Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-11-15 Thread Paul Donohue
For the benefit of anyone reading this who doesn't want to spend hours digging through the archives to figure out exactly what's going on: Marco's original plan from 2002: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/09/msg01532.html Marco's recent revised plan: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel

Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-11-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 15, Paul Donohue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that update-inetd has been separated into another package, what is the > status of this bug? It has been discussed on debian-devel@ two months ago. > Is there any way myself or others can help with this work? No. The dependency will be rem

Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-11-14 Thread Paul Donohue
Now that update-inetd has been separated into another package, what is the status of this bug? Do packages that actually require update-inetd (and were depending on netbase to get that script) need to be updated to depend on inet-superserver or update-inetd before the inetd dependency can be rem

Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-10-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 28, David Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is no list, only inet-superserver and the default choice > > openbsd-inetd. > So which package should I file a bug against? xinetd? I'm a bit > confused, could you elaborate on what The Right Thing is? Yes, xinetd some day is supposed

Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-10-28 Thread David Madore
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 28, David Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If inetd can't yet be removed as a dependency of netbase, is it at > > least possible to include xinetd as an alternative in this list? > There is no list, only inet-superserver an

Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-10-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 28, David Madore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Depends: ifupdown (>= 0.6.4-4.9), openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, > iputils-ping | ping, lsb-base (>= 3.0-6), debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 > > If inetd can't yet be removed as a dependency of netbase, is it at > least possible to include

Bug#87240: xinetd should satisfy dependencies for netbase

2006-10-28 Thread David Madore
# Version: 4.27 # Depends: ifupdown (>= 0.6.4-4.9), openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver, iputils-ping | ping, lsb-base (>= 3.0-6), debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 If inetd can't yet be removed as a dependency of netbase, is it at least possible to include xinetd as an alternative in this list? --