Hi, On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:46:38 +0000 Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:18:32PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >Please, do not be so fast. > > That's why I uploaded to DELAYED-7 -- so it wasn't fast. > > >Does all that work really necessary ? There is no complain > >until this week > > It's been bugging me for a while but I've only just had time to file the > bug (and work on the fix). > > > and there are others packages with the same situation. > > I haven't personally been affected by other packages in this situation, > but if I was, I might try to fix them too. > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:21:27PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >You already did the upload. > > > >I will cancel it. > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:36:03PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > >I will really appreciate if you cancel the NMU. > > I think you already have? I can no longer see it in the DELAYED queue. > > Now that you are engaging here I'd love to hear your opinion on your > preferred approach going forward. I was actually about to cancel my > upload because the Conflicts: in the duc binary needs to be versioned > for smooth upgrades in the situation where someone has both installed > already (work I have completed this evening). > > Looking forward to hearing from you (and thanks for packaging duc in the > first place)
I would like to say I agree here with Jonathan, there's no reason not to have both packages provide the same binary. It's not difficult to implement, and makes it is easier for our users to run — and users are our priority in Debian. If I were the maintainer, I would give this a second thought. -- Cheers, Andrew
