On 26.05.14 18:25:25, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dariusz Dwornikowski <dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl>, 2014-05-26,
> 17:19:
> >>What happened to debian/patch/legacy.patch?
> >As upstream informed me legacy.patch is in 2.7 already, which I try to
> >push into Debian, that is why I have deleted it.
>
> Then this should be documented in the changelog. But at least this part
>
> - {status = execl(cmd,cmd,nb,arg2,nt,arg4,arg5,subprocess_ind,0);
> + {status = execlp(cmd,cmd,nb,arg2,nt,arg4,arg5,subprocess_ind,NULL);
>
> hasn't been merged. And it is really needed; see bug #37304, which your
> version of crashme reintroduces.
I have updated the git, added the changelog entry, and also a patch
fixing this.
> >>
> >>2.7 4-APR-2014 __APPLE__ port, fix linux 64 bit port.
> >>
> >>I wonder how badly broken is the package in the archive (2.4). My
> >>understanding is that it's completely useless on some architectures,
> >>because it doesn't actually stress-test anything; but I might be wrong.
>
> If my supposition is correct, then this is a grave bug, and after it's fixed
> in unstable, it should be also fixed in stable and oldstable.
>
I can fix this when I am given DM rights to crashme.
--
Dariusz Dwornikowski,
Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/
room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
