On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:14:08AM +0100, Ingo Saitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: python2.3-libxml2
> Version: 2.6.16-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I installed python2.3-libxml2 as a dependency pa
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: nvu
> Version : 0.90
> Upstream Author : Linspire, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : htt
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:26:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:28:56AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2005-07-17 11:10:40 +0300, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2005-07-17 Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's not entirely clear, are you saying that you only have these
> > > problems with mozilla-t
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 02:12:26PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2005-07-17 12:09:46 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > If i got it correctly, this bug got introduced because of the changes to
> > the security model for XUL applications... so, for
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:51:44PM +0200, Patrick Cornelißen <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just checked the original sun plugin from the 1.5 jre. It doesn't
> complain about anything, but refuses to work too (silently).
I guess it is due to the ABI change with gcc4. Until the JVM gets
c
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:22:49PM +, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 07/18/2005 12:33:22 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> >It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> >Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> Here
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:15:49PM +, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 07/18/2005 02:14:37 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:22:49PM +, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >>
>
> >
> >It w
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:07:25PM +, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>(...)
Could you try again the two xmlcatalog commands trying with the -v
option ? it might give a little help.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> as you migt have guessed, I rely on the ieee802.11 as well ;-)
> How far are you, do you need any help?
>
> Regarding your comment about the header files, why no make a -dev package and
> install t
s network entity when --nonet is
specified)
To: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:38:57 +
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 07/22/2005 12:56:05 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:34:15PM +, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECT
tag 319336 upstream
forwarded 319336 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293307
close 319336 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
Tagging accordingly,
Cheers,
Mike
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:40:09PM +0400, Serge Belyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This bug is known, and was fixed by upst
severity 301479 normal
forwarded 301479 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246313
merge 301479 259215
Downgrading to normal, this is workaroundable and doesn't occur for
everybody at anytime.
See upstream bug for a workaround.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 01:39:23AM +0800, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Tags: upstream
> Severity: normal
>
> I comment this out
>
>
>
> but it is still acted upon. Maybe it is some kind of convention.
This
merge 302586 300685
thanks
Please avoid filing dupes.
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:19:54PM +0100, Mark Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When upgrading Firefox with apt-get there are typos in the output:
>
> --
> Setting up mozilla-firefox (1.0.2-1) ...
> Updating mozilla-firefox chrom
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:26:33AM +0200, Mike Bursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'd be surprised if it were firefox, too, but I don't see any other
> applications exhibiting similar behaviour, which confuses me. Maybe
> there's a process that firefox has dependencies on which has problems -
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:11:12PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-tabextensions
> Version: 1.13.2005022401-1
> Severity: important
>
> The new version (1.14.2005032801-1) render tabextensions unusable as
> several error messages will be displayed below the statu
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:31:35AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> Am Sa den 2. Apr 2005 um 10:27 schriebst Du:
> > Is your mozilla in german, though ?
>
> Yes, the menues are in german. But no locales are set:
> #! /usr/bin/perl
>
> for (keys %ENV)
> {
>delete $E
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:20:16PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Sa den 2. Apr 2005 um 11:40 schriebst Du:
> > I can't reproduce your bug after switching mozilla in german...
>
> Mad. But maybe there is another reason than the locales.
What other extensions do
tag 302529 unreproducible
thanks
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:41:15PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am Sa den 2. Apr 2005 um 12:32 schriebst Du:
> > What other extensions do you have installed ?
>
> ikki:/etc/apt# COLUMNS=100 dpkg -l *mozilla*| grep ^ii
> ii mozilla-browser
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:16:41PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am Sa den 2. Apr 2005 um 13:42 schriebst Du:
> > With the same set of extensions, I really can't reproduce your bugs.
>
> Hmm... I have two more localy installed in .mozilla:
> - mozex
> - flashblock
>
> Removin
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:28:19PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now I just remove the whole chrome directory and reinstalled the mozex
> and flashblock plugin in the newest version. Now it works.
>
> Maybe realy reassign the bug to mozilla. It is fixed now on my side
tag 302730 confirmed
thanks
That's one I've experienced, it's pretty annoying, as i failed to find
what triggers it... :-/
Mike
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:03:46AM -0600, autarch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: mozilla-tabextensions
> Version: 1.14.2005032801-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:45:04PM +0200, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see:
> checking for X... (cached) libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers
> /usr/X11R6/include
>
> and it builds for me... can you test lirc_0.7.1pre2-6?
>
You won't get any answer to a bug in lirc if you ask in a closed b
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:43:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> E> Can you give me a page to test this on?
>
> >> $ firefox file:///usr/share/doc/mozilla-firefox #to test
>
> and just ALT-VCMA and pick a coding and start hitting Ctrl-minus.
>
> Or try http://jidanni.org/ bu
reopen #247085
thanks
Points 1 and 3 from original bug report still apply, though point 2 has
been fixed.
Cheers
Mike
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:18:15PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #247085: some la
tag 318083 wontfix
thanks
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Subject: libxml2-utils: Add history to xmllint --shell.
> Package: libxml2-utils
> Version: 2.6.16-7
> Severity: wishlist
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> Wou
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:58:32PM +0300, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xlibs
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading xlibs the backslash no longer works on
> my Toshiba Dynabook with a japanese keyboard. This makes
> coding really
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ieee80211-source
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : James P. Ketrenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ieee80211.sf.net/
* License : GPL v2
Description
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-ctxextensions
> Version: 3.1.2005012901-1
> Severity: normal
>
> I mutch like the funktion of using my own stylesheets for several sites
> to fix there cracy view of usability by, for example doin
Package: netpbm
Version: 2:10.0-8
Severity: wishlist
As noted in HISTORY file from netpbm upstream :
00.07.01 BJH Release 9.5
(...)
Translate pstopnm from Csh to C, eliminate dependency
on the 'bc' program.
Therefore, you can remove dependency on bc in d
Package: libeel2-data
Version: 2.8.2-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Attached is a fix to po/ja.po.
This string shows up in Nautilus when filesystem contains some
non-UTF8 filenames.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archite
Could you give a try to version 1.0.7 of ipw2200 ?
Cheers
Mike
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:57:31PM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: ipw2200-source
> Version: 1.0.6-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> ipw2200-source 1.0.6-6 fails to build with linux 2.6.14-rc1:
>
> make[4]
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:33:25PM -0400, Marco Presi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> || On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:17:38 +0200
> || Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mh> /lib/firmware is listed as the first location in the
> README.firmware.
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:29:09AM +0200, Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -/etc/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefoxrc or ~/.mozilla-firefoxrc and set
> +/etc/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefoxrc or ~/.mozilla-firefox/rc and set
Actually it's ~/.mozilla/firefox/rc
Thanks
Mike
--
To UNSU
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:52:47AM +0200, Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.6-5
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Before, I could use the middle mouse button to paste stuff into
> webforms. That is _very_ useful when entering information into
> web-based
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: important
Building the following code:
#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
#include
#pragma GCC visibility pop
__attribute__ ((visibility ("default"))) void Func() {
char c[100];
memset(c, 0, sizeof(
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:19:28PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.6
> Severity: important
>
> I have a standards compliant XHTML 1.0 transitional page which has an
> empty script element which looks like this:
>
>
>
> firefox proc
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:08:53PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Previously Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Are you accessing the file from you local hard drive (file:...) or from
> > a web server ?
>
> Both.
>
> > In the latter case, first che
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reopen 325535
> thanks
>
> Sorry, the arm build of mozilla-firefox still fails, because the patch
> for arm is on drugs:
>
> +static nsresult PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodIndex,
> PRUi
tag 327216 wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:52:12PM +0200, Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-2
> Severity: normal
>
> There's a lack of update-mozilla-firefox-chrome, which means that
> extension packages don't get properly
On which arch did you test that ?
Mike
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 01:07:00AM +0100, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just had a quick look at this.
>
> This is reproducible for me (note the changing result):
>
> $ dchroot
> Executing shell in 'unstable' chroot.
> $ xsltproc /html/docbook
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:49:41AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version: 1.1.15-1
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:32:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FYI, the package rekall also fails to build on several architectur
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On which arch did you test that ?
>
> x86.
O_o I always get 4 and don't see how it could be otherwise reading the
code...
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:28:36PM +0100, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:08:04AM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> >
> > as we don't seem to have the problem, I suggest you try to build the
> > source package on
> > http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libx/
tag 327828 unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:15:05PM +0200, Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1-2 Severity: minor
>
> Firefox does not appear to have any icon displayed as the "program
> icon" (not sure what the correct term is
tag 327828 - unreproducible
tag 327828 confirmed
thanks
Okay, I finally got what you meant... and can see the problem...
strangely, the file needed for the icon to correctly show up is not
provided by a make install anymore... It might be related to all the
branding stuff they are putting. I'll ch
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:00:16AM -0400, Eloy Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > Okay, I finally got what you meant... and can see the problem...
> > strangely, the file needed for the icon to correctly show up is not
> > provided by a make install anymore... It mig
forwarded 328238 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249579
thanks
Could you try to build with one of the tricks given on the upstream bug
report ? We will add the corresponding workaround in debian/rules
Cheers
Mike
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL
found 328238 1.0.4-2
severity 328238 important
thanks
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:53:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: mozilla-firefox
> > V
Package: ext2resize
Version: 1.1.19-3
Severity: normal
Running ext2resize displays the following:
ext2resize v1.1.18 - 2001/03/18 for EXT2FS 0.5b
while installed version is obviously 1.1.19.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unsta
reassign 323757 linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
thanks
This is a bug in linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 10:36:09AM +0200, Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: ieee80211-source
> Version: 1.0.3-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to build ieee80211-source w
tag 324131 wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-ctxextensions
> Version: 4.0.2005071301-2
> Severity: normal
>
> The extension does not work anymore with mozilla.
>
> Seems the links for mozilla is forgotten.
Upstre
reassign 328226 ipw2100-source
thanks
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reassign 328226 ieee80211-source
> thanks
>
> From a discussion with upstream I was told that ieee80211 ought to remove
> header files from the kernel. Of course this is no
tag 328226 patch
thanks
The attached patch does the trick.
Cheers
Mike
diff -ruN ipw2100-1.1.2/Makefile ipw2100-1.1.2.new/Makefile
--- ipw2100-1.1.2/Makefile 2005-09-20 21:10:53.189138384 +0200
+++ ipw2100-1.1.2.new/Makefile 2005-09-20 21:10:19.977187368 +0200
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
else
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:11:55PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tag 328226 patch
> thanks
>
> The attached patch does the trick.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mike
Replacing "gcc" by "$(CC)" does even a better work.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSC
severity 329389 normal
merge 329389 326870
thanks
Downgrading severity because it's barely a corner case. It builds with a
vanilla kernel... but suspend2 breaks it.
Mike
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:28:26PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: ipw2200-source
> Version:
forwarded 329642 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301936
thanks
mmm seems tricky... I'll take a look.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:13:46PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
> Severity: important
> Tags:
close 329618 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
thanks
On the other hand, it doesn't happen any more with 1.5beta1.
Mike
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:27:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> severity 329618 important
> tags 329618 confirmed
> thanks
>
> * Marko Mäkelä ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wro
forwarded 330015 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301936
severity 329642 serious
merge 329642 330015
tag 330015 - experimental
close 330015 1.0.4-1
found 330015 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1
thanks
Please avoid filing duplicates.
Thanks
Mike
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 02:10:49AM -0700, Don Ar
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-9
Severity: important
This is upstream bug #20297
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20297)
and got triggered while building mozilla-firefox 1.5beta1 on powerpc
(see bug #330015). While a workaround is possible (use
-fvisibility=hidden instead of the syst
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:02:18AM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: ipw2200
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Debian does not have 2.6.13 yet, so this is only a heads-up. It looks
> like somebody merged an old version of the ieee80211 Subsystem to
> kernel 2.6.13, and thus building i
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:02:33PM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:30:04AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:02:18AM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:22:31AM +0200, Thomas Quas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox-gnome-support
> Version: 1.0.6-3
> Severity: normal
>
> I grab the little icon in Firefox' URL field and drag it
> to the desktop. I drop it, and after choosing to store the link,
> the new
severity 326082 wishlist
merge 326082 325523
thanks
This can't be grave, the 2.6.13 kernel is not even in sid. And please
avoid filing dupes, thanks.
Mike
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: ipw2200-source
> Version: 1.0.6-2
> Seve
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:28:26AM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> found #325523 1.0.6-3
> thanks
>
> 1.0.6-3 still fails to build with kernel 2.6.13. Same Problem.
Shit. What's the easy method to reproduce ? untar the vanilla kernel in
/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.13, and go for a ma
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:18:34AM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> found #325525 1.0.3-3
> thanks
>
> I have to NACK that one as well, doesn't build with 2.6.13. Typescript
> attached.
Did you uncompress the new ieee80211-source.tar.gz file ? because
/usr/src/modules doesn't get up
severity 326803 important
thanks
Downgrading severity because package still works with gcc in sid.
What is your compiler ?
Mike
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:50:44PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: ipw2200-source
> Version: 1.0.6-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:48:14AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for looking at this. Since Firefox 1.5 is right around the
> corner and will presumably have these fixes, I don't know if there's
> any applying it at this point.
Moreover, they might already been fixed in
fixed 266755 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:41:03PM +0200, Andrzej Mendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It's been already fixed upstream and ethe package in experimental no
> longer has this bug.
Thanks for the hint
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
tag 326938 unreproducible
thanks
Works for me...
Mike
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:15:17PM -0400, John V. Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: ipw2200-source
> Version: 1.0.6-4
> Severity: normal
>
> DHCP fails when using the ipw2200 driver. Using static network settings
> works fine,
close 319184 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:06:24AM +0200, Andrzej Mendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> tags 319183 fixed-in-experimental
>
> Fixed in Deerpark 2 alpha release.
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
reopen 319184 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
oops.
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:35:37AM +0200, Sergio Talens-Oliag <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tag 319184 - fixed
> thanks
>
> I'll upload a package fixing this and other bugs soon, but the message that
> tagged the bug was for another bug # (I be
close 298810 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:15:04PM +0200, Andrzej Mendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As in topic, Deerpark 2 doesn't have this bug. Scrolling just VOMs
> on example page.
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
close 279557 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Andrzej Mendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> same as #298810 - fixed in experimental
>
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
close 269033 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:00:40PM +0200, Andrzej Mendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> text:
> "1) There's only one place in new preferences dialog - language
> selection
> with more than 5 languages selected (very unlikely) - where scrolling is
> neede
I'm unable to find a page with a working scrolling, I'm beginning to
think upstream just disabled the functionality in deer park...
Could someone check that i'm not crazy ? (deer park is available in
experimental)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:27:51AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libxml2-python2.3
> Version: 2.6.20-1
> Priority: wishlist
>
> This dummy package is present in sarge, etch and sid.
> As this is a dummy transition-only package (for woody?), is there
Package: libunderware
Severity: wishlist
The subject says it all. libxml2-python2.3 is a dummy package for smooth
upgrade path, it shouldn't be used for dependencies any more (and will
be removed shortly).
Cheers,
Mike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unsta
Package: python2.3-poker-network
Severity: wishlist
The subject says it all. libxml2-python2.3 is a dummy package for smooth
upgrade path, it shouldn't be used for dependencies any more (and will
be removed shortly).
Cheers,
Mike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT pr
Package: gnome-doc-utils
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: wishlist
The subject says it all. libxml2-python2.3 is a dummy package for smooth
upgrade path, it shouldn't be used for dependencies any more (and will
be removed shortly).
Cheers,
Mike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Package: rubrica
Severity: wishlist
The subject says it all. libxslt1-python2.3 is a dummy package for smooth
upgrade path, it shouldn't be used for dependencies any more (and will
be removed shortly).
Cheers,
Mike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:28:23PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> tags 322521 wontfix
> thanks
>
> * Hidetaka Iwai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Package: mozilla-firefox
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I maintain the debian package of kazehakase(gecko based web browser)
> > and
severity 322680 critical
severity 322765 critical
merge 322680 322765
reassign 322680 linux-header-2.6.12-1-686
thanks
Raised severity to critical because breaking other packages.
This is a bug in linux-header-2.6.12-1-686 not providing the genksyms
script, reassigning.
Mike
PS: please avoid fi
tag 313535 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Fabrice Jammes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: ipw2200-source
> Version: 1.0.4-1
> Severity: normal
>
> modprobe ipw2200 fails with message :
> WARNING: Error inserting ieee80211
> (/lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/drivers/
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:31:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:15:54AM -0500, Zachary C. Miller <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: ipw2200-source
> > Version: 1.0.3-1
> > Severity: important
> >
>
tag 322332 unreproducible
thanks
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do:
>
> module-assistant a-i ieee80211-source
> module-assistant a-i ipw220-source
>
> then I copy firmware from ipw2200.sf.net (version for drivers 1.0.4 and
>
close 321876 1.0.3-2
thanks
This has been fixed in upload of 1.0.3-2.
Mike
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 04:46:13PM +0200, Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: ieee80211-source
> Version: 1.0.3-1
> Severity: minor
>
> The README.Debian file says:
>
> ieee80211 for Debian
> ---
close 321976 1.0.3-2
found 321876 1.0.3-2
thanks
Sorry, i'm _really_ stupid.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:45:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> close 321876 1.0.3-2
> thanks
>
> This has been fixed in upload of 1.0.3-2.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mo
reassign 130557 zlib1g
thanks
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:32:00PM +, Thomas Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: libxml2
> Version: 2.4.13-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When xmlParseFile hits end-of-file, it keeps trying to read. Only after read()
> has failed multiple times does it actua
close 304759 1.0.6-1
thanks
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:08:45PM -0500, Zachary C. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, this bug was resolved by using the latest version of the
> software. Thank you!
Then, closing the bug.
Thank you
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, May 1
forwarded 313631 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228557
close 313631 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1
thanks
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 11:21:48PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> retitle 313631 mozilla-firefox: crash when flashblock is installed due to
> Gecko reflow bug
>
tag 269975 fixed-upstream
thanks
This is supposedly fixed upstream, and should be okay in Firefox 1.5.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.10-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
As said in the subject, the update-mozilla-chrome script does set a bad
LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and should export it, so that it is not useless with
ldconfig and other commands.
(I think calling ldconfig is useless, by the way, th
close 312659 1.0.6-1
close 319953 1.0.6-1
thanks
These bugs have been solved with upload of version 1.0.6 of ipw2200,
which, in turn, was only awaiting the ieee80211 package the go through
the NEW queue.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
I used to check my maintained packages by my gpg key reference, since I
have packages registered with different mail addresses, and got
"No information available for 54FD2A58".
I went back to my DD login one
(http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=glandi
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 08:17:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > With the fixed xulrunner packages I successfully compiled
> > > epiphany-browser and with the few website
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:53:15AM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061204 13:00]:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:50:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:45:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> BTW, these packages currently still contain /usr/lib/iceape/chrome in
> unstable:
> usr/lib/iceape/chrome web/iceape-browser
> usr/lib/iceape/chrome/checky
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:37:42AM +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > That won't be enough to be sure of the upgrade path.
>
> Of course - but I think that are still bugs?
Yes, they are. I'm fixing checky right now.
> > Moreover, iceape
> > itself generates files in usr/lib/ice
101 - 200 of 4749 matches
Mail list logo
