in gtk_signal_remove_emission_hook () from
/usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
#5 0x0fd82f98 in gtk_signal_remove_emission_hook () from
/usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t part of the hppa patch should
be separated and rejoin the main debian patches instead of keeping such a huge
hppa-specific patch, maybe this would be the best time to do this, or at
least try to get that done for 2.6.13-1.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
5]: *** [net/802] Error 2
> make[4]: *** [net] Error 2
>
> Curiously -6,-7,-8 and -10 all built on sparc
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=linux-2.6&ver=2.6.12-10&arch=sparc&stamp=1127830883&file=log&as=raw
>
> I say curious, because -10 made
The mips/mipsel packages are only in experimental ATM. I hope to
> prepare an unstable upload the next days.
BTW, what is the status of those, and why don't you add your stuff to the
linux-2.6 package now ?
linux-2.6 will soon move to 2.6.13, which you told us a couple of weeks ago
was
ses that process to take 14 seconds!
> > And combining both cpufreq and throttling causes it to take much
> > longer. All these phenomena should be explained.
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Could you please draft an amendment to the documents in question
> and I will pass it on to upstream
his bug report to be
> opened. I plan to close it in two weeks from today, unless some new
> information will appear.
Also, there is the udev backports, either at my place, horms place or on
backport.org.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
re.
Manoj promised some rewrite, modularization and debconfification for
post-sarge, but i don't know what the current planes are for this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
want to look at the rest of the debian bugs, they are at :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=parted
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
question: it works exactly as expected, but it is
> not enough clever to understand that it should install libglu1-xorg-dev
> in place xlibmesa-gl-dev because it is the best solution...
>
> I have filled a bug on lablgl, and propose a solution.
Could you update the SVN accordyingly.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
While doing breakage things in the postinst is allowed ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ivated or such.
Did you really need to make such a mess about this ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le situation is a mess, udev should be fixed to behave less
stupidly in such cases, which will most assuredly break sarge->etch upgrades.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> not 2.6.12. preinst is a poor place for this check, imho.
> If you think you have a better idea, feel free to explain it.
Have a compatibility udev maybe ? Also you have to remember, that some people
like or need to run two sets of kernels.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:54:59AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Did you really need to make such a mess about this ?
> Yes, but thank you for asking about it.
Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug o
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, badly worded maybe :), but i think your RC bug on the kernel without
> > prior discussion may have been somewhat rude.
> It was discussed
ut it needs to be DFSG-free.
Well, i was just surprised that you listed the second alternative as asking
the author to GPL it, instead of asking for a fre elicence, but i believe that
in this case, any licence that allows distribution of the music track should
be ok, not sure though.
Friendly,
Sve
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:15:22AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It was discussed with vorlon.
> > Vorlon is not the kernel team however.
> But he is the one who decides when packages should or should not
now, even if the kernel maintainers object to having it
> listed against linux-2.6.
It would also be nice for Marco to be a bit more cooperative next time such
situation arise.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:04:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Of course, we want udev 0.060 and linux-2.6 to be available at the same
> > > time in each suite, because dealing with the udev preinst fail
; (eventually making a non-free enigma-music package, but I'm too lazy)
> - ask the author of the song if he'd GPL-licence it
> - move enigma as-is to non-free
Erich, applying the GPL to a documentation is ok, but don't you think you are
pushing things a bit hard by applying i
e-distributors like ubuntu -
> but still not DFSG-free.
So, what is it you want ? Full redistribution right outside of enigma as well
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:20:58PM +0200, ILF wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:47:05 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the report, but this should be fixed in the 1.2-3 release.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:51:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Indeed, i am waiting for the glibc/g++/whatever transition to finish to be
> > able to check this, since last i tried a couple of libraries had no
Package: cdrtools
Severity: normal
In order to investigate a DVD-RW blanking bug with growisofs and 2.6.12
kernels, i wanted to build cdrecord with the DVD patch in order to check if it
is a kernel or growisofs bug.
This filed twice, first trying to build as per the debian/README.DVD.Debian,
fai
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:51:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed, i am waiting for the glibc/g++/whatever transition to finish t
do to do the same works just fine.
I have the device (/dev/hdd symlinked to /dev/dvd) in the group cdrom, which
the user is part of, and am able to burn DVDs (but not erase them) just fine
as user with growisofs.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
supposed to be a version of this
package with the patch applied, or fix the build with dvd=yes.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: growisofs
Version: growisofs fails to blank DVD-RW media
Severity: important
growisofs fails to blank DVD-RW media, while writing is just fine.
Here is the log :
$ growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -R -J 2005.08.30/
WARNING: /dev/dvd already carries isofs!
About to execute 'mkisofs -R -J 2005.08.3
xml
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:51:32AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 325833 normal
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:27:51AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from sou
inks
accordyingly.
This can be done in a way similar to how the powerpc mkvmlinuz does its
debconf magic, by putting adequate files under /etc/kernel/post-inst.d, which
would then be used to setup the bootloader, instead of the current way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hould be enough for now. If there'll be a delay, I'll bump the
> severity to grave.
... which is how bugs end up getting missed for release.
So, i think the severity raising is waranted.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- ../tmp-orig/lablgl-1.01/debian/control2005-08-31 18:55:15.0
> +
> +++ ./debian/control 2005-08-31 18:55:13.0 +
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> Section: libdevel
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Build-Depends:
the severity of this bug report to normal or
important once ipchains has reached sarge this evening, but i leave that upto
to you.
(and it would be nice to have real communication through the bug report next
time, not this total silence and then outrage as i consider an NMU).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icence for, but you can find it on :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot
The current 2.6.12 sid kernel is too big by around 200K, but we will work it
to fit on a miboot size again before the etch release, hopefully, and by then
we may even have quik-floppy support or whatever, so ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot though.
> floppies in the powerpc kernel source, and would building a minimal 2.6.13
> kernel fit on floppy?
Yes, with 2.6.8 though the box died when switching the framebuffer on or
something.
you need the miboot package from p.d.o/~luther/miboot, and can look at the
instructions on how
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 06:54:57AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I know that this may be off-topic for the bug, but just for archiving
> purposes, I'm also sending it to the BTS.
>
> On Sep 03 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There has been some discussion about using hfs
k if using the parted tool directly
causes the same problem, or if it is a partman-only bug ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ting. language doesnt matter, i tried german and
> englisch).
This is probably another incarnation of the infamous kde-security packages
being utterly broken for powerpc.
Do we have any recomendation on how to solve this ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
feedback from
users with problems about this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:02:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 05 September 2005 19:59, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Do we have any recomendation on how to solve this ?
>
> Sure. "Do not select the desktop task on powerpc; it is temporarily
> broken."
>
>
The manpage doesn't contain the string 'hfs':
>
> % zgrep --ignore-case HFS /usr/share/man/man8/parted.8.gz; echo $?
> 1
>
> Maybe some patches were misplaced?
Probably, maybe you can resend them ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in this regard.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
different, well,
it should work for kernel-build-2.6.8-powerpc, but the user complained about
some kernel-headers-2.6.8-powerpc crap. there was never such a package, and
never anything dependended on it, so i think the situation can be closed on
powerpc.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:40:21AM -0400, A. Costa wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:12:39 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:59:22AM -0400, A Costa wrote:
> > > ...Maybe some patches were misplaced?
> >
>
bug, regardless.
Just wanted to know if this is a partman-only bug or a parted one. but this is
not conclusive, it may still be a libparted bug to allow
ped_disk_minimize_extended_partition to break the partition table.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
trd or even later, there is no way
to make what you want work, especially for a generic kernel like the debian
one.
(and especially not on powerpc, which this has good chances of being since
there are few non-apple laptops which dropped the serial port :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
vious release. It might be an AGP issue,
> not a radeon driver issue though.
This is also the case on a fairly recent ubuntu/breezy install on my 1Ghz
titanium powerbook. It is just X, and the display in general who locks up, you
can still ssh to the box over the network.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:36:27AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Sep 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, are you saying that you managed to build miboot floppies using the
> > old woody miboot floppies,
>
> Yes, I did.
>
> > (i think woody came with do-it-y
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:55:07PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:28:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:56:21AM -030
linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
> linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which conflicts w/ the name of a flavour.
> Suggestions?
linux-headers-all-2.6.12-1-powerpc ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_name
Well, the reason for this seems obvious :
> ii libparted1.6-12 1.6.21-1 The GNU Parted disk partitioning
> s
Please use the same version of the library as parted :)
I will add stronger dependencies so that this kind of problems don't happen
again.
Friend
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:26:27PM +1000, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:22:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, the reason for this seems obvious :
> >
> > > ii libparted1.6-12 1.6.21-1 The GNU Parted disk
> > > parti
can't understand how it comes /var/lib/ocaml/md5sums is
> something else than a directory.
It is probably not there, but why if it was not there, and some random
packages does a :
cp stuff /var/lib/ocaml/md5sums
expecting it to be a dir, this would end in it being a file.
Friendly,
Sven
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:43:42AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:09:10AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1) ocaml-md5sums may be not available when postrm scripts are invoked
> > Sure, you should use it in prerm, since postrm removes it, no ?
>
e
>
> The debian installer works on systems where we[1] have acces to.
>
> > boot.img for sarge on powerpc doesn't boot, no matter what i do, what
There is no such thing as boot.img on powerpc, this is probably some random
boot-floppies leftover and should be ignored.
Friendly
//people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/sarge/images/
Chose a date, and go to powerpc/floppy-2.4 to find something working.
Again, sorry for my other stupid mail, and test these ones.
Maybe i should build a couple of miboot floppies accompanying the official
release ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:58:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2005 21:02, Sven Luther wrote:
> > As a result, the floppies present in sarge are entirely broken and will
> > never work. Also the 2.6 floppies, even with miboot present never
> > worked fiab
support, or something
subtile and undocumented is going on, and in either case i would appreciate
help in how to solve this, as i expect to do 2.6.12 udeb uploads to sid
tomorrow when 2.6.12-4 packages enter sid.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
having the character not displayed as utf-8, but
this is really cumbersome, and may cause lost email when one is not careful.
Oh, and i am running gnome-terminal on both sides.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testin
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:14:07PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Sven Luther in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Package: mutt
> >
> > I have two systems, one running sarge with a fr_FR.UTF-8 locale, and the
> > other
> > running todays sid, but with a [EMA
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:24:53PM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le lun 2005-08-15 a 17:44:46 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:13:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > severity 323182 normal
> > > thanks mate
> >
y with the necessary
(A stack of 10 oldworld machines ? :)
> skills to come out of the woodwork... If ten of us put up US$100,
> would that be enough?
Probably, not sure though.
There is also the approach of applefreeing aid code, but they probably lost
the source code for it, altough chanc
> results).
libparted's ext2/3 code need to either be adapted to the new ext2/3 format, or
better yet be changed to use libext2 or whatever it is called.
In the meantime, and since nobody showed up to implement that bit of code for
over a year now, i strongly recomend you to use resize2fs t
eople installing
> > > linux want nothing to do with mock os, or apple. the oldworlds often
>
> > (Notice i did build some nubus kernel even, but i guess nobody even bothered
> > to test those.)
>
> it's ok, some people did, in the channel for instance.
but i had
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:24:27AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> Le mer 2005-08-17 a 02:05:14 -0400, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:51:53AM -0400, SR, ESC wrote:
> > > > Yep, but nobody came forward and did so. This should h&
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:14:07PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Sven Luther in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Package: mutt
> >
> > I have two systems, one running sarge with a fr_FR.UTF-8 locale, and the
> > other
> > running todays sid, but with a [EMA
orth London)
Cool, try booting the kernel-image-2.4.27-nubus on it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (17/08/05 10:52), Sven Luther wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Bug#323182: debian-installer: boot.img for sarge doesn't, on
> > PPC
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:51:49AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
&g
tags 323438 upstream
thanks
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:53:13PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi Sven!
>
> Thank you for the fast reply.
>
> On Wed 17 Aug 2005 07:52 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > libparted's ext2/3 code need to either be adapted to the new ext2/3
&g
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:51:46PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: important
>
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> [http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/07/msg00304.html]:
>
> Sven> Oh, d
t; /var/lib/dpkg/info/ocaml.postinst: line 9: ocaml-md5sums: command not found
>
> And ocaml is not usable.
ocaml-md5sum is i guess a part of ocaml-base or ocaml-nox, and it seems
strange that you are having the old version of ocaml-nox installed.
Stefano, can you please have a look at
to record it here just in case.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:31:12PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:53:43PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > ocaml-md5sum is i guess a part of ocaml-base or ocaml-nox, and it seems
> > strange that you are having the old version of ocaml-nox installed.
>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:49:09PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le Mon 1/08/2005, Stefano Zacchiroli disait
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 02:53:43PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > ocaml-md5sum is i guess a part of ocaml-base or ocaml-nox, and it seems
> > > strange
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:13:21PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Sven, do you agree on adding the dependency from ocaml directly to
> > > ocaml-base-nox (>= 3.08.3-5)? This should fix the problem.
>
S_TARGET)
$(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_DIR)/Makefile 2>/dev/null`" != 0; then \
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: L
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:13:21PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Sven, do you agree on adding the dependency from ocaml directly to
> > > ocaml-base-nox (>= 3.08.3-5)? This should fix the problem.
>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2005 at 18:55:18 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am still wondering about what emacsen has to do with ocaml-base-nox
> > though.
> >
> Nothing at all. ocaml-nox, on the other han
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:39:21PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le Mon 1/08/2005, Sven Luther disait
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2005 at 18:55:18 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am still
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:12:42AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:42:44AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, what did you upgrade from ?
> >
> > Stefano, maybe the right answer would be to have a strict version dependency
> > between t
Hi Manoj, ...
It seems this bug report got erroneously appended to #320055, so you may have
missed it.
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:10:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Package: kernel-package
> Version: 9.004
> Tags: patch
> Followup-For: Bug #320055
>
>
> Hi Manoj, it seem
thermore, gnome-apt fails to install right now on powerpc, because of some
libapt package that does not exist :
gnome-apt: Dépend: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 mais il n'est pas installable
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
ld be no
major problem i think.
(Note, i am still in search of parted co-maintainers :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 03:18:26AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:53:49AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Package: parted
> >> Version: 1.6.23-3
> >> Severity: minor
> &g
Package: partimage
Version: 0.6.4-11
Severity: serious
Package is uploaded with arch:i386, which is not policy compliant, and stop
the package from being built on other architectures. Please fix this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
ARCH=$(KERNEL_ARCH) -C $(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_DIR)
$(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_TARGET); \
fi
Maybe this could become :
if test "`grep -c $(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_TARGET)
$(IMAGE_POST_PROCESS_DIR)/Makefile 2>/dev/null`" != 0; then \
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:40:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:54:26AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Altough after a suggestion from Steve, this should rather be :
>
> > --- /usr/share/kernel-package/rules 2005-07-28 07:22:16.0 +0200
>
I can try to upgrade it
this evening, and send it to you for testing, how does that sound ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rnel-package/config .config
test -f .config || (echo "*** Need a config file .config" && false)
Makefile:2: *** missing separator. Stop.
Please ignore the warning about overriding and ignoring targets above.
These are harmless. They are only invoked in a part of the process
t
it, and many
> are of the same opinion). Do you really think people will be so
> discouraged that they'll give up all together instead of just filing
> the Debian bug.
What about a mechanism for transparently forwarding a bug report to upstream
instead, in such a way that the link b
DULES=most in
/etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf ? I asked for this to be the default on powerpc,
since i had the same kind of huge, useless initrd problems, but as it was
difficult to get this change in even after asking for it during months and
months, i guess it didn't do to do the same for x86.
not in the archive make them more or less
none-usable.
Ralph, in any case, you will want the -pseries kernel on your hardware, the
other options being -pseries-power4 which is power4 optimized, and
-iseries-legacy, for pre-power5 iseries.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o propose such descriptions in a patch or even just plain
text in this bug report.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:59:58AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Lun 8 Août 2005 09:33, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > What about a mechanism for transparently forwarding a bug report to
> > upstream instead, in such a way that the link between the debian bug
> > report an
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi, with current 2.6.12, the symlinks for asm-* are fine, and i belive it is
enough to ship -2 as is, as we don't have ppc64 kernels yet.
Now, the current setup includes asm-ppc and asm-ppc64 in the common kernel
header files, but the per flavour include only
#x27;t make any demands. it _does_ however hint at some socially
> uncomfortable responsibilities.
Luke, do you have an idea of what exactly is the problem with 2.6 kernels and
low memory support ? Could you describe it, especially since i believe it is
only a problem related on how the initrd i
nstaller
> with "expert". I have limited patience for people who think they are
> experts and are not familiar with man pages.
Notice that this option is also easily available by hitting "go back" once or
twice at the root password prompt, and then following the installation
no
e shipped with Debian Installer rc1 is 2.6.17. Probably, the daily
> build installer already incorporates the 2.6.18 kernel.
It does indeed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
your vendor to either exchange it
for a not broken one, or at least provide a bios upgrade which fixes the
brokeness.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
601 - 700 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
