d unblock would not look
completely insane to me, considering the package has been living for
two months in unstable and the world did not explode yet.
(Disclaimer: I'm no member of the release team.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.as
posed changes look good, and I recommend the
release team grants the requested unblock.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
ng a debdiff and explaining in more
details what the changes are, what specific bugs they fix, and why it
satisfies the current freeze policy.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
opose a package for
testing-proposed-updates, or get them as 1.3.5-3 into sid with minimal
changes, depending on whether the 1.3.4-1 to 1.3.5-2 delta itself
meets the freeze policy?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ http
e team closes this
unblock request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
#x27;ll include this translation as a Debian specific change.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
Hi,
Eduard Bloch wrote (27 Jan 2013 13:14:53 GMT) :
> * intrigeri [Sat, Jan 26 2013, 10:33:35PM]:
>> intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 10:58:28 GMT) :
>> > Eduard, given the apparent brokenness of the version currently in
>> > testing, the size of the delta, and the
it crashed before installing the package and now works like a charm).
Thanks a lot, this is really helpful!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSU
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote (26 Jan 2013 13:41:14 GMT) :
> Intrigeri, we should go through this list, and see which bugs will be
> closed/are duplicates and we should list them in the changelog:
Agreed.
> - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667032
> - http://bugs.debian
; keyring if necessary.
The diff is way out of my comfort zone to review, but FWIW I've
upgraded to the sid version (and asked a few other people to do so
too) in order to bring some first-hand real world testing reports and
ease the decision. I'll report back in a week.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
n", etc.
(No, I'm not volunteering for anything more than testing these user
stories once before they're published.)
But perhaps I'm making it too much of a deal and the release team
would be happy to unblock this package without all these efforts that
might be better spen
y the Debian Live
maintainers, so given live-tools does not seem ready for Wheezy
yet [1], I see little benefit to unblocking 3.0.1x now, only to see it
unsupported in testing, and eventually having to unblock 3.0.2x or
something again for Wheezy in a few weeks.
[1] http://live.debian.net/devel/rf
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 14:33:28 GMT) :
> (Cc'ing the maintainer, who may have his opinion on the matter.)
It's been a month and a half since I wrote this, and I can see no
indication that Michael thinks this version of synaptic should be
unblocked for Wheezy, so I recommen
their side, but quite some time has passed since then so I'm
not sure what I would decide if I were in their position.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
nd to backport
the minimal bugfix for Wheezy into 0.2.20-2.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debia
x on
the right. If I click refresh they get populated.
This was fixed in upstream Git six months ago (commit b00f51dc, that
also has the two lines fix for upstream Trac#6482), released in
Vidalia 0.2.21 two months ago. I intend to backport the minimal fix of
Trac#6483 for Wheezy in 0.2.20-2.
Ch
, and
> the buildd's all look fine here with the exception of hurd-i386:
I cannot replicate this FTBFS with 1.25-1 in my kfreebsd-amd64 VM
(perl 5.14.2-5, libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3).
Regards,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri
Hi,
(disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team, merely trying to help.)
Matthias Klumpp wrote (12 Dec 2012 12:47:07 GMT) :
> +packagekit (0.7.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
> + * Removed some unused build dependencies
I'm not sure the build dependencies changes qualify for an unblock
reque
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Noël,
Bob Bib wrote (20 Dec 2012 21:05:32 GMT) :
> Please unblock package hwdata.
> [...]
> unblock hwdata/0.234-1
First, I guess it would be useful to hear from the maintainer:
do you think this update is fit / needed for Wheezy?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
three formats supported by vite).
Thanks.
No reverse dependencies, priority: optional, leaf package.
I don't feel I'm qualified to review the actual code changes,
but they are indeed non-intrusive, relatively short,
and to the point as far as I can tell.
Cheers,
--
intrige
it's
getting less clear to me. Steve, what's your take on that regression?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (05 Dec 2012 23:53:13 GMT) :
> After looking around a bit, reproducing the bug, getting more
> information from submitters and merging accordingly, this bug looks
> a bit more important to me than it's current "normal"
Hi,
Christian Perrier wrote (02 Jan 2013 06:03:19 GMT) :
> The NMU I uploaded yesterdaty includes 3 upstream patches
> cherry-picked by Jérémy Bobbio to fix #673042 (loses 'legacy BIOS
> bootable' flag on GPT disks).
I've tested the updated package and can confirm it does fix the RC bug.
I'm not
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I'm not a member of the Release Team,
merely trying to help with some unblock requests.)
Alessio Treglia wrote (02 Jan 2013 13:59:00 GMT) :
> unblock accountsservice/0.6.21-8
Thanks.
The debdiff looks good, but it seems that 0.6.21-8 somehow did not
make it into the archive yet
the file /tmp/virt_, it will hang
> the
> instalation.
>From a remote point-of-view, this is worrying: do you mean something
during the installation will access or create a file with a fixed name
in /tmp? May it have security implications?
Cheers,
--
intriger
Hi,
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (02 Jan 2013 20:22:43 GMT) :
> intrigeri
>> From a remote point-of-view, this is worrying: do you mean something
>> during the installation will access or create a file with a fixed name
>> in /tmp?
> Yes.
>> May
ugs in packages of priority:
optional or extra, only when this can be done via unstable;
What do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
n.net/job/chroot-installation_squeeze_install_gnome_upgrade_to_wheezy/lastBuild/consoleFull
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
> wheezy).
Fair enough.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
s like a local
> (mis)configuration problem.
I can't reproduce this bug, either.
$ python -c 'import gio; f = gio.File("file:/tmp/Nothing-to-hide.pdf");print
f.query_default_handler();'
Tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer
how about trying to bisect this problem by copying into
a fresh user account parts of your dotfiles until you manage to
reproduce the problem?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.o
according to popcon
=> low risk.)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
diff -Nru parcimonie-0.7/bin/parcimonie parcimonie-0.7.1/bin/parcimonie
--- parcimonie-
the symbolic link is
broken) look trivial, harmless, and useful enough to be worth
including in Wheezy at this point.
=> Julien's third alternative makes sense to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fing
nt?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
d_extension's value to the new path, if and only if
its original value is still the one shipped in Squeeze, looks doable.
But perhaps we want to avoid hard-coding this path once again?
Any idea how this could be achieved? (I guess the maintainers did not
do it that way simpl
ba) in the Git packaging
repository. Thank you. Tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@li
t sure this would
be suitable for a freeze exception, if it does not fix a RC bug.
So, from a release engineering PoV, I suggest we address the
RC-buggy(?) part of the bug report first :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR f
it.
> Ok great, i just canceled it!
All reproducible RC bugs against dovecot have been fixed in Git for
a month. Can we expect a package suitable for a freeze unblock request
to be uploaded any time soon?
Thank you for maintaining Dovecot in Debian!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ http
4bcab6d9f0e1f09aef6491b
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
needed.
Thank you for your work on poedit in Debian so far :)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
r basis. Do you
think you will manage to do that consistently, now that you're back,
or should we hunt for another co-maintainer to help handle that part
of the workload?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https:/
Hi,
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (31 Oct 2012 17:15:28 GMT) :
> intrigeri, since you could reproduce the problem, could you test,
> whether this patch fixes the problem for you?
I confirm I cannot reproduce the bug anymore with brasero 3.4.1-4.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @
ogic right :)
Looks good to me.
Holger Levsen wrote (26 Oct 2012 23:56:23 GMT) :
> I fear I might "just" be busy with DebConf13...
Thank you for taking care of this.
> I certainly loved a clear patch ;)
Then you should be happy with gregoa's one,
and Wheezy will have one les
0-lame
pn gstreamer0.10-plugins-really-bad
ii gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly 0.10.19-2+b2
-- no debconf information
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intri
lready fixed in the upstream git and
> in the SVN.
Giovanni, can you reproduce this bug with current sound-juicer?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To
;m under the impression this bug report should be closed.
Did I miss anything?
(The following discussion, about failing to build on Ubuntu, seems
more or less disconnected, and there are probably better places to
track it than this very bug.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
is other issue needs its own bug
report, isn't it?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.
ore-or-less-tiling environment, that is clearly
not bug-free either, but is at least barely usable.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
place.)
> But packages which mangle load-path themselves are unchanged.
> If they put themselves at the front of the load-path they that's
> where they stay. (A deliberate decision so as not to upset anything
> which has to or had to force an order ...)
Yes. This will be for
incent, have you tested how your suggestions behave on a CRT display?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
e, but I think it depends on *how much* it
is degraded. Hence the need for testing.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Josselin Mouette wrote (07 Nov 2012 18:13:18 GMT) :
> Is gvfs-backends installed?
Yes, it is.
Should I retry after removing it?
Cheers
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
eezy all works as
> expected, also when started via systemd.
These two messages in a row from Ingo tend to make me think this bug
was fixed at some point. Can you reproduce it on current Wheezy?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
I suggest s,rkward/,rkward/qwinhost/,
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
I'm not part of the release team.
Merely trying to help a bit.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (08 Nov 2012 09:21:06 GMT) :
> #690409: php5-xcache: upgrades clobber local changes to xcache.ini
> It has been closed by Michal Čihař .
I'm a bit unsure about the bugfix:
I just upgraded php5-xcache 2.0.0-2 from testing to 2.0.0-3 from sid.
My own /etc/php5
tell me more
clearly what I should do. Probably not a blocker, though.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...
tend I have seriously
reviewed the diff, but I've read it all, and it seems to make sense.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
ttp://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=278&r2=279
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
idea to unblock this package
at this time of the Wheezy release cycle. I'm sorry, and I hope this
package is not too much of a pain to maintain in stable backports.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffe
late
for Wheezy.
> Users should check package's README.Debian and modify
> /etc/default/grub and run update-grub by hand if it's not
> introduced this change. For better user friendly package, I want it
> put to Wheezy.
I appreciate your concern about usability.
Cheers,
--
bind-dynamic mode
... and I would not bet that's enough.
Simon, are you interested in listing the commits that are needed,
on top of 2.62-3, to fix CVE-2012-3411 without breaking anything?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
930.
How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
> unblock fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
Looks good, since the ttf-liberation transitional package ships
compatibility symlinks.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Hi david,
david sporschill wrote (25 Dec 2009 20:39:24 GMT) :
> Package: sound-juicer
> Version: 2.28.1-1
> when starting cd-ripping (mp3-encoding) sound-juicer segfaults.
Can you reproduce this bug with current sound-juicer?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG ke
Giovanni Mascellani wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:15:58 GMT) :
> No, apparently the problem has been fixed (although my environment
> completely changes since I wrote to the report).
> BTW, I'm using 3.4.0-3.
Nice to read. Thanks for reporting back. Accordingly marking as fixed
in this version.
--
To
Adam D. Barratt wrote (04 Aug 2012 09:56:26 GMT) :
> For the record: the new package is therefore currently in NEW.
Still true.
Kees Cook wrote:
> I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development
> work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward.
I am not sure I exact
nblock dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
-perl (>= 1.245),
I'm under the impression that debian/control was not updated to match
e.g. the bumped versioned dependency on Config::Model. Perhaps it's
not an isolated case.
> + migriate older configurations without user interaction (cme migrate
s/migriate/migrat
er another system(like livecd)
^^
Missing space
> +1. luksOpen with the new name, change the target name to the new one
> +2. chroot into it(now, the living target name is the same as it in
^^
Missing space
Ch
erfect if it had been
applied right from the beginning, and I guess it's good for Squeeze to
Wheezy upgrades, but apparently it does not deal well with
Wheezy->Wheezy upgrades :(
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
|
imported from the new Mozilla certdata, but the way
debian/changelog is phrased leads me believe the only changes is
adding CA certificates, which apparently is not the case.
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intr
tags 692928 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) :
> unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9
The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is
supposed to meet the current guidelines for freeze exceptions [1].
Please clarify.
[1] http://releas
Hi,
david sporschill wrote (11 Nov 2012 00:06:37 GMT) :
> no, i cannot reproduce this bug in the current version. it works fine!
Thanks for reporting back.
Accordingly marking as fixed in this version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Yes file is introduced to suppress the lintian warning.
A Lintian override would be less hackish, and would express the intent
a bit more clearly, wouldn't it?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://g
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote (20 Sep 2012 11:21:04 GMT) :
> #681426: syslinux-themes-debian-wheezy: extlinux/theme.cfg refers to
> debian-squeeze files
> It has been closed by Daniel Baumann
> .
I stumbled upon this critical bug while looking at the list of those
fixed in sid but not in
hat libquvi -backed software don't.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
ly new
upstream release, it probably won't be granted a freeze exception. So,
what's the plan? Fixing #675895 in Wheezy through tpu? Removing parrot
from Wheezy altogether?)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
he FTBFS on a wheezy chroot.
Great news! One less RC bug in Wheezy :)
> I think it can be set as fixed by icu/4.8.1.1-8.
I'll let you proceed, then.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcana
an undocumented change in
a security-sensitive area. I'm still curious and feeling like this
should be documented somehow, but I'll happily let others decide how
important this concern of mine is important for Debian.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.o
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote (10 Nov 2012 20:51:33 GMT) :
> I did test both and in both cases I had .dpkg-something files
> around. Maybe I just did not torture dpkg enough to test all
> cases...
I just tried again:
1. install 2.0.0-1 (not sure it's needed, but I wanted to simulate
a "coming from p
Hi,
Anton Gladky wrote (11 Nov 2012 22:00:06 GMT) :
> So, probably, backports are much better alternative for gmsh in
> this case.
You may want to close this bug, then.
Cheers!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
,
you know how much degraded your experience of the Debian desktop
was previously.
We might want to get this into Wheezy at the same time as the fix
for #684923.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
Hi,
> The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move),
I think this unblock request should wait until it's clarified on
#690409 that the absolute extension path is updated or .dpkg-dist
appears through every supported upgrade path.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key
to enabling bitmapped fonts: just
+removing the no-bitmaps.conf symlink is not enough, the corresponding
+symlink for yes-bitmaps.conf needs to be added too.
+Thanks to Andreas Metzler for the patch.
+Closes: #684923.
+
+ -- intrigeri Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:09:54 +0100
+
fontconfig
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 22:40:05 GMT) :
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:14 intrigeri wrote:
>> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) :
>> > There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would
>> > be better to set Daniel as owner of t
Hi,
Eduard Bloch wrote (13 Dec 2012 22:35:45 GMT) :
> Here is a little patch, would you like to test it?
This patch fixes the bug for me, thanks!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ ht
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I'm neither part of the release team nor speaking on
behalf of it.)
> Therefore I would like to seek preapproval of grml-debootstrap/0.54.
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fin
y comment on Adam's reasoning about how the fix is sub-optimal,
and about his suggestions to improve it? (Related question: what's
the upstream status of this patch, by the way?)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.as
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
>> We do not have access to NEW. Hence you'd need to provide us with
>> a debdiff for us to voice our opinion about it.
> Attached.
The patch was too big, so it did not make it to the list, but it is
attached to the
Package: gpa
Severity: minor
Upstream homepage has moved to
http://www.gnupg.org/related_software/gpa/,
and the old one 404's.
Please update the Homepage control field accordingly.
Thanks for maintaining GPA in Debian!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
> intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
>> How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
>> current testing's gpa?
It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1].
I'm not fluent at
noisy indentation changes filtered
out. These, and a few others changes I noticed while having a first
glance at the diff, are not documented in debian/changelog.
This makes the reviewers life quite harder.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.or
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
> On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
>> library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the version
>> emb
Hi,
Ivo De Decker wrote (14 Dec 2012 15:07:06 GMT) :
> I would like to ask pre-approval for a TPU upload of redhat-cluster.
I did not check the exact files list is correct,
but otherwise the diff looks good.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
sual"
unblock request reviews.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (26 Dec 2012 09:58:31 GMT) :
> unblock fuse/2.9.0-2+deb7u1
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
> On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
>>
>> 1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the "current copy of
>> Wheezy's p
Hi,
(I'm not part of the Release Team, just trying to help them.)
Michael Biebl wrote (20 Dec 2012 23:33:19 GMT) :
> retitle 696116 unblock: systemd/44-7
The diff looks good to me, and the resulting packages have been
working fine on my main system for a week.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
401 - 500 of 3776 matches
Mail list logo
