Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-06-09 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
t: Re: Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:02:00 +0200 > Am 26.05.2019 um 03:52 teilte Ryutaroh Matsumoto mit: > > Matsumoto-san, > >> You are right. The way to reproduce this issue (not related to >> mktexlsr) >

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-06-09 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi > (2) Run lualatex with the below LaTeX source and have error > "Package fontspec Error: The font "NotoSerifCJKJPLight" cannot be found." Yes, because luatexja preloads all the fonts defined in the noto-otf preset: \ltjpreset_declare_preset:nx{noto-otf}{ mc-m = Noto~Serif~CJK~JP~Regular,

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-06-09 Thread Norbert Preining
> (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luatexja/luatexja.sty Yes, luatexja needs lualatex, you cannot use anything else. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-06-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.05.2019 um 03:52 teilte Ryutaroh Matsumoto mit: Matsumoto-san, You are right. The way to reproduce this issue (not related to mktexlsr) is (1) Install texlive-full and fonts-noto-cjk from experimental. (2) Run lualatex with the below LaTeX source and have error "Package fontspec Error: Th

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-06-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 27.05.2019 um 04:09 teilte Ryutaroh Matsumoto mit: Matsumoto-san, thanks for your interest and comment. It is (in my opinion) a well-known issue among Japanese LuaLaTeX users, and I can show a even worse example (for your fun), which needs 6 GB of real RAM and 10 minutes to compile three lin

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-26 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
e closed immediately. > >*** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk *** Best regards, Ryutaroh From: Hilmar Preuße Subject: Re: Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 17:45:14 +0200 > Am 26.05.2019 um 03:52 teilte Ry

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-26 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
", which suggests that this issue should be filed against "fonts-noto-cjk". Your feedbacks are welcome. Ryutaroh From: Hideki Yamane Subject: Re: Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 16:08:15 +0900 > Hi, > > O

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.05.2019 um 03:52 teilte Ryutaroh Matsumoto mit: Matsumoto-san, I followed your instructions and tried to reproduce some kind of issue. I compiled your document using TL from experimental; it triggered some kind of memory leak in luatex. At least I would not expect that luatex needs 1,5 GB

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-24 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all, > It is a dpkg trigger on /u/s/fonts as far as I remember. That is, if files > are installed there the postins if tex-common should be called and the > necessary actions taken. Sorry, completely wrong. We only have interest (dpkg-interest) in /u/share/texmf/fonts etc. So nothing will b

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-24 Thread Norbert Preining
Sorry for brevity, traveling with daughter intercontinental. It is a dpkg trigger on /u/s/fonts as far as I remember. That is, if files are installed there the postins if tex-common should be called and the necessary actions taken. I will look into it and see what is the reason, my guess is tha

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-24 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
t;, "apt-get install texlive-full" installs "fonts-ipaex-mincho" and "texlive-fonts-recommended" by the dependency. Then the "postinst" in "texlive-fonts-recommended" runs "update-texmf-config map", which in turn runs "mktexlsr". That

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-23 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Fri, 24 May 2019 13:15:46 +0900 (JST) Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote: > "postinst" scripts are very different between > fonts-ipaexfont-mincho and fonts-noto-cjk. Yes, but it's for obsolete config and alternatives. > mktexlsr in installation of a font package is executed > as a trigger to te

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-23 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
sses this issue. If my guess is correct, fonts-noto-cjk-extra should also have the same issue. Ryutaroh From: Hideki Yamane Subject: Re: Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 11:59:24 +0900 > Hi, > > On Fri, 17 May 2019 23:53

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-23 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Fri, 17 May 2019 23:53:05 +0900 Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote: > I suggest to execute mktexlsr in the installation of fonts-noto-cjk > if mktexlsr is installed. Isn't it a issue on mktexlsr, instead of fonts? -- Hideki Yamane

Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr

2019-05-17 Thread Ryutaroh Matsumoto
Package: fonts-noto-cjk Version: 1:20181130+repack1-1~exp1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Font Noto CJK can be used by lualatex (in texlive-latex-base). But lualatex does not recognize the Noto fonts until one executes mktexlsr. I suggest to execute mktexlsr in the installation of fonts-noto-