On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:07:16AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 Jan 2005 05:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This release-critical bug report about clisp failing to build on mipsel has
> > been open for some time. Has there been any progress on resolving the
> > testsuite problems on th
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi,
[This is gonna be a sloppy bugreport; however, I still feel the problem
needs to be reported.]
In the last couple of days, 2 of my systems suffered major filesystem
corruption. Both
# submitted Debian report #291060 as PR
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165271
# http://gcc.gnu.org/PRhttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165271
forwarded 291060 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165271
tags 291060 + upstream
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #291060 as PR
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165271
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PRhttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165271
> forwarded 291060 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165271
Bug#291060: libstdc
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:49:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> * Fix xserver-xfree86's configure script to not die if Discover 1.x's
> discover command segfaults. Thanks to Kyle McMartin for reporting this
> problem and testing the fix.[1]
Yes, that was indeed the problem.
> The s
On Tue, 2005-25-01 at 10:59 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:01:00AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [...]
> > Both of them, if exploitable, would be bugs in the Xrm or Xpm library
> > respectively.
> >
> > The same argument can probably made against pretty much an
Subject: migrate devfs to udev: no terminal, no cdrom, no sound
Package: udev
Version: 0.050-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
*** Please type your report below this line ***
i did "wajig purge devfs" and then "wajig install -t unstable udev". after that
there is:
* no
* Stephen Quinney [Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:32:45 +]:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:42:51 +0100 Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> > The alsaplayer-common depends on libflac4 which is unavailable on
> > unstable since Jan 7th 2005. To solve the problem please rebuild
> > the package with libflac-dev >> 1.1.1
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes data loss
Hi,
I created a device md0 w/ 3 block devices; hdf1, hdg1, and hdh1. It was
set to use raid5. Today, hdg1 disappeared from the machine.
Unfortunately, mdadm 1.8.1 does not appear to be able to assemble md
devices in
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:32:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292238: fixed in nvtv 0.4.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 292093 sid
Bug#292093: amoeba: depends on experimental libgcc1 on i386
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:21:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:21:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Should be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Wednesday, January 26, 2005 at 02:06:48, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
: On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 21:48:57, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
: : Package: nvtv
: : Version: 0.4.7-1
: : Severity: serious
: :
: : The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
: : the GFDL, but do not inclu
On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 21:48:57, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
: Package: nvtv
: Version: 0.4.7-1
: Severity: serious
:
: The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
: the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
: license:
:
: nvtvd.8.gz
Eduard, do you agr
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:48:05PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Package: headache
> Version: 1.03-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
> the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
> license:
>
> headache.1.gz
>
>
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:32:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292248: fixed in libassuan 0.6.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:47:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line problem solved in version 0.9.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 292224 discover 1 segfaults in xserver-xfree86 postinst
Bug#292224: discover: stop segfaulting, you idiots
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 292224 discover1
Bug#292224: discover 1 segfaults in xserver-xfree86 postinst
Bug reassigned from package `
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 290291 + fixed
Bug#290291: evolution: Evolution does not authenticate using MD5 methods
(DIGEST/CRAM) and remains plaintext
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Package: phpgroupware-todo
Version: 0.9.14-0.RC3.2.woody3
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sv01 2.4.19 #2 SMP Mon Jan 17 18:27:03 CST 2005 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> That might be true for X resource files and the docs sound realy scary
> (also shown by your segfault). But aren't there any suid/sgid game
> programs with xpm (or png or jpeg or any other complex lib for that
> matter) support? Any kde/gnome program can probably be ex
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> concerning your
>>
>> 1. Unsafe resource file reading.
>>
>> and
>>
>> 2. Unsafe XSHISENLIB environment variable.
>>
>> Both of them, if exploitable, would be bugs in the Xrm or Xpm library
>> respectively.
>>
>> The same
Package: libassuan-dev
Version: 0.6.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
the package is not installable correctly:
Setting up libassuan-dev (0.6.9-1) ...
error in control file: `Section' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs
line 606, line 5.
dpkg: error p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 231924 + fixed
Bug#231924: oops_1.5.23.cvs-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 254837 + fixed
Bug#254837: Update of the french debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 26
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 292224 discover: stop segfaulting, you idiots
Bug#292224: fails to upgrade/install
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 291722 xserver-xfree86: don't let vomit get on you when Discov
Package: xbvl
Version: 2.2-4
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
xbvl.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http://li
Package: partimage-server
Version: 0.6.4-10
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
partimaged.8.gz partimagedusers.5.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
Package: manpages-ja
Version: 0.5.0.0.20050115-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
groff_tmac.5.gz groff.7.gz roff.7.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my ma
Package: m17n-docs
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
mdbDir.5.gz mdbFLT.5.gz mdbFontEncoding.5.gz mdbFontSize.5.gz mdbFontset.5.gz
mdbGeneral.5.gz mdbIM.5.gz mdb
Package: kbiff
Version: 3.7.1-3
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
kbiff.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http:
Package: nvtv
Version: 0.4.7-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
nvtvd.8.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http:/
Package: hasciicam
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
hasciicam.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-lega
Package: oidentd
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
oidentd.conf.5.gz oidentd_masq.conf.5.gz oidentd.8.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my
Package: headache
Version: 1.03-2
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
headache.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
Package: partimage
Version: 0.6.4-10
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
partimage.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-leg
Package: gnuserv
Version: 3.12.6-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
dtemacs.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:56:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.76
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Package: blinkd
Version: 0.4.7-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
blink.1.gz blinkd.8.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:56:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.76
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:56:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.76
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:56:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in initrd-tools 0.1.76
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Package: crack-attack
Version: 1.1.10-2
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
crack-attack.6.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debi
Package: gidentd
Version: 0.4.5-7
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
gidentd.8.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
h
Package: groff
Version: 1.18.1.1-5
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
groff_tmac.5.gz groff_out.5.gz roff_diff.7.gz groff.7.gz roff.7.gz
groff_trace.7.gz groff_mom.7.gz ditroff.7.
Package: groff-base
Version: 1.18.1.1-5
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
troff.1.gz groff.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and
Package: icecast-server
Version: 1:1.3.12-9
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
icecast.8.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debia
Package: mtools
Version: 3.9.9-2
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
tgz.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http:/
Package: snacc
Version: 1.3bbn-6
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
berdecode.1.gz snacc-config.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 287899 + sarge
Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user
Tags were: security
Tags added: sarge
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 291722 -1
Bug#291722: fails to upgrade/install
Bug 291722 cloned as bug 292224.
> retitle 291722 xserver-xfree86: don't let vomit get on you when Discover pukes
Bug#291722: fails to upgrade/install
Changed Bug title.
> severity 291722 important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 291386 creates initrd that cannot use lvm 2 volumes if both lvm2 and
> lvm10 are installed
Bug#291386: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686: creates bad initrd with complex lvm2
setup
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:35:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292214: streamtuner segfaults on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:43:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Finally fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> reopen 287899
Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 287899 - sid
Bug#287899: vdr: run as non-root user
Tags were: security
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
ack...
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-25 20:39 +0100]:
> Package: wmacpi
> Version: 2.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Version 2.0-1 of wmacpi Depends: libdockapp1, which is no longer in
> unstable. Please rebuild this package against the current version of
> libdockapp-dev.
>
> Because
Package: streamtuner
Version: 0.99.99-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
streamtuner displays the splashscreen at startup but then segfaults,
here's the backtrace:
#0 0x002a9ac8 in init_gtk () from
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so
#1 0x000
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> concerning your
>
> 1. Unsafe resource file reading.
>
> and
>
> 2. Unsafe XSHISENLIB environment variable.
>
> Both of them, if exploitable, would be bugs in the Xrm or Xpm library
> respectively.
>
> The same argument can probably made against pretty much any X
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #292191 normal
Bug#292191: upgrade changes ownerhsip of /var/spool/exim4
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
severity #292191 normal
thanks
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:30:53PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Package: exim4
> Version: 4.43-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
NACK
> I tagged this report as critical because the problem has caused mail to be
> lost in the past and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 290291 + pending
Bug#290291: evolution: Evolution does not authenticate using MD5 methods
(DIGEST/CRAM) and remains plaintext
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of mess
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291914: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287167: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287167: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287167: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287167: fixed in meld 0.9.4.1+20050125-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Stephen C. Grubb wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I've completed the clean-up pass on the ploticus source code and have
> successfully compiled/tested it on AMD64 platform on the sourceforge
> compile farm. Thanks for making these suggestions. Just wanted to let
> you know where this st
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 290238 xvfb: overquoting in xvfb-run
Bug#290238: Overquoting in xvfb-run
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 290619 xvfb: xvfb-run doesn't correctly quote arguments
Bug#290619: xvfb
Chris,
I would also like to thank you for taking the time for chasing this bug.
Indeed it seems finally to have something with printing as initially
suggested (or cups server support at least). Could you see if you can
reproduce also the bug #289715 in the same non working condition.
I have in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 289967 normal
Bug#289967: twig: STARTTLS doesnt work with imap connections
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:47:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287899: fixed in vdr 1.2.6-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
> It is no viable strategy to release with a libglade2 that has
> incompatible behaviour to upstream. Just think of a user compiling
> software locally that relies on the changes made in libglade
> 2.4.1.
Then you will need to change the name of the libglade binary package
instead. It is not acce
Hi,
Goswin von Brederlow:
> > Assuming it lets me do that.
>
> I'm not sure about the -2 but it should let you upload any file that
> doesn't already exist in the DB.
It doesn't let me upload an .orig.tar.gz that's still in the NEW queue,
though. (That's (part of) why the -2 got in there sans so
"Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Goswin von Brederlow:
>> I can't seem to find any source for ntp there.
>>
> ... probably because the disk died today. I *HATE* when that happens.
Thats bad. I hate that too. I hope you have backup and waranty.
>> Could you upload a -2 f
Hi,
Goswin von Brederlow:
> I can't seem to find any source for ntp there.
>
... probably because the disk died today. I *HATE* when that happens.
> Could you upload a -2 for some missing arch with source (just the
> orig.tar.gz) or a full -3? You might have noticed none of the buildds
> have b
tags 284096 - moreinfo unreproducible
tags 284096 + confirmed
thanks
For the record:
The key to reproudcing this are the following conditions:
- Not using KDE or Gnome plugin (or using OOO_FORCE_DESKTOP=none)
- No CUPS server running (maybe no printer queues at all on the system)
Finally I can
* Stephen Quinney [Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:32:45 +]:
> I have uploaded it to DELAYED+3days to give the maintainer time to
> review my changes and upload their own fixes, if they wish.
For anybody looking for this upload, it seems it was uploaded to
9-day.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykw
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 284096 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#284096: openoffice.org: writer crash in 'modify style' when selecting
another tab
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#289715: openoffice.org-bin: Impress single Word color modification is
broken again
Tags
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:33:40 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line {wsoundprefs, wsoundserver}: can't fulfill the build
dependencies in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:33:40 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line {wsoundprefs, wsoundserver}: can't fulfill the build
dependencies in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 281772 -sarge
Bug#281772: wvstreams: FTBFS: cannot convert `unsigned char (*)[8]' to `const
unsigned char*'
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge
> close 281772
Bug#281772: wvstreams: FTBFS: cannot convert `unsigned char (*)[8]' to `const
unsigne
Package: vlc
Followup-For: Bug #289490
On AMD64 pure64 dist, there's still the problem. VLC depends on
libflac4, but libflac6 is available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # I'm sorry, but I'm not going to dignify the severity with a comment.
> # It's a bug, but not a critical one. Feel free to remove
> # bugs.debian.org from the distribution if you disagree.
> severity 292151 normal
Bug#292151: bugs.debian.org: privacy c
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 07:47:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291700: fixed in postgresql 7.4.6-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:48:00PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> amoeba: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0) but 1:3.4.3-7 is installed.
>
> Please rebuild against packages that are actually available on sid;
> you may wish to use a chroot for this purpo
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:01:00AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [...]
>> Both of them, if exploitable, would be bugs in the Xrm or Xpm library
>> respectively.
>>
>> The same argument can probably made against pretty much any X
>> applicatio
"Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Goswin Brederlow:
>> while updating my debian mirror I noticed the sid ntp is missing its
>> source:
>>
> The reason for this is that the -1 version was in NEW, thus I couldn't
> upload -2 with the original source, so I did it without. Appa
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Full email headers are visible on "http://bugs.debian.org";.
This introduces several problems:
1) Privacy concerns. It is just not neccessary to keep anything except for the
"From:" (and possibly "Sender:", and "Subje
Hi,
a very simple quick-fix would be an executable file /sbin/kernelversion
with the following content:
echo 2.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 292116 sid
Bug#292116: module-init-tools: breaks boot-up if modutils is not installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Hi,
I would suggest something like:
KVER_MAJOR=${KVER%${KVER#*.*[^.]}}
to fix it.
Und weg...
Roni
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:47:03 -
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292118: syntax error in /etc/init.d/xfs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> # removed from testing
> tags 276212 sid
Bug#276212: RM: [ia64 alpha sparc] please remove supercollider
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> # as the package isn't in testing, this is hardly RC
> severity 291993 normal
Bug#291993: RM: kissme -- upstream unable to maintain compatibility with
classpath library
Severity set
Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hola Ross Burton!
>
>> What about glade files and applications which expect the new API to be
>> used? The problem is that the two APIs cannot be mixed, so will this
>> change just result in a different set of applications breaking?
>
> If there
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> severity 292126 serious
Bug#292126: ntp_4.2.0a+stable.orig.tar.gz missing
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 292126 291929
Bug#291929: ftp.debian.org: ntp_4.2.0a+stable.orig.tar.gz is
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:01:00AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
> Both of them, if exploitable, would be bugs in the Xrm or Xpm library
> respectively.
>
> The same argument can probably made against pretty much any X
> application and X itself. There is a lot of software that just loa
Hi,
Goswin Brederlow:
> while updating my debian mirror I noticed the sid ntp is missing its
> source:
>
The reason for this is that the -1 version was in NEW, thus I couldn't
upload -2 with the original source, so I did it without. Apparently one
of the girls ;-) forgot to move the .orig.tar.gz
On Tuesday 25 Jan 2005 05:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> This release-critical bug report about clisp failing to build on mipsel has
> been open for some time. Has there been any progress on resolving the
> testsuite problems on this architecture? Since the only package depending
> on c
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
