Bug#295736: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole.

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 295736 important tags 295736 moreinfo thanks > Stella on 64-Bit does not work on my computer. With the same command, the > 32-Bit stella works fine when I boot 32-Bit Sarge. When I run "stella" from the commandline on alpha, it gives me a usage message. Does this bug require a ROM to re

Processed: Re: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole.

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295736 important Bug#295736: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole. Severity set to `important'. > tags 295736 moreinfo Bug#295736: stella: Stella does not work. I get only "Abgebrochen" on Konsole. There were no ta

Bug#297116: kaffe - FTBFS on s390

2005-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: kaffe Version: 2:1.1.4.PRECVS8-2 Severity: serious kaffe fails to build from source on s390. | In file included from /build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/build-tree/kaffe-1.1.4.PRECVS8/config/s390/linux/md.h:19, | from ../../../config/md.h:1, | from /buil

Bug#294867: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
I've just switched to tulip from de4x5 on my alpha, and none of the problems that were present previously appear to persist under 2.4.27-2. So I don't have any objections to blacklisting de4x5. OTOH, I also can't find anything in the current kernel-image 2.6.8-2 packages that explains why the de4

Bug#297105: ppp_2.4.3-20041231+1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends

2005-02-26 Thread lamont
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.3-20041231+1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of ppp_2.4.3-20041231+1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5 > Build started at 20050226-1530 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package

Bug#295344: segfaults on startup

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
This appears to be a problem with gxine's handling of character encodings for translations. If I set my locale to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I have no problems starting gxine; setting it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], however, I get the same segfault, along with: (gxine:7997): Gtk-WARNING **: Invalid input strin

Processed: severity of 296807 is important

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > severity 296807 important Bug#296807: ftp.debian.org: ftp.nz.debian.org inaccessable from majority of nz internet Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#297096: adonthell: FTBFS: Link errors

2005-02-26 Thread Daniel Schepler
Package: adonthell Severity: serious Version: 0.3.3.cvs.20031022-2 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link i386-linux-g++ -Wall -fno-exceptions -DSWIG_GLOBAL -DDATA_DIR="\"/usr/share/games/adonthell"\" -O2 -o adonthell main.o libadonthell.a -

Bug#296582: marked as done (security fixed version 2.0.12 available)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:23:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed version in testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#296531: marked as done (zircon: Fails to start)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:47:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296531: fixed in zircon 1.18.255-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#296839: marked as done (unace: multiple buffer overflows and directory traversal bugs)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:47:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296839: fixed in unace 1.2b-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#296266: greylistd: fails to install

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
> IIRC, it failed in greylistd.postinst right after: > . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule > so it's likely not a bug in greylistd, but somewhere between debconf > and/or ash. It looks a lot like #242011. No, this is completely unrelated to #242011. This *is* a bug in greylistd. false=-1 ismember

Bug#295774: Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Michael, Yes, you will want to ask your sponsor to upload this package to non-free for you. In the meantime, I have removed daapd from testing to facilitate getting the original mdnsresponder bug resolved in a timely manner. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Des

Processed: new in sid

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297020 sid Bug#297020: dbus-1-dev: Version 0.23.2 breaks API There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#296863: libgnomedb FTBFS (#296863)

2005-02-26 Thread Gustavo R. Montesino
tag 296863 pending thanks. On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:30:45PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, Hello, > Just wanted to know whether you had time to investigate a bit on the > libgnomedb FTBFS (#296863), I've heard you had a stuck package in NEW, > but I don't know if it's related. I'

Processed: Re: libgnomedb FTBFS (#296863)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 296863 pending Bug#296863: libgnomedb: FTBFS: Errors processing docs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#296835: openafs-modules-source: Fails to build with kernel-source-2.6.10

2005-02-26 Thread Sam Hartman
svn://ia.mit.edu/svn-debian/openafs/branches/experimental contains packages that work against 2.6.10. I'm not happy with the server packages; there is a horrible bug that tends to take out windows clients in sufficiently large cells. I'm not sure whether I'm going to upload these packages. - --

Bug#260808: reopening bug

2005-02-26 Thread Erich Schubert
Hi, > The other solution is to close this bug - as noone is able to > reproduce it - so obviously it has got fixed over the time. If the original submitter cannot reproduce it either, or is no longer reachable, you can close the bug. But use the *proper* way to do that, not the changelog. The ch

Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306

2005-02-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26-02-2005 18:23, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >>Have been too busy with real life to dig into the problem myself, but >>will appreciate a patch and package it. Well - off course I won't package it unless it looks sane... > the patch is inspired by

Bug#272364: Maybe just remove kernel-patch-redhat

2005-02-26 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi Dan, I see you've recently orphaned kernel-patch-redhat. Maybe you're better off just requesting its removal from the archive, given that it has a release critical bug filed against it, which suggests it's going to be useless in Sarge anyway? Just my $AUD 0.05 worth. regards Andrew -- linu

Bug#185479: marked as done (html2ps generates no output)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185479: fixed in html2ps 1.0b3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#291408: OpenLDAP 2.2 packages

2005-02-26 Thread matthijs
> Hi there, > > Please help testing the new OpenLDAP 2.2 packages at > > http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/ > > I'd like to know if they fix the index and data corruption problems. > > Thanks > > Torsten > I will directly test it after i'm back from fosdem. Thank you for response.

Bug#297026: libcppunit-1.10-0: bumped soname without bumping package name

2005-02-26 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:26:44PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Can you remove the following mistakenly-uploaded packages from > the archive? Is stuff like this ever removed from the archive? (Not to mention it wouldn't help any; lots of people have probably already upgraded.) My best guess wo

Bug#297026: libcppunit-1.10-0: bumped soname without bumping package name

2005-02-26 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Dear FTP-masters, I screwed up the recent upload of cppunit: I neglected to check that the SOVERSION remained the same from cppunit 1.10.0 to 1.10.2. Unfortunately, it isn't. I will upload a cppunit 1.10.2-2 that builds a new library package libcppunit-1.10-2. Can you remove the following mist

Bug#297054: should not enter sarge

2005-02-26 Thread Mirco Bauer
Package: mono Severity: serious This bug keeps Mono out of sarge. For more information why it should not enter sarge see: http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOC

Bug#297055: should not enter sarge

2005-02-26 Thread Mirco Bauer
Package: mcs Severity: serious This bug keeps Mono out of sarge. For more information why it should not enter sarge see: http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK

Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails

2005-02-26 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:36:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The problem may be that the DB_PASSWORD line is unable to handle an @ > > sign (though I cannot reproduce it). > > I'm not sure why you can't reproduce this: 1) You seem to have replaced ')' with '}'. (Just for the record). >

Processed: fresh breakage in unstable only

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 293564 sid Bug#293564: strace - miss build-depends against libc6-dev-s390x [s390], libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc] Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 297010 patch thanks The attached patch adds the upstream patch for bug 341. Bastian Index: debian/patches/00list === --- debian/patches/00list (revision 853) +++ debian/patches/00list (working copy) @@ -116,3 +116,4

Bug#276800: patch for --disable-hipe

2005-02-26 Thread Torsten Werner
tags 276800 + patch thanks Hello, a patch is attached to this message. Regards, Torsten diff -ru erlang-10.b.1a/debian/changelog erlang-10.b.1a-tw/debian/changelog --- erlang-10.b.1a/debian/changelog 2005-02-26 18:56:43.0 +0100 +++ erlang-10.b.1a-tw/debian/changelog 2005-02-26 18:12:26.

Processed: patch for --disable-hipe

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 276800 + patch Bug#276800: erlang: Segmentation fault trying to run "erl" Tags were: sid sarge Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fault on start... Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still present in sarge Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping process

Processed: Re: Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297010 patch Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#289968: marked as done (scilab-bin needs Replaces: scilab to get around moved file)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:32:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289968: fixed in scilab 3.0-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#296845: marked as done (phpmyadmin: new upstream release addresses several security problems)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:17:05 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296845: fixed in phpmyadmin 3:2.6.1-pl2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306

2005-02-26 Thread Pierre Habouzit
> I have been listening on the sideline, and really appreciate the good > input on this. great :) > Have been too busy with real life to dig into the problem myself, but > will appreciate a patch and package it. well, then a patch is attached. it is a patch against the tree built by the

Processed: reassign 297010 to libc6-dev,lvm2

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > reassign 297010 libc6-dev,lvm2 Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers,lvm2' to `libc6-dev,lvm2'. > End of message, stoppin

Processed: cleanup

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 293815 Bug#293815: libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tag 293815 sarge Bug#293815: libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: sarge > thanks, c

Bug#295510: Pointer to discussion on debian-devel

2005-02-26 Thread David Schmitt
Hello world! http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/02/msg01254.html is the last post on a short discussion regarding the effects of this bug. As far as I understand it, the old packages have to be retained, because removing them would force a soname bump on cernlib. Perhaps the sections wo

Processed: reassign 297010 to linux-kernel-headers,lvm2

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 297010 linux-kernel-headers,lvm2 Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `linux-kernel-headers,lvm2'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#276800: do you want to fix erlang?

2005-02-26 Thread Torsten Werner
reassign 294992 erlang merge 294992 276800 thanks Package: erlang Version: 1:10.b.1a-2 Followup-For: Bug #276800 Hello, I think recompiling with --disable-hipe would be appropriate. Regards, Torsten -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (986, 'testing'

Bug#219165: reopen

2005-02-26 Thread Chris Butler
reopen 219165 thanks This affects woody as well, so I shouldn't have closed it with the sarge upload. Fixed packages for woody have been sent to the security team. -- Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key ID: 1024D/D097A261 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#297026: libcppunit-1.10-0: bumped soname without bumping package name

2005-02-26 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: libcppunit-1.10-0 Version: 1.10.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, libcppunit-1.10-0 now suddenly contains the file /usr/lib/libcppunit-1.10.so.2 instead of the file /usr/lib/libcppunit-1.10.so.0; if you want to bump the soname, you must also bump the package name. (This change does of

Bug#273871: getting libsilc to Testing

2005-02-26 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:00:59PM +0200, Toni Willberg wrote: > Hi. > > I'm not a Debian developer, so I don't know (nor really care) about the > policy. > > What should be done, and by who, to get libsilc package to Testing? > There are more than one SILC client packages (GAIM's SILC plugin an

Bug#288013: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:29:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line scilab: FTBFS in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Processed: ejabberd

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 282247 erlang Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fault on start... Bug reassigned from package `ejabberd' to `erlang'. > severity 282247 grave Bug#282247: ejabberd: Segmentation fault on start... Severity set to `grave'. > merge 282247 276800

Processed: reopen

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 219165 Bug#219165: DoS in WU-FTPD (exploit in 'ls') Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Processed: do you want to fix erlang?

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294992 erlang Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still present in sarge Bug reassigned from package `ejabberd' to `erlang'. > merge 294992 276800 Bug#276800: erlang: Segmentation fault trying to run "erl" Bug#294992: ejabberd: #282836 is still p

Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 297010 - patch reassign 297010 libc6-dev retitle 297010 libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm thanks Fixing l-k-h does not help, it is not possible to use asm/fcntl.h and fcntl.h at the same time. It has to be fixed in bits/fcntl.h which comes from $glibc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/$arch/bits/fcn

Processed: Re: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297010 - patch Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch > reassign 297010 libc6-dev Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers'

Processed: tagging 262925

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 262925 sid Bug#262925: gfs framework should not enter testing There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#297020: dbus-1-dev: Version 0.23.2 breaks API

2005-02-26 Thread Edd Dumbill
Package: dbus-1-dev Version: 0.23.2-2 Severity: grave Version 0.23.2 removes a function from the API without changing the SONAME of the library. In particular, my package bluez-utils is caused not to build from source by this change. bluez-utils-2.15/hcid/dbus.c:75: undefined reference to `dbus_

Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 297010 patch thanks The attached patch updates asm-*/fcntl.h to the versions in 2.6.10 which includes O_NOATIME. Bastian -- "That unit is a woman." "A mass of conflicting impulses." -- Spock and Nomad, "The Changeling", stardate 3541.9 diff -u linux-kernel-h

Processed: Re: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297010 patch Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#260808: reopening bug

2005-02-26 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:12:45PM -0800, Erich Schubert wrote: > reopen 260808 > thanks > > Reopening this bug report. > You must not close bugs in changelogs if you did not *change* anything. > Please handle this bug report correclty. w I see you are some 'bug search' fanatic - Obviously you h

Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm

2005-02-26 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17 Severity: critical File: linux-kernel-header Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock itself due to atime updates on /dev/ being blocked while the LVM is locked. Sine

Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306

2005-02-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25-02-2005 19:46, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Ven 25 Février 2005 17:32, Frank Küster a écrit : > >>Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>* Pierre Habouzit [Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:50:54 +0100]: >>> - : this is really not trivial : inetd

Bug#295112: clamsmtp requires newer start-stop-daemon, but can be installed without

2005-02-26 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 11:49:33PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote: > > Although, I agree that this is a policy error, the scope of the error > only applies to back porting the package. The problem will also happen on a woody system which is in the process of being upgraded to sarge. I do second gi

Bug#296971: marked as done (ltp_20050107-2_ia64: FTBFS: implicit declaration of function `_syscall3')

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:32:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296971: fixed in ltp 20050107-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#273871: getting libsilc to Testing

2005-02-26 Thread Toni Willberg
Hi. I'm not a Debian developer, so I don't know (nor really care) about the policy. What should be done, and by who, to get libsilc package to Testing? There are more than one SILC client packages (GAIM's SILC plugin and Silky) on hold because of this. - Toni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Bug#296971: ltp_20050107-2_ia64: FTBFS: implicit declaration of function `_syscall3'

2005-02-26 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On Aoine, 2005-02-25 at 20:27 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: ltp > Version: 20050107-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid Thanks for your work on this. I've backported a fix that was present in the ltp-20050207 release, though I will be conservative and not try a new upstream release at thi

Bug#296514: Cervisia license issues

2005-02-26 Thread Ben Burton
Hi, Thanks to everyone for their helpful responses. > BTW, about which KDE version do we talk? Is it enough if we change the > license in CVS HEAD aka KDE 4 (maybe 3.5)? If a license change is likely, I would be most appreciative if the change could be made in KDE_3_3_BRANCH also (since it app

Bug#296514: Cervisia license issues

2005-02-26 Thread Shaheed
As a minor contributor too, you also have my permission to dual-license Cervisia with GPL, that's okay with me. Shaheed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295310: please verify

2005-02-26 Thread Willi Mann
Hi! Please verify if the new version of libgnomecups1.0-1 (0.1.14-1), which is now in testing, solves this bug. Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296991: octave2.1: Additional information -- bug is in octave-forge

2005-02-26 Thread ShunTim LUK
Package: octave2.1 Version: 2.1.66-1 Followup-For: Bug #296991 On further investigation, it is octave-forge (version 2004.11.16-5) that changes the default plotting to use grace. However, "toggle_grace_use" from octave-forge doesn't work. Trace: octave:1> toggle_grace_use error: /usr/share/oct

Bug#296991: octave2.1: Octave plot depends on grace

2005-02-26 Thread ShunTim LUK
Package: octave2.1 Version: 2.1.66-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The current octave "plot" appears to depend on grace as the default plotting bbackend and seg faults if grace is not found. Here's a trace. octave:1> t=0:pi/100:2*pi; octave:2> x=sin(t); octave:3> plot(t

Bug#296922: marked as done (netplan: Typo in init.d script)

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:32:37 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296922: fixed in plan 1.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#296975: installing udev on running system left me with a /dev/null that was not a device file

2005-02-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Feb 26, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems somewhat similar to the bug described in #296776, but I did It is. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: small fixes II

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295344 - unreproducible Bug#295344: segfaults on startup There were no tags set. Tags removed: unreproducible > tags 296732 + patch Bug#296732: 3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing he

Bug#295914: tvtime: seems to include undistributable code

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 295914 important thanks > The code that this comment refers to was not being used and has been > removed from newer versions of tvtime. Since the code is long gone, I > have removed the comment describing the license from the source file in > CVS. It will be gone from the next version

Processed: unexplained install failure, downgrading/reassigning

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294895 unreproducible Bug#294895: dependency problems prevent configuration of a2ps There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > reassign 294895 emacsen-common Bug#294895: dependency problems prevent configuration of a2ps Bug reassigned fr

Processed: Re: tvtime: seems to include undistributable code

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 295914 important Bug#295914: tvtime: seems to include undistributable code Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Processed: tagging 294415, closing 294415

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > tags 294415 - sarge Bug#294415: Two problems in Firefox Tags were: sarge security Tags removed: sarge > close 294415 Bug#294415: Two problems in Firefox 'close' is deprecated; see htt

Processed: severity of 295919 is important

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > # not a RC issue > severity 295919 important Bug#295919: Recommends: field has typos Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: only affects the version in sid

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 295918 sid Bug#295918: libgtkada2-dev: inappropriate symlink left in /usr/share/doc There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Bug#292098: does not depend on xemacs

2005-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 292098 important reassign 292098 hyperlatex thanks > Found it. e3 package is buggy and keeps alternative on e3em after > removal. A stupid case check on prerm, running update-alternatives only > on upgrades. > Removing e3 ... > + '[' remove '!=' upgrade ']' > + update-alternatives --quie

Processed: Re: does not depend on xemacs

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 292098 important Bug#292098: does not depend on xemacs Severity set to `important'. > reassign 292098 hyperlatex Bug#292098: does not depend on xemacs Bug reassigned from package `e3' to `hyperlatex'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Processed: fixed galeon package has reached testing

2005-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 289310 -sarge Bug#289310: galeon-common: Remove complains about missing /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/apps/galeon Tags were: sarge Bug#290951: galeon: Dpkg error while upgrading Galeon Tags removed: sarge > close 289310 Bug#289310: galeon-common: