Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-09-03 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 03/09/2019 05:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 9/2/19 11:12 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 9/2/19 10:43 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the >>> excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-09-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 9/2/19 11:12 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 9/2/19 10:43 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the >> excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's blocking proj >> from >> being a migration candidate.

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-09-02 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 9/2/19 10:43 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the > excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's blocking proj > from > being a migration candidate. That's why I filed #939002. There is also the autopkg

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-09-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/08/2019 07:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > That leaves: There's also an autopkgtest regression for r-cran-sf as you can see in the excuses at https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/proj.html. That's blocking proj from being a migration candidate. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-08-29 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 8/28/19 6:05 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 8/26/19 5:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 8/25/19 4:31 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 8/25/19 3:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:39:26PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > For the Debian GIS tea

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-08-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 8/26/19 5:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 8/25/19 4:31 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 8/25/19 3:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:39:26PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to PROJ 6. This is a

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-08-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 8/25/19 4:31 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 8/25/19 3:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:39:26PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to PROJ 6. >>> >>> This is a major change that affects the wider GIS ecosystem, with

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-08-25 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 8/25/19 3:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:39:26PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to PROJ 6. >> >> This is a major change that affects the wider GIS ecosystem, with proj >> being at the bottom of the dependency chain. >

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-08-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:39:26PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to PROJ 6. > > This is a major change that affects the wider GIS ecosystem, with proj > being at the bottom of the dependency chain. Please go ahead. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshi

Bug#931949: transition: proj

2019-07-12 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-proj.html Control: block -1 by 931914 931922 931931 931935 931940 931943 931945 931941 931944 931948 931904 931908 9