I ask you to be more kind with this issue, and I have reasons to consider it a clear problem in Flex (this is the reason why I reported it as a bug).
"Using flex normally seems to work." -> Why do you consider the way I used flex as not normal? I think I did the most normal and common steps that everyone should do. Let me describe. First, I have a machine where everything works: gcc, make, and everything else related to compiling and running programs work flawlessly. So it also has a valid setup of LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable that will be used by any programs that need it. Now I want to use flex. So I download its source code, compile it, and install according the documentation that comes with it. What is the result? It doesn't work! And the original bug report shows all the details I think that are relevant to point the problem, and (I hope) to fix the problem. Is it related to flex? Of course! It got a working setup machine and could not work with it! We need a correct setup and flex do not have it. -=-=-=-=-= Certo dia, Debian Bug Tracking System escreveu: =-=-=-=-=- > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the flex package: > > #810830: Flex produces some basic errors in lex.yy.c > > It has been closed by Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@golden-gryphon.com>. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Manoj Srivastava > <sriva...@golden-gryphon.com> by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 810830: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810830 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems >
