What Jason said. It's fine for me, on 3.22.2, and more info is needed in
any case.
Also, I suspect it's quite likely this is a duplicate of Bug#843418
Don't. That's blaming Debian for upstream's problems, which are outwith the
distro's control. Complain to the source. Then everyone who uses the
upstream package benefits. Did you think that if you complain loudly enough
to Debian, that its maintainers will wrangle with upstream on your behalf?
The
You asked for "the upstream bug [log, presumably]", so it was reasonable
for people to presume you wanted a list of bugfixes.
upstream is git.gnome.org and browse for gtk+
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Michael Biebl:
> > Am 20.05.2016 um 12:15 schrieb Ximin Luo:
> >> Pac
Yup, I'm beginning to think it'd be good if Debian reverted to 3.18 until
3.20 is less broken. The latter will be great when it's ACTUALLY ready -
but right now, it's a rushed-out, poorly tested mess in various areas.
Maybe they felt meeting some deadline took precedence over actually testing
every
Thanks, Paul: I can confirm the below on unstable. Executing sudo aptitude
install context sorted this...
...but seeing as this pulled in a whopping 365 MB of archives (and that's
just the compressed version), which I might've never voluntarily installed,
possibly just to get a single file that re
Hi,
After speaking with the author of the menu music, he has licensed it under
CC-BY-3.0. The latest package reflects this:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfighter/bitfighter_019d+dfsg-14.dsc
I also replaced the 'Play' font usage with 'LiberationSans' so it isn't so
ugly (becau
Bitfighter is ready for another review. See the package here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitfighter/bitfighter_019d+dfsg-14.dsc
Please forgive the double post. I had used poor subjects for previous e-mails.
Thanks!
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...
Sorry about the delay, first message got caught by the debian spam filter.
Here are the screenshots. Attached.
Thanks,
David
Hi,
I am attempting to continue the work that Bryan started for packaging
bitfighter. Wish me good fortune!
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I am attempting to continue the work of a previous developer on packaging the
game 'bitfighter'. He had previously uploaded a package here:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/bitfighter
However, I find that this has been deleted. Is there any possible way to
restore it?
He had gotte
15, 2015 at 4:23 AM, D B wrote:
>
> > However, I find that this has been deleted. Is there any possible way to
> > restore it?
>
> I checked on the mentors server already (for someone else?) and found
> no copies, however his packaging is present in the upstream c
I have a crude package building again on mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bitfighter
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bitfighter"
* Package name: bitfighter
Version : 019d-2
Upstream Author : Chris Eykamp
* URL : http://bitfi
so file a bug upstream with a patch. I don't see why this should be
debian's problem. Fyi, the docs seem to come from here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/docs/reference/gtk/gtk-query-settings.xml?h=gtk-3-22
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 3:05 PM, D. B. wrote:
> so file a bug upstream with a patch. I don't see why this should be
> debian's problem. Fyi, the docs seem to come from here:
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/docs/reference/gtk/
> gtk-query-settings.xml?h=gtk-3-22
&g
#2 seems like the superior option, right?
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Dariusz Gadomski <
dariusz.gadom...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Looks like this behaviour was introduced with a change to cairo
> in version 1.12.16-4 [1]. So looks like gtk was depending on being
> linked to libGL.so indirect
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Daniel
>
>
> I see that you've been working with upstream, trying to resolve this.
> Thanks a lot for that.
> The latest stable release 3.22.5, contains your patches.
>
> What's unclear to me is whether your patches replace the above two
>
Are you using X.org or Wayland, and which GTK+ theme?
I get this sometimes in unstable of today, even without automatic login
being enabled.
Did anyone ever find a fix? This can be hugely disruptive.
Sometimes messing around with the Ctrl+Alt+F1 etc works to get a working
login screen, but I don't think this always works, so sometimes, the
session i
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jeffrey H. Ingber
wrote:
> Package: gtk+3.0
> Version: libgtk-3-0:amd64
>
> All combo boxes under gtk 3 attempt to open in the very far upper-left
> hand corner of the screen. Maybe you can see part of the combo box, and
> maybe you can't.
>
>
This is hardly enoug
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 09:01, D. B. wrote:
>
>> Why did you log this against 3.20.9 if that one is fine?
>>
>
> I reply only to the constructive part of your message.
>
No, you reply only to the part that doesn't
As a fellow user I would request that you file this bug upstream so that
GTK+ are aware of how annoying it is, if no one has already filed such a
ticket (I could not find one on an extremely brief search)
This annoyance is not debian specific, so why (A) burden the deb
maintainers, (B) not make GT
y been reported, I forgot to add links. I hope they fix this
> problem but maybe would be faster to use the Ubuntu patch.
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766089
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758065
>
> 2016-09-07 21:12 GMT-03:00 D. B. :
>
>> A
Why are you reporting this here? Upstream would be happy to hear about it,
but it's not Debian's problem (and nor is it serious enough to warrant a
distro-specific patch)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Joe Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Package: libgtk-3-0
> Version: 3.21.4-1
> Severity: minor
>
> gssize
With respect (and forasmuch as I love anything that promotes vim) - if some
program and/or theme has managed to request <= 0 size for a widget, then
it's broken GTK+, not the other way around.
That said, on a quick glance at the gtk-3-22 branch, I can't see any
changes in gtkwidget.c that would've
Are you using unstable? Then you have no right to be melodramatic about
people "demolishing" the distro.
It's not the maintainers fault if 3rd-party software is not up to date with
the libraries on which it relies. And by using unstable or testing, the
user accepts the very likely possibility of t
Hello,
I also second this request, for whatever it's worth. As of now with Debian
unstable I don't have GTK+3 in Firefox and can see no way to install/enable
it.
Cheers!
That warning has been widely reported for countless packages and should be
resolved by the app developer. Still, to keep people happy until then, it
will be silenced by default in GTK+ 3.22.1 (accidentally got omitted in
3.22.0)
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=54fdcb3ffac3383432b379f3
Package: gtk-3.0
Version: 3.22.0-1
Hello,
The problem here is this patch:
https://sources.debian.net/src/gtk%2B3.0/3.22.0-1/debian/
patches/016_no_offscreen_widgets_grabbing.patch/
although its counterpart looks similarly old and ill-substantiated:
https://sources.debian.net/src/gtk%2B3.0/3.22
Package: libgtk-3-0
I'm still trying to figure out how this adventure game, I mean bugtracker,
works - so forgive me if I seem to be spamming or failing comedically. In
this case, I got the package name wrong, since the Package Tracker seems to
use a different name from the Bug Tracker. Which is h
Package: libreoffice-calc
Version: 5.1.4.2 and 5.1.5.1
Build ID: 1:5.1.4~rc2-2 and 1:5.1.5~rc1-1
Dear Maintainer,
Tooltips are no longer shown in LibreOffice Calc when dragging to 'fill
series' - and possibly in other location that use the same kind of
tooltips. (Note that normal GTK+ tooltips o
31 matches
Mail list logo
