Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-27 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 12:30:54 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I hereby call for votes on the following ballot to resolve #994275. I vote A > B > FD (which I believe means the outcome is no longer in doubt and we resolve A). > === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-26 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:30:54PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program >until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least >transitively es

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-26 Thread Margarita Manterola
> === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program >until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least >transitively essential in Debian 12. > >For the Debian 12 release, we expe

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-22 Thread Elana Hashman
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:30:54PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > I hereby call for votes on the following ballot to resolve #994275. The > voting period starts immediately and lasts for up to one week, or until > the outcome is no longer in doubt (Constitution 6.3.1). > > === Resolutio

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-22 Thread Christoph Berg
> === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program >until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least >transitively essential in Debian 12. > >For the Debian 12 release, we expe

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-21 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Thank you very much for starting this vote, Sean. I vote A > B > F. > > === Resolution A === > > > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program > >until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least > >

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-20 Thread David Bremner
Sean Whitton writes: > > I hereby call for votes on the following ballot to resolve #994275. The > voting period starts immediately and lasts for up to one week, or until > the outcome is no longer in doubt (Constitution 6.3.1). > > === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-20 Thread Sean Whitton
On Wed 20 Oct 2021 at 12:30PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program >until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least >transitively essential in

Bug#994275: Call for votes on "Reverting breaking changes in debianutils"

2021-10-20 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, I hereby call for votes on the following ballot to resolve #994275. The voting period starts immediately and lasts for up to one week, or until the outcome is no longer in doubt (Constitution 6.3.1). === Resolution A === The Technical Committee resolves: 1. The debianutils package must