On 04/06/15 17:27, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> onsdagen den 3 juni 2015 20.04.29 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> On 03/06/15 11:00, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>>> Also please don't forget haskell-hopenpgp-tools.
>>
>> I did them. haskell-hopenpgp-tools and aria2 look bad.
>
> Haskell may be a bit of a
onsdagen den 3 juni 2015 20.04.29 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 03/06/15 11:00, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Also please don't forget haskell-hopenpgp-tools.
>
> I did them. haskell-hopenpgp-tools and aria2 look bad.
Haskell may be a bit of a hassle but aria2 we can always temporarily patch n
On 03/06/15 11:00, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> We can start with the binNMUs soon.
>
> None of the other dependencies depend on the haskell packages, so I think you
> can go on with level 3.
>
> Also please don't forget haskell-hop
tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> We can start with the binNMUs soon.
None of the other dependencies depend on the haskell packages, so I think you
can go on with level 3.
Also please don't forget haskell-hopenpgp-tools.
--
Magnus Holmgren
Debian Developer
--
On 02/06/15 11:47, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> On 02/06/15 08:53, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
>>> at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct p
tisdagen den 2 juni 2015 10.08.56 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 02/06/15 08:53, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
> > at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/sta
On 02/06/15 08:53, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
> at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nettle&arch=arm64&ver=3.1.1-3&stamp=1433198670
I've give
Well that didn't appear to go so well on arm64 after all... could you look
at the build log and check the version of gcc was correct please?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nettle&arch=arm64&ver=3.1.1-3&stamp=1433198670
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed - moreinfo
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:26:11PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> fredagen den 15 maj 2015 16.09.20 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> > On 15/05/15 14:43, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
>
fredagen den 15 maj 2015 16.09.20 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 15/05/15 14:43, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
> > version 3.1.1) that I'd like to upload to unstable.
>
> Please fix the nettle arm64 build in experimental
fredagen den 15 maj 2015 16.09.20 skrev Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> Please fix the nettle arm64 build in experimental first.
Naturally, as soon as I get a porterbox rolling; asachi is unreachable and my
sudo password takes a long time to propagate to turfan.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@de
On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Why does nettle not version its symbols? For such a low level library
> (especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a
> fairly major oversight.
It does now, albeit perhaps not quite properly. (I have tried to explain
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 16:16:25 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Why does nettle not version its symbols? For such a low level library
> > (especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a
> > fairly major oversight.
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 15/05/15 14:43, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
>
> There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
> version 3.1.1) that I'd like
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 14:43:51 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
> version 3.1.1) that I'd like to upload to unstable.
>
> I've tried building all depending packages found on
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
There's a new major release of the GNU Nettle cryptolibrary (stabilized at
version 3.1.1) that I'd like to upload to unstable.
I've tried building all depending packages found on
https
16 matches
Mail list logo
