatex'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 289310 -sarge
Bug#289310: galeon-common: Remove complains about missing
/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/galeon
Tags were: sarge
Bug#290951: galeon: Dpkg error while upgrading Galeon
Tags removed: sarge
> close 289310
Bug#289310: galeon-common:
77 matches
Mail list logo