If I may throw in my 2¢ here - 0.26 will not have any different
functionality
to 0.24. All fixes that are applied to 0.26 will be ported to 0.24 where
applicable. I don't see the map functionality going in as we still have
not
resolved the tile provider issue.
So the main difference of 0.26
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst
wrote:
> Am Montag, den 06.02.2017, 07:41 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>> It sounds to me like you misunderstand Shotwell's current release
>> schedule. Shotwell is now aligned with GNOME's release schedule. The
>> next stable version of Shotwell 0.
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.02.2017, 07:41 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> > * 2016-12-28 At irc.gimp.org #shotwell: "next scheduld release is Jan,
>
>17th"
>
> It sounds to me like you misunderstand Shotwell's current release
> schedule. Shotwell is now aligned with GNOME's release schedule. The
>
> * 2016-12-28 At irc.gimp.org #shotwell: "next scheduld release is Jan,
17th"
It sounds to me like you misunderstand Shotwell's current release
schedule. Shotwell is now aligned with GNOME's release schedule. The
next stable version of Shotwell 0.26 therefore is expected to be
released around
severity 849688 important
(This is "a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package,
without rendering it completely unusable to everyone", so setting to
important.)
Please respond today with a proposal how to get this broken package in
Debian fixed. I may help with an NMU unless the
On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:19:47 +0100 Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> I set the severity to normal because
> * there are only 2 open bugs[5] for release 0.25.x at shotwell
>bugtracker
> * the next release date is near enough to get it into
>unstable/testing.
Jörg, having the freeze in mind, may
On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:19:47 +0100
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Frings-F=FCrst?=
wrote:
> I set the severity to normal because
> * there are only 2 open bugs[5] for release 0.25.x at shotwell
>bugtrackerÂ
I just tried using shotwell (I don't use it often) but it turned out
to be barely usable. 'Set
On 01/02/2017 11:19 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> * the next release date is near enough to get it into unstable/testing.
That is great news!
In the meanwhile, I suggest to upload a prerelease version with decent
quality off from git into unstable/testing so it can receive fair testing.
No bug
severity 849688 normal
thanks
Hello Richard,
thank you for spending your time helping to make Debian better with
this bug report.
First, a brief outline of the process:
* 2016-10-24[1] shotwell release 0.25.0 was released.
* 2016-11-09 the release 0.25.0-1 was uploaded to mentors.
* 2016-11
Package: shotwell
Version: 0.25.1
Severity: grave
The version 0.25.1 of shotwell that is packaged for Debian/testing is
unsuitable for release in stretch. As Jens Georg points out on his Blog
at http://jensge.org/, the odd-numbered versions are unstable
development versions that should not be pack
10 matches
Mail list logo
