>
> Oh. I read “Forwarded: no” as “it should be forwarded, but it's not been
> done yet”. In this case “Forwarded: not-needed” would be more adequate; or
> even better, use “Origin: upstream”, and then you don't need Forwarded at
> all.
Thank you for that.
>
> >>I didn't get answer to my quest
* Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-05-30,
13:32:
* Added patch fixing memset transposed arguments
Good catch. Please don't forget to forward the patch upstream.
Laszlo caught this but the patch was backported from 2.8.2 of crashme.
So technically upstream forwarded it to me.
Oh. I read “Forwarded
> >>>If my supposition is correct, then this is a grave bug, and after it's
> >>>fixed in unstable, it should be also fixed in stable and oldstable.
>
> I've filed it as #749816.
Thanks.
>
> * Paul Wise , 2014-05-27, 08:43:
> >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> >>I
If my supposition is correct, then this is a grave bug, and after
it's fixed in unstable, it should be also fixed in stable and
oldstable.
I've filed it as #749816.
* Paul Wise , 2014-05-27, 08:43:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
I can fix this when I am given DM
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> On 26.05.14 18:25:25, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> If my supposition is correct, then this is a grave bug, and after it's fixed
>> in unstable, it should be also fixed in stable and oldstable.
>
> I can fix this when I am given DM rights to cra
On 26.05.14 18:25:25, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-05-26,
> 17:19:
> >>What happened to debian/patch/legacy.patch?
> >As upstream informed me legacy.patch is in 2.7 already, which I try to
> >push into Debian, that is why I have deleted it.
>
> Then this should be documented
* Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-05-26,
17:19:
What happened to debian/patch/legacy.patch?
As upstream informed me legacy.patch is in 2.7 already, which I try to
push into Debian, that is why I have deleted it.
Then this should be documented in the changelog. But at least this part
- {stat
On 24.05.14 23:38:38, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-05-21,
> 13:48:
> >>If you listed files to remove in debian/clean, you could avoid the
> >>override in debian/rules.
> >Yes, fixed that too. Settled for d/rules.
>
> Well, now I can't build the source package:
>
> rm -f *.o
* Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-05-21,
13:48:
If you listed files to remove in debian/clean, you could avoid the
override in debian/rules.
Yes, fixed that too. Settled for d/rules.
Well, now I can't build the source package:
rm -f *.o
rm -f pddet
rm debian/upstream
rm: cannot remove ‘debian/up
> > * Copyright changed to DEP-5
>
> This is not an accurate description of changes to the copyright file. The
> original copyright file was already in the DEP-5 format.
Fixed that.
>
> > * New maintainer (Closes: #739083)
>
> Did you get any reply from George?
Yes, we talked that is why I to
Control: owner -1 !
* Dariusz Dwornikowski , 2014-05-21,
08:07:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crashme/crashme_2.7-1.dsc
[...]
* Copyright changed to DEP-5
This is not an accurate description of changes to the copyright file.
The original copyright file was alrea
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "crashme"
* Package name: crashme
Version : 2.7-1
Upstream Author : George Carrette
* URL : http://people.delphiforums.com/gjc/crashme.html
* License
12 matches
Mail list logo
