On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:00:24PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> You are right. However I'm the maintainer of that package as well and it seems
> to be used by about the same number of users. I think that package can
> be removed as well.
Also, nmap 5.00-3 will Provide/Replace: ndiff in addition t
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 08:52:24AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> /dev/sda2: Superblock last mount time is in the future
Is /etc/localtime a file or a symlink?
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:47:16AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> when upgrading bind9, named is stopped until the upgrade is completed.
And there is no real way to make sure it stays working while the
libraries and such are changed out from under it, based on some of the
issues we ran into earlie
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:47:59AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> i'm talking about a network being disrupted, not a single host.
> the hosts DON'T have 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf, they have the namesever.
I've gone back as far as 9.2.4, and haven't found anywhere that the
bind9 package actually kept
Signed-off-by: LaMont Jones
OTOH, that commit lacks changes to not stop it on upgrade.
> an even better option is for the bind9 package to actually make some
> effort to minimise downtime by restarting after upgrade rather than
> stopping early and starting late.
And it would appear that I w
tags 543721 + wontfix
severity 543721 wishlist
--
> util-linux didn't have a debian/watch file yet - attached.
And won't. I get daily email everytime the upstream git tree changes
and my daily fetch changes my tree... I think that's going to be a bit
more effective for telling me there's a new r
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:42:47PM -0700, Alan Baghumian wrote:
> Same issue on squeeze. Guys this becomes more and more of an issue.
> I have the same issue on my both computers and just keep one 24/7 on
> and use hibernate on the laptop! Please fix it.
> Also a new upstream version is available
reopen 471504
--
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:19:10PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> LaMont Jones wrote:
> I see that in hdreg.h the unsigned char has an effect, but it is not clear
> how that effects me...
>
> Could explain a bit more?
That's cfdisk passing the geometry to
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0700, Ben Holt wrote:
> bind9 dies with the following showing in the logs:
> Mar 20 03:51:02 firewall named[5714]: adb.c:2617: INSIST(bucket == (-1))
> failed
> Mar 20 03:51:02 firewall named[5714]: exiting (due to assertion failure)
> This has happened three ti
reassign 478831 nfs-utils
--
util-linux 2.13 just passes options through to mount.nfs.
lamont
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:55:22AM +0100, Bytemark admin wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.13.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> When trying to mount an NFS server which only supports TCP, the "-o tcp"
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> Debian Etch 4.0r3, amd64
> When I copy the main.cf.dist to /etc/postfix/main.cf and run postfix, I
> get strange error:
> postfix: fatal: bad string length 0 < 1: setgid_group =
>
> The same error I got when tryed postalias with su
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:01:14PM +0300, Mr. OJ J wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/f1235fecf, I think its a bug.
Apr 8 04:54:27 prometheus named[3217]: socket.c:1663:
INSIST(!sock->pending_send) failed
Apr 8 04:54:27 prometheus named[3217]: exiting (due to assertion failure)
That would be bind dyi
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:19:07AM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> I'd love to bump the severity of this bug. :)
> I'm sorry that I don't have strace output to provide.
And sadly, I'm unable to reproduce the bug, which makes fixing it rather
problematic.
If it is at all possible, could you see i
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:17:57AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> $ dig www.enyo.de +noall
> [output]
> Please restore the old behavior because custom written-scripts rely on
> it.
Interestingly(?), "dig +noall www.enyo.de" displays no output.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:09:15AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> The postfix package is in the way of the German and French team in
> their seek for the 100% po-debconf completeness Holy Grail.
heh.
> So, even though we only have one fuzzy string (fixed in #483835 for
> French), I'd like to a
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.4.1~dfsg-8
It would be nice if a group name could be given to snmpd, similar to how
the username is given.
The attached patch implements that.
thanks,
lamont
diff -ur t/net-snmp-5.4.1~dfsg/agent/snmpd.c net-snmp-5.4.1~dfsg/agent/snmpd.c
--- t/net-snmp-5.4.1~dfsg/agent/s
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 07:25:18PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> Lasts versions of postfix sets inet_protocols to all without asking. It
> violates the 10.7.3 Debian Policy Manual directive, so strictly speaking
> this is a serious bug, but the scope on my system is very limited: a
> warning that ipv
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 07:53:48PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> Well, I've configured Linux kernel without ipv6 support,
> my /etc/main.cf contains "inet_protocols = ipv4" but postfix upgrades
> always overwrites it. This is due to debconf priority?
Well, slightly. it's still a bug that postfix di
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:58:43PM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> I've been holding off upgrades to DNS here for a week and a half
> on this bug, since I don't know if upgrading is going to cause me
> problems. Is anything happening on this?
I have yet to reproduce it either in testing with 9
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 04:39:02PM +0200, Matteo SISA wrote:
> I use Debian Testing on a Dell Latitude 120L laptop. I have the same
> problem with a new version of hwclock, is there a solution or should i
> stick with the --directisa workaround?
I expect that there are a number of platforms th
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 08:03:18PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> could you please comment on this bug? It's really important for us to fix
> #311188 for Lenny, so that upgrades from Lenny to Lenny+1 will work without
> problems for Debian Edu installations.
I'll be working on adding some rationa
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:15:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It does not really matter because of the priming step at server start.
> Just type "dig l.root-servers.net +norecurse", and you should get the
> new address, or no address at all.
Roughly one out of 13 times, l.root-servers.net will
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:25:08AM +0200, Alban Browaeys wrote:
> am working on adding NetworkManager support for resolvconf (it has a
> server support since 0.7). The same issue arise if one try to setup the
> forwarders via ifup and resolvconf (dns-nameservers). That is
> /var/run/bind/named.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:48:16AM +0100, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> Well, I was only trying 'flock -x' from a X terminal running over xfwm4 when a
> crash happened.
Interestingly:
1) flock -x is invalid syntax, it wants an fd or a command to run
following that.
2) getopt_long finishes and indicates
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:57:58AM +0200, Johan Walles wrote:
> After creating a bind mount with "-o ro" I can still write to the target
> directory.
> Repro (notice how I can create a file in the readonly directory):
Mount called the kernel, told it to mount it read-only. And the kernel
said
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> On several of my machines running Etch I get the following instead of
> some "info" promised by the manual:
> # losetup /dev/loop0
> /dev/loop0: [38e4]:-1208829177 () offset -1208768944, xor encryption
> loop: can't get info on devi
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 08:15:20PM +0100, Peter Allgeyer wrote:
> Patches can be found here:
> http://ftp.sanguine.net/pub/postfix/SOURCES/
> http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/ (probably down today?)
The patch is for postfix-2.3.4, and I'm disinclined to deviate from
upstream on this... I'll accept it
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 01:26:30PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Don't we tell people in the release notes to upgrade aptitude, apt, and
> dpkg first? In that case, shouldn'
> 't Breaks: be usable for lenny?
See section 7.3 of Debian Policy. We can use it once Lenny is released,
not before.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:19:06PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> If I want to stop or to restart bind9, I can't by default. I get this message
> :
> Stopping domain name service...: bindrndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953:
> connection refused
> failed!
> Starting domain name service...: bind fai
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Shams Fantar wrote:
> Here are the two files you need in attachment.
> include "/etc/bind/named.conf.options";
I need this file as well...
> include "/etc/bind/named.conf.local";
If there is anything other than zone declarations here, I'd like it,
too.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:41:34PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>* Add support for syslogd configuration files under /etc/syslog.d/.
> (Closes: #370349, #462739)
> Do you think this bug can now also be solved on the postfix side?
>From reading the bug report, it would appear that he add
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:53:49PM +, Administrator wrote:
> Jul 28 11:40:22 cider named[4226]: socket.c:1630: unexpected error:
> Jul 28 11:40:22 cider named[4226]: setsockopt(45, IPV6_RECVPKTINFO) failed:
> Protocol not available
> It happens repeatedly, seemingly on almost every client conn
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:53:08AM -0400, Magnus Heinz wrote:
> postfix can't resolve hostnames anymore.
> The problem appeard 2 days ago.
> The mail.log shows:
> postfix/smtp[8659]: 7D5E1971C4: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none,
> delay=0.02, delays=0.02/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced (unable
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:45:25AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> All I know is that the problem does not reproduce with
> permit_mx_backup_networks on unmodified Postfix. Unfortunately I
> can't investigate every port of Postfix, nor can I speculate on
> the impact ofpossible changes that I not kno
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:36:14AM +0200, Erwin Dondorp wrote:
> bind9 cannot be run with a zone that has "allow-update" enabled.
> This option causes bind to use or, in its absense, create a journal file.
> The file is located in /etc/bind and has the same name as the zone file with
> the extensio
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 03:39:42PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> 1) buildd maintainers not caring to send updates (see s390 n-f-u)
> 2) maintainers frustrated due changes not happening timely
> 3) p-a-s full of aging cruft.
I'm not sure that the "aging cruft" is in fact (1) aging, or (2) cruft.
PaS
tag 493095 + wontfix
--
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:50:53PM +0400, Alexandra N. Kossovsky wrote:
> Well, I do have NFS mounts, and it is great to avoid breaking them, but
> as far as I can see, aptitude has no hints like "upgrade nfs-common
> before mount".
Exactly. Post lenny, we get 'Breaks:' w
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:00:32AM +0200, Bobby wrote:
> addgroup --gid 53 named
> useradd named -u 53 -g 53 -d /var/cache/bind -s /bin/false
> /etc/default/bind: OPTIONS="-u 53 -g 53"
A fresh install of bind9 will run as the user bind (via -u bind).
Because of the variety of ways people believe t
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 03:36:45PM -0700, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Fortunately there is a real simple way to add this support by adding
> the ability for postfix to make a call to mysql_options() which will
> read the /etc/mysql/my.cnf file and use the values specified there.
> Its an amazingly simp
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:01:57AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> This bug introduce a serious risk of loosing important log data, which
> is - especially for a MTA - not acceptable. Asking people to restart
> postfix after reloading syslog is a *stupid* workaround, which also
> results in the loss
severity 311812 important
--
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:17:12PM +, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> severity 311812 grave
It's only grave if the bug is against syslogd. Syslogd doesn't provide
a method for postfix to change the config file, and therefore it would
be a policy violation for postfix to
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:25:03AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Short report:
> Please do not set 'myorigin = /etc/mailname' at least for
> "Internat with smarthost". This may cause root mail etc. to be sent
> outside unless user checks result of debconf carefully.
Postfix has no concept of whethe
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:49:18AM +1100, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Seems to me that this has been fixed in DSA-1450-1 (which only mentions
> util-linux, not mount or bsdutils). However, the sarge AMD64 versions
> seems to be missing...
util-linux is the source package, no clue what's keeping amd64 from
Version: 1:9.4.0~rc1-1
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:52:44PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.3.1-2
> The online help for rndc mentions the "retransfer" command, but it does
> not appear to actually exists within rndc.
That's because it's implemented in 9.4.0, and no
tags 395191 + wontfix
--
I'll add this when it comes down from ISC.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:42:27PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:11:46PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:02:24PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Shouldn't adding libpq-dev to the build-dep only require the pgsql
> libraries
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:02:58AM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> $ renice +20 blahblahblah
> 0: old priority 19, new priority 19
> $ echo $?
> 0
This is because renice uses atoi, so your command is equivalent to
"renice +20 -p 0", and that succeeded just fine.
I'll be sending a patch upstream
la
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 06:45:23PM +, David wrote:
> Thank you for the mail.
> But, wait a moment... I see exactly the same behaviour as before:
> I replaced /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh and /etc/init.d/hwclockfirst.sh by the
> maintainer's versions (under synaptic's request), and I see no difference
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:06:54PM +, David wrote:
> > > Why did you close the bug?
> > > > If you put HWCLOCKPARS=--directisa into /etc/default/rcS, then you
> > won't
> > > > have to modify the file.
> > That's why.
> Ah, sorry, I did not see the name of the file. So, if --directisa is missin
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 05:43:22PM +0100, Alvaro G. M. wrote:
> >From time to time (nearly to about 'always') any helper app (by which I mean
> trivial-rewrite, flush, bounce, cleanup, etc) got killed by signal 6 having
> sent previously a bad command startup message. For example, this are the
> la
retitle 171440 dnsutils: dig manpage does not document exitcodes
--
dig exits zero when everything works from a DNS perspective.
NXDOMAIN is working. SERVFAIL is working. (In both cases, we sent a
request, and we got a reply that was correct.) Parse the output to
distinguish the variety of poss
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 09:24:35AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I think if we solve this broken dependency with the patch on the BTS, we
> may end up with undesirable situation.
Yep. that's why I modified the patch. See
git://git.debian.org/~lamont/postfix.git
> Solution1: (Pedantic)
> In additio
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:29:27AM +0200, Benjamin Sonntag wrote:
> Postfix smtp / smtpd daemons are launched in a chrooted environment.
> Therefore,
> when we use SSL/TLS and configure them properly to authenticate client /
> server
> certificates, we need to access /etc/ssl/certs/ to check CA
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:12:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> > found 423899 2.13-9
> Bug#423899: util-linux: please use libvolume-id instead of libblkid
> Bug marked
tags 447968 + moreinfo
--
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:22:50AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I cannot upgrade util-linux package because it conflicts with pcmciautils
> package.
This is most strange. /lib/udev is a directory, and there is therefore
no conflict between the packages
What does
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> it would be good if bind9 would have an LSB-compliant init script with
> the following features:
>
> - dependencies
> - "status" target
> - beautified output
bind9 already does lsb_* for all messages. As for the rest, a patch
wo
reassign 435125 nfs-common
--
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:08:19PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> mount now depends on nfs-common, and that brings in portmap, which is
> a potential security risk, and which I feel I should be able to
> explicitly remove.
mount no longer supports nfs mounts directl
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:13:37PM +0200, Thomas Antepoth wrote:
> According to the findings in the post above I patched the socket.c this
> morning as follows:
Thanks for the patch - I'll forward it upstream and (based on feedback
from upstream) include it in the next bind9 upload. (9.4.1 based,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 03:27:30PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> /etc/bind/db.root needs an update. Please see forwarded message
Yes, it does. The forwarded message arrived in my mailbox a few hours
earlier. And this obviously critical update needs to be done before too
many of the root namerserve
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:11:26PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> Due to a problem[1] with the kernel implementation of /dev/rtc on my
> laptop, hwclock cannot set the time here:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# hwclock
> select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
> > driver). If it is unable to ope
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:43:11PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Attached I include a patch for src/pipe/pipe.c which is needed by the
> Kolab packages. I think this patch will be available in the new postfix
> upstream version 2.3, but it would be nice if you could add it and make
> a Debian vers
check_name to allow all valid hostnames. (See RFC1123: 2.1 and
+RFC952: GRAMMATICAL HOST TABLE SPECIFICATION, specifically ""
+
+ -- LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:23:58 -0700
+
hostname (2.91) unstable; urgency=low
* Break in read_file instead of ret
tags 348483 + pending
severity 343483 serious
--
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:28:07PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hwclockfirst.sh can't perform by Syntax error.
> # dash /etc/init.d/hwclockfirst.sh start
> /etc/init.d/hwclockfirst.sh: 27: Syntax error: Bad function name
Your patch simply reo
severity 348645 important
tags 348645 + unreproducible
--
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:37:14AM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
> 2 not fully installed or removed.
Those 2 not-fully-installed packages cause me some wonder..
> Running n
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:20:31PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> An /etc/ldap/ldap.conf file needs also to be in chroot.
> In my case it has to have
> TLS_REQCERT allow
> in it.
Or, if you'd rather not have that in the chroot, use proxy:ldap:... for
the map entry. I'd rather not copy large chunks
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 04:40:51PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> I disagree with this patch. I believe the kernel hostname variable (the
> one that hostname(1) sets, and that {get,set}hostname(2) query and set)
> should not be a FQDN. Instead the FQDN should be looked up using
> gethostbyname(3) (w
Another issue with the patch is that it only checks the map type of the
first map in virtual maps, not all of them.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:25:01AM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > I think the rules that LaMont posted were the rules for FQDNs. My
> > contention is that the kernel hostname variable is not meant to
> > contain FQDNs, but only hostnames, which are single components of
> > domain names (and theref
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:22:51PM -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> Package: util-linux
> Version: 2.12p-4
> Severity: normal
2.12r is the current version now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Could you test forcing on the client side to mount it with udp. The patch
> changes the default to tcp (maybe that could be reverted..).
% sudo mount -oudp -v foo.example.com:/tftpboot /mnt
mount: no type was given - I'll assume nf
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:32:55PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:59:05AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > tag 353918 + unreproducible
> I understand that you can't reproduce it! It's really weird, but it's
> now happening consistently on my
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:30:30PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I have a very similar requirement like Hadmut (until I can throw
> Postfix out), and request that you please fix the problem.
More specifically, section 11.6 of Debian policy says:
"... all MTA packages must have Provides, Conflicts
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:30:30PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I have a very similar requirement like Hadmut (until I can throw
> Postfix out), and request that you please fix the problem.
Once policy changes to allow it, we might be able to "fix" this.
Until then, changing it as requested would
tags 360482 + patch
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 04:43:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > ../../include/IceUtil/Config.h:27:5: error: #error "Unknown architecture"
> > make[3]: *** [Base64.o] Error 1
The following patch takes advantage of and to
support all linux/glibc architectures.
lamont
diff
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 08:27:56PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-12 20:05]:
> > While I see this bug on mips, I don't see it on i386. It also doesn't
> > occur with 4.0. However, someone who took a brief look at the
> > failure suggested that it
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:22:26PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> find an updated patch attached.
How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch?
and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release
critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and threatenin
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:49:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This is a bug about my MTA not only stripping ^Ms out of mails but
> replacing them with a blank like. I suspect this is a bug in
> postfix or something. LaMont, can you please investigate.
Does this sound like it?
Workaround
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:12:39PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
Sigh... fat fingers on the last version of the patch (that one just
makes it die everywhere.. :) The real solution is to just drop the
assert.
New patch below.
lamont
tags 355109 + patch
--
> pwd: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getcwd.c:130: __getcwd: Assertion
> `__libc_errno != 34 || buf != ((void *)0) || size != 0' failed.
> pwd:
> /build/buildd/coreutils-5.94/build-tree/coreutils-5.94/tests/misc/pwd.tmp/25528/z[...]
> The above is
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:35:55PM +0200, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> # /etc/aliases
> mailer-daemon: postmaster
> root: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mail should go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What are the values for mydestination and myorigin in
/etc/postfix/main.cf (or whatever is referen
tags 359272 + pending
--
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.2.9-1
> Severity: minor
> postfix does not remember the setting for the internet protocol if I
> reconfigure the package.
> dpkg-reconfigure remembers all settings from a previous
Package: vpopmail-bin
Version: 5.4.4-1
Severity: serious
In a buildd chroot, attempting to install vpopmail-bin results in:
Unpacking vpopmail-bin (from .../vpopmail-bin_5.4.4-1_hppa.deb) ...
Checking vpopmail user...not exist.
Checking vchkpw group...not exist.
Creating vchkpw group.../va
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:18:06AM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> 1.) "rm -f /etc/aliases.db"
> 2.) "newaliases"
> both is terrible wrong.
> first, you have only an assumption what /etc/aliases.db is, and
> an assumption that you can delete and regenerate it. both is wrong,
> the file could be
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:01:22PM +, Richard Thrippleton wrote:
> When run as _any_ user, 'postqueue' allows them to see the contents of the
> queue
> with -p , and also to flush it with -f. The former is what I'd consider a user
> privacy violation, the latter seems to be putting administrat
Package: libc6
Severity: serious
Version: 2.3.6-4
After initializing a mutex, regcomp zeros the structure. On
architectures that have non-zero free lock values (e.g., hppa) this
results in deadlock.
The following patch fixes the problem.
(See
http://www.sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 08:03:33PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I have no opinion on whether scsh-0.6 should be or should not be put
> in p-a-s. What I know is that:
> - Trying to build it on a 64 bit architecture is a waste of
>resources. It will not work.
But 64-bit machines are fast.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Stefan Huehner wrote:
> your 'postrm' , 'postinst' scripts manually call 'update-rc.d'. These
> invocations are also added by debhelper. So they end up twice in the
> resulting scripts. The attached patch removes the manual calls.
> Please consider applying
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:46:31PM +0200, o...@cisko.se wrote:
> 9.6-ESV-R1 fails or is terribly slow to resolve for example dannychoo.com
> dns01:~# host dannychoo.com
> dannychoo.com has address 174.143.211.39
> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
> If you do the same on an older
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Michael Braun wrote:
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1+lenny1
> Today, named crashed suddenly after a few hours of operation with
> the failed assertion mentioned above. This in turn broke DHCP, as DNS
> was no longer resolvable, which in turn
Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content in the bug would have
helped simplify the work of understanding what your issue was.
lamont
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Package: bind9
> Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1
> User: debian-rele...@lists.debi
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
>
> The issue is identical to the issue in the last bug report? But right,
> I have retitled this bug report now so at least it has the same subject.
In which case, reo
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> When doing a postfix reconfigure/debconf... (at least when choosing the local
> host only templates), the current hostname is not set to myhostname (but the
> previous value is retained).
>
> This is in most cases ok, but
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:32:03PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> what about applying this patch?
Given how postfix does things internally, the exposure from this bug
is minimal to nonexistant: I doubt that it warrants a security release
for lenny.
Which would be why I haven't bothered to do
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:08:02PM +0900, MIZUHARA Bun wrote:
> While named runs as user "bind" by default, the configuration file directory,
> /etc/bind, is owned by root and not writable by anyone other than root.
> This effectively prevents named from creating any files in the directory,
> for e
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:48:28AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hmm, LaMont, would it be possible for you to reupload with fixed PO
> > files (I think you just need to dig them out from the BTSthey have
> > probably been broken by the infamous mutt encoding bug)? This,
> > assuming the rel
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:36:19PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> Or grab the PO file from the BTS web interface
Yeah - files grabbed, I need to build the debs and I'll get them uploaded.
that should happen within the next 12-14 hours. (sleep
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Lamont, would it be possible to prepare an upload fixing just the
> > security bug for squeeze (so based on 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2)?
>
> I looked into it a bit, but couldn't pinpoint the exact changes for
> CVE-2010-3752 (not with
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:10:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1 unblocked.
Thanks - the specific patch for the first CVE was not forthcoming. And
the others just combined to make it more sensible to just unblock it, IMO.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
reassign 566356 linux-2.6
--
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:03:14PM +0530, gnath wrote:
> using external hard disk formatted with ntfs on usb port gives
> read only mode. Can use or play with files on EHD without write/create.
>
> use additional flashdisk/pendrive with vfat on another usb port with r
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.6
Severity: normal
With the introduction of fsync() calls to protect data, applications
that do potentially large apt-get install invocations may not want
to incur the penalty of fsync() calls from dpkg.
In the case of building a livecd, this can be the difference betw
301 - 400 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
