On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:35:20AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:17:08PM -0400, westlake wrote:
> > This is a brand new VM-testing machine..
> >
> > The video speaks for itself. +x is required..
>
> And you know, NO .desktop file on Debian does have +x. NONE.
Not even
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:17:08PM -0400, westlake wrote:
> This is a brand new VM-testing machine..
>
> The video speaks for itself. +x is required..
And you know, NO .desktop file on Debian does have +x. NONE.
Seriously, did you ever read Mechtildes (or mine for that matter)
comment? Did you c
This is a brand new VM-testing machine..
The video speaks for itself. +x is required..
This bug will be reported to other package maintainers, as I said it
sounds like it's a deeper problem than libreoffice itself.. (and I don't
think I should be the one addressing this to other package mainta
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 02:52:33PM -0400, westlake wrote:
> I think i'll just post a video for libreoffice maintainers from now on ;)
If you want to delay the bugfix, sure. (See below).
> 1- Yes it is possible to drag and drop items from the gnome-classic
> menu (People who read the top of
I think i'll just post a video for libreoffice maintainers from now on ;)
1- Yes it is possible to drag and drop items from the gnome-classic
menu (People who read the top of the bug report will immediately assume
that it isn't possible, but it is)
2-There is a problem probably deeper than ju
5 matches
Mail list logo