Am 18.04.2013 22:59 schrieb "Scott Kitterman" :
> First, the absence of /usr/bin/python2 is a valid bug. The fact that
it's not
> present is an accident, but I think you are pointing your frustration in
the
> wrong direction.
>
> PEP 394 was written AFTER Archlinux took the insane step of pointing
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 06:30:26 PM Philipp A. wrote:
> Is there already a repository for Jessie packages? if so, this could
> be fixed there, then. Or can it be fixed in Wheezy? it’s a simple
> symlink, after all.
No. We're two and a half weeks from release and far past the point where the
Is there already a repository for Jessie packages? if so, this could
be fixed there, then. Or can it be fixed in Wheezy? it’s a simple
symlink, after all.
It’s sad that debian doesn’t follow this PEP: There is no simple way
to allow executing ./foobar.py on any system reliably if foobar.py
uses py
On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 06:27:42 PM you wrote:
> 2012/10/2 Scott Kitterman :
> > Developers that jump the gun and start using a feature before it's widely
> > deployed should not be surprised it doesn't work everywhere. Regardless
> > of
> > the severity level we stick on the bug, the release
On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 09:03:02 AM trueflyingsh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2012 15:20:02 UTC+2 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> > Since Debian is frozen for the Wheezy release, minor bug fixes like this
> > are extraordinarily unlikely to be accepted.
>
> is there a chance to up
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2012 15:20:02 UTC+2 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> Since Debian is frozen for the Wheezy release, minor bug fixes like this are
> extraordinarily unlikely to be accepted.
is there a chance to upgrade the severity then? i took it from the bug that
removed the symlink, but since
Since Debian is frozen for the Wheezy release, minor bug fixes like this are
extraordinarily unlikely to be accepted. It's generally not very difficult to
write Python that works with Python or Python3 in any case (as long as you
target 2.6 or greater) so a much better approach is to write bi-l
Package: python-minimal
Version: 2.7.3
Severity: minor
The past discussion said that we’d follow upstream decisions (even if
some are not happy with them), but, since PEP 394 was draft, and some
weren’t happy with it, debian would deviate.
Since Feb 17 2012, The PEP is accepted:
http://mail.pytho
8 matches
Mail list logo
