Source: ahven
Version: 2.4+repack-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ┌──
Source: factory-boy
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: E
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>>
>
>>Besides, it'd be appreciated if you also can setup DM upload
>>permission of this package for me, after this upload.
>>Thank you!
>
>
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/271663979/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.libcork_0.15.0+ds-4_BUI
Source: libnetfilter-cttimeout
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libconfig-model-lcdproc-perl
Version: 2.047-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopeful
Source: guile-gnome-platform
Version: 2.16.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libxml-dumper-perl
Version: 0.81-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> f
Source: macsyfinder
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: E
Source: zsh
Version: 5.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering di
Source: ktp-accounts-kcm
Version: 15.08.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
در تاریخ ۸ ژوئیهٔ ۲۰۱۶ ۲:۱۸، "Debian Bug Tracking System" <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> نوشت:
> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> this Bug report.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is bein
Source: r10k
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Erro
Sven Joachim:
> Control: reassign -1 debhelper 9.20160702
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Am 08.07.2016 um 07:07 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
>
>> [...]
>
> It's a regression in debhelper 9.20160702 that is triggered if a package
> symlinks its doc directory with "dh_installdocs --link-doc" _and_
> ins
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the libxapool-java package, this is an old JDBC pooling API
used by libspring-java until the version 2.5. This dependency is no longer
used and can now be removed.
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
Package: libmustache-d-dev
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: important
Hi!
I'm trying to deploy asgen on a Canonical cloud instance. These have
restricted internet access, meaning they can't download random stuff for
the internet. That exposed to me this bug:
ubuntu@asgen:~/appstream-generator$ dub b
I'll fix that in the next upload
On July 8, 2016 11:51:32 AM GMT+02:00, "Sandro Knauß"
wrote:
>Hey,
>
>I saw that you pushed libkolab 1.0 to unstable but you introduced the
>php
>bindings again. I think you overlooked the NMU (0.6.0-3.1) made by
>Ondřej Surý
> had removed the php bindings for
severity 829701 serious
thanks
this is still a legal issue
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > > Are there any other discussions about this where others agree with your
> > > interpretation about this? #760306 is still
Source: django-localflavor
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9
User: la...@debian.org
Usertags: network-access
Dear Maintainer,
Whilst django-localflavor builds successfully on unstable/amd64, according to
Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not attempt network access during
a b
Control: clone 806033 -1
Control: reassign -1 cli-common-dev
Control: retitle -1 dh_clideps expects dh_makeshlibs, but dh_makeshlibs isn't
called when building arch-indep packages
Control: affects: -1 src:gmime
On Wed 2016-07-06 12:55:59 -0400, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Mirco Ba
Source: django-polymorphic
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9
User: la...@debian.org
Usertags: network-access
Dear Maintainer,
Whilst django-polymorphic builds successfully on unstable/amd64, according to
Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not attempt network access during
a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-setuptest"
* Package name: django-setuptest
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Praekelt Consulting
This probably depends on the type on networking on the host. If the
problem still exists please send the network and cluster config.
--
Valentin
Hi,
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:57:04 +
> From: locutusofb...@debian.org
> To: vbd...@hotmail.com; 827...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#827990: virtualbox: Missing mini toolbar in version
> 5.0.22-dfsg-1
>
> control: tags -1 unreproducible
>
>
> H
Source: milter-greylist
Version: 4.5.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc:
Source: debomatic
Version: 0.21-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Ente
Source: sweethome3d-furniture-editor
Version: 1.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefull
Source: fgrun
Version: 3.4.0.final-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c
Source: libgfshare
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: kcalutils
Version: 16.04.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: E
Source: cluster
Version: 2.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: fexoticoptions
Version: 2152.78-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: connect-proxy
Version: 1.101-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: csoundqt
Version: 0.9.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -c -m64
Source: eficas
Version: 6.4.0-1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot d
Source: funitroots
Version: 3010.78-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apache-curator
Version: 2.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian
Source: gnat-4.9
Version: 4.9.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-
Source: gopacket
Version: 1.1.11-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ent
Source: atheme-services
Version: 7.0.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4
Source: emoslib
Version: 2:4.4.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc
Source: diffoscope
Version: 54
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: geda-gaf
Version: 1:1.8.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: commons-javaflow
Version: 0.0~svn20151101-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: assertj-core
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/r
Source: cafeobj
Version: 1.5.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: osptoolkit
Version: 4.11.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: mpi4py
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> DC-Build-Header
Source: golang-go-xdg
Version: 0~bzr20140219-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: keepass2
Version: 2.34+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libkf5grantleetheme
Version: 16.04.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: cigi-ccl
Version: 3.3.3a+svn818-10
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: pyresample
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linu
Source: kyototycoon
Version: 0.9.56-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libnb-platform18-java
Version: 8.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully)
Source: lbcd
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: freetype
Version: 2.6.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: hamradio-maintguide
Version: 0.2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3
Source: minizinc
Version: 2.0.13+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/b
Source: golang-rrd
Version: 0.0~git20131112-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> D
Source: avro-java
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rule
Source: libcgns
Version: 3.1.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot de
Source: log4cpp
Version: 1.0-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libaws
Version: 3.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enteri
Source: foptions
Version: 3022.85-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: En
Source: eancheck
Version: 1.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: acbuild
Version: 0.3.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: r-cran-geepack
Version: 1.2-0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -I/
Source: golang-github-thejerf-suture
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopeful
Source: eegdev
Version: 0.2-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: libterralib
Version: 4.3.0+dfsg.2-7
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: font-manager
Version: 0.5.7-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc src/l
Source: fbonds
Version: 3010.77-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ente
Source: magics++
Version: 2.28.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Ent
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Are there any other source packages that build an arch:any C library
> package and arch:all cli bindings for it that use this toolchain?
Yes. I'm not sure what they do internally, but based on the build logs and
the error messages, the following fo
> the following four packages failed in a similar way: [...]
Same info with bug numbers:
gmime_2.6.20-1#806033
libkarma_0.1.2-2.3#806629
xsp_3.8-2.1 #806879
libiio_0.6.40-1 #816981
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Running Sphinx v1.4.4
>> making output directory...
>>
>> Exception occurred:
>> File "conf.py", line 127, in
>> import sphinx_rtd_theme
>> ImportError: No module named sphinx_rtd_theme
i guess this is due to:
* Demote sphinx-rtd-t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Maier
* Package name: p4est
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Carsten Burstedde
* URL : http://www.p4est.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Algorithms for Parallel Adaptive Mesh Refin
Hello,
On 6 July 2016 at 11:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>>Have you coordinated with Dimitri? When the regular maintainer is active,
>
>>NMUs are appropriate for urgent changes, not for regular work. Ie, instead
>>of random sponsors,
Control: retitle -1 ITA: musl -- standard C library
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Kevin,
thanks for maintaining musl so far!
I intend to adopt this package.
Kind regards,
Reiner
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
>
>Besides, it'd be appreciated if you also can setup DM upload
>permission of this package for me, after this upload.
>Thank you!
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/271663979/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.libcork_0.15.0+ds-4_BUILDING.txt.gz
the multiarch stuff is broken in yakkety now.
G.
Source: postal
Version: 0.74
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -O2 -g -Wall
Some time after creating this bug report, I actually went ahead and
started maintaining a fork of cplay myself:
https://github.com/xi/cplay-ng
Most notably, it has python3 support.
Another active fork I know of is https://github.com/andreasvc/cplay
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Package: filezilla
Version: 3.19.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
filezilla (3.19.0-1) must depend on libfilezilla0 (0.5.3-1), because with
version 0.4.0.1-1 the program crash with th error "/usr/bin/filezilla: symbol
lookup error: /usr/bin/filezilla: undefined symbol:
_ZN2fz18replace_substringsERNSt7__cx
Hi JB,
could you work with this?
Am 23.06.2016 um 15:49 schrieb Evangelos Skarmoutsos:
> Package: kdenlive
> Version: 16.04.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When a title clip is above a video clip on different video tracks, and there
> is
> at least one empty video track between
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> -
> # https://bugs.debian.org/806033 -- dh_clideps expects to see
> # dh_makeshlibs called before it, but dh_makeshlibs is never called
> # when building only arch-indep packages. So we force the issue by
> # making a phon
Hi
Am 29.06.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
> Package: mlt
> Version: 6.2.0
> Severity: important
> User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: rtaudio 4.1.2
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> your package fails to build with the upcoming rtaudio 4.1.2
>
> Location of header f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: r-cran-treescape
Version : 1.9.17
Upstream Author : Thibaut Jombart, Michelle Kendall, Jacob Almagro-Garcia,
Caroline Colijn
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/treescape/
* License
> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog writes:
Raphael> Hi Sam,
Raphael> On Fri, 08 Jul 2016, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Now I can interact with the toggle details string, but nothing
>> happens when I do. Since you've made it a link, I'm going to
>> interact with it that way. Are yo
Hi!
Unfortunately, dub doesn't support this right now, a bug has been
submitted upstream a while ago.
You can work around this issue quite easily though, by symlinking the
directory or add it to the compiler include line.
See the appstream-generator package for the hack I included to make this work
Hi Scott,
On 07-07-16 22:54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> How big is the stack of affected rdepends?
I used dak (albeit probably not with the smartest commands) to get me
the following list (powerpc binaries build from the following source
packages):
lazarus
cqrlog
ddrescueview
dozzaqueux
easymp3gain
Source: libpoe-component-client-http-perl
Version: 0.949-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9
User: la...@debian.org
Usertags: network-access
Dear Maintainer,
Whilst libpoe-component-client-http-perl builds successfully on unstable/amd64,
according to
Debian Policy 4.9 packages may not
Control: tags 796585 + patch
Control: tags 796585 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for aoetools (versioned as 36-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Best,
Chris
diff -Nru aoetools-36/debian/60-aoe.rules aoetools-36/debian/6
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Since haskell-openglraw has been removed from armel and armhf as
requested by #829463, haskell-glut is uninstallable and unbuildable
on these architectures.
Please remove haskell-glut from armel and armhf.
Regards
Sven
I am using Debian/Sid and encountered the same issue.
upgrading to lightdm_1.19.2-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb fixed all issues.
On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 11:36:06 PM AEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:12:36AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > IMHO it could be useful to be able to drop everything _but_ some folders:
> > Files-Excluded: vendor/src/*
> > Files-Excluded-Ignore: vendor/src/github.com/docker
Hi Lucas,
On 2016-07-08 11:17 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: re2
> Version: 20160501+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid
On Thursday 07 July 2016 01:28 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:44:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016, ജൂലൈ 7 1:38:54 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> This is a very shitty way of making things work. So your approach is,
>>> instead of fixing the Debian p
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:22 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:43:16 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > Please go ahead. I'll look at getting an SUA sorted, although it might
> > be once I'm back home after Debconf.
>
> Perfectly fine, thanks.
>
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:26 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:47:47 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > > > I'd be okay with either of those options, having looked at the upstream
> > > > diff.
> > > Thanks, then I think we can proceed with the seco
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 19:25 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:41:12PM +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 14:49 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > > there is a way to trigger
101 - 200 of 346 matches
Mail list logo