Bug#810830: closed by Manoj Srivastava (Flex produces some basic errors in lex.yy.c)

2016-01-26 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Jan 25 2016, André Z.D.A. wrote: > I ask you to be more kind with this issue, and I have reasons to consider > it a clear problem in Flex (this is the reason why I reported it as a > bug). > > "Using flex normally seems to work." -> Why do you consider the way I used > flex as not normal?

Bug#810830: closed by Manoj Srivastava (Flex produces some basic errors in lex.yy.c)

2016-01-25 Thread André Z.D.A.
I ask you to be more kind with this issue, and I have reasons to consider it a clear problem in Flex (this is the reason why I reported it as a bug). "Using flex normally seems to work." -> Why do you consider the way I used flex as not normal? I think I did the most normal and common steps that e