Hi Herbert,
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 02:38:41PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
I opened an 'O' bug and you can take
the maintenance of the package. Which
is in good shape.
OK, thank you (yes it is in good shape). Thank you for packaging duc and
all your work on it. You will always be welcome to c
Hi Jonathan,
You have more interesting in the
package than me.
I opened an 'O' bug and you can take
the maintenance of the package. Which
is in good shape.
Do not worry about anything.
Kind Regards,
Herbert
On 30/12/2017 13:41, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Hi,
On 30 December 2017 at 11:53, Herbert Fortes wrote:
But I do not understand. It seems to me that an alias
solves the issue. And the user can set anything he
wants. Base on that, the use of 'Conflicts' seems too
much. It changes a lot of things.
use collab-maint? I did not need to do an NMU, I could have done a
regular upload. The reason I did this as an NMU, and the reason I used
the DELAYED queue, was just as a courtesy to you.
A NMU is when a maintainer does not care about
the package for a long time. And it is to fix
something. I
Hi Herbert,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 07:05:18PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
But I do not understand. It seems to me that an alias solves the issue.
And the user can set anything he wants.
Each individual user could indeed add an alias themselves, but we could
remove the need for them to do so.
Hi,
On 30 December 2017 at 11:53, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
>>>
>>> But I do not understand. It seems to me that an alias
>>> solves the issue. And the user can set anything he
>>> wants. Base on that, the use of 'Conflicts' seems too
>>> much. It changes a lot of things. What am I not seem ?
>>>
>>
>> But I do not understand. It seems to me that an alias
>> solves the issue. And the user can set anything he
>> wants. Base on that, the use of 'Conflicts' seems too
>> much. It changes a lot of things. What am I not seem ?
>> I learned that a NMU is when the package has a maintainer
>>
On 29/12/17 22:05, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Hi Andrew Shadura and Jonathan Dowland,
>
>
> First, let's not make big noise about this.
>
> But I do not understand. It seems to me that an alias
> solves the issue. And the user can set anything he
> wants. Base on that, the use of 'Conflicts' seem
Hi Andrew Shadura and Jonathan Dowland,
First, let's not make big noise about this.
But I do not understand. It seems to me that an alias
solves the issue. And the user can set anything he
wants. Base on that, the use of 'Conflicts' seems too
much. It changes a lot of things. What am I not se
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:46:38 + Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:18:32PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >Please, do not be so fast.
>
> That's why I uploaded to DELAYED-7 -- so it wasn't fast.
>
> >Does all that work really necessary ? There is no complain
> >until th
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:18:32PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
Please, do not be so fast.
That's why I uploaded to DELAYED-7 -- so it wasn't fast.
Does all that work really necessary ? There is no complain
until this week
It's been bugging me for a while but I've only just had time to file
tags 885404 = wontfix
thanks
I do not see enough reason to change the way
the package is. It is not hard to tab-complete.
The proposed solution was not Policy-preferred.
And force a NMU is not polite. NMU is not the
case.
On 28/12/2017 20:38, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I've now implemented both and I'm leaning towards a simple Conflicts.
The Conflicts version is branch jmtd/885404-proposed:
6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Lintian clean.
The alternatives version is branch jmtd/885404-alt:
10 files
On 28/12/2017 20:38, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I've now implemented both and I'm leaning towards a simple Conflicts.
The Conflicts version is branch jmtd/885404-proposed:
6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Lintian clean.
The alternatives version is branch jmtd/885404-alt:
10 files
On 28/12/2017 20:38, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I've now implemented both and I'm leaning towards a simple Conflicts.
The Conflicts version is branch jmtd/885404-proposed:
6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Lintian clean.
The alternatives version is branch jmtd/885404-alt:
10 files
I've now implemented both and I'm leaning towards a simple Conflicts.
The Conflicts version is branch jmtd/885404-proposed:
6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Lintian clean.
The alternatives version is branch jmtd/885404-alt:
10 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
*Not
On a closer reading of Policy, using alternatives is preferred, even if
a bit more complex.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
17 matches
Mail list logo
