On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 12:30:54 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I hereby call for votes on the following ballot to resolve #994275.
I vote A > B > FD (which I believe means the outcome is no longer in doubt and we resolve A). > === Resolution A === > > The Technical Committee resolves: > > 1. The debianutils package must continue to provide the which(1) program > until a compatible utility is available in a package that is at least > transitively essential in Debian 12. > > For the Debian 12 release, we expect which(1) to be in either an > Essential package or a transitively Essential package (that is, a > package that is depended on by an Essential package). > > 2. The which(1) program must not print any deprecation warnings. > > 3. We decline to overrule the maintainer of debianutils regarding the > use of alternatives. If another package takes over responsibility > for which(1), then the debianutils maintainers and the other > package's maintainers should coordinate to choose a suitable > mechanism, which might be either versioned Depends/Breaks/Replaces, > dpkg-divert, alternatives or something else. > > 4. The debianutils package must continue to provide the tempfile(1) > program until a compatible utility is available in a package that is > at least transitively essential in Debian 12. > > For the Debian 12 release, we expect tempfile(1) to be in either an > Essential package or a transitively Essential package. > > 5. Programs in debianutils must not be moved to /usr until we have a > project-wide consensus on going ahead with such a move, and any > programs that have already been moved must be moved back. In > particular, this means debianutils must contain /bin/run-parts and > /sbin/installkernel for the time being. > > === Resolution B === > > As Resolution A, except strike point (2) and renumber succeeding items. > > === End Resolutions ===
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
