Bug#336307: eclipse-platform: File/directory in 2 packages

I had exactly this problem, too. Removing the old eclipse-platform 2.1.x solved it. --Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#337903: mdadm: newer version (2.1) available

Package: mdadm Version: 1.9.0-4 Severity: wishlist Upstream has a newer version of mdadm available http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/ http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/ChangeLog In particular, I want to use the write-mostly and write-behind feature in conjunction with n

Bug#347254: eclipse: fails to locate the JVM when JAVA_HOME is not set

Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-8 Severity: normal So I went to run Eclipse on a computer that has just the Sun 1.5 JVM and got the following: rode:~> eclipse searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...not found testing /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads...not found testing /usr/li

Bug#346364: The problem is not solved(at least for me)

One is 347254 Btw, I didnt find the two other's bugreport about the same issue. Can you point it? --Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338624: Wrong $SUBJECTNA:U$ substitution for subject with mime encoding

Andrew, this is clearly a mhonarc upstream issue. Can you check to see if the problem is also present in mhonarc 2.6.15 (the current upstream release at http://www.mhonarc.org)? Also, I am making a note in upstream's bug tracking system. You may want to use it directly in the future. https://s

Bug#338624: [bug #15074] Wrong $SUBJECTNA:U$ substitution for subject with mime encoding

URL: Summary: Wrong $SUBJECTNA:U$ substitution for subject with mime encoding Project: MHonArc Submitted by: jab Submitted on: Sat 11/26/05 at 21:41 Categor

Bug#312014: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#312014: fop missing dependencies.)

Look at the package "java-package" On 6/5/05, Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 03:03:14PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > * Mohammed Sameer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050604 23:08]: > > > Package: fop > > > Severity: grave > > > > > > > >

Bug#290868: SAK and gnocatan meta server

Bastien, What's your response to Roland Clobus (upstream)? Do we need to make this change or not? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=290868 Cheers, Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300780: Swatting a very visible bug - # 300780

Now that I think about it, lucene-demo-1.4.3.jar has some very useful programs. It's arguably in a better place now than before. How about we leave it in the liblucene-java package, and follow the reporter's suggestion? "It seems like this should simply require the appropriate versioned Conflicts

Bug#297007: @INC problems with mhonarc

I'm sorry, is this a change you made to mharc or mhonarc? I can only make changes to the latter, since mharc is not packaged for Debian. > I fixed this by putting in: > ## Check what system we are executing under > push(@INC,'/usr/share/mhonarc'); > require 'osinit.pl'; &OSinit();

Bug#316036: yahoo2mbox: new upstream version available

Package: yahoo2mbox Version: 0.17-1 Severity: normal Maintainer did not respond to email inquiry. I'm going to NMU this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of package

Bug#316036: apologies

I've cancelled the NMU and I'm sorry for the communications failure. I'll check my spam filtering to see if it needs adjustment. Again, sorry for the confusion.

Bug#272295: lucene - gcj @ runtime

Looks like lucene may be able to run on a free JVM. Is there any easy way to run the entire set of junit tests? I mainly want to confirm everything works using this particular JVM. Cheers, Jeff === $ java -version gij (GNU libgcj) version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-13) $ java -cp /usr/share/jav

Bug#301761: tomcat4: make jdk list bigger

Package: tomcat4 Version: 4.1.31-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch For those using java-package (best practive if we're going to use Sun JDK on Debian) things end up in /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun. I'd like to see this added to the list. --- /etc/init.d/tomcat4~2005-01-06 04:43:40.0 -080

Bug#303067: python-imaging: PIL 1.1.5 is out

Package: python-imaging Version: 1.1.4-3 Severity: wishlist PIL 1.1.5 is out, and I'd love to see it in Debian. http://effbot.org/zone/pil-changes-115.htm -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.2

Bug#300209: tomcat4: tomcat dies with "Parse error in default web.xml" after upgrade

Hi Sarge release team, The java packing team just got blindsided by bug #300209, which appears to have knocked tomcat4 out of Sarge. Heads up that you may hear some begging for re-inclusion in the near future. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#280775: evolution: consistently losing focus when entering mail address

Package: evolution Version: 2.0.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #280775 I suffer from exactly the same problem. It is the number one usability problem I am facing with Debian. The problem occurs for me all the time because my mouse is on a slightly tilted surface and tends to slide around a lot (as soon as

Bug#334698: htdig: AMD64 arch corrupts databases

Package: htdig Version: 1:3.1.6-11 Severity: normal Running the AMD64 arch of htdig turns existing databases into mulch, generating errors like: BAD TAG IN SERIALIZED DATA: 177 Besides corrupting databases when writing to them, htsearch can't successfully read a i386 generated database. Fortunat

Bug#322212: remove gnocatan

I resign as the gnocatan package maintainer and request removal of the gnocatan-* packages from Etch and Sid. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322212: gnocatan: replaced by pioneers

Hi Bas, Handle as you see fit. Cheers, Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#332653: mhonarc: Huge memory usage (>>1Gb on 30Mb mail box) (patch)

Is the fundamental problem in perl, mhonarc, or both?

Bug#332653: [bug #14747] major (10X) memory savings possible in some situations

URL: Summary: major (10X) memory savings possible in some situations Project: MHonArc Submitted by: jab Submitted on: Sat 10/08/05 at 04:11 Category: None

Bug#272295: The natives are restless

I'm available for upload tonight. Will be out eating dinner shortly, though. Barry, do you think we'll need to reupload after kaffe fixes unicode (my guess is no, but the easy way to check is run the unit tests with a Sun runtime after compiling with kaffe). In any case, it will be very good to en

Bug#272295: The natives are restless

I have tested the kaffe built Lucene with the Sun runtime - all unit tests pass including the one giving us headaches. Thus there is no reason to believe the kaffe compiled jar is any worse than the Sun compiled jar currently in contrib. [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.ru.TestRus

Bug#272295: The natives are restless

>I just talked with ftp-master. Your upload is broken. When moving >packages to main you need to include the orig.tar.gz in the upload. I re-uploaded the package along with the orig.tar.gz. If more fancy trickery is required, please let me know. Thanks, Jeff

Bug#272295: kaffe CVS HEAD successfully compiles rmi class for lucene; passes unit tests

Awesome! --Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#272295: Fw: Re: Version 1.9

-Original Message- From: John Haxby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Version 1.9 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:04:23 +0100 John Haxby wrote: [...] compiled with gcj that I believe is compiled with gcj [...] It's only compiled once with gcj, if at all :-) Yo

Bug#272295: Unit test failure for org.apache.analysis.ru.RussianStem

An endianess problem sounds like a buffer overrun, which presumably only happens in native code. I wonder if running kaffe under valgrind while performing the unit test would show anything interesting. Is GNU Classpath written in native code or in Java?

Bug#322212: gnocatan: replaced by pioneers

Package: gnocatan Severity: normal Gnocatan has been renamed upstream to Pioneers. Pioneers packages are now inside Debian. The Gnocatan packages should either be removed completely, or replaced with empty packages with a Pioneers dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstab

Bug#321382: siege: segfault on AMD64

Package: siege Version: 2.61-1 Severity: normal apt-get source siege cd siege-2.61 ./configure make gdb ./siege current directory is /tmp/siege-2.61/src/ GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, a

Bug#400109: lucene: FTBFS: random, different build failures

While trying to autobuild lucene, I ran into several different failures. Over 16 builds, it failed 3 times and timeouted once. And succeeded 12 times? Sounds good enough to me. Let's leave this alone until etch is released, then can look into switching to a Sun JDK build (once the Sun JDK gets

Bug#400109: Can we downgrade severity to important on #400109?

However, I would prefer it to be etch-ignored instead of set to 'important', since serious bugs are less likely to be ignored. With all due respect, tough toenails. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#400109: Can we downgrade severity to important on #400109?

This bug does not "have a major effect on the usability of the package" so I am therefore resetting severity to normal. It will not be ignored. After the Sun JDK enters main (post etch), we will rebuild the package with it. Hopefully that will resolve the intermittent build failure. Jeff -- To

Bug#290454: Manual compile seems to confirm initial error

I checked the list archives for lucene-user and lucene-dev; there is no mention of kaffe anywhere. There is some mention that lucene requires Sun Java 1.3 or later, and is thinking about requiring Sun Java 1.4 or later for a future Lucene release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Bug#296326: Fixed upstream

Ok, the new package is uploaded to unstable (will get there in 12 hours or something like that). People who suffer from this bug, please check if 0.8.1.54 fixes the problem. If it is fixed for you, send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:47:18 +0100, Roland Clobus <[EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#296326: Debug information:

Not that I can think of. You may want to ask that question on upstreams mailing list. On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 8:41 am, Steve Kemp wrote: I rebuilt the package from source to see if that would help, using '--enable-debug' gives me this output: (I rolled, entered trade, swapped 4-for-1, at which

Bug#296326: gnocatan-client: Crash after trading fails.

Thanks. Because this patch treats the symptom, not the disease, I'm going to just hold it until upstream has a chance to take a serious look. Cheers, Jeff PS. Are you really in Iceland or is that just your email address? One of the gnocatan tile sets is made from photographs taken in Iceland. On

Bug#296326: gnocatan trade bug

It's very possible that I will not be able to do something about this bug for a while. I'm very busy this week and am going to be away this weekend at a cross country ski race. If a Debian developer is really anxious, go ahead and do a non-maintainer upload (NMU). Either keep an eye on a fix fro

Bug#377187: lucene2 packages

Wonderful! My initial suggestions are to build the JavaCC portions, don't depend on the precompiled classes shipped with Lucene. Also, I didn't see the tests being run; this is probably a good idea. Look through the current Debian (or Ubuntu) rules file for ideas on how to do this. Since this bui

Bug#388535: Patch for NMU 1.4.3.dfsg-1.2

Thank you, Thijs! --Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377187: Lucene 2.x

Given how much grief there's been with Lucene 1.4.x, I think it makes sesne to package version 2.x as a separate package. It will may also be easier to start out in contrib and use Sun Java to build. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#697966: leptonica-progs: 'man leptonica' oversells command line help.

Thank you for this report. I talked to upstream. First, the grep you used is incorrect; sometimes the help info is in the library but in main(). Second, we'll tone down the level of confidence in the manpage and increase the ratio of help in the next release, which is coming soon.

Bug#731168: Acknowledgement (transition: libwebp)

Ping.

Bug#731168: transition: libwebp

Thank you, Julien. I'll talk to upstream and get a few more details. They definitely bumped the soname for their release, and probably for a good reason. The libwebp upstream folks generally have their act together.

Bug#673934: perceptualdiff: Consider switching to OpenMP version

I would be happy to cede this package to someone with the energy to make the switch.

Bug#735510: transition: tesseract

Upstream has looked at compatibility and decided to not bump soname for this package. I'll give things a week to settle down and then this bug is ready for closure.

Bug#737481: tesseract: undefined symbol: _Z16tprintf_internalPKcz

Thank you for the problem report. I will adjust the dependency.

Bug#735103: update of debian/copyright

Thanks. Fixing debian/copyright today. Upstream is cleaning up the oddball headers in three files and that will be part of the version 1.70 final, to be released next week.

Bug#735509: transition: leptonlib

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Leptonica upstream is releasing a new version that will have an increased soname (liblept3 -> liblept4). No exotic challenges expected. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid

Bug#735510: transition: tesseract

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Tesseract upstream is releasing a new version that will have an increased soname (libtesseact3 -> libtesseract4). No exotic challenges expected. -- System Information: Debian Release: wh

Bug#728119: libwebp4: Build with support for WebP files with metadata

Sounds reasonable to me. Checking if upstream has any thoughts on the matter. I'm shocked, shocked that someone is forking PIL! Unless they add CCITT Group4 TIFF support, in which case I'm delighted.

Bug#731168: transition: libwebp

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Upstream is releasing a new version of webp soon that has an expanded API, and therefore will bump soname and package from libwebp4 to libwebp5. Reverse dependency list appended; I think

Bug#749953: pkg-config file missing

Will add to next release (coming up over the next month or two) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#750632: (no subject)

Thanks. NMU is acceptable, otherwise I'll get to it as soon as I get a chance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#742027: tesseract-ocr: tesseract doesn't start

Package: tesseract-ocr Version: 3.03.02-3 This is unexpected. The build dependency is on libleptonica-dev (>= 1.70~) which is leptonlib4. I don't see how or where a leptonlib3 could be sneaking in.

Bug#742027: tesseract-ocr: tesseract doesn't start

Package: tesseract-ocr Version: 3.03.02-3 I can't reproduce this. Please run ldd and md5sum on /usr/bin/tesseract and report the results. === $ curl http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/tesseract/tesseract-ocr_3.03.02-3_i386.deb> foo.deb $ ar x foo.deb $ tar xJvf data.tar.xz $ ldd usr/bin

Bug#742029: tesseract-ocr: Trainingtools missing in SID version (3.03.02-3)

Package: tesseract-ocr Version: 3.03.02-3 Problem confirmed, working on fix.

Bug#697544: tesseract-ocr: Segfault in batch processing

Upstream says: I think this might be a known issue that we have fixed in our [unreleased] version. Could do to get the svn repository up to date. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > I don't understand what you mean by "hardly trackable". The back

Bug#697967: leptonica-progs: 'man leptonica' SEE ALSO: 58% absent.

This is all very helpful. Well get an updated man page with the next Leptonica release. It almost sounds like you are interested in being a co-maintainer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#697544: tesseract-ocr: Segfault in batch processing

Thank you for the report. Please supply data and a simple command that reproduces the problem. The following command (with the standard tesseract-ocr-deu-frak Debian package installed) does not segfault for me. -Jeff $ while true; do tesseract img028.tif img028.txt -l deu-frak; done Tesseract Ope

Bug#697544: tesseract-ocr: Segfault in batch processing

I don't understand what you mean by "hardly trackable". The backtrace is helpful, thank you. But also having an easy, guaranteed way to reproduce the problem is also helpful. Is there some reason you do not wish to supply the images? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.deb

Bug#689240: please use a VCS for the packaging

>I wanted to locally build a newer tesseract package of upstreams current SVN What's wrong with uupdate? It took me about five minutes to build today's 3.02.02 point release. >May I help you setting up a git repo? Sounds scary. I'm comfortable with the current setup; will I get confused going to

Bug#684339: libwebp 0.2.1?

I'm not sure why experimental would be faster. In any case, since you packaged it, why not go ahead and upload? You have my blessing.

Bug#684339: libwebp 0.2.1?

I can't remember what I did for the libpng dependency. One used to be able to pull the package out of NEW and take a look, but maybe that is not possible anymore. I definitely changed the soname. Happy to sponsor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#684339: libwebp 0.2.1?

You aren't getting off that easy! Please add your name as an Uploader. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

Pascal, libwebp-0.1.99 bumps the soname from 2 to 3. Are you SURE you want that and are ready for this to ship? Soname changes are a big deal out here in packaging land. Shawn, I have the package built and ready, awaiting response from Pascal before submitting. -Jeff

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

> > As mentioned, we're going to do 0.2.0 very soon after... > Well, should we wait for 0.2.0 ? ETA?

Bug#685189: copyright file missing a detail

Package: python-pygame Version: 1.9.1release+dfsg-6 The copyright file says the following: Files: lib/freesansbold.ttf Copyright: 2002-2009 Free Software Foundation License: GPL-3.0+ However, that is incomplete. The actual license is GPL 3+ with an important exception. Please update the copyrigh

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

Working on packaging. Hit a small snag, most likely something on my end. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#684339: new upstream version (v0.1.99)

Okay, I worked it out. New files uploaded to Debian. I assume/hope the chromium folks who filed this bug are on top of any freeze related issues that are in effect. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@

Bug#659934: RM: tesseract-ocr-lat-lid -- ROM mislabeled, useless package

module for discriminating latin derviced languages. So specialized that it is completely useless outside upstream's compute environment. To reduce confusion I request its removal. Jeff Breidenbach j...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/

Bug#664176: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Just for background information, Leptonica has a big hulking API, something on the order of a thousand calls. Upstream is constantly making tweaks around the periphery, often just adding more stuff. In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump the soname up to 3 in one of the rele

Bug#657896: libwebp: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-2.1

Looks good to me. No need for delay.

Bug#658095: tesseract-ocr-eng: breaks tesseract-ocr (<< 3) and ocropus (without actually declaring Breaks)

Bug report is slightly mistaken. Ocropus does not depend on tesseract-eng. Tesseract-eng broke the older tesseract-ocr, and then tesseract-ocr broke ocropus. Fundamentally, new language data doesn't work with older binaries. I'll try this in the language packs: Breaks: tesseract-ocr (<<  ${binary

Bug#658095: tesseract-ocr-eng: breaks tesseract-ocr (<< 3) and ocropus (without actually declaring Breaks)

Very sorry, did not mean to close this bug prematurely. >[tesseract-ocr-eng] does break ocropus directly (too?). >ocropus is statically linked to Tesseract libraries. If ocropus is depending on tesseract-ocr-eng, shoudn't the ocropus package declare a dependency? Are you sure the right fix isn't

Bug#658095: tesseract-ocr-eng: breaks tesseract-ocr (<< 3) and ocropus (without actually declaring Breaks)

I double checked - lintian doesn't complain. Ocropus unsurprising fails to build from source in its current state. $ apt-get source -b ocropus checking for err_exit in -ltesseract_full... no configure: error: Could not find tesseract! Choose --without-tesseract if you do not want to use it. --

Bug#658476: libtesseract3: undeclared file conflict with tesseract-ocr

Doing this Package: libtesseract3 Breaks: tesseract-ocr (<< 3.01~) Replaces: tesseract-ocr (<< 3.01~) ... Because of this 7.6.1 Overwriting files in other packages It is usually an error for a package to contain files which are on the system in another package. However, if the overwri

Bug#658478: tesseract: no tesseract-ocr-dev -> libtesseract-dev upgrade path

>1) There's no mention of this rename in the changelog. Fixed (will upload shortly) >2) There are packages that build-depend on tesseract-ocr-dev, which you >now left unbuildable. What are they? What should I do about this aside from contacting the maintainers? $ apt-rdepends -r -b tesseract-oc

Bug#658478: tesseract: no tesseract-ocr-dev -> libtesseract-dev upgrade path

>2) There are packages that build-depend on tesseract-ocr-dev, which you >now left unbuildable. Also, I strongly suspect the build will break anyway; Tesseract 3.0.x is a big jump from 2.0.4. If you are thinking about Ocropus in particular, let me point you to some relevant discussion. http://gro

Bug#658490: mhonarc: version 2.6.18 fixes security problem, but not in stable

Hello Alvaro, I am aware of the recent upstream report, and also the CVE entry that was fixed in 2.6.18. With respect to the latter, when I last talked to Debian's security team years ago on the topic, they were not enthusiastic about bringing the entire 2.6.18 into older Debian releases. As main

Bug#658099: tesseract-ocr: unconditionally depends on tesseract-ocr-eng

First, sorry for closing bug earlier; it must have gotten lost in the shuffle. I think I'm going to simplify the situation. Upstream has asked every Tesseract to include dependency on "equ" which is equations, "osd" which is orientation and script detection. I'm going to add a direct dependency on

Bug#658099: tesseract-ocr: unconditionally depends on tesseract-ocr-eng

And it won't be worse that what we have now. ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#604520: tesseract-ocr: wordlist2dawg is very slow

Upstream says: "Yes, we know." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#658679: override: libtesseract-dev:libdevel/optional

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal >There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the >override file for the following file(s): > >libtesseract-dev_3.02-3_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override >says graphics. Reason: Lintian wants it there. -- To UNSUB

Bug#611645: Provide information for static library linking

Is this still relevant with the 3.0.x packages? We've stripped the .la files as per bug 658102. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658102 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia

Bug#658478: tesseract: no tesseract-ocr-dev -> libtesseract-dev upgrade path

$ grep-dctrl -FSource:Build-Depends -s Package,Build-Depends tesseract-ocr-dev < /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources Package: ocropus Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), dpkg-dev (>= 1.15.7), autotools-dev, autoconf, automake1.9, libtool, liblua5.1-0-dev, li

Bug#658478:

Statement from Sikuli upstream Sikuli has an experimental tesseract 3 branch https://github.com/sikuli/sikuli/tree/feature/tesseract3. The main reason we aren't not switching to tesseract 3 in an official release is that its recognition performance is worse than 2.04 in our dataset. (Not very

Bug#658634: Fwd: /usr/bin/tesseract: tesseract aborts with assert failure: in WERD_CHOICE::unichar_string()

Reproduced. Trying to remember how to coax GDB into showing line numbers. === $ gdb tesseract GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3-debian Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and

Bug#664176: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

I am also okay with you doing an NMU on Leptonica/Tesseract. Note that Jakub Wilk was fantastically helpful during the great Tesseract renaming a few months ago, although I probably drove him crazy in the process. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#664176: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Yes, I can sponsor. My goal is to not get in the way of your energy, but also be careful to keep the level of chaos under control. The inclusion of Leptonica and Tesseract must not be jeopardized. Jakub, you are welcome to weigh in on this bug if you wish. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug

Bug#684339: Fwd: Comments regarding libwebp_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Chromium people can take this up with Release Team directly if interested. On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi! > > this is a quick update on what's going on with your package in NEW. > > We're holding it due to a library transition which would affect some reverse > depen

Bug#664176: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Leptonica upload commencing now. Tesseract coming. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#664176: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Tesseract uploading now. We'll see how this goes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#682575: leptonica-progs: Please include more programs from prog/

> Hi. I noticed that there are a lot of useful programs in the prog/ > subdirectory of the leptonica lib. It would be nice to include more of > those [...] The author of Leptonica chose the program list. His goal is to ship the good stuff but not spam us with stuff nobody will use. This list can

Bug#682575: leptonica-progs: Please include more programs from prog/

See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/leptonlib/+bug/988112 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#680598: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Looks like an untar problem on my end when I rebuilt the package. Let me try again.

Bug#680598: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Okay, root cause was running patch -p0 in the wrong directory. That's resolved and running a clean build in pbuilder. Let's see if I managed to do the same thing in Leptonica. -Jeff

Bug#680598: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Okay, done. Want to double check this diff.gz file? tesseract_3.02.01-5.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#680598: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

I think we are finally in good shape... $ zcat tesseract_3.02.01-5.diff.gz | grep control --- tesseract-3.02.01.orig/debian/control +++ tesseract-3.02.01/debian/control $ tar tzf tesseract_3.02.01.orig.tar.gz | grep control tesseract-3.02/ccmain/control.h tesseract-3.02/ccmain/control.cpp tesse

Bug#680598: libleptonica: package name doesn't vary with soname

Good catch. Running dch without the -i option put in the [ Jonathan Nieder ] text; it looks like a mechanism for letting two people collaborate on a single changelog entry. Fixing and uploading soon. Fingers crossed.

  1   2   3   >