On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote: > Why does nettle not version its symbols? For such a low level library > (especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a > fairly major oversight.
It does now, albeit perhaps not quite properly. (I have tried to explain to upstream how you don't base the symbol versions on the SONAME, but in practice I guess the important thing is that two incompatible symbols don't have the same version string.) -- Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
