Bug#1020060: statsmodels: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:105: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

2022-09-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This is the same test as #1014278 / upstream 8341, but now on amd64. From the upstream discussion, it may be a numerically unstable test. It doesn't fail everywhere: a test build on Salsa CI passed, as did the last debci runs. (reproducible-builds FTBFS on the second build, on amd64/sid only,

Bug#1025393: dask: autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.5

2022-12-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-dask Version: 2022.02.0+dfsg-2 Tags: fixed-upstream Control: block 1022571 by -1 With pandas 1.5 (currently in experimental), the dask autopkgtest fails: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/d/dask/28842796/log.gz This appears to be fixed upstream, but I haven't

Bug#1024906: apparently fixed Re: dask autopkgtest fail with python 3.11

2022-12-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This combination stopped failing on 2022-11-22/23 (without a dask upload, suggesting it was fixed somewhere other than dask itself). Hence, I suggest closing this bug.

Bug#1026539: theano FTBFS

2023-01-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Please do *not* upload theano 1.12 to unstable - it's the Aesara version, which may seriously break backward compatibility. I haven't had time to properly look at this bug yet.

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask works, but am open to disagreement. Issues this would fix: python3.11 #1023965: We're currently ignoring these test failures. Mystery autopkgtest failure (fails without any listed individual test failure, started 2022-11-13)

Bug#1027254: dask: fail with numpy 1.24

2023-01-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream Those are all from bcolz, which upstream dask has stopped using: https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/9479 (Upstream also mention numpy 1.24 in https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/9777 which hasn't been in a release yet, but that one looks like it's only suppressing w

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 06/01/2023 09:16, Nilesh Patra wrote: The version of dask is same since few months. What do you mean by new dask? Current Debian dask (2022.02) fails its tests with pandas 1.5 (#1025393), and the obvious way to fix that (and #1027254) is to update it to current upstream dask (2022.12), but

Bug#1027254: dask and pandas 1.5

2023-01-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
To get the new upstream version to work, dask_sphinx-theme, dask and dask.distributed all need to be updated, in that order. Tests here: https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/dask2022p12v2/+packages dask didn't run its tests (PPAs only build, not autopkgtest), and dask.distribu

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
skbio is fixed, ulmo is maybe fixed but untested. dask is unclear (see #1027254 for details): it looks like it's probably fixable, but I don't have an actual working fix yet. There has been no response from its maintainers.

Bug#1017573: ulmo fails in pandas 1.4+

2023-01-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ulmo-dev/ulmo/pull/214 Control: severity -1 serious Untested patch at the above link. pandas 1.5 should be uploaded to unstable today, making this RC.

Bug#1027254: dask and pandas 1.5

2023-01-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
(I meant to send that to the dask/pandas bug, which is #1025393, but both of them are potential reasons to update dask.) The intake issue is now https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/9813 (They're planning to fix it in intake rather than dask, but we might not be allowed to do that after the 12th

Bug#1028359: pygpu: fails to import in numpy 1.24

2023-01-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pygpu Version: 0.7.6-12 Severity: grave numpy 1.24 no longer has np.bool, which makes pygpu fail to import: pygpu/dtypes.py:74: in _fill_dtype_registry register_dtype(np.bool, ["ga_bool", "bool"]) numpy/__init__.py:284: in __getattr__ raise AttributeError("module {!r} ha

Bug#1028373: pandas: test-failing warnings with numpy 1.24

2023-01-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pandas Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Looks like the numpy 1.24 issues I knew about weren't the only ones. Fix in progress in Salsa.

Bug#1022571: pandas 1.5 now in unstable

2023-01-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity 1025393 serious Control: severity 1024820 serious The autopkgtest fails (except statsmodels, which I just fixed) are packages that are test-uninstallable because pandas 1.5 Breaks: current dask. (This is #1025393, but some of its discussion was accidentally sent to #1027254

Bug#1027215: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-01-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork is not abandoned, but includes interface changes including the import name, so would break reverse dependencies not specifically altered for it.) Its reverse dependencies are keras, deepnano and invesalius. It is currently

Bug#1023986: parso: too old to parse Python 3.11

2022-11-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-parso Version: 0.8.1-1 Tags: fixed-upstream Control: block 1023965 1021984 by -1 Attempting to use parso on Python 3.11 gives an error that this is not supported. (e.g. some pandas tests do this - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/631797785/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.pandas_1.3

Bug#1023965: pandas FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version

2022-11-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: block 1021984 by -1 Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental There's more than just those 2[0]. Some are tests that expect an error and check the message (not just the type), and fail because the message has been reworded - these should be trivial to fix. The 2 in test_nul

Bug#1020060: statsmodels sometimes FTBFS

2022-11-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It also doesn't fail on the buildds. (The failed binNMU of statsmodels for Python 3.11 is instead the expected result of trying to build statsmodels on a Python version without pandas - pandas failed due to #1023965.) Is there anything special about the mass-rebuild environment that might ex

Bug#1024820: emperor: FTBFS/autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.5

2022-11-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-emperor Version: 1.0.3+ds-4 Control: block 1022571 by -1 Tests fail with pandas 1.5 (currently in experimental). Build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/633828020/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.emperor_1.0.3+ds-4_BUILDING.txt.gz Autopkgtest log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkg

Bug#1024821: q2templates: FTBFS/autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.5

2022-11-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: q2templates Version: 2022.8.0+ds-1 Control: block 1022571 by -1 Tests fail with pandas 1.5 (currently in experimental). Build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/633830688/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.q2templates_2022.8.0+ds-1_BUILDING.txt.gz Autopkgtest log: https://ci.debian.net/data/a

Bug#1017574: python3-skbio: FTBFS/autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.4/1.5

2022-11-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: block 1022571 by -1 This still fails with pandas 1.5. Build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/633830773/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-amd64.python-skbio_0.5.6-6build2_BUILDING.txt.gz Autopkgtest log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/p/python-skbio/28542505/log.gz

Bug#1022571: pandas 1.5

2022-11-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: retitle -1 transition: pandas 1.3/1.4 -> 1.5 Control: tags -1 fixed-in-experimental pandas 1.5.1 is now in experimental. It appears to break emperor, q2templates and statsmodels. (Compared to 1.4; also python-skbio (#1017574) compared to 1.3.) statsmodel

Bug#1000922: llvmlite: uninstallable due to llvm-11 removal

2022-11-27 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity -1 grave Control: merge -1 1024795 Control: retitle -1 llvmlite: uninstallable due to llvm-11 removal It looks like closing and reopening this removed its "blocks" relationship to 1000941 (the llvm-11 removal request). Hence, llvm-11 has now been removed, making llvmlite (and

Bug#1017573: python3-ulmo: autopkgtest fail with pandas 1.4

2022-11-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 On 13/11/2022 15:02, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: It looks like this has been fixed somewhere other than the ulmo package (I don't know where), as the autopkgtest now passes with pandas 1.4/1.5. No it doesn't - it's being run with pandas 1.3 because pandas

Bug#1033589: python3-theano: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'bool'.

2023-03-27 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
While that particular problem is easy to fix, there are other incompatibilities that aren't (see #1026539, #1027215) and I intend to let autoremoval happen.

Bug#1028667: dask BD-Uninstallable

2023-01-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 dask: B-D on python-numpy-doc which no longer exists Control: tags -1 pending The python-numpy-doc error is because that package no longer exists. This build-dependency has already been removed in Salsa. However, that version doesn't build the dask documentation due to othe

Bug#1028667: dask BD-Uninstallable

2023-01-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Probably fixed - see my merge request on Salsa.

Bug#1028667: dask BD-Uninstallable

2023-01-16 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 16/01/2023 07:22, Diane Trout wrote: On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 14:42 -0800, Diane Trout wrote: On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 18:16 +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: Probably fixed - see my merge request on Salsa. I'd tried to build versions of dask from 2022.03 - 2022.06 and they all failed

Bug#1027244: Are we still trying to do scipy 1.10, given transition freeze?

2023-01-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/17033 This "broken by numpy 1.24" bug looks to me like 17033, not 17630. This has what looks like a trivially-backportable patch, though I haven't actually tried that: https://github.com/scipy/scip

Bug#1029232: dask.distributed: broken by version mismatch with dask

2023-01-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-distributed Version: 2022.02.0+ds1-3 Severity: serious dask.distributed has been failing its autopkgtests since dask was upgraded to 2022.12.1. This is the expected result of upgrading one but not the other: I'd seen the same in my test PPA, and the upstream setup.py/requirem

Bug#1029232: dask.distributed: broken by version mismatch with dask

2023-01-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Would you like some help? If so, please push what you currently have to Salsa so we can see it. (No promises - #1029251 doesn't look like a big job but I might be wrong about that.)

Bug#1029251: pandas: FTBFS: tests failed

2023-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending Looks like rounding error in a test; ignored in Salsa.

Bug#1029533: python3-dipy: autopkgtest measures wall-clock time, causing random failures

2023-01-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-dipy Version: 1.5.0-6 Tags: patch test_mapmri_isotropic_static_scale_factor measures wall-clock time to check which of two methods is faster, which is flaky on a shared autopkgtest server. (Known instances of it failing are https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are: - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy, see #1029533 for a possible fix. - python-xarray/i386 looks like xarray not pandas: see #1004

Bug#1004869: python-xarray autopkgtest fail on i386

2023-01-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 2023.01.0-1 This patch was dropped in the next upload (probably by accident), and hence this bug has reappeared. It is currently listed as blocking pandas from testing, though I'm not sure why (it isn't obvious why pandas and xarray would have to go togeth

Bug#1027244: scikit-learn Re: Are we still trying to do scipy 1.10, given transition freeze?

2023-01-26 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags 1029701 fixed-upstream Full log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/s/scikit-learn/30693526/log.gz There appear to be at least 2 separate failures here, both known and probably fixed upstream. So yes, 'new upstream version' is the first thing to try, but we'

Bug#1017573: patch Re: ulmo broken by pandas 1.4+

2023-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Control: unblock -1 by 1011225 (Block possibly added by mistake - these don't look related.) This patch is now available as a Salsa merge request, and passed build+autopkgtest there.

Bug#1051233: openpyxl: too old for pandas 2.1

2023-09-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-openpyxl Version: 3.0.9-2 Severity: wishlist Control: affects -1 python3-pandas Upstream pandas 2.1 will only use openpyxl >= 3.0.10. If I override this to accept Debian's 3.0.9, I get 2 test failures that plausibly might be caused by it (but I haven't actually tried it with a

Bug#1051234: tabulate: too old for pandas 2.1

2023-09-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-tabulate Version: 0.8.9-1 Severity: wishlist Upstream pandas 2.1 will only use tabulate >= 0.8.10. Nothing obviously breaks if I override this to accept Debian's 0.8.9, but it might be better to actually update tabulate. (At least to the latest 0.8.x - I don't know whether g

Bug#1051234: tabulate: too old for pandas 2.1

2023-09-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Salsa has 0.8.10, but it's been there for some time and I don't know why it hasn't been uploaded.

Bug#1052454: numexpr: unnecessarily disables security check

2023-09-22 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-numexpr Version: 2.8.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: block testing migration of a known security hole Tags: patch numexpr 2.8.5 introduced a security check, which was initially buggy enough to break pyfai and pandas (#1049326). Fixes for this were sent upstream, but only

Bug#1031414: clinfo breaks libgpuarray autopkgtest on i386: numerical deltas

2023-02-16 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reassign -1 src:pocl,src:libgpuarray Control: found -1 pocl/3.1-3 Control: found -1 libgpuarray/0.7.6-13 Control: retitle -1 libgpuarray: i386 test fail with new pocl The trigger is probably pocl, not clinfo. I don't yet know whether the bug is in pocl or libgpuarray.

Bug#1031414: clinfo breaks libgpuarray autopkgtest on i386: numerical deltas

2023-02-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Possibly useful here: gdb disassemble works inside pocl kernels, see #920497 for an example.

Bug#1031701: python3-pandas: Pandas requires version '2.0.1' or newer of 'xlrd'

2023-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Is the file you're trying to open .xlsx or .xls? Do you have python3-openpyxl installed? If .xlsx and no, try installing it. (python3-)xlrd 2.0+ can only open .xls files, not .xlsx. Hence, pandas 1.5+ read_excel() always uses (python3-)openpyxl for .xlsx files. python3-pandas already Recomm

Bug#1031705: pymatgen: 7th item of test_babel randomly hangs autopkgtest

2023-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pymatgen Severity: serious Control: affects -1 python3-pandas The autopkgtest sometimes times out, and when it does, the last line is io/tests/test_babel.py and 6 'pass' dots, implying that the 7th item hung. All known instances are on amd64.

Bug#1031706: optuna: test_create_new_trial randomly fails on s390x

2023-02-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-optuna Severity: serious Control: affects -1 python3-pandas test_create_new_trial (both parts) sometimes fails on s390x, failing the autopkgtest. It might make sense to remove this package on s390x, if it isn't reasonable to actually fix this.

Bug#1031701: python3-pandas: Pandas requires version '2.0.1' or newer of 'xlrd'

2023-02-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reassign -1 python3-xlrd Control: affects -1 python3-pandas Control: retitle -1 pandas can't open xls (not xlsx) files, xlrd too old Then yes, you do need xlrd. As Debian is currently in freeze, I suggest installing it from PyPI (warning, this doesn't automatically install security up

Bug#1031701: python3-pandas: Pandas requires version '2.0.1' or newer of 'xlrd'

2023-02-26 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I don't consider the lack of .xls in pandas worth a freeze exception, but consider it reasonable for others to disagree with that. As noted in the bug, there are some (possibly not-technically-valid) .xlsx files that xlrd 1 can open but openpyxl can't - _pandas_ won't be able to open those eit

Bug#1026539: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-03-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I agree that switching to Aesara is probably the only reasonable option other than removal. (I'd given up on trying to fix 1.0, and was intending to let removal happen.) However, it's a much bigger change than is normally allowed in bookworm at this point. (1.1 includes multiple breaking cha

Bug#1026539: Bug#1027215: Bug#1026539: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-03-02 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 02/03/2023 10:38, Andreas Tille wrote: I admit I do not see any good reason to stick to the old version if we decided before that keras/deepnano are no real blockers to even drop theano. Thus I was considering it more promising to spent my time on the latest version. 1.1.2 isn't the latest

Bug#1027215: Bug#1026539: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-03-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 03/03/2023 06:00, Andreas Tille wrote: Ahh, so aesara is not really a "fork" but a "rename"? The original is abandoned (no new development since 2017, and now mostly unmaintained, which is probably why it has this kind of bug). Aesara is a continuation by a new upstream (possibly one that

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-16 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I pushed this fix to Salsa as the 'fix1049326' branch - it isn't enough to fix pandas by itself, but is plausibly an improvement.

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Given that this is a security feature and we hence want it in quickly, I'd consider that patch enough to xfail/disable the remaining issues in pandas, but discussions with upstream are ongoing. (It also won't do anything about the pytables breakage, known upstream as #1044.)

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
stringToExpression() in this numexpr patch needs a default of True for sanitize (like the others already have), because pytables calls that directly: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pandas/-/jobs/4571451/raw (The other failure in there is one I plan to fix.) The two pytables tests with

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On further thought, both of those probably should be fixed in numexpr - I have pushed them to fix1049326. With those changes to numexpr, the new pandas (1.5.3+dfsg-5) should build; pytables will still also need its upstream fix.

Bug#1033907: numba crashes on non-x86

2023-08-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
numba also crashes on mips64el, mipsel and armhf (and s390x but that was already known; not amd64, i386 or ppc64el). However, I agree that arm64 is a good place to start trying to fix this, given how common it is. For examples, see the pandas 2.0.3+dfsg-3 / 1.5.3+dfsg-5 build logs. Given the

Bug#1045316: snakemake: clean broken

2023-08-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending Fixed in Salsa, but please do NOT upload that version as-is (it FTBFS for an unrelated reason).

Bug#1050144: emperor: FTBFS with pandas 2.0

2023-08-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:emperor Version: 1.0.3+ds-7 Control: block 1043240 by -1 emperor fails to build with pandas 2.0, currently in experimental. Build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/682917876/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.emperor_1.0.3+ds-7_BUILDING.txt.gz A common source of failures is that pandas

Bug#1031414: not fixed Re: libgpuarray: i386 test fail with new pocl

2023-08-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity -1 serious That wasn't a fix - log with pocl 4: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/libg/libgpuarray/37023715/log.gz

Bug#1050619: nbclient: unreproducible output - iopub.* timestamps

2023-08-27 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-nbclient Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps By default, nbclient includes timestamps in its output, which makes packages built with it (e.g. python-pandas-doc) unreproducible. It provides a rec

Bug#1050693: sphinx: unreproducible output if the same function has two entries in the table of contents

2023-08-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-sphinx Version: 5.3.0-7 Severity: wishlist User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering When the same function has two entries in the table of contents, that function's documentation page may be generated with the table of contents open to either of

Bug#1055801: pandas: test failures with Python 3.12

2023-11-11 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pandas Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-6 Tags: fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.12 Control: block -1 by 1043240 Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/53665 (actually found independently) pandas 1.5 FTBFS w

Bug#1053672: Apple copyright notices in test .xlsx files

2023-10-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Source: openpyxl Version: 3.0.9-2 Severity: serious licensecheck -r --copyright . on openpyxl finds these: ./openpyxl/formatting/tests/data/conditional-formatting.xlsx: UNKNOWN [Copyright: 2007 Apple Inc.] ./openpyxl/reader/tests/data/complex-styles.xlsx: UNKNOWN [Copyright: 2007 Apple Inc.]

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1 pandas 2.1 is now in experimental. In addition to the above, it breaks these packages: astropy dask patsy pymatgen python-cooler python-geopandas q2-demux q2-taxa q2-types seaborn tqdm and maybe python-hypothesis. (python-pauvre and sunpy are

Bug#1053939: pymatgen: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:pymatgen Version: 2023.06.23+dfsg1-2 Control: block 1043240 by -1 pymatgen fails its tests with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Logs: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/p/pymatgen/38997822/log.gz https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/pandas

Bug#1053940: python-cooler: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:python-cooler Version: 0.9.1-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 python-cooler fails its autopkgtest with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/p/python-cooler/38997833/log.gz A common source of failures is new pandas FutureW

Bug#1053941: python-geopandas: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:python-geopandas Version: 0.14.0-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 python-geopandas fails its autopkgtest with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/p/python-geopandas/38997837/log.gz A common source of failures is new pand

Bug#1053942: q2-demux: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:q2-demux Version: 2023.7.0+dfsg-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 q2-demux fails its autopkgtest with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/q/q2-demux/38997862/log.gz A common source of failures is new pandas FutureWarnings i

Bug#1053943: q2-taxa: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:q2-taxa Version: 2023.7.0+dfsg-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 q2-taxa fails its autopkgtest with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/q/q2-taxa/38997868/log.gz A common source of failures is new pandas FutureWarnings in t

Bug#1053944: q2-types: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:q2-types Version: 2023.7.0-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 q2-types fails its autopkgtest with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/q/q2-types/38997869/log.gz A common source of failures is new pandas FutureWarnings in tes

Bug#1053945: seaborn: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:seaborn Version: 0.12.2-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 seaborn fails its tests with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Logs: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/s/seaborn/38997875/log.gz https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/pandas2p1/+build/267

Bug#1053946: tqdm: FTBFS with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:tqdm Version: 4.64.1-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 tqdm fails to build with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/pandas2p1/+build/26770822/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.tqdm_4.64.1-1_BUILDING.txt.gz A common source

Bug#1053947: dask: test failure with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:dask Version: 2023.8.0+dfsg-2 Control: block 1043240 by -1 dask fails its autopkgtest with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/d/dask/38997774/log.gz A common source of failures is new pandas FutureWarnings in tests that

Bug#1053948: patsy: FTBFS with pandas 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: src:patsy Version: 0.5.3-1 Control: block 1043240 by -1 patsy fails to build with pandas 2.1, currently in experimental. Log: https://launchpad.net/~rebecca-palmer/+archive/ubuntu/pandas2p1/+build/26770725/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.patsy_0.5.3-1_BUILDING.txt.gz A common sourc

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2023-10-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
astropy isn't actually a regression (i.e. it's probably _a_ bug, but unrelated to pandas 2.x), and python-hypothesis appears to be fixed (by upstream, in 6.83.1). I have filed individual bugs for the others.

Bug#1053984: xlsxwriter: too old for pandas 2.1

2023-10-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-xlsxwriter Version: 3.0.2-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: fixed-upstream Upstream pandas 2.1 will only use xlsxwriter >= 3.0.3. Nothing obviously breaks if I override this to accept Debian's 3.0.2, but it might be better to actually update xlsxwriter.

Bug#1027215: Proposed RM: theano, keras, deepnano -- broken by numpy 1.24, theano mostly abandoned upstream

2023-07-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 1026539 theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork is not abandoned, but includes interface changes including the import name, so would break reverse dependencies not specifically altered for it.) It is currently broken (FTBFS due to multiple te

Bug#1041803: hyperspy: FTBFS test_image fails

2023-07-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: hyperspy Version: 1.7.3-1 Severity: serious hyperspy currently FTBFS with several failing tests: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/678551154/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-amd64.hyperspy_1.7.3-1_BUILDING.txt.gz

Bug#1041805: RM: beignet -- RoM; FTBFS with LLVM > 9, mostly replaced by intel-opencl-icd

2023-07-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: ftp.debian.org beignet FTBFS with LLVM > 9 (#974792), and hence cannot be built in current unstable. (The existing package probably still works, because beignet statically links LLVM to avoid #852746, but unbuildable packages are unreleasable by policy.) beignet is abandoned upstre

Bug#1041805: Acknowledgement (RM: beignet -- RoM; FTBFS with LLVM > 9, mostly replaced by intel-opencl-icd)

2023-07-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
sorry, discussion on pkg-opencl-devel / debian-devel around 19 June, not actually in #974792

Bug#1042043: pandas: FTBFS: failed tests

2023-07-25 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch This is probably caused by the new fsspec version, and is also seen in autopkgtest: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/pandas/36146393/log.gz Upstream fix: https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/commit/ce9e3d658d6efa3600a4563ca7a00e7a15b8

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-numexpr Version: 2.8.5-1 Severity: serious Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/54449 (actually they found it first) I only have actual logs for 2.0.x, but I suspect 1.5.x is also affected. As a short term fix, it may be possible to disable pandas' n

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/54546 Control: affects -1 python3-pandas There's actually *two* bugs here: an exception in eval/query, https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/54449, and a changed result with integer overflow, https://github.com/pandas-dev/p

Bug#1049326: pandas FTBFS with numexpr 2.8.5

2023-08-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Numexpr upstream have what they think is a fix for the exception issue (though not the overflow change), but it hasn't been tested yet: https://github.com/pydata/numexpr/issues/442

Bug#974792: Proposed RM: beignet -- RoM; FTBFS with LLVM > 9, replaced by intel-opencl-icd

2023-06-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
beignet FTBFS with LLVM > 9 (#974792). beignet uses libllvm/libclang heavily enough that it usually has this kind of bug on a new LLVM release, but this time my attempts to fix it failed (see the Salsa CI logs). It is abandoned upstream and mostly replaced by intel-opencl-icd. (This is not a

Bug#974792: Proposed RM: beignet -- RoM; FTBFS with LLVM > 9, replaced by intel-opencl-icd

2023-06-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Additional information: As a rough estimate of how much speed this would cost on older hardware, I previously measured beignet as 8-16x faster than pocl (but this will obviously depend on hardware and application). However, beignet (on hardware that can't use intel-opencl-icd) is limited to s

Bug#1066801: pandas: FTBFS: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dateutil/zoneinfo/__init__.py:26: UserWarning: I/O error(2): No such file or directory

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 pandas: test-failing warning with new xarray This is a warning being treated as an error, but the one in test_to_xarray (probably due to the new version of xarray), not the zoneinfo one. This is a FutureWarning, so it should be OK to *use* the current pandas with the new x

Bug#1063959: pandas and pytest 8

2024-03-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 pending Control: tags 1066801 pending Control: tags 1064384 pending Sorry, that wasn't actually a fix, but what's now in Salsa should be.

Bug#1079789: statsmodels: tests fail on arm64 with scipy 1.14

2024-09-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending This has happened before (see #968210), with the same 'fix'. Test skip in Salsa, but please do not upload it right now as it has not yet been tested.

Bug#1060374: RM: libgpuarray - RoM; abandoned upstream, RC-buggy

2024-01-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: ftp.debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove libgpuarray has been de facto abandoned upstream since 2018, and is unused in Debian since theano was removed (#1042574). It currently has what may or may not be a wrong-answer bug (#1031414), and two broken-by-

Bug#1044057: python-ulmo: test failure with pandas 2.0

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
These tests are now skipped in Debian (for unrelated reasons), so this bug is no longer caught by the autopkgtest, but probably does still exist.

Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity 1053943 1053939 1053942 1044053 1044056 serious Control: severity 1044074 1053946 1044078 1044079 1044077 serious Control: severity 1044071 1044067 1044068 1044055 1044060 serious Control: severity 1044072 1044073 1044064 1053945 1044054 serious Control: severity 1044076 1053940

Bug#918206: Pandas new version

2019-02-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch The test failure is that np.array @ pd.DataFrame (matrix product) tries to keep both the DataFrame's indices, which fails because the new matrix is a different shape. This appears to be fixed in 0.24.1 from PyPI, but as previously noted, this is a new ma

Bug#921459: dead upstream - keep out of testing

2019-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: freefem3d Severity: serious This package is dead upstream, and it has been suggested [0] that because of this, it should not be fixed for buster. I don't know enough about it to have an opinion on this: I am opening this bug as a "don't waste your time fixing it" notice. If this re

Bug#921460: dead upstream - keep out of testing

2019-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: clsparse Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, ghisv...@gmail.com (plus an identical one for freefem3d) This package is dead upstream, and it has been suggested [0] that because of this, it should not be fixed for buster. I don't know enough about it to have

Bug#892288: arrayfire test crash

2019-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch These look like the upstream fixes, though I haven't actually tried them yet. for index: https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire/commit/58ac59497b50257631713e689a6b0ddffb73361a for assign: https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire/commit/1b18226dfec811e4b7b

Bug#892288: arrayfire test crash

2019-02-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On i386 with the above patches (plus the gcc8 build fix from the other bug), all tests pass in the build but Test_gfor_cpu fails in the autopkgtest; I don't yet know why.

Bug#921611: clblas: crashes (not just fails) on compile failure

2019-02-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: clblas Version: 2.12-1 Control: tags -1 patch (Split from #881054: cloning a merged bug is not allowed, and both original reports better match the other part.) After a compile failure (e.g. due to #881054), clblas crashes trying to dereference a NULL pointer. Fix: diff --git a/src

Bug#877316: clblas: Crashes on single-precision-only hardware, due to double-precision literals

2019-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
with what looks like https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS/issues/338. Description: Don't use double literals in single precision functions Allows it to work on single-precision-only hardware/ICDs e.g. beignet Author: Rebecca N. Palmer Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/877316 Forwar

Bug#921890: clblas: error: variables in the local address space can only be declared in the outermost scope of a kernel function

2019-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
uthor: Rebecca N. Palmer Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/ Forwarded: no --- clblas-2.12.orig/src/library/blas/gens/clTemplates/trmv.cl +++ clblas-2.12/src/library/blas/gens/clTemplates/trmv.cl @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ __kernel void %PREFIXtrmv_CU_kernel( __g __local %TYPE sXData[ TARGET_WIDTH ]; //

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >