Bug#733971: nginx-full: please provide XML entities

2014-01-03 Thread Michael Lustfield
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:10:34AM +0200, Christos Trochalakis wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:38:51PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > >I recently discovered that the XSLT module does not work very well > > >because of a missing list of entities. So I went to the W3C and then > > >generated

Bug#733971: nginx-full: please provide XML entities

2014-01-03 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Toni Mueller wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:42:17AM -0600, Michael Lustfield wrote: > > It definitely won't be part of nginx-full. It will either be part of > > Why? I am only aware of its usefulness in conjunction with the XSLT >

Bug#733971: nginx-full: please provide XML entities

2014-01-03 Thread Michael Lustfield
> > > > http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_xslt_module.html#xml_entities > > > > > I'm not familiar with this module. What are the chances that admins will > > want to change this file? Will the defaults suffice for anyone/everyone > > (the 99.99%)? > > My estimate is that at least everyone who

Bug#578029: Already Running?

2010-11-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
The message "[emerg]: bind() to [::]:80 failed (98: Address already in use)" happens when you try to start Nginx and it is already running. Would this happen to be the case? Could you please check that it is not running with ps? Thanks, Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#593580: I'll look into this

2010-11-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
owner 593580 mtecknol...@debian.org stop I'll look into adding either this script or one similar. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#605529: nginx: Default worker_connections too high for default system

2010-11-30 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: nginx Severity: minor For Debian systems, the default file descriptor limit is 1024. The default configuration has worker_connections 1024. These worker connections use up a file descriptor for each connection. Because file descriptors are also used for stdin, stderr, stdout, and log fil

Bug#644732: Sorry!

2014-02-17 Thread Michael Lustfield
2.5yr and I finally realize there's a bug here. That's entirely because I changed my email before this bug was filed. I'm sorry about that and I'll try to get this fixed. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#724756: grub-pc: Latest version of grub produces a core.img that is too large to install.

2013-12-10 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:45:41PM -0600, Michael Lustfield wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Colin Watson > wrote: > > > Note that systems that were installed with modern versions of the > Debian > &g

Bug#728015: [nginx] Don't use type=forking in systemd service file

2013-10-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
> =-+-= > nginx-common (= 1.4.3-2) | 1.4.3-2 > libc6 (>= 2.10) | 2.17-93 > libpcre3 (>= 8.10) | 1:8.31-2 > libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.1) | 1.0.1e-3 > zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 > > > Package's Recommends field is empty.

Bug#728038: Yessir!

2013-10-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
Yes, sir! Right away sir! Thanks for the bug report. This has been committed. :) -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#728103: initscript: show a proper message when test_nginx_config fails

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for the patch! I'll review and test it tonight, but it looks great. On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Pim van den Berg < pim.van.den.b...@mendix.com> wrote: > Package: nginx-common > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Attached is a patch to make the init script show a fail message when > t

Bug#701112: Delay...

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
This one sure slipped under the cracks for me. So... check if it's root:root 755; if so, change to www-data:adm 750 Would that sufficiently deal with this? -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#707069: Vote for no

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
also don't see any point to it. If you write your website decent to begin with, then this module provides nothing. This is essentially a band-aid for people that can't write proper code to begin with. (no offense anyone...) -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#722328: Hm..

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
ore interest or cause before tacking on three more modules (rds, form, postgres) to our list of modules to manage. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#701508: What else?

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
d and committed. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#697940: Closing

2013-10-29 Thread Michael Lustfield
I wasn't aware of forwarded or tags. Shows my experience level... Sorry for prematurely closing this and thanks for giving me new stuff to learn. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > reopen 697940 > forwarded 697940 http://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/13 > tags 697940 = secu

Bug#718639: Seems Odd

2013-10-29 Thread Michael Lustfield
This seems like a rather odd issue. I'd like to find the best solution possible. Could you please provide 'aptitude search nginx' output. Also, could you please try swapping the order those directives appear. It seems that both SCRIPT_FILENAME parameters are being passed and the first one use. That

Bug#730053: libnss-ldapd causes long login times because of recursive group lookups

2013-11-20 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: libnss-ldapd Version: 0.8.10-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have some servers that have users that log in that are members of many groups in an LDAP directory. When I watch debug output from nscd I see that the user is looked up, then the members of each group the user is a mem

Bug#730142: nginx: please provide a stronger ssl setup

2013-11-21 Thread Michael Lustfield
I definitely agree that it needs to be stronger. We'll look into this to figure out what would likely be best. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Toni Mueller wrote: > Package: nginx > Version: 1.2.1-2.2+wheezy1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > >

Bug#701508: Done

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
We added suggests fcgiwrap but not provides httpd-cgi. This has been fixed. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#728103: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for catching this! I'm sorry about the missing line. This has been pushed. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#728015: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
This has been corrected and pushed. It will be fixed in the next upload. Thanks for taking the time and effort for this! -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#730142: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for catching this. This has been committed and will be fixed in the next upload. In the meanwhile, I will be doing further browser testing for compatibility issues. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#718639: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
I still need more information in order to be able to understand if this is an nginx bug, a config bug, or neither. Please provide the information that was requested. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Bug#729860: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for reporting this issue. This change has been committed and will be pushed with the next upload. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#722328: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'm still waiting to see some extra level of interest. As I said, this is a rather heavy module to add and I don't want to add it for very few users. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo

Bug#701112: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
will be resolved in the next upload. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#730432: (no subject)

2013-11-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
ad. I still side with it not being needed at all. If you build a decent web app, it offers no benefits. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#737176: (no subject)

2014-06-26 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'm looking at the source package and have this line in mime.types. application/javascriptjs; It looks like you're using an Ubuntu version of the package. Could you verify that the issue is present in Debian testing? -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#707069: Not Convinced

2014-06-26 Thread Michael Lustfield
This still seems like a much larger headache than it's worth. As for point #2, gzip can do a lot to compress data, especially white space. It does have some nice features, but it seems like a large headache that I don't see going away. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#732330: (no subject)

2014-06-26 Thread Michael Lustfield
ckaging is already very easy to modify if you want to build your own flavor from it. We won't be making any changes for this. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#733971: done

2014-06-26 Thread Michael Lustfield
This has been added to the documentation and will be fixed with the next release. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#738543: (no subject)

2014-06-26 Thread Michael Lustfield
This appears to already be in nginx-extras. Are you having issues with it? -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#742652: Info received (Bug#742652: Acknowledgement (wheezy/backports nginx does not include basic_auth))

2014-03-25 Thread Michael Lustfield
oops. It happens. Thanks for following up to let us know. On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:48:35 +1100 Paul Morahan wrote: > stupid user error, sorry. config was missing a line terminator. > > - Paul > -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.deb

Bug#652108: Some news about these scripts

2012-12-19 Thread Michael Lustfield
Further Development... I plan to completely rewrite the logic in these scripts. I guess this would be the third full rewrite. I will try to get to them today or tomorrow. We discussed in the past whether this should be part of nginx-common or if there should be an nginx-utils package added for th

Bug#652108: Some news about these scripts

2012-12-20 Thread Michael Lustfield
Yup, that's true. So we'll keep it in -common! :) I still need to find the time to rework them to make them as sensible as possible. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote: > nginx-utils would only make sense in case the package would be Arch: any > while nginx-common is Arch: all

Bug#688410: (no subject)

2012-10-29 Thread Michael Lustfield
tall... I have a feeling that we'll end up doing this which should eliminate that potential issue entirely. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#657852: Been Unstable

2012-02-06 Thread Michael Lustfield
In my experience, the fancyindex module has been extremely unstable and prone to breaking. As much as I'd love to be able to use it myself, I'd like to see a lot of testing done before considering it for inclusion. -- Michael Lustfield Ubuntu Member, Nginx Developer -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#705401: Include ability to load dynamic modules

2013-04-14 Thread Michael Lustfield
tags +wontfix thanks We won't be applying any patches to make this work. Nginx will be making this available in the future. When they add that functionality, we'll make the packages work with it. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia

Bug#705401: (no subject)

2013-04-14 Thread Michael Lustfield
tags 705401 + wontfix forgot the bug number... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#697940: (no subject)

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
tags 697940 + wontfix thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#695119: (no subject)

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'm not entirely sure what we're expected to do here. I'm not able to reproduce the issue as described. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700857: IRC

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
Instead of trying to debug this config issue in a bug report thread, could you join #nginx on irc.freenode.net? We can work through your issue there and then just summarize the resolution here. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#696797: (no subject)

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'm still not able to reproduce this behavior. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#700857: [#ZIH-894-30161]: Re: Bug#700857: postinst stops nginx instead of restarting it

2013-02-18 Thread Michael Lustfield
Get rid of /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/000-default. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Martin von Wittich wrote: > Hi Steven, > > > That looks like it tried to restart, but may have failed for some > > reason. You may want to check /var/log/nginx/error.log for clues... > > The error.log.1 file says

Bug#697940: Status

2013-03-11 Thread Michael Lustfield
" * This issue will be closed when upstream closes it. We won't be doing any special patching for this bug without careful consideration. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#701112: (no subject)

2013-03-11 Thread Michael Lustfield
chmod 0750 $logdir fi This should create the log directory if it doesn't already exist. We're not enforcing this because the permissions could be changed. Is there any better way to handle this than what we're doing now? I haven't tested, but it seems that this should wo

Bug#696797: (no subject)

2013-03-11 Thread Michael Lustfield
I haven't been able to reproduce this. Does it happen after an update or just out of the blue? We need more information to track it down. -- Michael Lustfield -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#701112: (no subject)

2013-03-12 Thread Michael Lustfield
idea to force it to happen. On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/03/13 03:33, Michael Lustfield wrote: > > In debian/nginx-common.postinst we have: > > > > configure) > > logdir="/var/log/nginx" > &

Bug#636597: Info

2011-08-08 Thread Michael Lustfield
Any chance you could provide a justification of why this third party module should be built into every version of nginx? It seems like added overhead that is not needed for nginx-full and definitely not nginx-light. I could see it in nginx-extras, but we would need a good reason before adding yet a

Bug#725732: (no subject)

2013-10-07 Thread Michael Lustfield
This is indeed a module that was added as of 1.5.4. It's also stable and seems to be used by a large number of people as a third party module. When 1.5.x becomes stable (1.6.0 will be the mainline), I don't see any reason to not add this to -extras. -- Michael Lustfield -- To U

Bug#724756: grub-pc: Latest version of grub produces a core.img that is too large to install.

2013-09-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: grub-pc Version: 2.00-19 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to the latest version of grub-pc in Debian jessie, th core.img file went from 32K to 36K. This makes it no longer possible to install grub to the MBR. It seems that some of the modules are significantly larger

Bug#660408: Late Here

2012-02-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
table putting it in anything other than nginx-extras. I have included in there. Unless I see some very good and compelling reason to include it in -light or -full, it'll stay there only. -- Michael Lustfield Ubuntu Member, Nginx Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#651441: Potential Headache

2012-03-29 Thread Michael Lustfield
I would like to very strongly discourage the inclusion of a passenger module. No offense to passenger, but in terms of Nginx it tends to cause a massive number of headaches. In general, the Nginx community not only won't support the use of passenger, but also will offer no support when it's involve

Bug#668953: lists.debian.org: please create debian-nginx

2012-04-15 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Here is the requested information as per [2]. Name: debian-nginx Rationale: The current Nginx package maintainers have been involved in an increasing number of conversations related to web server packages and would like a list that woul

Bug#664850: (no subject)

2012-06-18 Thread Michael Lustfield
sane way to do this. -- Michael Lustfield Ubuntu Member, Nginx Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#840124:

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Lustfield
merge 790623 843777 840124 thanks Re: "nginx: rtmp-module integration" The author of this module has proven to be an unreliable upstream contact. Even if we were willing to add modules to the nginx packaging, this would be in the No pile. Re: "Provide ngx_pagespeed / libnginx-mod-pagespeed" Wit

Bug#819751:

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Lustfield
reassign 819751 src:nginx merge 701112 819751 thanks The bug 819751 is blocked by 701112 and, not so coincidentally, will be resolved by the same upstream modification. I'm merging these two because they are essentially the same issue.

Bug#816446: (no subject)

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Lustfield
/share and possibly others. Anyway, this is all for continued discussion. As for roll-out, I would prefer include this with #822792. If this is going to break anything, keeping the roll-out schedule to that bug should help make sure I break everything that can be broken before releasing for publi

Bug#822792: (no subject)

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Lustfield
;d like to get something like _provider_php available via php-fpm as well as uwsgi-plugin-php. Doing it this way would reduce security, but I'm thinking it's to a very negligible degree and not very concerned. > 2. Do we have recommended naming for files added by the >local admin to apps.d? We could suggest custom_.conf. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#822792: (no subject)

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Lustfield
Sorry for the noise... should quiet down now. :(

Bug#822792: your mail

2016-11-10 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Elrond wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 18:47:15 -0600, Michael Lustfield wrote: >> I'd like to get something like _provider_php available via php-fpm as well as >> uwsgi-plugin-php. > > Okay, so if an admin only wants to handle local .

Bug#858871: ITP: golang-gopkg-gomail.v2 -- simple and efficient package to send emails in Go

2017-03-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Lustfield * Package name: golang-code.gitea-sdk Version : 0.0~git20170322.0.1bec42c-1 Upstream Author : The Gitea Authors * URL : https://code.gitea.io/sdk/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#859043: (no subject)

2017-03-30 Thread Michael Lustfield
s/saintfish/gogits/ -- actively maintained fork

Bug#859176: Fixed

2017-03-31 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for catching this mistake! I'm sorry it happened in the first place. I've taken a close look at every file, updated d/copyright, and pushed a correction. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#859256: Thanks!

2017-04-02 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for reporting this and providing a patch! Fixing now... -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#859577: (no subject)

2017-04-04 Thread Michael Lustfield
Heh.. it seems I thought golang-goleveldb-dev was the alternate name of a different package. I'll review this and get it corrected. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#840676:

2017-04-05 Thread Michael Lustfield
Control: owner 840676 ! I ended up creating duplicate packaging and merged my changes which included a version bump. I didn't look, but remember at least some of these modifications being present in the current packaging. Sometime today, I'll take a look and see if any changes still need to be mad

Bug#859577:

2017-04-07 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for looking over my changes and catching this mistake! I'll get a correction uploaded today.

Bug#859704:

2017-04-07 Thread Michael Lustfield
Thanks for reporting this error! I checked reverse deps of this build dependency, but neglected to check newer packages such as this. Hopefully this was the only package missed, but I will spend some time making sure. I'll get this bug report resolved today.

Bug#859704: (no subject)

2017-04-07 Thread Michael Lustfield
f the packaging did not play well with dh-golang. A corrected version of this package has been uploaded and is now in unstable. I'm looking into kicking off another rebuild test and will close this if it succeeds. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#857698: ITP: golang-code.gitea-git -- Go module that provides git access through shell

2017-03-13 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Lustfield * Package name: golang-code.gitea-git Version : 0.0~git20170313.0.3374688-1 Upstream Author : The Gitea Authors * URL : https://code.gitea.io/git/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#792101: still going...

2017-03-23 Thread Michael Lustfield
Work in Progress: https://github.com/MTecknology/gitea-wip -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#856615: Will Fix

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'll get this fixed and re-uploaded tonight. Thanks for catching this! I'll go through and re-check my other packages for accuracy as well.

Bug#856615: Second Look

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Lustfield
. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#792101: Progress Report

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Lustfield
There are about 30 more ITPs to fill out and close. I'm sure I'll find more missed dependencies while working through them, but we're getting closer. :) -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#857241: ITP: golang-github-go-macaron-bindata -- provides in-memory static and template files for macaron

2017-03-08 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Lustfield * Package name: golang-github-go-macaron-bindata Version : 0.0~git20161222.0.85786f5-1 Upstream Author : The Macaron Authors * URL : https://github.com/go-macaron/bindata * License : Apache-2.0

Bug#843777: [Pkg-nginx-maintainers] Bug#843777: temporarily loosen new nginx modules ban until separate module compilation available?

2017-02-20 Thread Michael Lustfield
nd maximise the chances for future inclusion. This actually isn't a bad idea, but maybe we can start off with the inclusion? -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#855660: ITP: golang-github-blevesearch-go-porterstemmer -- A native Go clean room implementation of the Porter Stemming algorithm.

2017-02-20 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Lustfield * Package name: golang-github-blevesearch-go-porterstemmer Version : 1.0.1+git20141230.9.23a2c8e-1 Upstream Author : Charles Iliya Krempeaux * URL : https://github.com/blevesearch/go-porterstemmer * License

Bug#855981: ITP: golang-github-denisenkom-go-mssqldb -- Microsoft SQL server driver written in go language

2017-02-23 Thread Michael Lustfield
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Lustfield * Package name: golang-github-denisenkom-go-mssqldb Version : 0.0~git20170117.0.9e40d9d-1 Upstream Author : The Go Authors * URL : https://github.com/denisenkom/go-mssqldb * License : BSD-3-clause

Bug#855985: (no subject)

2017-02-23 Thread Michael Lustfield
Control: retitle -1 golang-github-facebookgo-stack -- Stack provides utilities to capture and handle stack traces I'm also aware the description needs to be improved. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#855997: (no subject)

2017-02-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
License: LGPL-3+ -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#859655: (no subject)

2017-04-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
unblock request: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860429 (with more discussion)

Bug#860429: (no subject)

2017-04-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
Ivo, Thanks for providing direction! I believe I can get the updated package produced and uploaded to unstable tomorrow. Once that's uploaded, I'll work on an update for packer and figure out what else needs to be rebuilt. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#860429: CVE fixed in unstable

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
t20170407.0.55a552f+REALLY.0.0~git20161012.0.5f31782-1.dsc [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855208 [4] https://git.gueux.org/restic.git -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#859655: (still in progress)

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
Control: reopen 859655 ! This is obviously not resolved yet, but the fix is in unstable. I'm currently discussing the idea of unblocking this package and requesting nmu rebuilds. If this works out, it shouldn't take too long to get this closed. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#836487: (no subject)

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
Control: owner 836487 ! I will complete this once #859655 has been resolved. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#832387: (no subject)

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Lustfield
Control: tags 832387 + wontfix Without upstream making changes, this will not be resolved. Based on upstream's responses, I am adding the wontfix tag to this bug. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#861431: restic: Rebuild needed for CVE-2017-3204; #859655

2017-04-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
to come from the changes made in the crypto library. I have attached the build log from that failure, as generated by sbuild. The error indicated it may be a simple solution, but I'm lacking the time to dig into it. I saw no build failure when testing the change in unstable. Thanks, -- Mi

Bug#861432: nmu: golang-go.crypto

2017-04-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
e_0.0~git20161122.0.a3e5876-1 . ANY all . unstable . -m 'Rebuild against fixed golang-go.crypto; #859655' nmu acbuild_0.4.0+dfsg-1 . ANY all . unstable . -m 'Rebuild against fixed golang-go.crypto; #859655' nmu golang-github-coreos-go-oidc_0.0~git20160926.0.16c5ecc-1 . ANY all . unstable . -m 'Rebuild against fixed golang-go.crypto; #859655' nmu kubernetes_1.5.5+dfsg-1 . ANY all . unstable . -m 'Rebuild against fixed golang-go.crypto; #859655' nmu golang-github-weaveworks-mesh_0+git20161024.3dd75b1-1 . ANY all . unstable . -m 'Rebuild against fixed golang-go.crypto; #859655' [2] failed (not included above): notary_0.1~ds1-1 (see buildlogs/notary_0.1~ds1-1) nomad_0.4.0+dfsg-1 (see buildlogs/nomad_0.4.0+dfsg-1) packer_0.10.2+dfsg-4 (see buildlogs/packer_0.10.2+dfsg-4) systemd-docker_0.2.1+dfsg-2 (see buildlogs/systemd-docker_0.2.1+dfsg-2) docker-swarm_1.2.5+dfsg-2 (see buildlogs/docker-swarm_1.2.5+dfsg-2) grafana_2.6.0+dfsg-3 (see buildlogs/grafana_2.6.0+dfsg-3) docker.io_1.13.0~ds1-3 (see buildlogs/docker.io_1.13.0~ds1-3) [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859655 ^ tl;dr -- insecure default is now secure default Sorry to all for the massive rebuild list... and Thanks! -- Michael Lustfield pgpSbcFOxZNzX.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#860429: binNMU in unstable

2017-04-28 Thread Michael Lustfield
8ca-1 skydns_2.5.3a-1 syncthing_0.14.18+dfsg1-1 tendermint-go-merkle_0.0~git20160312.0.05042c6-1 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861432 -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#861432: closed by Ivo De Decker (Re: nmu: golang-go.crypto)

2017-04-30 Thread Michael Lustfield
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote: > I scheduled the binNMUs. Please note that we currently cannot schedule binNMUs > for arch:all packages. So these are not rebuilt. The other ones should be ok > (with the exception of restic, but you already filed #861431 for that).

Bug#861431: restic: Rebuild needed for CVE-2017-3204; #859655

2017-05-02 Thread Michael Lustfield
> It's built happily on ppc64el for the archive, so please either close this > bug or leave the fixed version in place (by all means keep it open if you > want to explore possible resource exhaustion on other machines). I haven't had a chance to re-test this build. If it's building fine for the ar

Bug#792101: (no subject)

2017-02-10 Thread Michael Lustfield
lecting gitea. In the event someone wanted to maintain a vanilla gogs, I would be more than happy to drop that from the packaging, but would otherwise prefer it as a convenience to new users. I still have a *lot* of work to do on the dependencies, so lots of room for discussion if anyone is interested. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#823608:

2016-05-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
I've been looking at this a bit more. As much as I understand the motivations, it seems incredibly heavy to create an entirely separate package just to install one small file for vim. Looking at other packages, it seems they've made the same decision. I see very few (four) packages that seem to cre

Bug#819751:

2016-05-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'm a bit surprised your tool had access issues when it was running as root. Your solution may work initially, but I expect you'll see problems in the long run because of the way nginx workers interact with these files. I can do some testing and try to come up with a better solution, but I don't i

Bug#823435:

2016-05-24 Thread Michael Lustfield
I'm really happy I read this prior to another similar but not identical bug report. Thanks for the patches! I will try to review/test/commit tonight.

Bug#790854: (no subject)

2015-12-10 Thread Michael Lustfield
e fix trickle down. -- Michael Lustfield

Bug#826167: Untracked changes on changelog

2016-06-06 Thread Michael Lustfield
This will become a non-issue in the future when we no longer ship these various flavors and switch to using dynamic modules. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Nuno Leitao wrote: > Package: nginx-extras > Version: 1.6.2-5+deb8u2 > Severity: important > > it's a major concern that changelog from ngi

Bug#823608: nginx-common: Move nginx.vim to a separate package?

2016-05-06 Thread Michael Lustfield
A separate package just for a single file seems a little bit overkill, but I do understand. You may not want /etc/nginx but want to edit the configs. I do this frequently and just skip the benefits of nginx.vim. This should stay open for discussion for a while, but I'm in support of this change.

  1   2   3   4   >