Am 26.05.2019 um 03:52 teilte Ryutaroh Matsumoto mit:
Matsumoto-san, I followed your instructions and tried to reproduce some kind of issue. I compiled your document using TL from experimental; it triggered some kind of memory leak in luatex. At least I would not expect that luatex needs 1,5 GB of RAM to compile your document: %Cpu(s): 1.3 us, 47.8 sy, 0.3 ni, 0.0 id, 50.5 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st MiB Mem : 938.3 total, 59.5 free, 860.5 used, 18.3 buff/cache MiB Swap: 1376.6 total, 295.4 free, 1081.2 used. 21.0 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 137 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 32.2 0.0 0:11.56 kworker/0+ 5014 root 20 0 1533540 669688 168 D 8.3 69.7 1:13.58 lualatex Please file a bug against our package texlive-binaries, version 2019.20190507.51032-1 . Many thanks! Hilmar
Matsumoto-san, I am actually surprised that mktexlsr call fixed it, since luatex doesn't use ls-R files. Do you have a way to reproduce this behaviour?You are right. The way to reproduce this issue (not related to mktexlsr) is (1) Install texlive-full and fonts-noto-cjk from experimental. (2) Run lualatex with the below LaTeX source and have error "Package fontspec Error: The font "NotoSerifCJKJPLight" cannot be found." (3) Installation of fonts-noto-cjk-extra fixes the issue even though no font from fonts-noto-cjk-extra is used. XeLaTeX (with \usepackage[noto]{zxjafont}) and uplatex (with \usepackage[unicode,noto-otc]{pxchfon}) produce the desired PDF without fonts-noto-cjk-extra. \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{ltjsarticle} \usepackage[noto-otf]{luatexja-preset} \begin{document} 日本語 \end{document} This seems a feature or a bug in TeXLive 2019 upstream, which should not have been filed in BTS. So I close this issue.
-- #206401 http://counter.li.org
