On 03/31/2018 03:23 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
PS: I forgot one thing:
Please update the date in the changelog; (convenient is to use
'dch -r ""' for this, with the "")
--
tobi
All done!
- symbol files
I cleaned things up with c
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 02:48:22PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
PS: I forgot one thing:
Please update the date in the changelog; (convenient is to use
'dch -r ""' for this, with the "")
--
tobi
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 01:40:28AM -0500, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
> > Ok, I've concluded the next round
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 01:40:28AM -0500, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
> Ok, I've concluded the next round of work on the package. I recreated the
> repo with `gbp import-dscs --debsnap`. I moved my d/watch and
> +Files-Excluded d/copyright file but ran into issues with missing files
> (e.g. src/Standard
Ok, I've concluded the next round of work on the package. I recreated
the repo with `gbp import-dscs --debsnap`. I moved my d/watch and
+Files-Excluded d/copyright file but ran into issues with missing files
(e.g. src/Standard file and folders was totally missing) when trying to
do `gbp import-
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:43:26AM -0500, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
>
>
> On 03/15/2018 04:37 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > What is still missing from my side is a complete d/copyright review,
> > > but I need a break right now... Will
On 03/15/2018 04:37 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
What is still missing from my side is a complete d/copyright review,
but I need a break right now... Will continue later.
Ok, went over the package for a copyright review.
One part of th
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> What is still missing from my side is a complete d/copyright review,
> but I need a break right now... Will continue later.
Ok, went over the package for a copyright review.
One part of the result resulted in a MR [1], but not all cou
(Anton, there is a question below for you, that's why you are in To:))
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:13:54AM -0600, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Alright, I've addressed all the points brought up by you two (thanks for the
> feedback so far!)
>
> I have done a thorough che
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Alright, I've addressed all the points brought up by you two (thanks for
the feedback so far!)
I have done a thorough check of the licenses, updated d/copyright, and
found a few problematic Qt Commercial license files, which I reported to
upstream. [1]
But, besi
On 03/04/2018 01:11 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Then after each release you one need to make a diff over all headers
and create also symbols-files to be sure that the ABI is not broken.
Anton
I've got the symbols files set up now.
By the way, while talking to upstream I've seen that they refer
Then after each release you one need to make a diff over all headers
and create also symbols-files to be sure that the ABI is not broken.
Anton
2018-03-04 1:18 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki :
>
>
> On 03/03/2018 04:12 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>>
>> 2018-03-01 5:32 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki :
>>
>>>
>>
On 03/03/2018 04:12 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
2018-03-01 5:32 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki :
To summarize:
1. When the OCC was in Debian previously, and its current form in the Ubuntu
PPA, we had e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.1.0
2. Anton suggested e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.2
3. Appendix
2018-03-01 5:32 GMT+01:00 Kurt Kremitzki :
> To summarize:
> 1. When the OCC was in Debian previously, and its current form in the Ubuntu
> PPA, we had e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.1.0
> 2. Anton suggested e.g. libopencascade-foundation-7.2
> 3. Appendix A of the Debian New Maintainer's Guide
On 02/27/2018 12:02 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hi,
just to avoid a dead-lock: you're still working on the package, nothing to
review atm?
Just let us know (and remove the moreinfo tag as sign) when ready for
the next round of review. (I'd like to avoid reviewing when not everything
has been imple
Hi,
just to avoid a dead-lock: you're still working on the package, nothing to
review atm?
Just let us know (and remove the moreinfo tag as sign) when ready for
the next round of review. (I'd like to avoid reviewing when not everything
has been implemented)
--
tobi
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 0
I'm still addressing some of the feedback given by you and Tobias, but I
thought I would post an update.
On 02/12/2018 05:44 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Just a short review. I did not test the package. But some
stuff should be fixed before it will be uploaded.
As I understand you want to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hallo Kurt,
Sorry for the delay, I did not find time for a review up to
now...
- Please consider the feedback from Anton
- d/compat is 11, but you B-D only on debhelper > 9
- d/rules: --with quilt is not needed, also the B-D on quilt is not.
- c/changelog: The Entry st
Hi Kurt,
Just a short review. I did not test the package. But some
stuff should be fixed before it will be uploaded.
As I understand you want to maintain the package under the
umbrella of debian science team? If so, please fix some
corresponding fields (maintaner etc) in d/control.
=
1. sour
On 02/11/2018 10:36 AM, Kurt Kremitzki wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am still looking for a sponsor for this package. My current work is at
> https://salsa.debian.org/kkremitzki-guest/opencascade.
>
> I have an experimental FreeCAD 0.17 (as well as Netgen 6.2.1801) built against
> this package, and I
Hello all,
I am still looking for a sponsor for this package. My current work is at
https://salsa.debian.org/kkremitzki-guest/opencascade.
I have an experimental FreeCAD 0.17 (as well as Netgen 6.2.1801) built against
this package, and I would greatly like to get them in to Testing, if at all
pos
20 matches
Mail list logo
